This poll is to determine a few questions that have been plauging us in the details of running the game.
Chapter III will most likely stay to the 3 month pattern
William is the king of Holland/England
Charles II is the king of spain
WSS/GNW Game poll
This poll is to determine a few questions that have been plauging us in the details of running the game.
Chapter III will most likely stay to the 3 month pattern
William is the king of Holland/England
Charles II is the king of spain
Last edited by Lord Winter; 09-29-2007 at 08:10.
When it occurs to a man that nature does not regard him as important and that she feels she would not maim the universe by disposing of him, he at first wishes to throw bricks at the temple, and he hates deeply the fact that there are no bricks and no temples
-Stephen Crane
Re: WSS/GNW Game poll
Made my choice, but forgot to vote for one turn per year!
Re: WSS/GNW Game poll
I voted 2 turns per year. I think that's the best choice.
Originally Posted by Sooh
Re: WSS/GNW Game poll
I'm again the death of William next turn. I made my game tactics on it, and when he gets killed I can simply start over again (ie. I can just as well quit the game)
Re: WSS/GNW Game poll
Wouldn't the death of Charles result in the 'War of Spanish Succession'?
"Nietzsche is dead" - God
"I agree, although I support China I support anyone discovering things for Science and humanity." - lenin96
Re: Pursuit of happiness
Have you just been dumped?
I ask because it's usually something like that which causes outbursts like this, needless to say I dissagree completely.
Re: WSS/GNW Game poll
I voted to keep all the deaths historical and for 2 turns per year. At 2 turns, Willem and Charles will boths still get a little more time, and it'll help the game move along a bit faster.
It is better to conquer yourself than to win a thousand battles. Then, the victory is yours. It cannot be taken from you, not by angels or by demons, heaven or hell.
Re: WSS/GNW Game poll
Correct
Re: WSS/GNW Game poll
My High School education is working!
Oh ya.
Anyway, using my limited (17th Century, Sengoku Jidai, WW1) experience, I would say that if you've got alot of people then 2 turns would be more efficient than 4 turns per year.
"Nietzsche is dead" - God
"I agree, although I support China I support anyone discovering things for Science and humanity." - lenin96
Re: Pursuit of happiness
Have you just been dumped?
I ask because it's usually something like that which causes outbursts like this, needless to say I dissagree completely.
Re: WSS/GNW Game poll
Just a comment on the 'historical!.
The Interactive starts with a historical startiong point; what follows leaves 'real' history. It has to be feasible, but does not have to stick to the fact.
In our case everybody knows when a 'historical' person dies. So it is no surprise and this is certainly not historical.
For example: If my strategy bases on the fact that Wiliam will die in three years, than this is very unrealistic. Death should come as a surprise.
Re: WSS/GNW Game poll
Next turn ain't a surprise either
We said before the game started that William would die in 1702
Re: WSS/GNW Game poll
About the death: DoH could throw a dice. This would be most historically!
Re: WSS/GNW Game poll
What my established pollicy was I would start throwing the dice 2 turns before the historical death (except for Charles who is to close to the start date) and then have a 1/3 chance that they would die each year.
The results 2 turns per year
Charles and William survive (well Charles dies next turn but you get the point he didn't die this turn.)
When it occurs to a man that nature does not regard him as important and that she feels she would not maim the universe by disposing of him, he at first wishes to throw bricks at the temple, and he hates deeply the fact that there are no bricks and no temples
-Stephen Crane
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks