Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 61 to 90 of 143

Thread: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

  1. #61
    Celto-Germanic Spearman Member Kuningaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Aquae, Pannonia
    Posts
    135

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Wow was really interesting to read about this, unfortunately I almost don't know anything about proto germanic languages. I got a question though: are the Sweboz somehow related to modern day Schwaben? (just cause it sounds so similar). Ah and as an Austrian I gotta tell you I'm really thankfull for your great work, no problem with you being American at all...

  2. #62

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Quote Originally Posted by Ibrahim View Post
    its OK, just figured Its unusual that 2 groups can evolve the exact same word seperately.
    Not necessarily. In languages of thousands of words [1], it's easy for similar words to crop up by pure coincidence. Of the many examples that surely exist, the one that comes to mind right now is the Taiwanese-Fujianese "热" /ʃjɔ/ (hot) and the French "chaud" /ʃɔ/ (hot).

    -Glee

    [1] For example, the average native English speaker has a 10 000 to 20 000 word vocabulary
    Sheer musical genius: Gould on Mozart

    Balloons: ("Welcome to EB" from T.A.)


  3. #63
    master of the wierd people Member Ibrahim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Who cares
    Posts
    6,192

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Quote Originally Posted by Gleemonex View Post
    Not necessarily. In languages of thousands of words [1], it's easy for similar words to crop up by pure coincidence. Of the many examples that surely exist, the one that comes to mind right now is the Taiwanese-Fujianese "热" /ʃjɔ/ (hot) and the French "chaud" /ʃɔ/ (hot).

    -Glee

    [1] For example, the average native English speaker has a 10 000 to 20 000 word vocabulary
    I never said it was impossible-just somewhat unusual, that's all. (I even have examples of me own: aye in english, compared to aye in sudani arabic. both= yes. aye in saudani is cognate to aywa, and a in varios eastern arabic dialects (from egypt to the east; aye is apparelty a verient of yes in English-details uncertain)

    but Is Malik independantly evolved, or is it indeed a loan word from Arabic? because If what Spawn found is right, I've got one heck of a headache
    Last edited by Ibrahim; 12-16-2008 at 06:11.
    I was once alive, but then a girl came and took out my ticker.

    my 4 year old modding project--nearing completion: http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=219506 (if you wanna help, join me).

    tired of ridiculous trouble with walking animations? then you need my brand newmotion capture for the common man!

    "We have proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that if we put the belonging to, in the I don't know what, all gas lines will explode " -alBernameg

  4. #64
    EB on ALX player Member ziegenpeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    COLONIA CLAVDIA ARA AGRIPPINENSIVM
    Posts
    741

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Quote Originally Posted by Kuningaz View Post
    I got a question though: are the Sweboz somehow related to modern day Schwaben?
    Yes, indeed in modern german the Sweboz are called "sueben" and they've given the name for the modern Schwaben. This phenomenon is the same for other germanic tribes: The francs, Bajuwaren (Bayern), Alamani, Saxons, Frisians, Chatti (Hessen) etc.
    However, this doesnt always imply a straight descendence from these tribes.

    EDIT: In case someone wants to be given sources, I'll look them up later.
    Last edited by ziegenpeter; 12-16-2008 at 19:22.

    "A wise man once said: Never buy a game full price!"
    - Another wise man

  5. #65
    Like the Parthian Boot Member Elmetiacos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    The Forests of Roestoc
    Posts
    1,770

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Quote Originally Posted by Ibrahim View Post
    I never said it was impossible-just somewhat unusual, that's all. (I even have examples of me own: aye in english, compared to aye in sudani arabic. both= yes. aye in saudani is cognate to aywa, and a in varios eastern arabic dialects (from egypt to the east; aye is apparelty a verient of yes in English-details uncertain)

    but Is Malik independantly evolved, or is it indeed a loan word from Arabic? because If what Spawn found is right, I've got one heck of a headache
    Outside Arabic speaking regions, Malik only seems to be used by Muslims, so it looks very likely to have been loaned from Arabic. No Indo-European root makes any sense unless it's possible to get from honey or milk to a ruler.
    'you owe it to that famous chick general whose name starts with a B'
    OILAM TREBOPALA INDI PORCOM LAEBO INDI INTAM PECINAM ELMETIACUI

  6. #66
    Celto-Germanic Spearman Member Kuningaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Aquae, Pannonia
    Posts
    135

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Hm interesting, any books you would recommend me to read about germanic etymology?

  7. #67
    Member Member Cartaphilus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Baliar Maior
    Posts
    268

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Quote Originally Posted by Elmetiacos View Post
    Outside Arabic speaking regions, Malik only seems to be used by Muslims, so it looks very likely to have been loaned from Arabic. No Indo-European root makes any sense unless it's possible to get from honey or milk to a ruler.
    Malik came from the semitic root mlk and the meaning is obviously king or lord.
    In fact the God Melqart would be the King of the City.
    "Iustitia procurat pacem et iniuria bellum, humilia verba sunt nuntii pacis et superba, belli." (Ramon Llull)

  8. #68
    Member Member Viking_Wårlord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Janköping(sweden) , Tromsø(norway) , Godthåb(greenland) and Ribe(Danmark) > I move from settlement to settlement co's i must raid more often:)
    Posts
    82

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Quote Originally Posted by ziegenpeter View Post
    Oh, cool! Could you be so kind and give me a brief overview of its etymological developpement?
    Unfortunatly, I don't posess a swedish etymological dictionairy...
    IT COMOES FROM Dómi in old norse...simple as that!

  9. #69
    Member Member Viking_Wårlord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Janköping(sweden) , Tromsø(norway) , Godthåb(greenland) and Ribe(Danmark) > I move from settlement to settlement co's i must raid more often:)
    Posts
    82

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Quote Originally Posted by Kuningaz View Post
    Wow was really interesting to read about this, unfortunately I almost don't know anything about proto germanic languages. I got a question though: are the Sweboz somehow related to modern day Schwaben? (just cause it sounds so similar). Ah and as an Austrian I gotta tell you I'm really thankfull for your great work, no problem with you being American at all...
    Yes,the Swêboz came from the actual Swabian region but it's descendants are the Portuguese...

  10. #70
    EB on ALX player Member ziegenpeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    COLONIA CLAVDIA ARA AGRIPPINENSIVM
    Posts
    741

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Quote Originally Posted by Viking_Wårlord View Post
    IT COMOES FROM Dómi in old norse
    Meaning...?

    @Kuningaz: Wait till I got home and I give you some titles... oh wait whats your mother tongue?

    "A wise man once said: Never buy a game full price!"
    - Another wise man

  11. #71
    Member Member Viking_Wårlord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Janköping(sweden) , Tromsø(norway) , Godthåb(greenland) and Ribe(Danmark) > I move from settlement to settlement co's i must raid more often:)
    Posts
    82

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Quote Originally Posted by ziegenpeter View Post
    Meaning...?

    @Kuningaz: Wait till I got home and I give you some titles... oh wait whats your mother tongue?
    It can mean 'prevailance'(for example,heathendom=holyness' prevailance) but can also mean 'time'...
    My mother tongue is Danish...

  12. #72
    Member Member Viking_Wårlord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Janköping(sweden) , Tromsø(norway) , Godthåb(greenland) and Ribe(Danmark) > I move from settlement to settlement co's i must raid more often:)
    Posts
    82

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Quote Originally Posted by Cartaphilus View Post
    Malik came from the semitic root mlk and the meaning is obviously king or lord.
    In fact the God Melqart would be the King of the City.
    False,it comes from Baal the old semitic Baal(מלך) that also gave the Carthaginian god Baal-saphôôn.

  13. #73
    Member Member Viking_Wårlord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Janköping(sweden) , Tromsø(norway) , Godthåb(greenland) and Ribe(Danmark) > I move from settlement to settlement co's i must raid more often:)
    Posts
    82

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Quote Originally Posted by ziegenpeter View Post
    Yes, indeed in modern german the Sweboz are called "sueben" and they've given the name for the modern Schwaben. This phenomenon is the same for other germanic tribes: The francs, Bajuwaren (Bayern), Alamani, Saxons, Frisians, Chatti (Hessen) etc.
    However, this doesnt always imply a straight descendence from these tribes.

    EDIT: In case someone wants to be given sources, I'll look them up later.
    Not exactly,the Swabian region got croosed by many tribes during the barbarian invasions,
    that's why Swabians are Germanic but not 'genetically' Swêboz...

    The protuguese are the actual descendants of the Swêboz

  14. #74
    EB on ALX player Member ziegenpeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    COLONIA CLAVDIA ARA AGRIPPINENSIVM
    Posts
    741

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Quote Originally Posted by Viking_Wårlord View Post
    Not exactly,the Swabian region got croosed by many tribes during the barbarian invasions,
    that's why Swabians are Germanic but not 'genetically' Swêboz...
    Why do you introduce your post by "not exactly", if you don't contradict me?
    I was just saying that the name(!) has its origin from sweboz but, to quote myself,
    this doesnt always imply a straight descendence from these tribes.
    Sorry but my dictionary didn't give me a translation for prevailance, only for prevail, so I assume its the corresponding noun.
    SO we have "prevailance" as a meaning, which is IMHO a notion that can be found in the suffix "-dom"
    we have "jugement" and "time"... hmm and you say the meanings in old norse are "prevailance" or "time", right? I wonder where the jugement is coming from...

    Please use the "Edit" button.

    "A wise man once said: Never buy a game full price!"
    - Another wise man

  15. #75
    Celto-Germanic Spearman Member Kuningaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Aquae, Pannonia
    Posts
    135

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Mother tongue is (Austrian) German

  16. #76

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    I agree with Ziegenpeter- Viking_Warlord, I had a similar reaction in that you come across as unnecessarily antagonistic, but I at least prompted such a response toward me by saying you were not correct and while it's your right to have whatever attitude you want, don't expect to people to take that attitude or appreciate it. The Indo-European root *sue- rather ensures that there is no exclusiveness to those who call themselves 'Swabbian', meaning "one's own" as you know, although you are correct in that the later Migration Period Germanic tribes assume the identity of Suebi even though they were not directly related to Arminius' confederation or that named by Tacitus.

    [edit] I just realized that maybe there is a language issue going on- in English, 'related' is not necessarily by blood, so Ziegenpeter was referring to the 'name' which is indeed related... yet it is also true there is no evidence genetically linking the original Suebi with the later Suebi (and their territory is vastly different between classical references), although there is no way to verify ethnicity or genetics, so it's a rather moot point in that specific sense.

    The Portuguese are not 'the Suebi'. Tribes under the identity of the Suebi did invade, but so did Celtiberians and Romans, while retaining non-Indo-European elements, yet I would not say they are 'this' or 'that', but you probably are just referring to the best known Suebi of Late Antiquity, so that is correct in that very limited sense.


    * For those curious on -dōm / 'doom' - it is related to 'deem' and 'do':

    A Handbook of Germanic Etymology by Vladimir Orel :



    Altenglisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch von F. Holthausen :



    Language and history in the early Germanic world by D.H. Green
    (warning- large size) :
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

    Someone had asked about a good book to read on this kind of thing, so there is an answer for ya (DH Green)

    Quote Originally Posted by Elmetiacos View Post
    I believe on the Isle of Man a judge is still called a Doomster, or something like that.
    nice fact, Elmetiacos - i didn't know that - very interesting
    Last edited by blitzkrieg80; 12-18-2008 at 11:07.
    HWÆT !
    “Vesall ertu þinnar skjaldborgar!” “Your shieldwall is pathetic!” -Bǫðvar Bjarki [Hrólfs Saga Kraka]
    “Wyrd oft nereð unfǽgne eorl þonne his ellen déah.” “The course of events often saves the un-fey warrior if his valour is good.” -Bēowulf
    “Gørið eigi hárit í blóði.” “Do not get blood on [my] hair.” -Sigurð Búason to his executioner [Óláfs Saga Tryggvasonar: Heimskringla]

    Wes þū hāl ! Be whole (with luck)!

  17. #77

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Quote Originally Posted by SpawnOfEbil View Post
    Completely different topic:

    How did the team reconstruct the steppe languages (ie the Sauromatae and the Saka Rauka). Presumably, being an Indo-Aryan language, you could look at related languages (indeed, there are a few recognizable words such as malik referring to king), but still, that's a lord of work to be done.

    Also are there any pronounciation guides? Some of them are a right nightmare (especially the word for rider, whatever it is).
    Just to answer this: almost all reconstructions of ancient steppe languages are AFAIK based on Ossetian with a input from epigraphy and Indo-European cognates.

  18. #78
    EB on ALX player Member ziegenpeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    COLONIA CLAVDIA ARA AGRIPPINENSIVM
    Posts
    741

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Quote Originally Posted by Kuningaz View Post
    Mother tongue is (Austrian) German
    Well great, because I only know german books about this.

    @Blitzkrieg: Thanks for your clarification and the Links/pics.

    "A wise man once said: Never buy a game full price!"
    - Another wise man

  19. #79
    Member Member Cartaphilus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Baliar Maior
    Posts
    268

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Quote Originally Posted by Viking_Wårlord View Post
    False,it comes from Baal the old semitic Baal(מלך) that also gave the Carthaginian god Baal-saphôôn.
    Nop.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melqart

    I know that wiki is not a great source but is the only one I have now at my disposition.
    But I am sure about that.
    "Iustitia procurat pacem et iniuria bellum, humilia verba sunt nuntii pacis et superba, belli." (Ramon Llull)

  20. #80
    master of the wierd people Member Ibrahim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Who cares
    Posts
    6,192

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Quote Originally Posted by Cartaphilus View Post
    Nop.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melqart

    I know that wiki is not a great source but is the only one I have now at my disposition.
    But I am sure about that.
    I just came back from a reading, and I confirm yor source, Cartaphilus.
    I was once alive, but then a girl came and took out my ticker.

    my 4 year old modding project--nearing completion: http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=219506 (if you wanna help, join me).

    tired of ridiculous trouble with walking animations? then you need my brand newmotion capture for the common man!

    "We have proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that if we put the belonging to, in the I don't know what, all gas lines will explode " -alBernameg

  21. #81
    Member Member Viking_Wårlord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Janköping(sweden) , Tromsø(norway) , Godthåb(greenland) and Ribe(Danmark) > I move from settlement to settlement co's i must raid more often:)
    Posts
    82

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Quote Originally Posted by blitzkrieg80 View Post
    I agree with Ziegenpeter- Viking_Warlord, I had a similar reaction in that you come across as unnecessarily antagonistic, but I at least prompted such a response toward me by saying you were not correct and while it's your right to have whatever attitude you want, don't expect to people to take that attitude or appreciate it. The Indo-European root *sue- rather ensures that there is no exclusiveness to those who call themselves 'Swabbian', meaning "one's own" as you know, although you are correct in that the later Migration Period Germanic tribes assume the identity of Suebi even though they were not directly related to Arminius' confederation or that named by Tacitus.

    [edit] I just realized that maybe there is a language issue going on- in English, 'related' is not necessarily by blood, so Ziegenpeter was referring to the 'name' which is indeed related... yet it is also true there is no evidence genetically linking the original Suebi with the later Suebi (and their territory is vastly different between classical references), although there is no way to verify ethnicity or genetics, so it's a rather moot point in that specific sense.

    The Portuguese are not 'the Suebi'. Tribes under the identity of the Suebi did invade, but so did Celtiberians and Romans, while retaining non-Indo-European elements, yet I would not say they are 'this' or 'that', but you probably are just referring to the best known Suebi of Late Antiquity, so that is correct in that very limited sense.


    * For those curious on -dōm / 'doom' - it is related to 'deem' and 'do':

    A Handbook of Germanic Etymology by Vladimir Orel :



    Altenglisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch von F. Holthausen :



    Language and history in the early Germanic world by D.H. Green
    (warning- large size) :
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

    Someone had asked about a good book to read on this kind of thing, so there is an answer for ya (DH Green)


    nice fact, Elmetiacos - i didn't know that - very interesting
    Though the DNA tests performed on the portuguese showed the that their Y chromosome was of Germanic origin,assuming that it was different if we compared it to Spanish Y chromosome,it was concluded that the Portuguese were the actual descendants of the Swêboz and for the Spanish,madrilenes and Iberians were majoritarily wisigothic(though they represented some Basque and Celitc elements).

    Thanks for bringing another translation of domi but as I said, I don't think it has an exact translation as different dialects used it to describe different things...its meaning also changed throughout time,hence Vikings used it to describe 'do'...though it was also used by Swedish Varanguians to describe a home(!)...

  22. #82
    Member Member Viking_Wårlord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Janköping(sweden) , Tromsø(norway) , Godthåb(greenland) and Ribe(Danmark) > I move from settlement to settlement co's i must raid more often:)
    Posts
    82

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Quote Originally Posted by Cartaphilus View Post
    Nop.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melqart

    I know that wiki is not a great source but is the only one I have now at my disposition.
    But I am sure about that.
    I though you were talking about the word meaning 'master',not 'king'!
    Sorry,my mistake,you're right.

  23. #83
    Member Member Cartaphilus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Baliar Maior
    Posts
    268

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Quote Originally Posted by Viking_Wårlord View Post
    I though you were talking about the word meaning 'master',not 'king'!
    Sorry,my mistake,you're right.
    No problem, man, you were right with Baal of course, he's the "Lord", the "Master"...
    "Iustitia procurat pacem et iniuria bellum, humilia verba sunt nuntii pacis et superba, belli." (Ramon Llull)

  24. #84
    EB on ALX player Member ziegenpeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    COLONIA CLAVDIA ARA AGRIPPINENSIVM
    Posts
    741

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Here we go Kuningaz: As a good introduction I'd advice you to read
    Wilhelm Schmidt: Geschichte der deutschen Sprache
    Astrid Stedje: Deutsche Sprache gestern und heute

    "A wise man once said: Never buy a game full price!"
    - Another wise man

  25. #85
    Celto-Germanic Spearman Member Kuningaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Aquae, Pannonia
    Posts
    135

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Ok thanks, once I'm back in Austria I'll buy them

  26. #86
    Like the Parthian Boot Member Elmetiacos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    The Forests of Roestoc
    Posts
    1,770

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    The thread is not dead, only stunned. Since it all started with some of us pointing out how hard it would be to reconstruct Dacian and/or Thracian, here are some interesting snippets.
    1. The (Latinised) Getic personal name Zalmodegicus: look at the second element in the name. Surely it must be a cognate of Celtic *dexs- which appears in Lugudeccas on an Ogham stone "of the servant of Lugh" - that means Zalmodegicus is "servant of Zalmoxis".
    2. Did Daco-Thracian turn Indo-European M into B? Bassaris is a Greek word for the fox skin worn by Dionysos which doesn't seem to have an etymology in Greek. Bassareus is also supposed to have been the Thracian version of the god. Bendis was the Thracian moon goddess. Both these make sense as PIE roots if we turn the Bs into Ms: *moiso- meaning the hide of an animal and *meh1ns- meaning the moon...

    EDIT: bah - Duridanov's Thracian vocabulary (http://www.kroraina.com/thrac_lang/thrac_5.html) is full of words that kept the M as M...
    Last edited by Elmetiacos; 12-22-2008 at 01:38.
    'you owe it to that famous chick general whose name starts with a B'
    OILAM TREBOPALA INDI PORCOM LAEBO INDI INTAM PECINAM ELMETIACUI

  27. #87
    Tuba Son Member Subotan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    The Land of Heat and Clockwork
    Posts
    4,990
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    bredas ‘pasture-ground’
    dentu- ‘clan, tribe’
    desa(s), disa(s) ‘deity, god’
    ermas ‘fierce, mad’
    esvas (ezvas) ‘horse’
    mezēna ‘a horseman
    skaplis "axe"
    suras ‘strong, brave; a hero’
    taru- ‘spear’
    These look particularly useful to us. But I laughed out loud when I saw
    stra (from an earlier *strava) ‘ torrent’
    Hehe, file-sharing Dacians...

  28. #88
    Like the Parthian Boot Member Elmetiacos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    The Forests of Roestoc
    Posts
    1,770

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    I'm now getting a bit sceptical about that list and Duridanov's determination to link Thracian to Baltic and Slavonic... which just happened to have been done by a Bulgarian in the middle of the Cold War. We already know how politics could muddy the waters in Romania and Albania at this time.
    'you owe it to that famous chick general whose name starts with a B'
    OILAM TREBOPALA INDI PORCOM LAEBO INDI INTAM PECINAM ELMETIACUI

  29. #89
    NOBAΛO AYΣE Member Ayce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    București, România
    Posts
    442

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    Elmetiacos: That would be the case if the name for the Getic god is Zalmoxis, not Zamolxis. And this is still an issue.
    And I wouldn't say Daco-Thracian, for all we know, there could have been important differences between the two.
    On post 44 I tried to start a small discussion based on the usually ignored Sinaia tablets, but everyone here was too busy with germanic languages.
    Looking over that link, and quickly crosschecking what words appear in both places, I do see correlations, but also differences, mostly in form. Ex:
    -god - T: Desa/Disa/Zi, D: Dio/Zei(only once)/Za prefix for Za-Boly
    -T: ut (river), D: ut (river bed)
    -T: stra (current, torrent), D: Streo (hydronym, possibly the current Strei, originating in „torrent”)
    -T: esvas (horse), D: eskoe (horses/studs), ekyo (the horses)
    -Differences: Sar is used for water in all the Sinaia plates, never anything relating to aqva, apa.
    Interestingly in the texts, the form for the supreme god of the Dacians is Zamolxo.
    Of course the language on the tablets is supposed to be be the central dialect of the 1st century AD state, so it would have evolved somewhat from the 270 BC dialects. I did however change some of the text files in RB 1.2 to use what I have managed to translate using Romalo's book.

  30. #90
    Like the Parthian Boot Member Elmetiacos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    The Forests of Roestoc
    Posts
    1,770

    Default Re: Linguistics discussion (split from new factions thread)

    The consensus is that the Sinaia plates are forgeries, and I have to agree with that. Apart from the language being strange, and there being what seems to be a fully developed logographic writing system appearing out of nowhere (with what look like modern mathematical signs accompanying them?) The heads look as if copied straight from the Turda coins and the little robed people stuck in the middle of the writing look more like something taken from the Aztec or Maya Codices than anything from the time and place they are supposed to belong to.
    'you owe it to that famous chick general whose name starts with a B'
    OILAM TREBOPALA INDI PORCOM LAEBO INDI INTAM PECINAM ELMETIACUI

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO