I think that priests should have the option of engaging a priest of a different
religion in a debate. As a result, the piety rating of the priests would change,
reflecting the fact that the loser would have a harder time influencing people,
and that the winner would become even better at getting his point across.
Historically, debates like this happened, or at least, they are now part of the
lore in Christian Orthodox countries. 'Sweet tongued' is often used to refer
to medieval priests in, at least, Bulgaria and Greece. Tales are told about
such and such theologist who challenged a 'Papal' scholar, and crushed him
with cunning arguments on some obscure point.
Propaganda? Probably. But still, it would be another way to deal with the
influx of preachy enemy priests... sending assassins against priests and
princesses is something I cringe at. Speaking of princesses, any general
should be able to court these. And frankly, rejection should not necessarily
be a bad thing when it comes to their effectiveness as a warrior, should it?
Bookmarks