Ancient organized crime

[J.Alco]

I'm back! After a lengthy absence I am SO back! Merry christmas all!

OK, now that's done, onto a historical question that's got my curiosity piqued.

I recently re-watched the Rome series (which coincidentally is awesome and I wholeheartedly recommend it to anyone interested) and was struck by how they presented organized crime in ancient Rome as being (aside from the ranks, some organisational details, numbers and general brutality) virtually indistinguishable from the modern-day camorra.

So my question is, was this a decision of the series creators to dramatize and make more accessible this part of the series, or was crime in large ancient cities, such as Rome or Carthage or Athens, actually that well organized?

To me, personally, it makes sense that criminals, even 2000-plus years ago, would organize themselves into large, even somewhat complex gangs, though of course nowhere near the level you can expect nowadays. But, as everyone who has gone into EB knows well, what makes sense to you isn't necessarily what made sense then, seeing as we have the benefit of hindsight now, whereas before that benefit was non-existent.

Anybody got any thoughts?

[ironanvil1]

The accuracy of exact details of the depiction in the series are hard to judge but I'd think the broad outline is reasonable.
It would seem likely that in a city famed for the application of organisational skills someone would come up with the basic principles of organised crime.

The series might have struck the nail on the head with ex-Legionaries taking up crime, a group of men used to casual violence, inured to discipline and aware of the benefits of organisation could very easily transfer their skills to "private enterprise" if they didn't fancy being farmers.

In the struggles around the end of the Republic various factions used street gangs as "muscle", which implies a degree of organisation was in place to make them worthwhile as tools.
The gap between crime and politics was pretty thin at times in Rome.

While not the EB time-frame IIRC the chariot factions of Byzantine times seem to have been organised crime to a degree, though again the overlap of crime and politics is pretty big. The chariot teams of Rome could similarly have been the nucleus of crime gangs, you have races, you will get gambling.

[Asmodius]

As Iron mentioned organized crime and politics were hand in hand for much of late Republican Rome. Caudius was especially notorius for using these syndicates to pollute the collegia. (I can look this up in more depth asap...damn friends who borrow books n dont bring em back). Going to the senate could be very risky for some. Cicero began wearing a breastplate under his toga, and others would go nowhere without thier personal small army/guard force.

however studies like the book/essays, Organized Crime in Antiquity, show thier was little organized crime in Athens and Rome beyond this except for periods of government formation/reformation. IMO this is more due to a lack of evidence to the contrary. Its not the kind of thing they would want to glorify/write down. As the book basically says organized crime breeds best where the rich/poor gap is largest (common sense of course)....sounds like Rome to me.

Of course many of the island "kingdoms" were nothing but organized piracy groups. So in that aspect organized crime was prevalent. Rome's piracy wars were in effect a battle against organized crime.

[Dayve]

Well if you want to get right into it i mean... the entire structure of the Roman government was practically a criminal organization. Perhaps not always but absolutely around the time of Caesar the Roman government was in itself a very large criminal organization.

You had the guys at the top, the senate, the soldiers doing their dirty work and intimidating (even killing) their political opponents and foreign opponents, and extorting unreasonable amounts of money from basically everybody in their empire upon threat of violence or worse.

If you want to look at it that way then the Roman government, especially at the time of Caesar, WAS a criminal organization in its rawest and most literal sense.

If you want to look for smaller groups within the city of Rome then yeah, it stands to reason and logic that of course there would be smaller groups of organized criminals, most of them probably funded by one politician or another so he could use them to intimidate and/or kill his opponents.

You think men who have been in the army since they reached the age of adulthood and have known nothing but violence and death for decades and decades can just one day go home and plow a field or keep a shop? i very much doubt it.

[satalexton]

VERY WELL SAID, them romaioi barbaroi!

[SwissBarbar]

Well if you want to get right into it i mean... the entire structure of the Roman government was practically a criminal organization. Perhaps not always but absolutely around the time of Caesar the Roman government was in itself a very large criminal organization.

You had the guys at the top, the senate, the soldiers doing their dirty work and intimidating (even killing) their political opponents and foreign opponents, and extorting unreasonable amounts of money from basically everybody in their empire upon threat of violence or worse.

If you want to look at it that way then the Roman government, especially at the time of Caesar, WAS a criminal organization in its rawest and most literal sense.

If you want to look for smaller groups within the city of Rome then yeah, it stands to reason and logic that of course there would be smaller groups of organized criminals, most of them probably funded by one politician or another so he could use them to intimidate and/or kill his opponents.

You think men who have been in the army since they reached the age of adulthood and have known nothing but violence and death for decades and decades can just one day go home and plow a field or keep a shop? i very much doubt it.

Which still is the case in Italy