Representative Democracy [Concluded]

[Cass_]

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Forum help? Why do I keep getting extra quotes?

[Montmorency]

Can you explain how the bold fits with the rest?

Don't put too much stock on the relationship within-district, I'm saying. One prediction I am willing to make is that scum don't want static groupings, whether or not they can push for groupings that highlight their targets. Static groupings, perhaps in a way that your thoughts foreshadow, are more difficult for scums to move in and pocket in than the larger mass of players.

If we get redistributed we re-elect the person we want to either represent our, or justify their own, vote?

I don't think a gameplan is helpful right now, but by all means compile a list of possibilities that we can refer to later.

I'm getting the impression you're leaning towards playing independently with the setup as an additional piece if the puzzle?

Yeah


EVIL
EVIL

[Zack]

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Forum help? Why do I keep getting extra quotes?

think you have to go advanced to clear multi-quotes

[Dp101]

Ok, someone else be chancellor since it is obvious that my plan is bad.

[Visor]

Who'd you bribe to get that role?

I gave Pizza a double stuffed crust

Also this mechanics talk, whilst great

is distracting from actual gameplay

No point worrying about reordering districts or chancellor or whatever

we have to work with what we have for this lynch right?

Worry about it in the next day phase, right now we need information on players in this game before we even decide about restructuring

so lets start doing that first

[Montmorency]

So you're also for the 'put all the possi/consensus-scummies' in one District?



Why privately?

Well, obviously they can do so publicly, but privately fits better with the theme and gives more personal weight to the positions than merely vote channels. Allows them to plan for future districting, to exchange favors.

You would probably need to permit more representatives, that I give you. A game with many players like in the old days, 30, 40, 50 - that would be a real run. Proper elite networking, though not necessarily PR networking.

[Montmorency]

My EVIL EVIL remark was directed at Visor, but his quote disappeared from my post.

VISOR IS EVIL

[Montmorency]

Vote: Visor

Elect and lynch, or reject and lynch. Either way he must be purged.

[Visor]

I'm a fan of the mindless push monty, but you might want to give a reason for it at some stage

[Montmorency]

I don't think straightforward is a word I would have ever used to descibe his play in that game lol

Go on.

[Zack]

I gave Pizza a double stuffed crust

Also this mechanics talk, whilst great

is distracting from actual gameplay

No point worrying about reordering districts or chancellor or whatever

we have to work with what we have for this lynch right?

Worry about it in the next day phase, right now we need information on players in this game before we even decide about restructuring

so lets start doing that first

also this

[Montmorency]

I'm a fan of the mindless push monty, but you might want to give a reason for it at some stage

You claim and run. You can't run.

And I would have followed you, my brother, my partner, my don.

[Zack]

Go on.

no it's irrelevant

[Renata]

Hey folks. Just checking in during some pre-Christmas cleaning. Given that I only know Dp here, I don't have much to offer at this point other than my initial reactions. The push to get Zack seemed to pick up a lot of steam very quickly. That could simply be his personality, we have some very good townies on my board as well, but it still strikes me as somewhat odd. I do find Cass' take on it to be more reassuring. Given the format of this game, the person in charge of setting districts has the capacity to either greatly hurt or greatly help town, and I'm more interested in someone who is going to take a strategic approach to the position rather than use it as a platform to test their own gut feelings on who is scum.

[votes removed]





I think the more groups we have total, the less likely we are to have Scum in control of a majority of them. Seven sounds like a safer play for town.

Hi Jabbz! vote: Jabbz

For an innocuous "here's the state of the game, yup" intro.

[Montmorency]

no it's irrelevant

Write me a letter.

[Zack]

You claim and run. You can't run.

And I would have followed you, my brother, my partner, my don.

???

[Renata]

I gave Pizza a double stuffed crust

Also this mechanics talk, whilst great

is distracting from actual gameplay

No point worrying about reordering districts or chancellor or whatever

we have to work with what we have for this lynch right?

Worry about it in the next day phase, right now we need information on players in this game before we even decide about restructuring

so lets start doing that first

:state:

Yes, sir, mr townie sir.

[Renata]

Emoticon fail.

[Montmorency]

???

He claims double vote, and leaves it hanging.

[Visor]

Hi Jabbz! vote: Jabbz

For an innocuous "here's the state of the game, yup" intro.

i like this because its what i thought about the post

i want to give him some time though, see where he goes from there yet

could just be a style clash

[Visor]

He claims double vote, and leaves it hanging.

What do you want me to say about it?

[Zack]

He claims double vote, and leaves it hanging.

he claimed a double vote if he is elected representative then pushed people to vote him representative

how in the fuck is that "claim and run" ?

[Zack]

why would that even be a wolfy thing to do?

[Montmorency]

What do you want me to say about it?

Everything you can. Starting with why you would claim it.

[Visor]

Everything you can. Starting with why you would claim it.

so I can get voted into a position to use my power?

[Zack]

he literally claimed why simultaneous with the claim

[Winston Hughes]

Hardclaim: Liar

[Montmorency]

he literally claimed why simultaneous with the claim

That's exactly why it's evil and makes no sense ffs

[Visor]

Vote: Sooh

[Zack]

That's exactly why it's evil and makes no sense ffs