XCOM Mafia [Concluded]

[Montmorency]

It's also worth noting that despite Csargo's jumpy progression on Monty, his stance on me remains rock solid, despite the majority of my time in the thread being engaging with Monty - so you think that would change a bit.

Go ahead and read some of D1 now. Pizza describes Csargo in this game as "turbocharged", and as having either his best town game of all time, or his best scum game of all time.

[GeneralHankerchief]

Go ahead and read some of D1 now. Pizza describes Csargo in this game as "turbocharged", and as having either his best town game of all time, or his best scum game of all time.

I'm not going to read any of the game until the night phase, assuming I live that long. That's just something people are going to have to deal with. What's your actual stance on what I just laid out?

[Csargo]

This is an interesting progression from GH, I wonder what he'll think when he gets the full picture.

[El Barto]

Go ahead and read some of D1 now. Pizza describes Csargo in this game as "turbocharged", and as having either his best town game of all time, or his best scum game of all time.

Note the bolded.

[Logic]

I'm not going to read any of the game until the night phase, assuming I live that long. That's just something people are going to have to deal with. What's your actual stance on what I just laid out?

Now THIS i find a tad on the scummy side.

Why intentionally deprive yourself of information? If you are indeed town, that is all you have to work with. But a scum could easily get a summary from the wolf-chat, and be able to faux-try and point to a post like yours in the event any errors have been made.

Monty, I agree that GH is looking very suspicious.

[Winston Hughes]

Vote: Manasi

[Montmorency]

I'm not going to read any of the game until the night phase, assuming I live that long. That's just something people are going to have to deal with. What's your actual stance on what I just laid out?

I don't think there's any particular jumping around, rather that he didn't have a particular stance on you (in thread). Maybe you could argue his progression on me is thin, but you haven't really seen his progression by your own admission.

[GeneralHankerchief]

Now THIS i find a tad on the scummy side.

Why intentionally deprive yourself of information? If you are indeed town, that is all you have to work with. But a scum could easily get a summary from the wolf-chat, and be able to faux-try and point to a post like yours in the event any errors have been made.

Monty, I agree that GH is looking very suspicious.

Because I have neither the time nor the motivation to go through a thousand posts at the moment.

[Montmorency]

Because I have neither the time nor the motivation to go through a thousand posts at the moment.

Which is fair. I haven't even fully read the second-half of D1 yet.

By the end of D2, this game is shaping to exceed FrenchRev's post count.

[GeneralHankerchief]

I don't think there's any particular jumping around, rather that he didn't have a particular stance on you (in thread). Maybe you could argue his progression on me is thin, but you haven't really seen his progression by your own admission.

All I know is what I've seen, and his first two posts regarding Monty that I quoted above were pretty damn contradictory. At least his later shift on you had a small amount of cover.

[Csargo]

It's also worth noting that despite Csargo's jumpy progression on Monty, his stance on me remains rock solid, despite the majority of my time in the thread being engaging with Monty - so you think that would change a bit.

You have no idea what my thoughts on Monty are, since you have so little information to work with. Just because I liked that one post doesn't mean I have him as town, nor do I have him as scum. There's always another option GH, always. I wanted something from you and I got it, and it's not terribly positive. I can't say I'm impressed with your performance so far, you're all over the place. My Champ gutread was because I had literally nothing to go on except past style, and that doesn't apply to you. Fresh start.

[Logic]

Because I have neither the time nor the motivation to go through a thousand posts at the moment.

Ok, but I think being upfront with your reasoning would be in the beat interest of everyone. Especially the think-skulled players like myself.

[Montmorency]

All I know is what I've seen, and his first two posts regarding Monty that I quoted above were pretty damn contradictory. At least his later shift on you had a small amount of cover.

The first post of his you quoted wasn't a serious endorsement of my alleged position but a jibe wrt to this post, that several others also found funny for whatever reason. So it's perfectly in line with a dismissive attitude toward town Monty from Csargo, if not a belligerent one.

No death means it's very likely someone townie-looking got doctored properly.

Which means I am going to reiterate my point about the top 4 posters not needing to be pushed today.

Also @Sooh, my love, my decision about you today will be based on what you put into it. Pre-emptively deciding you're not going to try looks bad.

Just find townies and find scums. I won't even deluge you with accusations. Have some space. Do your thing.

Then I'll judge.

It's as fair as I can be.

Same with Fredwood. On the chance his behavior is self-focused townie, my advice to him to break our deadlock is to have a better day 2. My feelings are on record, I don't have to reiterate them.

Roleblock, bulletproof, MAFIA HOLSTER

But yeah, maybe.

[GeneralHankerchief]

The first post of his you quoted wasn't a serious endorsement of my alleged position but a jibe wrt to this post, that several others also found funny for whatever reason. So it's perfectly in line with a dismissive attitude toward town Monty from Csargo, if not a belligerent one.

Okay, that makes a little more sense then.

[Csargo]

All I know is what I've seen, and his first two posts regarding Monty that I quoted above were pretty damn contradictory. At least his later shift on you had a small amount of cover.

Does viewing one post in a positive light, greatly change an overall view? I'm not sure what you're arguing, because it doesn't make sense to me.

[GeneralHankerchief]

Does viewing one post in a positive light, greatly change an overall view? I'm not sure what you're arguing, because it doesn't make sense to me.

Before Monty clarified that you were sort of making fun of him/referencing an earlier thing, my impression of your progression on Monty was:

Positive - Negative (very next post) ----time passes----- Monty NAI analysis post - positive

So you see why I didn't like it from my POV.

[Csargo]

Before Monty clarified that you were sort of making fun of him/referencing an earlier thing, my impression of your progression on Monty was:

Positive - Negative (very next post) ----time passes----- Monty NAI analysis post - positive

So you see why I didn't like it from my POV.

You should always question the seriousness of my statements.

[Montmorency]

In this exchange GH slightly towny for appearing not to avail himself of more info to improve his position, but as we saw last game GH is perfectly capable of combining misdirection with indignation, so it doesn't count.

[crimson_snow]

Hi.

Crimson popping in for a bit.

I've read virtually none of D2, will try to fix that over next few hours.

If someone wants to give me a breakdown of things I'll probably use it to get a read on you.

[Askthepizzaguy]

1:35am

burned out pizza.

LolCuth

Vote stays on Novice the obvious scumbag.

Good night all!

[El Barto]

Vote: Manasi

I find it very odd that you suddenly come out to reinforce the Manasi counterwaggon.

[Logic]

There is a very good chance I won't be online again before EOD. I will try to check back and read what others post, but roght now, I am happy with where my vote is.

[El Barto]

Nope.

1. Pizza-novice more important
2. I want Pizza's input.
3. GH should receive the courtesy of being permitted to catch up.

unvote

and then

vote: novice

If anything, we'll force atpg to look at others tomorrow.

[Montmorency]

Official Tally as of #1132

----

Day 2 ends in:

----

3 Manasi (Sooh, El Barto, novice)
3 novice (Askthepizzaguy, Logic, Montmorency)

2 Askthepizzaguy (Cuthillius, Dp101)

1 Sooh (Manasi)

----

Not Voting: BSmith, crimson_snow, Csargo, Fredwood, GeneralHankerchief, Winston Hughes

Not Posting: autolycus

----

If you notice anything wrong, PM me.

Then:

1. GH and Csargo vote each other
2. Winston votes Manasi
3. Barto unvotes Manasi and votes Novice

UPDATED TALLY

----

4 novice (Askthepizzaguy, Logic, Montmorency, Barto)
3 Manasi (Sooh, novice, Winston Hughes)

2 Askthepizzaguy (Cuthillius, Dp101)

1 Sooh (Manasi)
1 GH (Csargo)
1 Csargo (GH)

----

Not Voting: BSmith, crimson_snow, Fredwood

Not Posting: autolycus

----

[Manasi]

Sup y'all.

Glad you decided to join Sooh in the "Let's vote on a villager bc we don't know what else to do" wagon.

Got a sudden urge to cook so I'm in and out of the kitchen for a little bit.

I think the GH outbursts are super towny.

Don't know what to think of Barto's vote/unvote because I think he has been a bit different this game.

[Manasi]

lol at winston coming out of the woodworks to lynch me glgl buddyboi

[El Barto]

Don't know what to think of Barto's vote/unvote because I think he has been a bit different this game.

It's the hair.

[El Barto]

lol at winston coming out of the woodworks to lynch me glgl buddyboi

Yes! That was an interesting intervention by him. He had never posted anything related to you or to novice (either to justify lynching you for yourself or as a byproduct of saving novice whom he'd be townreading). He's only made sociable posts. Even my Day One posts have had more game-related content than his. But the clearness of his vote belies his claimed drunkenness/hangover.

[Montmorency]

Yes! That was an interesting intervention by him. He had never posted anything related to you or to novice (either to justify lynching you for yourself or as a byproduct of saving novice whom he'd be townreading). He's only made sociable posts. Even my Day One posts have had more game-related content than his. But the clearness of his vote belies his claimed drunkenness/hangover.

I wouldn't say that your posts - adjusting for relative count - have had more game-related content than his.

It's certainly an interesting move, reminiscent of old Org culture. Are you eager to call it a "slip"?

[El Barto]

I wouldn't say that your posts - adjusting for relative count - have had more game-related content than his.

I was speaking in overall terms, rather than in content density.

It's certainly an interesting move, reminiscent of old Org culture. Are you eager to call it a "slip"?

A possible slip, right now. :)