PDA

View Full Version : Third Diet Edicts - Poll



econ21
02-15-2007, 10:22
This vote is for players in the King of the Romans thread. The text of the motions is:

Edict 3.1: The Chancellor shall seek to have Milan cease to exist by the conclusion of his term.
---Proposed: Kaiser Heinrich
---Seconded: Otto von Kassel, Maximillian Mandorf

Edict 3.2: The Chancellor is to keep his alliance with Sicily, thus disobeying the Papal Order.
---Proposed: Kaiser Heinrich
---Seconded: Maximillian Mandorf, Duke Leopold

Edict 3.4: A defensive war will be fought with Milan, no incursions into their territory, until they are excommunicated or our standing with the Pope is "very good" or higher.
---Proposed: Otto von Kassel
---Seconded: Prinz Henry, Fourth Elector of Austria (AussieGiant)

Edict 3.5: "Sigismund der Stolze, Count of Lorraine, requests permission of the this assembled Diet to attack the court of Rome, should he become Chancellor"
---Proposed: Sigismund der Stolze
---Seconded: Maximillian Mandorf, Kaiser Heinrich

Edict 3.6: The Chancellor has to avoid excommunication to the best of his abilities, by agreeing to the following: No offensive war may lead to excommunication and no attack on Rome is to be made.
---Proposed: Duke Leopold
---Seconded: Fourth Elector of Austria (AussieGiant); Prince Henry

Edict 3.8: Milan is to be crushed by an offensive campaign, one that does not wait for Papal opinion or any other outside factor to strike. Kaiser Heinrich is to have a major role in this campaign.
---Proposed: Kaiser Heinrich
---Seconded: Maximillian Mandorf, Sigismund der Stolze

Edict 3.10: If Rome is assaulted and Kaiser Heinrich is alive, he must lead the attack.
---Proposed: Maximillian Mandorf
---Seconded: Kaiser Heinrich, Otto von Kassel

Edict 3.11: The Chancellor will endeavor to construct naval forces capable of blockades and transport of mid-sized armies in the Baltic and especially the Mediterranean. Dukes and Counts are encouraged by the Diet to build port facilities in their domains, if applicable.
---Proposed: Otto von Kasel
---Seconded: Prince Henry, Maximillian Mandorf

Edict 3.15: Taking the city of Milan,taking the city of Genoa and taking the city of Dijon.
---Proposed: Fifth Elector of Swabia (Kagemusha)
---Seconded: Otto von Kassel, Maximillian Mandorf

Charter Amendment 3.1: Stewards may bestow the rank of Count on nobles of their House. This Amendment does not give Stewards any other Ducal power, it does not give Stewards additional Influence, nor does it allow Stewards to be Counts themselves.
---Proposed: Maximillian Mandorf
---Seconded: Duke Leopold, Prinz Henry

Charter Amendment 3.3: Replace point 3.10 with

"Influential players get bonus votes (max +5 bonus)

Appointed Influence (Max 3 points):
Duke: +2
Count: +1
Chancellor, ex-Chancellor, or Prince: +1

Stat Influence (Max 2 points):
15 or more total stat points: +1 (I thought about a lower number, but all avatars are given a base 3 piety and base 5 loyalty, which means those points are freebies. So, 15 is only 7 from actual traits, plus the 8 piety and loyalty freebies)
6 or more ranks in one stat: +1 (In the unlikely scenario where a character gets 6 or more in 2 stats without having 15 total, they get this +1 twice)

The player who is Emperor gets bonus votes differently, being equal to his authority."

Replace 4.5 with:

"Counts are governors of their settlements. Dukes govern settlements that are allocated to their Houses but not to a Count. The Emperor governs settlements that are not allocated to any House."
---Proposed: Econ21
---Seconded: GeneralHankerchief, AussieGiant
---Note: Please discuss this amendment in the OOC thread.

econ21
02-16-2007, 00:19
Provisional results as of 23.27 UK time:

Edict 3.1:
Yes : AussieGiant, Ignoramus (+2), Ituralde (+4), Overknight (+1), TinCow (+3), GH (+4)
No : Dutch_guy, econ21 (+4), Kagemusha , FLYdude
PASSED 21 to 7

Edict 3.2:
Yes : AussieGiant, Dutch_guy, econ21 (+4), Ignoramus (+2), Ituralde (+4), TinCow (+3), GH (+4), FLYdude
No :Kagemusha, Overknight (+1)
PASSED 25 to 3

Edict 3.4:
Yes :Dutch_guy, econ21 (+4), Overknight (+1)
No : AussieGiant, Ignoramus (+2), Ituralde (+4), Kagemusha, TinCow (+3), GH (+4), FLYdude
FAILED 8 to 20

Edict 3.5:
Yes :Ignoramus (+2), TinCow (+3), GH (+4)
No : AussieGiant, Dutch_guy, econ21 (+4), Ituralde (+4), Kagemusha, Overknight (+1), FLYdude
FAILED 12 to 16

Edict 3.6:
Yes :AussieGiant, Dutch_guy, econ21 (+4), Ituralde (+4), Kagemusha, Overknight (+1)
No :Ignoramus (+2), TinCow (+3), GH (+4), FLYdude
PASSED 15 to 13

Edict 3.8:
Yes : econ21 (+4), Ignoramus (+2), TinCow (+3), GH (+4)
No :AussieGiant, Dutch_guy, Ituralde (+4), Kagemusha, Overknight (+1)
PASSED 17 to 10

Edict 3.10:
Yes : AussieGiant, Dutch_guy, econ21 (+4), Ignoramus (+2), Ituralde (+4), Kagemusha, Overknight (+1), TinCow (+3), GH (+4)
PASSED

Edict 3.11:
Yes :Dutch_guy, econ21 (+4), Ignoramus (+2), Kagemusha, Overknight (+1), TinCow (+3), GH (+4), FLYdude
No: AussieGiant, Ituralde (+4)
PASSED

Edict 3.15:
Yes : AussieGiant, Ignoramus (+2), Ituralde (+4), Kagemusha, Overknight (+1), TinCow (+3), GH (+4)
No : Dutch_guy, econ21 (+4)
PASSED

Charter Ammendments 3.1 & 3.3: Passed with no opposition