Askthepizzaguy Mafia III [Concluded]

[Askthepizzaguy]

Askthepizzaguy Mafia III

Game rules:

You all receive the same standard townie role PM, unless you're a gangster. Therefore, quoting your role PM is pointless.

Screenshots are not allowed and also pointless.

Each Day cycle, you will discuss and vote, if you wish, by placing a wager, like so:

Wager: 10 chips on Askthepizzaguy

If you wish to remove your wager, you must FOLD, so please do so like this:

Fold: Askthepizzaguy

Only then may you place another wager. Otherwise, your new wager is illegal and won't be counted.

You may wager on only one lynch candidate at a time. The candidate with the most total chips wagered on them will be lynched.

In the event of a tie, I will personally ensure that a townie dies. You cannot lynch mobsters with tied votes, period.

Even if you happened to lynch two mobsters with a tied vote, I'd shoot a townie instead and both gangsters will live.

(So if you know what's good for you, DO NOT CREATE TIED VOTES. Note: This part isn't a rule, just sound advice.)

You will lose your wager if the candidate is not lynched.

You will lose your wager if the candidate is lynched and was a townie.

You will have your wager returned to you in full, if the lynchee was a mobster and you wagered on them to die.

Each round, there is a betting limit. Betting above that limit will not count.

It is legal to bluff when you are wagering, by placing wagers above the amount of chips that you have remaining. However, it should be noted that such wagers are completely null and void.

What that means is that, if you wager more than your total number of chips remaining, that wager is completely meaningless and has no actual effect whatsoever, not on the tally, and not on your personal finances at the end of the round. You have been warned.

You all begin with 100 chips and there is no way to gain more chips than the ones you begin with.

In the event any player has zero chips remaining at the end of a round, and have no chips returned to them, they die.

In the event that the remaining mobsters have more total chips than the remainder of the town side, they win. Doesn't matter how many of you are left. They can out-bet you every round and therefore, they can outvote you and prevent all lynches. That's GAME OVER.

If you fail to post during the game for two straight voting Days, you'll be replaced by Visorslash.

Day One begins now, and ends after everyone who signed up has posted at least once.
That makes the first round rather open-ended.

Enjoy your complimentary slice of pizza.


Valued Guests remaining: (20/20)

edse
rickinator9
Chaotix
Gaius Scribonius Curio
Montmorency
BSmith
autolycus
Ishmael
johnhughthom
Makrell
Riedquat
White_eyes:D
Ferret
Darth Feather
Jarema
classical hero
TheLastDays
LazyMcCrow
Zack
Ironside


Reserve Player: Visorslash

[Askthepizzaguy]

ROUND ONE BETTING LIMIT: 10 chips.

[TheLastDays]

Alright, Chaotix, JHT, let's do this! Any thoughts on who to kill tonight?

EDIT: This isn't the Mafia QT?

Wager: 10 chips on Ferret - I don't like ferrets

[Visor]

Wager: 1 chip on TLD

I haven't even got a role PM.

EDIT: unbolded to not confuse tally.

[Montmorency]

Vote: Visorslash 10 credits

It is against your interests to bet so low, if you are town.

[TheLastDays]

Wager: 1 chip on TLD

I haven't even got a role PM.

How scummy

[Ishmael]

I haven't really thought about vote weighting strategy for this game, but hopefully I'll work things out as I go along. In the interim I think I'll hoard my chips.

Wager: 1 chip on Ferret

It occurs to me, though, that creating ties might actually be a really good idea, since it can give you information on the alignment of more than one person at once. For example, if a player were to survive a couple of tied votes he'd be rather suspicious. If you tie him in a third lynch and he still survived you could flat-out lynch him with a fair degree of confidence, whilst if a random third party died you know you've caught two scum. It would probably be a bit tricky logistically though, and later on bluff votes could throw a spanner in the works. Still, something to consider.

[edse]

Wager 10 chips on Visorslash He didn't even sign up for this.

[Askthepizzaguy]

Wager 10 chips on Visorslash He didn't even sign up for this.

Unfortunately he did, and I completely missed it. I have to stick him as a reserve player and offer my most profuse apologies.

Visorslash is not an active player due to game host screw up.

[Askthepizzaguy]

While not betting is legal in this game, I'll put in an inactivity rule.

If you fail to post during the game for two straight voting Days, you'll be replaced by Visorslash.

[Montmorency]

Unvote; Vote: Ishmael 10 chips

You brought it upon yourself, Fugazy.

[Askthepizzaguy]

I could be a total jerk mod and insist upon Wager and Fold, but I know you're going to all forget no matter how many times I try to enforce the flavorful wording difference, so yes I will count Vote and Unvote as legal formats for wagering and folding.

I guess I'm feeling conciliatory due to recent muck-ups, but I wouldn't press your luck.

[Makrell]

BAHAHA i will hoard all my chips, even though i realise it will make me a likely kill target for the mafia.


i just realised i would look really scumy if not killed tonight, but but now that i have indeed said so, all blame will disapear.

[Darth Feather]

BAHAHA i will hoard all my chips, even though i realise it will make me a likely kill target for the mafia.


i just realised i would look really scumy if not killed tonight, but but now that i have indeed said so, all blame will disapear.

Your WIFOM confuses me. Wager 5 chips on Makrell Also Ishmael, tying is bad. If we put one person over the top, he will die, scum or not. We can still kill the other one next round. We have a 50 percent chance of lynching the scum (if one of them would actually be scum) If we don't push someone over the top we have a 0 percent chance of lynching the scum. The only way how I see ties can benefit town is if both tied persons are scum and someone else dies. I am sure though the scumbags will never let that happen; so tying is BAD. (hope this made sense )

[Jarema]

wager: 1 chip on Darth Feather.

I do not want to spent too much at day 1

[Ishmael]

Your WIFOM confuses me. Wager 5 chips on Makrell Also Ishmael, tying is bad. If we put one person over the top, he will die, scum or not. We can still kill the other one next round. We have a 50 percent chance of lynching the scum (if one of them would actually be scum) If we don't push someone over the top we have a 0 percent chance of lynching the scum. The only way how I see ties can benefit town is if both tied persons are scum and someone else dies. I am sure though the scumbags will never let that happen; so tying is BAD. (hope this made sense )

My argument is that in the case of a tie, the person who survives should be placed in another tied vote the next day. If they survive that, it's probably reasonable grounds to lynch them (or at least tie them for a third day to be sure). That said, the more I think about it the more I realise it would most likely be impossible to arrange consistently. Never mind.

[Darth Feather]

wager: 1 chip on Darth Feather.

I do not want to spent too much at day 1

If Makrell was not so WIFOMmy, I would vote you for grammatical crimes (just kidding, my english is probably worse than yours )

[Chaotix]

Visorslash is the new Ironside, it seems. That's what you get for not writing down the sign-ups as they come in, Mr. Pizza.

Speaking of Ironside...

Wager One Thousand Million chips on Ironside

[Jarema]

If Makrell was not so WIFOMmy, I would vote you for grammatical crimes (just kidding, my english is probably worse than yours )

grrr
wager: 12 chips on Farth Deader.

[Ferret]

Wager: 10 chips on Chaotix

People that rich are always evil.

[Zack]

I'm saving my monies for a generous tip to the waiting staff.

[White_eyes:D]

Time to put on my serious poker face.

Vote: 15 chips on Jarema

[Jarema]

Time to put on my serious poker face.

Vote: 15 chips on Jarema

lol

why do you bet so much on me? it does not seem rational...

[Ferret]

Especially as we're only allowed to bet a maximum of 10...

[Ironside]

Visorslash is the new Ironside, it seems. That's what you get for not writing down the sign-ups as they come in, Mr. Pizza.

Speaking of Ironside...

Wager One Thousand Million chips on Ironside

You rich people and all your money. Us poor ones can barely afford anything.

Wager 1,00 chip on Chaotix

Stupid rules about not being able to cut up those chips into smaller pieces.

[TheLastDays]

Fold

[White_eyes:D]

Especially as we're only allowed to bet a maximum of 10...

Awww...this doesn't feel like real gambling in the slightest then...

Unvote:15 chips on Jamera Vote:10 chips on Jamera

[Chaotix]

You rich people and all your money. Us poor ones can barely afford anything.

Wager 1,00 chip on Chaotix

Stupid rules about not being able to cut up those chips into smaller pieces.

Wait a minute now.

Your European currency rules are confusing me.

Is that one chip or one hundred chips? Or possibly one thousand chips and you just forgot the third zero?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Europeans use the comma in the same way that Americans use the period, and vice-versa?

[Gaius Scribonius Curio]

Wager: 7 on Makrell

Because perhaps illogical numbers will best the system..?

[johnhughthom]

I don't wager, I bet.

Bet 10: GSC

Seven is a perfectly logical number. Especially for dwarves.