I have never heard of the site, but then there are many things I have never heard of.Originally Posted by The Wizard
Smitha (if that is his real name) is clearly not a professional historian, but most of the sites I link to are not professional and some amateur sites are far better than professional ones. As long as the origin of the content is transparent and the site doesn't contain obvious propaganda or gaffes, it's okay with me. But I'm open to suggestion and if members find obvious fault with a site I'll scrap it.
So please tell us, what inaccuracies or bias did you find in Smitha's?
Bookmarks