I ignore what you said today about me? I answered literally the only thing you said about me. Further, being unwilling to explain your argument against me makes it seem like a fairly weak argument. I'll do the work though and go back and take a look. I'll be honest, I'm not expecting to find much of note.
Hey guys, I'm back to full access. Pretty tired from traveling so don't expect much of me tonight but I'll fully launch into things tomorrow. Just wanted to quickly clarify something:
It was shortened for the fact that I didn't have enough information to make a decision between auto and Monty (still haven't read most of the posts made on Saturday) to feel confident in being the tiebreaker and thus decided to stay on Jabbz at EOD.
"I'm going to die anyway, and therefore have nothing more to do except deliberately annoy Lemur." -Orb, in the chat
"Lemur. Even if he's innocent, he's a pain; so kill him." -Ignoramus
"I'm going to need to collect all of the rants about the guilty lemur, and put them in a pretty box with ponies and pink bows. Then I'm going to sprinkle sparkly magic dust on the box, and kiss it." -Lemur
Mafia: Promoting peace and love since June 2006
Ok. So it starts here as best as I can tell.
I say
You say
I addressed your vote with this comment. Something you evidently chose to ignore.
You then asked about a list of policy lynch candidates Novice posted in 859, which included myself, Champ, Autolycus and Bsmith.
Novice them responds in the next post by saying he didn't like me anymore as a policy lynch, because of an ISO he did.
Again in the very next post, you promise an ISO, but say your vote stays on me regardless.
Mind you this is three posts in a row.
You never do report on that ISO you claimed you were going to do.
The last thing you post about regarding me is this.
Evidently you find that questionable for me, enough so to vote, but you don't explain why, and you ignore the context that led to those votes.
That is the entirety of your "case" against me. You said I failed to respond, yet I did so. To me it looks like you're either being very lazy, or you are scummy and looking for low hanging fruit. Care to share which it is?
I suppose that you mean this:
So, what was it that made you suddenly see the light, as you appear to imply?
Oh, so you meant that you had not sufficient information and that therefore your vote would stay where it was. Am I correct? (it is me we're talking about so there's an almost overwhelming probability that I am, but still, anyway…) So why did you vote for Jabbz,JennaGeneral?
As for the first question, I hope that he will be able to answer that satisfactorily himself. But as for the second one, I think I had better repeat my earlier remarks to the effect that his behaviour is pathologically cunicular.
good lord| if you're telling the truth you're setting new records for scumminess as a townie -Renata on IM, 16/09/2011
Feles deliberatissimae subiugare humanitiati sunt, et res solae quae eas desinunt canes sunt.
I see I've been sigged yet again -Askthepizzaguy, 02/08/2012
Hindsight is 20/20 Askthepizzaguy, 10/07/2013
It was kind of hard not to notice, and confirming it takes 5 seconds.
But if it makes you feel better, I'll keep my reads on you static and promise not to be affected by any of your posts henceforth in this game.
If I decide to lynch you, it will be for no reason rather than for your content.
wagons, as I said in the post above that you responded to. Want to lynch.
Poison.
If El Barto is looking for an easy case, why hasn't he gone after me?
Could it be that he and GH want to keep their distance from me so as not to be overly stained by my eventual flip?
UUJ@! "_ :UUU :O
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Monty is still a wolf. Not a fan of the auto wagon, I didn't care for it at the time, didn't understand why Csargo was so insistent on it.
Viper being aggressive (but in a fairly shallow way as Jabbz noted earlier) then falling off a cliff, and going into "oh man idk" mode is like, classic Zack in Aspiring Rappers type wolfing. Forgetting the counterclaim is bizarre, as novice pointed out. Csargo is a weird place to be putting all your trust right now, too.
Some pause about the GH has treated Monty. He townread him for awhile for nebulous reasons, a pretty unusual reaction to someone blatantly tunneling you for silly reasons. Yesterday he finally seemed to be turning on Monty, then he didn't even care who was lynched between Monty and Auto (whose case he called "kinda weak").
Almost felt like he was fully aware of the backlash from his last deciding vote and didn't want to repeat.
lol
It's a direct question. If I am necessarily scum, then you can't countenance a scummy GH unless we are partners.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Whatever, I meant loaded. Clearly when I say you're a wolf, I'm omitting the implied I believe...likely, not stating a fact I'm 100% certain of. I'm not saying he's scummy, I'm saying there's stuff that gives me pause.
You are not above bussing a partner all game, and GH has been kinda weird with you.
Vitiate Man.
History repeats the old conceits
The glib replies, the same defeats
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Your strong resistance to the faintest whiff of the notion is noted.
Because I don't think it makes sense for him to tunnel GH for the entire game, almost getting lynched multiple times in the process, only to continue to pursue GH. It doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. It's more likely he's town, genuinely convinced that GH is scum, I think that makes more sense. It may not be the greatest logic, but I think that's the case.
I've had a busy day at work so I haven't thought about this game, but I guess everyone's been sleeping anyway.
Viper, there's no need to get upset at my questioning. I don't see the downside in questioning you for explanations rather than making my own assumptions, and I thought you subscribed to the same philosophy given your day one comments.
Bookmarks