I thought this was common knowledge, but here you go - from a law enforcement periodical no less. No one who could be a microbiologist goes into law enforcement, at least not at the beat cop level.
So... pretty much the same standards as Wal-Mart. The only thing separating the police and the criminals they pursue is a badge, at least socioeconomically.Compare these standards with the educational requirements of a typical police officer: a high school diploma or GED, followed by less than six months of academy training and several months of field training at the expense of the police department. Until we raise these requirements, many will refuse to see policing as a profession.
Low educational requirements not only diminish the prestige of policing but also prevent police from meeting the high expectations of the people who invest heavily in each police officer position. In California, salary and benefit costs can easily exceed $130,000 per officer per year. At this rate, many taxpayers and elected officials expect officers to have more than just high school diplomas. And they also expect much more from the police departments that employ them.
Stop... Just stop. This is the kind of unwarranted veneration that has allowed the police to run roughshod over local administrations across the nation. Chicago cannot make important infrastructure investments for the future because it's stuck in a seemingly never ending pension quagmire, largely driven by the voracious appetite of the local police union and city politicians that do not dare challenge these everyday heroes. Heroes, by the way, that routinely torture random people to close cases.Originally Posted by ReluctantSamurai
The police are paid for the risk involved in their work, and paid handsomely. We owe them nothing more, not a higher level of respect than afforded any other government worker and not the benefit of the doubt.
Bookmarks