JMRC
06-01-2007, 12:21
Hi.
I've been looking at the descr_strat.txt file and checked the factions' priorities and there were some that I could not agree:
- Saka Rauka (balanced, smith): I think it should change to (bureaucrat, genghis) because they should be more concerned about taxable income than growth; and biased towards missile cavalry and light cavalry.
- Saba (balanced, henry): I think it should change to (comfort, henry) because they should not be concerned about making walls and should go for farming.
- Ptolemaioi (religious, caesar): I think it should change to (religious, napoleon) because they are more biased towards a mix of light and heavy infantry instead of just heavy infantry.
- Arche Seleukeia (balanced, stalin): I think it should change to (fortified, stalin) because they should be more concerned about making walls, defenses and law, since they are surrounded by all sides with powerful enemies.
- Aedui (religious, napoleon): I think it should change to (religious, smith) because I don't think they are biased towards mix of light and heavy infantry, plus light cavalry. I believe they take a more level approach when recruiting units.
- Sweboz (balanced, mao): I think it should change to (religious, mao) because they give much importance to loyalty and use more farming than taxes and trade.
- Koinon Hellenon (balanced, smith): I think it should change to (balanced, napoleon) because they are biased towards a mix of light and heavy infantry, plus light cavalry.
- Baktria (trade, smith): I think it should change to (trader, napoleon) because they are biased towards a mix of light and heavy infantry, plus light cavalry.
- Sauromatae (balanced, smith): I think it should change to (bureaucrat, henry) because they are not much inclined towards making roads and prefer income than growth. Also, they are biased towards heavy and light cavalry, plus missile infantry.
- Lusotannan (fortified, mao): I think it should change to (craftsman, mao) because they use weapon upgrades and mines instead of growth and loyalty.
I've been looking at the descr_strat.txt file and checked the factions' priorities and there were some that I could not agree:
- Saka Rauka (balanced, smith): I think it should change to (bureaucrat, genghis) because they should be more concerned about taxable income than growth; and biased towards missile cavalry and light cavalry.
- Saba (balanced, henry): I think it should change to (comfort, henry) because they should not be concerned about making walls and should go for farming.
- Ptolemaioi (religious, caesar): I think it should change to (religious, napoleon) because they are more biased towards a mix of light and heavy infantry instead of just heavy infantry.
- Arche Seleukeia (balanced, stalin): I think it should change to (fortified, stalin) because they should be more concerned about making walls, defenses and law, since they are surrounded by all sides with powerful enemies.
- Aedui (religious, napoleon): I think it should change to (religious, smith) because I don't think they are biased towards mix of light and heavy infantry, plus light cavalry. I believe they take a more level approach when recruiting units.
- Sweboz (balanced, mao): I think it should change to (religious, mao) because they give much importance to loyalty and use more farming than taxes and trade.
- Koinon Hellenon (balanced, smith): I think it should change to (balanced, napoleon) because they are biased towards a mix of light and heavy infantry, plus light cavalry.
- Baktria (trade, smith): I think it should change to (trader, napoleon) because they are biased towards a mix of light and heavy infantry, plus light cavalry.
- Sauromatae (balanced, smith): I think it should change to (bureaucrat, henry) because they are not much inclined towards making roads and prefer income than growth. Also, they are biased towards heavy and light cavalry, plus missile infantry.
- Lusotannan (fortified, mao): I think it should change to (craftsman, mao) because they use weapon upgrades and mines instead of growth and loyalty.