Results 1 to 30 of 140

Thread: Do you want Germany to raise military expenses?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Humanist Senior Member Franconicus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Trying to get to Utopia
    Posts
    3,482

    Default Do you want Germany to raise military expenses?

    The new US governments demands that the other members of the NATO raise their military expenses to 2 per cent of their GDP. And those already agreed. This means, that the richer countries will increase their armed forces drastically. For example, Germany currently pays about 1.2 per cent of the GDP. So Germany would have to increase the budget by 66 per cent.
    Is this really a desirable goal?

  2. #2
    Horse Archer Senior Member Sarmatian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Novi Sad, Serbia
    Posts
    4,315

    Default Re: Do you want Germany to raise military expenses?

    Speaking as a European, whenever Germany raises military budget, things get ugly.

    Put me down for a no.

    Members thankful for this post (2):



  3. #3

    Default Re: Do you want Germany to raise military expenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarmatian View Post
    Speaking as a European, whenever Germany raises military budget, things get ugly.

    Put me down for a no.
    An endless source of mirth.

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    Vitiate Man.

    History repeats the old conceits
    The glib replies, the same defeats


    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 


    Members thankful for this post (4):



  4. #4
    Shadow Senior Member Kagemusha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Helsinki,Finland
    Posts
    9,595

    Default Re: Do you want Germany to raise military expenses?

    Combined military spending of NATO members is in the neighbourhood of 892 Bn $. Global military spending is about 1.2 trillion $. So NATO combined is spending more then twice the rest of the non NATO world is spending together. Just for the reference.
    Ja Mata Tosainu Sama.

    Member thankful for this post:

    Husar 


  5. #5
    Humanist Senior Member Franconicus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Trying to get to Utopia
    Posts
    3,482

    Default Re: Do you want Germany to raise military expenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kagemusha View Post
    Combined military spending of NATO members is in the neighbourhood of 892 Bn $. Global military spending is about 1.2 trillion $. So NATO combined is spending more then twice the rest of the non NATO world is spending together. Just for the reference.
    These are interesting numbers. Although you can hardly compare the cost of 500,000 soldiers in Europe with those in China.

    Member thankful for this post:

    Husar 


  6. #6
    Shadow Senior Member Kagemusha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Helsinki,Finland
    Posts
    9,595

    Default Re: Do you want Germany to raise military expenses?

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List...y_expenditures

    Of course personnel are cheaper in China similarly to for example manufactoring personnel in China compared to West. Also conscription is source for cheap military personnel, but military hardware for example have comparable prizes, because of global market. Quality is another factor. Nevertheles
    whether if Western military spending is efficient is a question that should be thoroughly examined.
    Ja Mata Tosainu Sama.

  7. #7
    Voluntary Suspension Voluntary Suspension Philippus Flavius Homovallumus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Isca
    Posts
    13,477

    Default Re: Do you want Germany to raise military expenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by Montmorency View Post
    An endless source of mirth.

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    I feel like we should be the drunken angry uncle in this scenario, not the oldest kid storming out of the house.

    In answer to your question -

    Yes, increase your military spending by 66%, it will cause us to increase our military spending by 33%.

    Nothing makes the Royal Navy grow like the growth of the German army.
    "If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."

    [IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]

  8. #8

    Default Re: Do you want Germany to raise military expenses?

    I feel like we should be the drunken angry uncle in this scenario
    My interpretation is 'German + French = English'.
    Last edited by Montmorency; 04-04-2017 at 00:37.
    Vitiate Man.

    History repeats the old conceits
    The glib replies, the same defeats


    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 



  9. #9
    Voluntary Suspension Voluntary Suspension Philippus Flavius Homovallumus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Isca
    Posts
    13,477

    Default Re: Do you want Germany to raise military expenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by Montmorency View Post
    My interpretation is 'German + French = English'.
    But that's not England, it's the UK.
    "If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."

    [IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]

  10. #10
    Horse Archer Senior Member Sarmatian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Novi Sad, Serbia
    Posts
    4,315

    Default Re: Do you want Germany to raise military expenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by Philippus Flavius Homovallumus View Post

    Yes, increase your military spending by 66%, it will cause us to increase our military spending by 33%.

    Nothing makes the Royal Navy grow like the growth of the German army.
    Now if France would just ally Russia and Austria would send a high profile politician for assassination, we're halfway there.

    Members thankful for this post (2):



  11. #11
    Senior Member Senior Member Brenus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Wokingham
    Posts
    3,523

    Default Re: Do you want Germany to raise military expenses?

    Being part of the first generation of French NOT having to pack to fight the invading Germans (or assimilate) for 150 years (around) I quite happy the Germany NOT to invest in weapons and military thank you...
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. Voltaire.

    "I've been in few famous last stands, lad, and they're butcher shops. That's what Blouse's leading you into, mark my words. What'll you lot do then? We've had a few scuffles, but that's not war. Think you'll be man enough to stand, when the metal meets the meat?"
    "You did, sarge", said Polly." You said you were in few last stands."
    "Yeah, lad. But I was holding the metal"
    Sergeant Major Jackrum 10th Light Foot Infantery Regiment "Inns-and-Out"

    Member thankful for this post:



  12. #12
    Praefectus Fabrum Senior Member Anime BlackJack Champion, Flash Poker Champion, Word Up Champion, Shape Game Champion, Snake Shooter Champion, Fishwater Challenge Champion, Rocket Racer MX Champion, Jukebox Hero Champion, My House Is Bigger Than Your House Champion, Funky Pong Champion, Cutie Quake Champion, Fling The Cow Champion, Tiger Punch Champion, Virus Champion, Solitaire Champion, Worm Race Champion, Rope Walker Champion, Penguin Pass Champion, Skate Park Champion, Watch Out Champion, Lawn Pac Champion, Weapons Of Mass Destruction Champion, Skate Boarder Champion, Lane Bowling Champion, Bugz Champion, Makai Grand Prix 2 Champion, White Van Man Champion, Parachute Panic Champion, BlackJack Champion, Stans Ski Jumping Champion, Smaugs Treasure Champion, Sofa Longjump Champion Seamus Fermanagh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Latibulm mali regis in muris.
    Posts
    11,450

    Default Re: Do you want Germany to raise military expenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by Franconicus View Post
    The new US governments demands that the other members of the NATO raise their military expenses to 2 per cent of their GDP. And those already agreed. This means, that the richer countries will increase their armed forces drastically. For example, Germany currently pays about 1.2 per cent of the GDP. So Germany would have to increase the budget by 66 per cent.
    Is this really a desirable goal?
    I would be happy to see them do so, and for at least one other NATO partner to take up more of the strategic logistics load.
    "The only way that has ever been discovered to have a lot of people cooperate together voluntarily is through the free market. And that's why it's so essential to preserving individual freedom.” -- Milton Friedman

    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -- H. L. Mencken

    Member thankful for this post:

    Xiahou 


  13. #13
    Humanist Senior Member Franconicus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Trying to get to Utopia
    Posts
    3,482

    Default Re: Do you want Germany to raise military expenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by Seamus Fermanagh View Post
    I would be happy to see them do so, and for at least one other NATO partner to take up more of the strategic logistics load.
    Could you define "strategic logistic load"?

    Although I see that the NATO has to react to the Russian policy I wonder what shall be done with all that money. NATO is (or should be) still a defensive pact, so what enemy is there that we cannot handle with.

    Raising the expenses for guns would lead to new arm races, but what would be the benefit of having more soldiers. I even do not understand why the US increases their expenses.

  14. #14

    Default Re: Do you want Germany to raise military expenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by Seamus Fermanagh View Post
    I would be happy to see them do so, and for at least one other NATO partner to take up more of the strategic logistics load.
    I would take you to mean the capacity for significant and sustained force projection.
    The U.S.A. is perhaps not the only NATO power with this interest, but with European defence in mind, it has the longest and likely most complex chain to manage.
    I would assume the rest simply think they will cobble together whatever is needed (if it is ever needed).
    If we view NATO's mission as world police, not European defence, then this becomes more important; who, besides the US takes this view?
    Ja-mata TosaInu

  15. #15
    Praefectus Fabrum Senior Member Anime BlackJack Champion, Flash Poker Champion, Word Up Champion, Shape Game Champion, Snake Shooter Champion, Fishwater Challenge Champion, Rocket Racer MX Champion, Jukebox Hero Champion, My House Is Bigger Than Your House Champion, Funky Pong Champion, Cutie Quake Champion, Fling The Cow Champion, Tiger Punch Champion, Virus Champion, Solitaire Champion, Worm Race Champion, Rope Walker Champion, Penguin Pass Champion, Skate Park Champion, Watch Out Champion, Lawn Pac Champion, Weapons Of Mass Destruction Champion, Skate Boarder Champion, Lane Bowling Champion, Bugz Champion, Makai Grand Prix 2 Champion, White Van Man Champion, Parachute Panic Champion, BlackJack Champion, Stans Ski Jumping Champion, Smaugs Treasure Champion, Sofa Longjump Champion Seamus Fermanagh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Latibulm mali regis in muris.
    Posts
    11,450

    Default Re: Do you want Germany to raise military expenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by HopAlongBunny View Post
    I would take you to mean the capacity for significant and sustained force projection.
    The U.S.A. is perhaps not the only NATO power with this interest, but with European defence in mind, it has the longest and likely most complex chain to manage.
    I would assume the rest simply think they will cobble together whatever is needed (if it is ever needed).
    If we view NATO's mission as world police, not European defence, then this becomes more important; who, besides the US takes this view?
    Not quite as "world police," hopper.


    But, the scope of NATO's original mission has changed, though the mission remains.

    When NATO was founded, and up through the early 1980s, ALL of the logistics for the primary NATO mission involved getting US, UK and other NATO forces in place near the Rhine so as to counterattack, stop, and then roll back Soviet forces who'd been bled by US and mostly German troopers on their way to and through the Fulda gap. The only strategic logistic/mobility component of that was the cross-Atlantic element and the USN and RN had that pretty well covered.

    With the draw down following 1989-1991, NATO cashed in on the absence of a USSR by reducing military expenditures, especially on those components that serve force projection (a function that has become almost a USA only affair at present).


    With a somewhat resurgent Russia now serving again as a strategic opponent (though admittedly less combative and aggressive than the Soviets by far), and with the growth in NATO membership to include former Warsaw Pact states, the "line of defense" for the basic NATO mission is further East by a goodly bit. Moreover, while the Cold War featured little likelihood of the Russians pushing through Turkey or into the Southern Balkans, the chaotic nature of the Middle East at present, and of the Middle East/Central Asian region in general, makes some form of threat to Turkey and/or Greece more likely than before, not less. Again, the need to support deployments in service of NATO's primary mission at a greater distance than envisaged in 1960 is increased.

    Enhancing NATO's ability for such a force projection would make sense. Cobbling Heavy airlift and sealift together is NOT all that easy. I suspect the Germans have the tech and the resources base to ramp up this skill set faster than the other NATO members, as well as the economy best able to absorb that expense.


    This all references the NATO primary mission. If we view NATO as having a role in North Africa or the Levant as a form of "extended defense" zone for protecting its membership, than force projection becomes even more important. Moreover, the ability to project force should enhance whatever deterrent value is to be had.
    "The only way that has ever been discovered to have a lot of people cooperate together voluntarily is through the free market. And that's why it's so essential to preserving individual freedom.” -- Milton Friedman

    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -- H. L. Mencken

  16. #16
    Shadow Senior Member Kagemusha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Helsinki,Finland
    Posts
    9,595

    Default Re: Do you want Germany to raise military expenses?

    Quote Originally Posted by Seamus Fermanagh View Post
    Not quite as "world police," hopper.


    But, the scope of NATO's original mission has changed, though the mission remains.

    When NATO was founded, and up through the early 1980s, ALL of the logistics for the primary NATO mission involved getting US, UK and other NATO forces in place near the Rhine so as to counterattack, stop, and then roll back Soviet forces who'd been bled by US and mostly German troopers on their way to and through the Fulda gap. The only strategic logistic/mobility component of that was the cross-Atlantic element and the USN and RN had that pretty well covered.

    With the draw down following 1989-1991, NATO cashed in on the absence of a USSR by reducing military expenditures, especially on those components that serve force projection (a function that has become almost a USA only affair at present).


    With a somewhat resurgent Russia now serving again as a strategic opponent (though admittedly less combative and aggressive than the Soviets by far), and with the growth in NATO membership to include former Warsaw Pact states, the "line of defense" for the basic NATO mission is further East by a goodly bit. Moreover, while the Cold War featured little likelihood of the Russians pushing through Turkey or into the Southern Balkans, the chaotic nature of the Middle East at present, and of the Middle East/Central Asian region in general, makes some form of threat to Turkey and/or Greece more likely than before, not less. Again, the need to support deployments in service of NATO's primary mission at a greater distance than envisaged in 1960 is increased.

    Enhancing NATO's ability for such a force projection would make sense. Cobbling Heavy airlift and sealift together is NOT all that easy. I suspect the Germans have the tech and the resources base to ramp up this skill set faster than the other NATO members, as well as the economy best able to absorb that expense.


    This all references the NATO primary mission. If we view NATO as having a role in North Africa or the Levant as a form of "extended defense" zone for protecting its membership, than force projection becomes even more important. Moreover, the ability to project force should enhance whatever deterrent value is to be had.
    0,8% of GDP increase to German defense budget would mean 32 Bn $. About two times the defense budget of Israel, or three times Poland´s defense budget.
    Last edited by Kagemusha; 04-04-2017 at 17:19.
    Ja Mata Tosainu Sama.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO