Results 1 to 30 of 550

Thread: Climate Change Thread

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #22

    Default Re: Climate Change

    Incandescent bulbs have a lot of glass and metal and stuff and animals cut themselves on it. Or, stepping aside from your level of reasoning: http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2..._lca-pt2_0.pdf

    Scroll to the charts and discussion of environmental impacts in Section 7, of filament, CFL, LED 2012, and LED 2017 lamps, across soil, water, and air, from raw materials and manufacturing to disposal and storage.

    For the LED lamp in 2017, the profile is similar to that of the 2012 lamp, however the significance of
    energy is diminished due to the fact that this lamp is considerably more efficacious. For this reason, the
    other impacts are able to gain a slightly higher proportion of the relative impact for each of the fifteen
    categories considered. In this analysis, energy in use represents an average of 78.2% of the impact,
    followed by raw materials at 19.3% and manufacturing at 2.3%. The transportation and disposal of the
    lamp are negligible, at less than 0.2% each.
    And for comparisons between lamps: LED simply does better in every category, including hazardous and non-hazardous landfill.
    Vitiate Man.

    History repeats the old conceits
    The glib replies, the same defeats


    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 


    Member thankful for this post:

    Husar 


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO