PDA

View Full Version : The Bush and Kerry girls show us....



Shahed
05-17-2004, 23:27
First the democratic nominee

Image edited by the Ministry of Vice and Virtue. http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/tongue.gif

And ....the republican contender

http://www.thefirsttwins.com/images/JennaBush.jpg

LOL PARTY ON http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/gc-jester.gif

Cebei
05-17-2004, 23:34
Well, look in the second picture the republican contender is attacking a US civilian, whereas the first nominee is just exposing herself for our viewing pleasure.

I said democrats are peaceful... http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif

RisingSun
05-17-2004, 23:36
Due to that first pic, I give this thread a lifespan of ~20 minutes. Depending on where the moderators are, of course. They have a sixth sense, you know. I call it Pornovision. http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif

Shahed
05-17-2004, 23:37
These girls should run for president of the United States Outrageous I tell you

http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/gc-jester.gif

Gawain of Orkeny
05-17-2004, 23:39
Hey I posted it first unfair.

JAG
05-17-2004, 23:53
lol Class, now do you reckon the fathers will take some tips?

nightcrawlerblue
05-17-2004, 23:59
Uh... For that first girl... That can't possibly be legal can it? Indecent exposure or something?

Shahed
05-18-2004, 00:05
LOL I mean gimme a break it's over the top hilarious. She is not very pretty IMO so perhaps she's drawing attention in other ways. Well she is all right looking, not my type though.

Hmm maybe in the USA it would be indecent exposure or something, but AFAIK that shot was taken in France.

nightcrawlerblue
05-18-2004, 00:07
That would explain it. Those dirty French http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/gc-no.gif

Oaty
05-18-2004, 02:21
That dress might not have been see through to the naked eye, there is special photography equipment and techniques to allow this. Maybe Solypist could shine more light on this.

Also if you wanna have some fun do a websearch on x-ray vision. I always thought it was a hoax until I stumbled into it. I had come across a forum where poeple were exchanging pics of shots on girls taken with x-ray lenses. Do't ask for the link though for 1 I did'nt save it and 2 thats a bit tasteless.

Now you know you are never safe in public, but if you want to be safe x-ray vision does not see through blue jeans very well

JAG
05-18-2004, 02:31
Quote[/b] (oaty @ May 18 2004,02:21)]That dress might not have been see through to the naked eye, there is special photography equipment and techniques to allow this. Maybe Solypist could shine more light on this.
Pun intended? http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/gc-jester.gif

son of spam
05-18-2004, 03:59
Quote[/b] (RisingSun @ May 17 2004,17:36)]Due to that first pic, I give this thread a lifespan of ~20 minutes. Depending on where the moderators are, of course. They have a sixth sense, you know. I call it Pornovision. http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif
Must come in quite handy when they aren't busy denying others the pleasures of pornovision. http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif

Mouzafphaerre
05-18-2004, 09:11
-
I have saved the democratic one for pure archival purposes and nothing else. http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/gc-jester.gif
_

dessa14
05-18-2004, 09:40
i think the frontroom needs new mods.
thanks, dessa

p.s, .org policy means that this kind of stuff isn't mean't to be posted.

sorry guys, i didn't retrieve BKS.
thanks, dessa

Big King Sanctaphrax
05-19-2004, 00:41
I'm sorry Sinan, but unless you remove that first pic, it will be edited.

JAG
05-19-2004, 00:43
OMG BKS already draconian OMG we have lost him http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/tongue.gif

Big King Sanctaphrax
05-19-2004, 00:46
Quote[/b] (JAG @ May 19 2004,00:43)]OMG BKS already draconian OMG we have lost him http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/tongue.gif
They indocrinate us at mod camp. http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif

Teutonic Knight
05-19-2004, 00:47
Quote[/b] (JAG @ May 18 2004,19:43)]OMG BKS already draconian OMG we have lost him http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/tongue.gif
that's right.... my poison is working and he's already becoming a fascist conservative http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/gc-devil.gif

either that or he's becoming a totalitarian communist... one or the other... http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/tongue.gif http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif

Malcolm Big Head
05-19-2004, 01:21
After much searching to find the first picture.

Warning this website contains a very sheer shirt over a girl who forgot to wear a bra.
I must say it is better. http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/gc-smile.gif

I am now a democrat until Bush adopts.

Edit: BKS says no links. http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/gc-juggle.gif

Fragony
05-19-2004, 06:57
The girl that got hit by the Bush projectile is kinda cute.

Mouzafphaerre
05-19-2004, 07:33
-
Hey By removing only the democratic (and prettier http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif) one, you have violated mod objectivity

http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/gc-toff.gif
_

Big King Sanctaphrax
05-19-2004, 08:25
Malcolm, I'm afraid the link isn't much better. Could you remove that too, please? Anyone who really wants it can PM you, anyway.

BDC
05-19-2004, 08:36
I'm surprised the Concerned Women of America haven't declared Kerry a public enemy and started suicide bombing him yet...

Second pic is funnier though.

http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/gc-surprised.gif

Malcolm Big Head
05-19-2004, 11:28
I got a PM and smacked in the forum.
http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/gc-wall.gif http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/mecry.gif

Shahed
05-19-2004, 11:33
Hey if you are going to edit posts at least have the courtesy to link pics. Thank you.

Btw what is it about wearing a dress (hence being fully covered) without wearing a bra that violates org policy ?

Man the guns The Talban are coming http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/gc-stunned.gif http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/gc-jester.gif

Seriously though I just checked the rules and here is what it states:

obscene, profane, sexually oriented

The first picture is neither of any of the above. It is simply a picture of Kerry's daughter at a well known and world renowned film festival (Cannes), showing her in a FULL dress. That's how she arrived at the festival and it is fully acceptable by the laws of this forum and of our free society.

I request that the edit be reconsidered since there is no violation of the rules here.

Thank you.

http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif

dessa14
05-19-2004, 11:59
some people could see it as obscene. Eg: Conservatives.
or Right Wingers.

i don't really care at all for myself, but others may be offended. but no links is a bit extreme, i believe a link is reasonable, as long as it comes with a footnote, or is explained in the context of the post.

thanks, dessa

Shahed
05-19-2004, 12:21
Hey Dessa http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif

I understand your point perfectly.

What they see it as and what it is are two different things. That young lady (Kerry's daughter) is dressed perfectly covered up and we have the right to discuss that (and laugh about it) even with an image, but at least with a link, under the rules of the org. The image does not show full nudity or anything like that.

The way people see things is not at issue. If the way people see things is part of the rules then it is acceptable. But the rules state nothing about the way people see things they state clearly what is NOT to be posted.

At the moment a moderators job is to ensure that the rules are respected. The rules were respected in the initial post in this thread and therefore my conclusion is that intervention in this topic is not necessary.

We have 31 pages of Soly's babes hardly wearing anything at all, to censure one image of a lady fully covered would be very hypocritical.

I don't mean to offend anyone. My comments are in all honesty and I them forward in an honest and frank manner.

http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif

chunkynut
05-19-2004, 12:34
And it could have been taken with night vision with infra red filter on a (i think) sony handycam during sunlight hours (i haven't seen the pic as it was edited to quick). That has definate see through results http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif not quite xray vision but close.

And as i access the org at work i could lose my job for looking at anything remotely sexual as i also work in education. That said i couldn't care less http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif

BDC
05-19-2004, 12:38
Heh, lose your job for looking at a picture of Bush's daughter in public... Be a bit unlucky.

http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/rolleyes.gif

Big King Sanctaphrax
05-19-2004, 12:43
We're a PG-13 rated forum Sinan. I can see where you're coming from, but the powers that be deem no nudity. Sorry. I will discuss this with the other mods though.

To qoute Mr. Saturnus-


Quote[/b] ]I´m forced to do so. I´m an advocate of sexual freedom and free use of pornography, I would like to see the Org rules loosened on that.

Said that, never question my power again, or you´ll be banned for lifetime (j/k)

Shahed
05-19-2004, 12:47
Hey no problem m8 http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif

See you all later...time for me to get to work http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/gc-juggle.gif

....bleh

http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/wave.gif

Malcolm Big Head
05-19-2004, 13:16
A more acceptable picture of Alexandra Kerry. You can imagine the rest.

http://www.imdb.com/gallery....exandra (http://www.imdb.com/gallery/ss/0360009/Ss/0360009/C35-13A.jpg?path=pgallery&path_key=Kerry,%20Alexandra)

Teutonic Knight
05-19-2004, 15:18
Alright BK Your spine isn't made of linguini after all http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/bigthumb.gif

You have passed the first test, Sinan, begin phase 2 http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/gc-devil.gif

Big King Sanctaphrax
05-19-2004, 15:28
Quote[/b] ]Alright BK Your spine isn't made of linguini after all

That would be an interesting conversation in an emergency room-

What's wrong?
My Spine's made of Linguini. *falls on floor*

*everyone faints*

Teutonic Knight
05-19-2004, 16:36
Quote[/b] (Big King Sanctaphrax @ May 19 2004,10:28)]
Quote[/b] ]Alright BK Your spine isn't made of linguini after all

That would be an interesting conversation in an emergency room-

What's wrong?
My Spine's made of Linguini. *falls on floor*

*everyone faints*
that's an old Rush Limbaugh thing, he likes to say linguini spined liberals allot http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif

I like to say that their spine isn't the only thing that's linguini-like about them http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/gc-laugh4.gif

7Bear7Scar
05-19-2004, 17:01
Quote[/b] (dessa14 @ May 19 2004,05:59)]some people could see it as obscene. Eg: Conservatives.
or Right Wingers.

i don't really care at all for myself, but others may be offended.
hmm, just a question (from a lady too :P).

In some places, religions and cultures, showing ankles, the neck, or even the face is offensive. So my question is this. Can a picture only be shown if it does not offend conservative Americans? Surely it cannot be one rule for one and not for another?

lets see.... is this offensive?

http://www.psa-photo.org/phototravel/lybrand3.jpg

(lady of the Arbore tribe, Ethiopia, everday dress.)

Scar

Teutonic Knight
05-19-2004, 17:05
I believe the problem is that the Kerry picture explicity sexual in nature, and was what was offensive not the picture itself. While the picture you posted does not seem to be sexual in nature.(at least not to me)

Shahed
05-19-2004, 17:08
Well hello there Scar. http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/wave.gif

I don't think it's offensive in the least. If it was an image of some porn star in a doggy pose nude, that may be construed as a violation of the forum rules, but not that image you posted.

The picture I orginally posted was a fully clothed reasonably well known woman i.e Kerry's daughter at the Cannes Film Festival. No nudity whatsoever and no sexual misconduct or obscenity was implied. It was not sexual or pornographic in any way.

IMO that picture (you posted) is not violating any of the rules. And now we have two rooms in the Tavern so certainly one of these rooms is appropriate for such discussion.

7Bear7Scar
05-19-2004, 17:13
Hi Sinan http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/wave.gif Long time mate http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif

I cant see the issue. A nipple is a nipple. Even the most conservative of guys has made use of them once - unless they were formula-fed ;)

Teutonic Knight
05-19-2004, 17:15
Quote[/b] ]The picture I orginally posted was a fully clothed reasonably well known woman i.e Kerry's daughter. No nudity whatsoever and no sexual misconduct or obscenity was implied. It was not sexual or pornographic in any way.

define the latter term...

Big King Sanctaphrax
05-19-2004, 17:17
Do not question my authoritah http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/tongue.gif

No, seriously, the problem was the nudity. Our rules state no nudity. My job is to enforce those rules. I'm just a pawn.

If you want to discuss it more, please look to the watchtower. Thankyou.

Teutonic Knight
05-19-2004, 17:19
woah double post..

but about the photo of the African woman BK, it contains nudity too, do define that as obscene? You need to set down some ground rules and stick them to the top of the page. I don't care what they are, just define what terms like pornographic and sexually explicit mean...

Shahed
05-19-2004, 17:23
Ok BKS. Thanks for your attention. http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif

Big King Sanctaphrax
05-19-2004, 17:23
As I mentioned before, I'm very low down the pecking order, so until somebody tells me otherwise, it's 'no nudity'. GAH This job is tougher than I thought it would be... About the african woman, I'm going to talk to A. Saturnus about that, so it can stay until he comes on line.

Anyway, no more policy discussion in the front room. We're supposed to be OT, remember.

dessa14
05-20-2004, 09:51
so the first test is coming to a close.
try to find another loophole guys.
thanks, dessa

A.Saturnus
05-20-2004, 16:41
The difference is that in the cultural context, the Kerry picture is sexualy explicit, the African not. If that´s not satisfying you, you can simply make up you own bogus explanation.
Seriously I have no idea why any of these pictures really needs to be censored. The rules are here so fuzzy, consistently following them is practicably impossible.

Teutonic Knight
05-20-2004, 16:48
Quote[/b] (A.Saturnus @ May 20 2004,11:41)]The difference is that in the cultural context, the Kerry picture is sexualy explicit, the African not. If that´s not satisfying you, you can simply make up you own bogus explanation.
Seriously I have no idea why any of these pictures really needs to be censored. The rules are here so fuzzy, consistently following them is practicably impossible.
thanks for parroting me Sat http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif


when should we expect the editorial on Org rules to be released?

nightcrawlerblue
05-20-2004, 17:07
Quote[/b] (Sinan @ May 19 2004,06:21)]Hey Dessa http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif

I understand your point perfectly.

What they see it as and what it is are two different things. That young lady (Kerry's daughter) is dressed perfectly covered up and we have the right to discuss that (and laugh about it) even with an image, but at least with a link, under the rules of the org. The image does not show full nudity or anything like that.

The way people see things is not at issue. If the way people see things is part of the rules then it is acceptable. But the rules state nothing about the way people see things they state clearly what is NOT to be posted.

At the moment a moderators job is to ensure that the rules are respected. The rules were respected in the initial post in this thread and therefore my conclusion is that intervention in this topic is not necessary.

We have 31 pages of Soly's babes hardly wearing anything at all, to censure one image of a lady fully covered would be very hypocritical.

I don't mean to offend anyone. My comments are in all honesty and I them forward in an honest and frank manner.

http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif
How is she Perfectly covered up? Her dress is almost completely transparent (though it is probably just the picture)

ICantSpellDawg
05-20-2004, 17:11
can someone send me the link in pm

http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/gc-curtain.gif

soso
05-21-2004, 04:27
I mean c'mon guys. Are you serious? This is PG-13 material. I saw it. Big deal. You see stuff like that on public TV or in the Tabloids all the time. Wow...pffffft.

Chalk it up to censorship then, but really who are you kidding here.

My two cents.

P.S. McGruff, just go to the Internet Movie Database IMDb (http://us.imdb.com/) and search for her name. By the way the IMDb is a great way to research movies and actors.

Obex
05-21-2004, 08:24
speaking from the referenced american Christian conservative right, i find the kerry photo grossly inappropriate. such a public display of raw sexuality fills my upright, moral mind with unwanted, covetous thoughts. having never seen a nipple before (male or female), i now find myself in an immoral stupor, picturing the lusty figure every time i close my eyes. after this post, im on my way to confess the sin forced upon me, and try to recover from the damage suffered from this jezebel. dont EVEN get me started on the provocative african lady

Big King Sanctaphrax
05-21-2004, 08:53
Closed-I did give a warning-policy discussion should go in the watchtower.