One might think "examining the facts" is the purpose of the trial.
You make your decision, then explain why you decided so in the opinion. Beginning to write your opinion and then making your decision seems a bit backwards.
Re: NFIB vs Sebelius
One might think "examining the facts" is the purpose of the trial.
You make your decision, then explain why you decided so in the opinion. Beginning to write your opinion and then making your decision seems a bit backwards.
"Most of the harm in the world is done by good people, and not by accident, lapse, or omission. It is the result of their deliberate actions, long persevered in, which they hold to be motivated by high ideals toward virtuous ends... ...when millions are slaughtered, when torture is practiced, starvation enforced, oppression made a policy, as at present over a large part of the world, and as it has often been in the past, it must be at the behest of very many good people, and even by their direct action, for what they consider a worthy object."
-Isabel Paterson (The God of the Machine)
Re: NFIB vs Sebelius
Its very common to have an epiphany in the middle of a serious piece of writing that causes you to change your perspective.Originally Posted by Xiahou
"The mind commands the body, and instantly it obeys. The mind commands itself, and meets resistance."
~St. Thomas Aquinas
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks