Conqueror
12-29-2005, 21:09
I think there's a unit balancing issue with these 2:
https://img523.imageshack.us/img523/4370/ebthanvabara8be.th.jpg (https://img523.imageshack.us/my.php?image=ebthanvabara8be.jpg)
https://img523.imageshack.us/img523/6227/eberanshararshtbara2zf.th.jpg (https://img523.imageshack.us/my.php?image=eberanshararshtbara2zf.jpg)
Eranshar Arshtbara is the superior archer (higher missile attack & defense), capable to double as light spearmen and has a combat bonus in wood and snow. Yet Thanvabara are more expensive in both initial recruitment (767 vs 618 Mnai) as well as upkeep (192 vs 155 Mnai). Comparing these units, I can't think of any reason to ever recruit Thanvabara. Perhaps the recruitment/upkeep costs could be swapped?
https://img523.imageshack.us/img523/4370/ebthanvabara8be.th.jpg (https://img523.imageshack.us/my.php?image=ebthanvabara8be.jpg)
https://img523.imageshack.us/img523/6227/eberanshararshtbara2zf.th.jpg (https://img523.imageshack.us/my.php?image=eberanshararshtbara2zf.jpg)
Eranshar Arshtbara is the superior archer (higher missile attack & defense), capable to double as light spearmen and has a combat bonus in wood and snow. Yet Thanvabara are more expensive in both initial recruitment (767 vs 618 Mnai) as well as upkeep (192 vs 155 Mnai). Comparing these units, I can't think of any reason to ever recruit Thanvabara. Perhaps the recruitment/upkeep costs could be swapped?