104 replays up for download

[Mithrandir]

104 replays around 900kb-1 MB.

some are nice to watch, some are epic, and some are just plain boring .

[Daevorn]

104??

well, a VERY long night is waiting for me

[MF_Ivan]

Are they all categorized or just plain random? Hmm... Might be good preparation for tournament.

*starts taking notes*

[Crandaeolon]

Gah They're random... VERY random. It would be nice if ya would be bothered to rename them either according to players, a defining event if there's one or even just the size of the match...

(that "4vs4GlorGetsRushedByHam" replay is an example of the system I use... )

I too have about a hundred nice and educative replays, and hunting for duplicates in Mith's pack would be very annoying... perhaps I'll just post some choice ones

[Mithrandir]

that glorgetsrushed was sent to me by you .

I could,but I'd get many replays named :
"stupidXgotmeroutednotetoself:neverplaythatidiotagain.mrp"

I tried it for a while, GG-2v2-1 but after a while I forgot which numbers I had used .

[Cheetah]

yup, it would be nice to introduce some system in it and perhaps delete the boring ones

[Dionysus9]

A good way to do it is to rename the replay to the date/time of the logfile (and include the logfiles). Then you can look at the logfile and see if you are interested in watching the replay. You could look at all 104 logfiles and flag the ones you were interested in reveiwing.

This is a lot of work for Mith tho

[Mithrandir]

13 new replays ,sorta categorised.

(2v2-1 ,2v2-2 ,3v3 -1, 3v3-castle1 etc.).

well over 650 online post-patch games so far .

[Nobunaga0611]

Yeah I was wondering, would it be considered rude if boring games were deleted? I'm all for it, I just wonder if the people who upload the boring games would be offended, thinking themselves that the games aren't boring. Maybe a rule could make made stating that you have to believe the replay shows something you want everyone to see, or its a very good battle, or a game everyone is interested in, like the CA games.