Naive. If this were strictly true, then it would immediately lead into solipsism.The "physical is composed exclusively of what we can sense with our sense organs, therefore to propose that there is nothing beyond the "physical" is to propose there is nothing beyond our senses.
Since we can only test with out senses it's impossible to argue one way or another.
"Physical" is simply 'all that exists, and all that can exist'.
If you don't like that appropriation, then we can instead speak of Reality.
So, would you rather call me a Physicalist, or a Realist?
Bookmarks