From the official statement by ISIS on the Brussels attacks:
"First we want to make it clear to all that what makes the kafir’s blood permissiable to spill is not him fighting the Muslims, rather it is his “KUFR” that necessitates his killing. So if one asks, can you kill a Kafir (who does not fight Islamand muslims)? the answer is a big YES."
In other words, nothing that we do or don't do will affect whether or not we will be targeted. Even if we do nothing whatsoever to upset Muslims and the middle eastern countries, the fact that we are "other" means we are legitimate targets for killing.
http://heavy.com/news/2016/03/offici...h-translation/
I remember coming across as Islam as being "Submission before God/Allah", meant in a similar manner that a Christian is theologically submissive to God/Jesus.
A quick google search confirmed this. even one aptly named "Submission.org" which describes it as the following:
So Fragony is correct that "Islam" means "Submission" in this context However, the key word is Context. It does not mean that the role or goal of islam is to go out and make everyone submit (becoming Muslim) as what is being implied, but it named after the religious stance that the followers of Islam submit to the will of God/Allah.Submission or Islam in the Arabic language is a meaning or a description rather than a name or a title. It describes the state of mind of anyone who recognizes God’s absolute authority, and reaches a conviction that God alone possesses all power; no other entity possesses any power or control independent of Him. The logical consequence of such a realization is to devote one’s life and one’s worship absolutely to God alone.
So, Submission (or Islam in Arabic language) is a spiritual state of mind and not a title of a religion that belongs to a specific group of people. ANYONE who submits and worships one God without idolizing other entities is a Submitter by definition (Muslim in Arabic language).
This state of mind basically conforms with God’s one and only message He delivered to man-kind through all of His messengers since Noah; worship God alone and avoid idolatry. Based on that, one can safely conclude that the message of Islam or Submission has been in existence way before the time of prophet Muhammad and way before Quran. All God’s messengers, since Noah, devoted their lives and worship to God alone and were Submitters to Him alone.
As for the Peace, a Q&A website makes note of the following:
The Arabic word salaam (سلام) ("Peace") has the same root as the word Islam. One Islamic interpretation is that individual personal peace is attained by utterly submitting to Allah.
As in other Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Judaism, etc.), peace is a basic concept in Islamic thought.
The greeting "Salaam alaykum", favoured by Muslims, has the literal meaning "Peace be upon you". Muhammad is reported to have said once: "Not one of you believes until he loves for his brother what he loves for himself." (Great Muslim scholars have said that the words ‘his brother’ mean any person irrespective of faith.)
Last edited by Beskar; 03-23-2016 at 19:41.
Days since the Apocalypse began
"We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
"Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."
It says that the relations with the kufar begin with the default position of it being permissible, nay necessary, to kill us, not for what we've done, but for what we are. There may be various modifiers to this, but if in doubt, kill. And perhaps it would be a good idea to pay attention to what they say, since they're the ones acting and all.
Not forbidding and demanding, bit of a difference
A group that claims all Muslims as part of its nation, which a fair number of our residents agree with, says that kufar should be killed by virtue of our being kufar. There is no political goal in terms of defining a location in which we're unfairly intervening, resulting in violence aiming to remove us from our interference in these matters. By their own words, by simply existing, we are already deserving to be killed. I'm not sure why you're looking to downplay this.
If we're going to have this discussion we should bring out the big guns early.
And by big guns i mean informative and or propagandistic videos!
By "caliphate" standards me and every Muslim I know is a heretic. I would be beheaded before you are for being a fake Muslim.
Most of you are a bunch of haters anyway, just forget what I said. Get a life too, and try fixing your problems instead of drumming them up.
And the Chinese emperors claimed to be the rulers of the entire world for the last 2500 thousand years. Didn't affect your or mine ancestors all that much.
A grand total of a few hundred. If I were a betting man, I'd bet more of your residents believe Stonehenge was built by the aliens.which a fair number of our residents agree with,
If that was the case, they'd be trying to kill Bolivians and Mongols as well.says that kufar should be killed by virtue of our being kufar. There is no political goal in terms of defining a location in which we're unfairly intervening, resulting in violence aiming to remove us from our interference in these matters. By their own words, by simply existing, we are already deserving to be killed.
Because I refuse to hold 1.2 billion people responsible for the actions of the few? Because I'd hate if someone held me responsible if a member of my race/religion/nationality did something despicable? Why aren't you equating me with Mladic? He executed unarmed prisoners. I'm a Serb, a Christian, just like him.I'm not sure why you're looking to downplay this.
Because I've seen what fear can do to people? Maybe it is because I would take my family away from the war and I wouldn't want someone to tell my I'm not allowed because of my name or religion. Or it could be that my best friend, who is a Muslim (culturally, in reality he's an atheist) had to give his son a Christian name so that he would actually be allowed on a plane. Because of the very vivid stories of how cruel can people be in the name of their faith or nation? Because I was raised in a very culturally diverse region and seen it work, even under pressure? Just a few days ago, a Hungarian fascist party Jobik tried to open up offices in northern Serbia (or Southern Hungary, just temporarily lost, as they like to refer to it). And who told them to **** off? Local Hungarians. Ah, it was beautiful to watch.
I don't know, really. Probably all of those reasons, and some that didn't come to mind instantly.
Last edited by Sarmatian; 03-23-2016 at 22:39.
Funny, I think you're the third Muslim in a year to tell us all that - we're all haters of Muslims, regardless of what else divides us.
Anyway.
Islam means literally "submission" and in this context it means "submission to God".
This has a couple of implications - firstly it allows Muslims to expand their definition of "Islam" to include those who do not consider themselves Muslim but are monotheists. Historically this has meant Christians and Jews initially, followed by Zorastrians. HOWEVER, the long term goal it not only to bring everyone to a state of Submission, it is also to bring them into a "correct" form of Submission - i.e. to make them Muslims.
Muhammed did this by war - he destroyed idles (as IS has) and he forced people to submit to his interpretation of God's Law (as IS does).
The major difference between IS and the traditional depiction of those first Muslims Conquests is the level of brutality and the fact that monotheists are included among the Kafir.
"If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."
[IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]
"Submission to Divine Will" Not according some French Muslim scholars. I could try to put a link but it is in French, so would be lost. Roughly, the linguist explains that Islam as the same roots that "shalom" or "Salaam".
The "submission to Divine" explanation is favoured by the ones like Tarik Ramadan, grand son of the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, but nothing comes to back-up his claim.
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. Voltaire.
"I've been in few famous last stands, lad, and they're butcher shops. That's what Blouse's leading you into, mark my words. What'll you lot do then? We've had a few scuffles, but that's not war. Think you'll be man enough to stand, when the metal meets the meat?"
"You did, sarge", said Polly." You said you were in few last stands."
"Yeah, lad. But I was holding the metal"
Sergeant Major Jackrum 10th Light Foot Infantery Regiment "Inns-and-Out"
Jobik didn't know its way about such things. They should have started with propaganda among the locals on how oppressed they are culturally and linguistically and how free and much better off economically they would be if they join the Greater Hungary. They should refer to Russia's experience as the most recent paragon of such policies.
Well, acknowleding a Creator Deity as your master ("submitting") is a central tenet of all the Abrahamic religions, and presumably some unrelated religions as well.
Making a point of that Islam has decided to use this concept as the name of the religion seems pretty....odd. If this thread is to have any meaning at all it had better move beyond semantics.
I've never heard it suggested that "Islam" does not literally mean "submission", but I have heard different interpretations of the implications.
Really?
So today's Muslims are uncomfortable proclaiming their submission to God. That almost makes me feel sorry for Muhammed.
"If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."
[IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]
Bookmarks