Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 60 of 117

Thread: 'Featureless' Expansion

  1. #31
    Member Member Midnight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    289

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    I'm another one who's found nothing overly exciting in this. What I'd *really* like is a massive leap in AI, which would make the original game a lot more interesting (I haven't played in ages, a little part of me still hopes the x-pack will make the game what, IMO, it should have been).

    I'm going to wait until the x-pack's released, and see what those who do get it are saying after a couple of months. If the AI and original game aren't *seriously* improved, I will not be buying BI.

  2. #32

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    The vast majority are saying the same thing and I pointed out that I found this quite humourous. I did not blurt out a flippant remark to the negative response that BI has received, I posted my reply because all these posts have been seen before. I find it humourous because the same was said of VI........" I will wait to see what other's think before I buy it "
    What has transpired is that most of the community now regard VI as a benchmark.
    If we are talking purely real time gameplay, I think I would have to say that MTW v1.0 was my favourite. The v1.1 patch messed up spear units totally and no patch nor the VI expansion fixed them, to the detriment of the game IMO.
    I have read countless negative responses to BI and how nothing is going to change. Maybe they are right but only the release of the Expansion and subsequent tests will prove this. I have not been overly impressed with RTW but there are some details that I like very much. I hope that some of the issues will be addressed with BI but there is also a chance that I will be disappointed. I will be buying BI and I am willing to bet that the vast majority, even the negative posters, will be doing likewise....as they have done in the past

    ......Orda

  3. #33

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    Quote Originally Posted by Orda Khan
    I have read countless negative responses to BI and how nothing is going to change. Maybe they are right but only the release of the Expansion and subsequent tests will prove this.
    It's not going to be me doing the testing. Some of the key programmers who developed the previous game engine no longer work for CA. I doubt that sufficient skill to significantly improve the gameplay exists within CA at this point, and we know that they don't have the resources to do the kind of gameplay testing that such a complicated game requires. At the same time, CA will want to end-of-life RTW/BI quickly.

    _________Designed to match Original STW gameplay.


    Beta 8 + Beta 8.1 patch + New Maps + Sound add-on + Castles 2

  4. #34

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    Quote Originally Posted by Orda Khan
    I find it humourous because the same was said of VI........" I will wait to see what other's think before I buy it "
    What has transpired is that most of the community now regard VI as a benchmark.
    And you don't think that had anything to do with the fact that the VI expansion turned out to be good, and made some changes that the fans really approved of? I'm not sure why you consider the point "most of the community now regard VI as a benchmark" contradicts the "I will wait to see what other's think before I buy it" point. I can't say what happened, because I didn't see sales statistics. But it's entirely possible people did wait to see what other's thought, and the other's thought good things. Therefore, they decided to get it.

    If a lot of people are reporting in here about positive improvements to RTW from BI, I will most likely get it myself. What I won't do, however, is go get it simply because it's a TW expansion. Nor will I go get it based on my respect for CA. At this point, I'd need some assurances that they've delivered a quality product before I'd be willing to make that jump.

    Bh

  5. #35

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    It has nothing to do with contradiction at all. I was simply pointing out that the very thing that people expected to be poor was the opposite and the same thing could happen with BI

    ......Orda

  6. #36

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    In the discussion about the new units above, has there been anything to make us think that the unit limits will be lifted? If I say "EB has 250 new units!" or "500 new units!" it doesn't mean we've added 250 or 500 to the vanilla number. If they are dropping some factions in place of other new ones, the "10 new factions!" thing works the same way. Maybe I'm wrong, but if they are just swapping factions or units, then what's the great new achievement? I'll be impressed and would probably buy it if they genuinely increased the faction and unit limits now...

  7. #37
    dictator by the people Member caesar44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    the holy(?) land
    Posts
    1,207

    Smile Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    horse swimming pig eating, night battels afternoon shmatels - i want a better map AI , more options for diplomacy etc , this is a strategic game , dam !
    "The essence of philosophy is to ask the eternal question that has no answer" (Aristotel) . "Yes !!!" (me) .

    "Its time we stop worrying, and get angry you know? But not angry and pick up a gun, but angry and open our minds." (Tupac Amaru Shakur)

  8. #38
    Member Member Yun Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    622

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    I agree with Orda

    Lets not be hasty and say stuff that will make us look like MrNeverHappy whiners. I like Orda remember the angry posts of old, I remember writing one slamming MTW for being STW with more units and not as good. Now people talk of MTW being the benchmark.

    On the subject of selective memory, I remember playing STW and listening to the music from Gladiator, and offering my soul if I could play that first battle scene out of the movie, with total immersion in the battle not little sprites wiggling on the screen. When I first played RTW I knew I was headed for eternal damnation!

    IMO now we have the engine - the other stuff will come, more strategy, better AI. CA had to first make a game to ensure theirs and the future of the TW series, they did that with RTW.

    People whine 'its all about the money' WELL OF COURSE IT IS! what did you think it was about the LOVE, certainly I havent seen much love on the forums in a long long time - if ever. Heres how many games you get created out of love 0.

    so in summary - yes RTW has its problems - BUT IT IS MAGNIFICENT!!

    I for 1 will be waiting around for the gameplay, AI, and balance elements which Im sure will follow maybe not this expansion, maybe not until RTW2 expansion. And I look forward to enjoying the journey with immersive battles of EPIC proportions.

    but see the glass as half empty if you wish, its your choice
    Quote Originally Posted by pevergreen View Post
    its pevergeren.

  9. #39

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    Quote Originally Posted by Yunus Dogus
    I for 1 will be waiting around for the gameplay, AI, and balance elements which Im sure will follow maybe not this expansion, maybe not until RTW2 expansion. And I look forward to enjoying the journey with immersive battles of EPIC proportions.
    I realize that you were partially responding to the previous post, but I'm not sure if your point is terribly strong. Boiling it down, it seems like you are saying "We've got a good engine, so we shouldn't worry about inadequate gameplay, AI and balance". I'm afraid that's not something I could agree with. And it certainly doesn't sound like a selling point for an expansion.

    From the tone of your post, I'm guessing you'll be in the "buy the expansion immediately" crowd? Is there something specific about it that you find appealing, or is it simply the fact that it's a RTW expansion?

    Bh

  10. #40

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    I don't give a damn what the community says about BI. I'll buy it on day one and come to the conclusion myself.

    I Loved MTW.

    RTW was a huge improvement, despite the weak AI.

    With solid improvements to AI, the RTW engine provides the potential for one of those games that will be remembered forever...

    RoN, AoE, C&C, Warcraft, Dune 2000, etc, etc. The faceless "realtime strategy" game has become saturated by copies and duplicates with nothing truly revolutionary. Creative assembly has developed a truly unique concept. Total War, my friends, has broken all the molds and that is why we, the duplicitous TW community, are all bitching and moaning with exuberant gratitude. We bitch because we see the potential.

    I'll buy BI, and sadly, I'll also buy Spartan.

    da
    "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." -Einstein

    Quote Originally Posted by Pannonian View Post
    The Backroom is the Crackroom.

  11. #41
    Member Member Yun Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    622

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    Quote Originally Posted by Bhruic
    From the tone of your post, I'm guessing you'll be in the "buy the expansion immediately" crowd? Is there something specific about it that you find appealing, or is it simply the fact that it's a RTW expansion?

    Bh
    Yes immediately, because its a RTW expansion, more units, more campaigns what more would you want from an expansion.

    Look at the AOE expansions, more units, more campaigns. I cant actually think of an expansion that radically changed the original game engine.

    I see it more as a perspective thing I could choose to dwell on the problems with the game, and let that destroy any further fun I mightve had playing it, or be positive about the huge changes in the game, how it has been a transformation of the total war game series, and be hopeful that gameplay and strategy elements will be tweaked over time.

    As Divinus says we are disappointed because we want it all and now, and we see the potential for realising a long time gaming dream.

    If you love MTW more play that and be happy, but whining about an expansion not yet released is a little premature - dont worry - therell be plenty of time and opportunity for whining once the expansion hits the shelves.
    Quote Originally Posted by pevergreen View Post
    its pevergeren.

  12. #42

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    yo, Divinus Arma, you take this stuff too serioully. I agree with you that the CA team created a game engine that something are revolutionize the entire experience a strategy gamer point of view. CA rtw engine certainly is a fine piece of work that you can't find it in other game out there. first time I played rome total war, it complete engross me into it enhanced game engine and details that other can't compete with. As those are our point of view how a game should be like other have their own point of views as well. Sure the game engine allow me to experience what I've never experience before with other pc strategy game; however, there are more areas that CA need to focus on as well. For example the relationship system still fall behind it new revolutionize game engine. The wish and desire of a person can't never run out so you can complain and whinning all you want, it is the same complain and whinning that will win you your satisfaction. Cause if there is demand I am sure there is supply.
    Lord of Lucius
    No Matter what Pathes You Take All Lead To Death!

  13. #43

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    Im sad that people say They will rush out and buy the expantion instantly,

    Its like CA can do no wrong,
    They can release shoddy games which are unfinishedd and Full fo bugs,
    Then instead of releasing a patch to fix them,
    They can just watch all the lemmings march off to the store to Buy the exapantion Just to fix there inital mistakes,

    This will just prove to ca That they are able to rip off people in this manner time and time again,

    They can just make a crap game full of bugs sell it for £50 then, make an expantion to fix the flaws and sell that for £50 as well

    Personally I will not be buying there expantion, as the Game isnt good enough to begin with,

    AOE
    STW
    MTW
    were all Great games in the begining,
    And there expantions just prolonged the games life span,

    Where as RTW is vitualy unplayable in single player,
    and the expantion is there to fix there mistakes,
    and add some units, and a few campaigns
    This is just not right,

    Had they relased a patch to fix the bugs and made the game playable,
    I would then consider buying the expantion,
    But i refuse to bow down to any faceless corporation demanding more money from me to fix a problem they more than likley left in on purpous to force people to buy there new and improved expantion

    And i bet The AI will be just as moronic leaving the expantion Just as unplayable as the origional,

    Personally I will wait untill they have released 2 or 3 more games using this engine.
    So they actualy figured out how to utilise it properly,
    becous at the moment They havent got a clue.

    Not playing rome Has not been a loss to me, Obviously i lost £50 paying for the dumb game,
    But STW & MTW are still better, So i have lost nothing in terms of game play and fun,
    And not buying the expantion just means I dont need to reinstall an unfinished bug filled game that CA Rushed out just to get some revenue,

    ShambleS
    Last edited by Shambles; 06-03-2005 at 08:32.

  14. #44

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    Quote Originally Posted by Shambles
    Im sad that people say They will rush out and buy the expantion instantly,

    Its like CA can do no wrong,
    They can release shoddy games which are unfinishedd and Full fo bugs,
    Then instead of releasing a patch to fix them,
    They can just watch all the lemmings march off to the store to Buy the exapantion Just to fix there inital mistakes,

    This will just prove to ca That they are able to rip off people in this manner time and time again,

    They can just make a crap game full of bugs sell it for £50 then, make an expantion to fix the flaws and sell that for £50 as well

    Personally I will not be buying there expantion, as the Game isnt good enough to begin with,

    AOE
    STW
    MTW
    were all Great games in the begining,
    And there expantions just prolonged the games life span,

    Where as RTW is vitualy unplayable in single player,
    and the expantion is there to fix there mistakes,
    and add some units, and a few campaigns
    This is just not right,

    Had they relased a patch to fix the bugs and made the game playable,
    I would then consider buying the expantion,
    But i refuse to bow down to any faceless corporation demanding more money from me to fix a problem they more than likley left in on purpous to force people to buy there new and improved expantion

    And i bet The AI will be just as moronic leaving the expantion Just as unplayable as the origional,

    Personally I will wait untill they have released 2 or 3 more games using this engine.
    So they actualy figured out how to utilise it properly,
    becous at the moment They havent got a clue.

    Not playing rome Has not been a loss to me, Obviously i lost £50 paying for the dumb game,
    But STW & MTW are still better, So i have lost nothing in terms of game play and fun,
    And not buying the expantion just means I dont need to reinstall an unfinished bug filled game that CA Rushed out just to get some revenue,

    ShambleS
    Actually, I'm not even sure if they're going to fix anything that is wrong with RTW 1.2 with the expansion. I'll believe it when I see it. As far as I know, there will be no more patches for RTW. I'm going to stick with that belief so I don't get my hopes up only to get disappointed in the future.

    The game is still very playable, as long as you find the right mods to fix the bugs that can be easily fixed with modding. Things like save/load bug however can't be fixed. But IMO very irritating but still playable.

  15. #45

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    Quote Originally Posted by Virtute71
    Actually, I'm not even sure if they're going to fix anything that is wrong with RTW 1.2 with the expansion. I'll believe it when I see it. As far as I know, there will be no more patches for RTW. I'm going to stick with that belief so I don't get my hopes up only to get disappointed in the future.

    The game is still very playable, as long as you find the right mods to fix the bugs that can be easily fixed with modding. Things like save/load bug however can't be fixed. But IMO very irritating but still playable.
    Im quite shure they said they would fix the flaws in the expantion, They also asked for a bug list, So obviosuly they intended to do something.
    But i beleve that the thread in their fourum that said they would, Was misteriously deleted,

    So i guess i have no proof they ever said they would if they change there minds,

    It really is no loss to me as i have MANY games,
    ranging from moon patroll on my old atari 2600 up to the most recent games on my pc,
    All of which i prefer playing, compared to RTW.

    CAs policy of not fixing there flaws with a patch will and Has lost them many long term customers,
    But there are still some people with more money than sence who will rush out and buy anything they put on the selfs,

    However,
    I supose one mans trash is another mans tresure so who am i to complain,

    I have boycotted there game untill im satisfyed they can use there new technolagy,
    I only wish more people would do the same As this may force them to re evaluate there no patching policy.
    Or atleast begin releasing beta test's
    "having said this. i have witnessed many beata testers say This is great Impliment it at once, Then they leave the game forever never to return as they have just ruined the game for them selfs and every one els,"

    So i guess the only thing they could do to repreeve them selfs in to my favour would be to start releasing more patches Just to show they do care about end users, Becous right now, Its blaitant that they only care about there revenue.


    ShambleS
    Last edited by Shambles; 06-03-2005 at 09:19.

  16. #46
    Whimsysmith & Designy Bloke CA Captain Fishpants's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Beyond the galactic boundary...
    Posts
    453

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    Quote Originally Posted by Puzz3D
    It's not going to be me doing the testing. Some of the key programmers who developed the previous game engine no longer work for CA. I doubt that sufficient skill to significantly improve the gameplay exists within CA at this point, and we know that they don't have the resources to do the kind of gameplay testing that such a complicated game requires. At the same time, CA will want to end-of-life RTW/BI quickly.
    This has come as a considerable surprise to the programmers sitting at their desks. After they were told they didn't work here any more, they managed to raise a feeble cheer as they trooped from the building and headed back towards their loved ones.

    But seriously, the same people who did STW, MTW and RTW are still here. Please refrain from posting unsubstantiated rumours.
    Gentlemen should exercise caution and wear stout-sided boots when using the Fintry-Kyle Escape Apparatus. Ladies, children, servants and those of a nervous disposition should be strongly encouraged to seek other means of hurried egress.

    The formal bit: Any views or opinions expressed here are those of the poster and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of The Creative Assembly or SEGA.

  17. #47
    Bug Hunter Senior Member player1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Belgrade, Serbia
    Posts
    1,405

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Fishpants
    This has come as a considerable surprise to the programmers sitting at their desks. After they were told they didn't work here any more, they managed to raise a feeble cheer as they trooped from the building and headed back towards their loved ones.
    LOL!
    BUG-FIXER, an unofficial patch for both Rome: Total War and its expansion pack

  18. #48

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Fishpants
    . But seriously, the same people who did STW, MTW and RTW are still here. Please refrain from posting unsubstantiated rumours.
    I did't say all the programmers who worked on the previous game engine aren't at CA anymore. Also, RTW isn't the previous game engine.

    _________Designed to match Original STW gameplay.


    Beta 8 + Beta 8.1 patch + New Maps + Sound add-on + Castles 2

  19. #49
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    Quote Originally Posted by Shambles
    Im quite shure they said they would fix the flaws in the expantion, They also asked for a bug list, So obviosuly they intended to do something.
    But i beleve that the thread in their fourum that said they would, Was misteriously deleted,

    So i guess i have no proof they ever said they would if they change there minds,

    It really is no loss to me as i have MANY games,
    ranging from moon patroll on my old atari 2600 up to the most recent games on my pc,
    All of which i prefer playing, compared to RTW.

    CAs policy of not fixing there flaws with a patch will and Has lost them many long term customers,
    But there are still some people with more money than sence who will rush out and buy anything they put on the selfs,

    However,
    I supose one mans trash is another mans tresure so who am i to complain,

    I have boycotted there game untill im satisfyed they can use there new technolagy,
    I only wish more people would do the same As this may force them to re evaluate there no patching policy.
    Or atleast begin releasing beta test's
    "having said this. i have witnessed many beata testers say This is great Impliment it at once, Then they leave the game forever never to return as they have just ruined the game for them selfs and every one els,"

    So i guess the only thing they could do to repreeve them selfs in to my favour would be to start releasing more patches Just to show they do care about end users, Becous right now, Its blaitant that they only care about there revenue.


    ShambleS

    Patches are Activision's call, they published the game so they have to handle the functional part of the PR system. Meaning, Activision and NOT CA call the patches. Maybe being owned by Sega will change that.


    I'm going to be cracking up if the next TW goes does the SeeeeeGaaaa sound bite after their standard 100,000 screaming mean smashing into each other into movie.
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

  20. #50
    Not affiliated with Red Dwarf. Member Ianofsmeg16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Home of Palm trees, cats with no tails, three-legged men, fairies...and more german bikers than germany
    Posts
    1,996

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    Three points
    1. If you dont like RTW so much, sell it on e-bay and your truobles are over

    2. if you dont like the look of the expansion, dont buy it

    and 3. i personally thought .org and the guild was for people that liked total war, and here you are slagging off about something tht, i think, is one of CA's and activision's best games

    anyway thats my contribution
    When I was a child
    I caught a fleeting glimpse
    Out of the corner of my eye.
    I turned to look but it was gone
    I cannot put my finger on it now
    The child is grown,
    The dream is gone.
    I have become comfortably numb...

    Proud Supporter of the Gahzette

  21. #51
    Lurker Member Mongoose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,422

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    1:I think he already has...

    2:sure!

    3:Well, shambles likes STW and that is why he continues to post here.

    Really, look at his sig...

  22. #52

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    Quote Originally Posted by mongoose
    1:I think he already has...

    2:sure!

    3:Well, shambles likes STW and that is why he continues to post here.

    Really, look at his sig...

    Perhaps some positive posts in the Sword Dojo would be more appropriate then?

    " I won't buy it " has been said so often, along with " I'll wait to find out what it's like "

    Maybe the people who DO buy it should keep the information to themselves?

    Those of us who happen to be optimistic could quite easily ask what is the point in posting about a game you do not enjoy? If you do not like it then do not play it but it seems pointless to just keep on saying RTW is crap! RTW is crap! RTW is crap!

    Captain Fishpants, I guess you guys at CA have very thick skin or a bloody good sense of humour! It would be nice if BI turned out to be perfect but you know as well as I do that there would still be criticism.

    .......Orda

  23. #53
    Lurker Member Mongoose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,422

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    "Captain Fishpants, I guess you guys at CA have very thick skin or a bloody good sense of humour! It would be nice if BI turned out to be perfect but you know as well as I do that there would still be criticism."

    Yep, the programmers at Ca do have fairly thick skin. despite the fact that all their PR people/moderators are so...well...sensitive...

  24. #54

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    I love Shogun,
    I really like MTW.

    I was riped off when i bought RTW and did not get 1/10th of my moneys worth so I am entiteld to my say,
    Just like the people who like the game are entitled to theirs.

    I disslike the unfinished game, and have mearly stated fact in a polite manner,
    If you dissagree that is fine,
    But if you dont wish to see posts Where people say I disslike rome,
    and so on.

    Then i sudgest you stop visiting forums where people voice there oppinions

    Aslong as people say they like it i will say i disslike it,
    Other wize it just makes the game look impecable,
    Which is not the truth,

    Please note That I have not 1ce said i disslike either of the other games or expantions,
    and to that matter, have never dissliked ANY other game that i have purchased.
    And I have also siad had they bothered to finish rome, Or atlest released a patch to TRY and fix the problems Prehaps I would even like rome,

    I do not like seeing People throw their money away,
    I do not like the way they release unfinished games for full price then expect people to buy the expantion,
    So i will make shure Both sides of the story are well known to all

    ShambleS
    Last edited by Shambles; 06-03-2005 at 18:19.

  25. #55

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    STW had no bugs?
    MTW had no bugs?
    Please, this is not true.
    MTW/VI was a finished article after v2.01? I think not. Not unless you are happy with spears that are worthless. And why were they messed up in the first place? Because the community were not happy that they could beat swords. I saw no problem with 100 spears beating 60 swords but there you go. It seems people do not like the phalanx as it is....yet they were happy with VI spears!?!?
    We will soon see what BI is like. My guess is that it will surprise

    ......Orda

  26. #56

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    Dont get me wrong, I beleve rome has Massive potential,
    And i did not say that the other 2 were perfect,

    But as you can plainly tell I am most definatly happy with the few bugs that they may have,
    Where as the masses of bugs in rome lead me to b verry unhappy with it,
    I dont disslike the concept,
    Neither do i disslike the engine,

    I mearly wish to wait untill they have fully grasped the capabilatys of it and are able to utilise them properly,
    I to hope that the expantion will be great,
    And if it is and works Well enough "i dont expect perfect"
    then i will soon change my tune,

    But i for 1 will not go out and buy it,
    and even if it is flawless I ill wait untill the next game.
    simply for the reason that all rome does when its on my pc is eat up valuabale disk space,

  27. #57

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    Quote Originally Posted by Orda Khan
    MTW/VI was a finished article after v2.01? I think not. Not unless you are happy with spears that are worthless. And why were they messed up in the first place? Because the community were not happy that they could beat swords. I saw no problem with 100 spears beating 60 swords but there you go. It seems people do not like the phalanx as it is....yet they were happy with VI spears!?!?
    We will soon see what BI is like. My guess is that it will surprise.
    It's was the upgrade system combined with the cheap swords that caused the breakdown of the RPS in MTW/VI MP. The basic units functioned correctly when not upgraded or if all units were upgraded equally. This isn't the case in RTW where the best cav units defeat the best spear units frontally. RTW had many, many more issues to be patched than the other two games. CA stated publically that they initially put 25 programmers out of a total of 74 on the RTW v1.2 patch effort. It was an effort which ran for 3 months, but there were still outstanding issues which weren't addressed because there was so much to do.

    Now BI, which is supposed to be an add-on, has to also be a major patch to RTW, and yet we still see evasiveness from CA about gameplay issues, and I don't mean night battles or beserkers that go out of control. That doesn't instill confidence in me that the gameplay issues will be addressed. Everytime a player raises the issue of historical accuracy or realism someone we hear that gameplay comes first. Ok fine. I'd like to see the commitment to the gameplay because I haven't seen it yet. The basic RPS doesn't work. This has been pointed put to CA with replays which clearly show the problem, and it was done before v1.2 was finished.

    CA often falls back on the excuse that they don't have enough time and resources to fix all the issues. That means they don't have the time and resources to make the game into a finished product. This isn't going to change with BI. Maybe the managers at CA will incude more debugging time in the development schedule this time around.
    Last edited by Puzz3D; 06-03-2005 at 20:07.

    _________Designed to match Original STW gameplay.


    Beta 8 + Beta 8.1 patch + New Maps + Sound add-on + Castles 2

  28. #58

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    Hey Captain Fishpants,

    E3 had come and gone. When are you guys going to release some major Barbarian Invasion preview? Two months before the release and we are still in the dark.

    Shambles, RTW is far more complex than Shogun and MTW.

  29. #59
    Member Member Spartiate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    On the site of the Battle of the Boyne
    Posts
    422

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    I am unhappy with the finished product as released to us but i will also be buying the expansion pack the day it comes out.Maybe i'm lucky that i don't worry about 50 quid or maybe it's because i buy very few games these days so i rarely feel cheated of my cash.I will never buy a resource management AoE/Starcraft/Warcraft type of game again,so for me it's TW games and Space Strats like Homeworld from now on.Since STW i have been hooked on TW and will continue to buy them for the mods that our great .ORG TWC and RTR members are creating if nothing else.
    "Go tell the Spartans,stranger passing by that here,obedient to their laws we lie."

  30. #60
    Blue Eyed Samurai Senior Member Wishazu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Great Britain
    Posts
    1,679

    Default Re: 'Featureless' Expansion

    Quote Originally Posted by Shambles
    I love Shogun,
    I really like MTW.

    I was riped off when i bought RTW and did not get 1/10th of my moneys worth so I am entiteld to my say,
    Just like the people who like the game are entitled to theirs.

    I disslike the unfinished game, and have mearly stated fact in a polite manner,
    If you dissagree that is fine,
    But if you dont wish to see posts Where people say I disslike rome,
    and so on.

    Then i sudgest you stop visiting forums where people voice there oppinions

    Aslong as people say they like it i will say i disslike it,
    Other wize it just makes the game look impecable,
    Which is not the truth,

    Please note That I have not 1ce said i disslike either of the other games or expantions,
    and to that matter, have never dissliked ANY other game that i have purchased.
    And I have also siad had they bothered to finish rome, Or atlest released a patch to TRY and fix the problems Prehaps I would even like rome,

    I do not like seeing People throw their money away,
    I do not like the way they release unfinished games for full price then expect people to buy the expantion,
    So i will make shure Both sides of the story are well known to all

    ShambleS
    i think people are just sick of reading the same thing everytime you make a post, youve had your say, and we all have probably got most of it memorized by now. maybe you should spend more time in the stw and mtw forums, as i think you`ll get less worked up in there.
    "Wishazu does his usual hero thing and slices all the zombies to death, wiping out yet another horde." - Askthepizzaguy, Resident Evil: Dark Falls

    "Move not unless you see an advantage; use not your troops unless there is something to be gained; fight not unless the position is critical"
    Sun Tzu the Art of War

    Blue eyes for our samurai
    Red blood for his sword
    Your ronin days are over
    For your home is now the Org
    By Gregoshi

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO