At least in this case, the poor bugger was only wrongfully imprisoned for twenty years due (arguably) to police misconduct. Just imagine if the state had whacked the guy instead. One thing that really pisses me off is that prosecutors tried to block the use of DNA evidence, presumably because they thought (knew?) it would clear him. That just doesn't seem right to me. Are prosecutors not supposed to be bound by the truth? Is the prosecutorial view now that even a wrongful conviction is better than no conviction at all?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8790793/
Bookmarks