The Rise of the Arche Boukephelia
Introduction
The rise of the Hellenes in Asia seems an unlikely thing with hindsight. That Megas Alexandros was able to conquer is way all the way from Hellas to India is truly an amazing feat. But that after his death, and all the wars between his successors, it would be the Hellenes who had settled in the furthest reaches of his conquests who would create the greatest Hellenistic empire of them all seems impossible. With endless hordes of nomadic horsemen to the North, the powerful armies of India with their many elephants to the South, and seemingly much more powerful and and secure Hellenistic kingdoms to the west.
Yet in spite of all these challenges, it was the Greeks who settled in Baktria (modern Boukephelia) and India who would be the most successful in the end. One has to wonder, offhand, why it was they who rose to prominence, and indeed, how they survived at all. The answer, it seems, is pride. All peoples are naturally proud of their heritage, but the Hellenes even more-so than seems normal. This is perhaps their greatest blessing, and their greatest curse. It is pride that allowed them to conquer nearly all of the known world, and it was this same pride that led most of their kingdoms in the east to failure. The mutual pride and animosity between the Hellenes and the Asians made it difficult to maintain order. If both the rulers and their subjects of a kingdom refuse to respect each other, then there can be no peace or order. The kingdom continue cannot exist at all.
Megas Alexandros was wise enough to understand this, and so he tried to merge East and West together in a way that all could become equally proud, and for this, he was murdered by his own people. Today he is revered by many as an angelos of Epiphanaios Soter, the enlightened savior, for it was through his life that he freed the people of the East from slavery, and it is through his death that the Hellenes were taught humility. This is perhaps a romantic claim about a man who, from all accounts, was all too human, despite his own claims to the contrary.
His successors made token efforts to legitimize themselves to their people, but none of them, other than maybe the early Seleukid kings, seemed to truly believe in Alexandros' dream. So why was it, that in the most distant regions of his conquest, his dream of a Brotherhood of Man was finally realized? Most likely, it was out of necessity. The Arche Boukephelia herself would not have come into existence had the Arche Seleukeia not already been failing. No matter how much authority a ruler claims, or where he claims it comes from, if he is not able to assert it, then he has already lost the right to it. This is related to a concept which the Sinai call the "Accordance of Olympos". Those whom deserve to rule shall, and those who do not, will eventually always fail.
Had Hellenes of the East and their Asian subjects not truly attempted to unite, it seems unlikely that they would have survived for long. Without the support of their people, the Hellenes would have been replaced by yet another wave of conquerors, likely some tribe of nomads from the North, and without the Hellenes, the Asians who they ruled over likely would have continued on as nothing more than uneducated slaves to the next group of conquerors.
But the calls of necessity are not always heeded, and when they are, they are often done so halfheartedly. Indeed, even the family that would eventually lead the Eastern Hellenes to follow the dream of Alexandros began it's story in the East as a prideful and foolish one. As much as they, the Boukephelaioi, are revered today, their earliest history is one that is mired in conspiracy and betrayal. It is how they rose above their situation, and brought their people with them that is the subject of this history.
to be continued…
–
Credit goes to the EB team for the banner image, found unused in the depths of the Data folder.
Bookmarks