Cloning

[Montmorency]

The "physical is composed exclusively of what we can sense with our sense organs, therefore to propose that there is nothing beyond the "physical" is to propose there is nothing beyond our senses.

Since we can only test with out senses it's impossible to argue one way or another.

Naive. If this were strictly true, then it would immediately lead into solipsism.

"Physical" is simply 'all that exists, and all that can exist'.

If you don't like that appropriation, then we can instead speak of Reality.

So, would you rather call me a Physicalist, or a Realist?

[Papewaio]

To say our senses define what is real is a step too far.

With that statement if I see someone they are real. When they go out of sight they cease to exist. Not only is there no God as you cannot sense him, the rest of the universe and people cease to exist every time you blink your eyes.

[Montmorency]

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Totally tangential, but I didn't want to post it without a source, and with a source it just wouldn't be appropriate for the Babe Thread.

[Gilrandir]

According to the bible, Adam was unique to all humanity. He was directly created by God. He had no mother (so no, probably no navel), and since being directly created of God was a son of God. There are many sons of God. Angels are sons of God.

Being created (manufactured) =/= being someone's child. Robots aren't the children of their designers. By your logics all animals are God's children as well.