There's a triggered joke in there somewhere.
It was an "identity politics" parallel.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
"Close" is a relative notion. I don't think the time span between the referenda is stipulated by some law. Moreover, Scotland may state changing the international status of the UK (against the will of the Scots) as a reason for a new referendum. So if Nicola is really determined to get a referendum and not just trying to get favorable concessions from London (much as Cameron did with the EU) she should popularize it within her realm.
It's not a legal issue it is a public patience issue and as exhibited by the poll public patience is against referendums in the immediate future despite such arguments as change in status. This 69% majority against a referendum before brexit is done gives May carte blanche to ignore sturgeon for at least two years.
"The only way that has ever been discovered to have a lot of people cooperate together voluntarily is through the free market. And that's why it's so essential to preserving individual freedom.” -- Milton Friedman
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -- H. L. Mencken
The Leave the EU campaigners promised before the 2016 referendum that they'd continue to campaign to leave if they lost. The Tory right have the situation exactly as they want it, so they're now arguing that any more referendums would be against the will of the people.
Chronologically the SNP started the trend of bad losership in these matters. In the capacity for bitterness on the other hand would tie the SNP and remain quite evenly.
Last edited by Greyblades; 05-09-2017 at 18:36.
I call it exitmania. The UK wants to exit the exit negotiations:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/n...00bn-h9cqqtsxc
They can, why don't. The EU is holding an empty gun at their head. Eurocrats need humiliation
Last edited by Fragony; 05-21-2017 at 05:30.
I already did. You seem to forgetting that the protective rules imposed upon you were a burden for making deals with growing economies outside the eurozone. Or maybe there was nothing you could forget because you just didn't know that operating outside the eurozone has consequences for the UK, the EU wants it's cut even if you are a net payer, figures if you don't know that, who does, there is nobody to tell you
Last edited by Fragony; 05-21-2017 at 08:55.
and back, just spended some time. You are so pessimistic about all this, there's no reason for that. i know I really annoy you for saying that but I can assure you that what I say isn't just hollow talk, the EU has never been more than a very costly restriction to the global market, fueled only by a ideoligy of the idiotic idea that the EU is responsible for peace in Europe. Get it of me for me please I fucking hate the EU and their judas-kiss, and thankly, you much more influential Brits swamped them and boy are they kicking, knowing
It's a bit easier to understand when the author explains the point himself. The headline point is the practice of slumming. However, the salient point is that you don't truly get what a life is like when you can exit it at any time. You've passed through the UK. That's not the same as living in the UK. Stop telling people who live in the UK what the UK is like and will be like. You don't have a clue.
Cos everybody hates a tourist
Especially one who thinks it's all such a laugh
And the chipstains and grease will come out in the bath
Last edited by Pannonian; 05-21-2017 at 13:13.
The EU won't back down out of this - the 100 billion proposed will stay, so that's a serious stumbling block.
Ja mata, TosaInu. You will forever be remembered.
Proud
Been to:
Swords Made of Letters - 1938. The war is looming in France - and Alexandre Reythier does not have much time left to protect his country. A novel set before the war.
A Painted Shield of Honour - 1313. Templar Knights in France are in grave danger. Can they be saved?
Last edited by Greyblades; 05-21-2017 at 16:00.
Last edited by Elephantine; 05-21-2017 at 16:11.
I saw corbyn saying he'd take a bad deal over no deal, that is a far greater threat to our negociations than a long irrelevant talking point.
If you are here to debate I suggest bringing arguments instead of regurgitating your favourite commentator's one liners. If you are just here to vent, I am sure you can find any number of willing echo chambers on reddit.
heh Brits don't like to be bullied, wether they like miss May or not
edit, that was fast http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...llions-pounds/
Very big lol, stfu, you must (yoda voice)
I love you Brits X, a few indifferences in the past alas
edit2, the UK can actually do this, this is so beautifull, never screw what you can get back three times, are the old ways
Last edited by Fragony; 05-21-2017 at 16:55.
A bad deal over no deal? Do you understand what no deal entials?
Perhaps you are just regurgitating the meaningless nonsense that is doing the rounds in the current Mayverse echo chamber.
Whatever next, brexit means brexit or a strong and stable slogan means a strong and stable slogan?
But anyway , if you are here for meaningful debate do you have any comment on the Boris lying this morning when he claimed that the lie that was sold to the nation over Brexit is included in the manifesto?
And if it is as you claim a long irrelevant talking point why was the minister talking about it again this morning and trying to convince the voters that the lie he sold is indeed the truth?
oh ffs why is Boris even an argument he's a dead man walking he will be dumped. I'm not English and not good in English sarcasm but even I get that much
Bookmarks