Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 58

Thread: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

  1. #1

    Default Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    After skimming over an article by Charles Edson, I have come to wonder whether Seleukos Nikator was not the one to continue Alexander's objectives. He was, after all, the one who secured the biggest chunk of the newly conquered Makedonian Empire.

    Any other thoughts on this?
    "Every good barbarian is a Greek, and every bad Greek is worse than a barbarian" - Megas Alexandros


    Please read my Getic AAR:
    On Mighty Getia: Commentaries on the Pan-Thracian Empire

  2. #2

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    After the battle of Ipsus, and the defeat of Antigonos, no one else was strong enough to definitively defeat the other successors. Had Antigonos won at Ipsus, then all of Macedonia, Asia Minor and Seleukos' eastern territories would have instantly became his, thus reforming Alexanders empire.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    In terms of "by law" => Phyrrhos (of Epeiros). After all he's family.
    - Tellos Athenaios
    CUF tool - XIDX - PACK tool - SD tool - EVT tool - EB Install Guide - How to track down loading CTD's - EB 1.1 Maps thread


    ὁ δ᾽ ἠλίθιος ὣσπερ πρόβατον βῆ βῆ λέγων βαδίζει” – Kratinos in Dionysalexandros.

  4. #4
    Lover of Toight Vahjoinas Member Bootsiuv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,411

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    Perdiccas. Well....he was supposed to be anyways. I actually just got a pretty informative book on this....the entire situation was quite confusing. All kinds of rulers supporting all kinds of others, with alliances changing on a whim...
    SSbQ*****************SSbQ******************SSbQ

  5. #5

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    Ze great question!

    Alexander mumbled something on his deathbed that confused everybody and opened the gate to widespread warfare between anybody who could get a couple thousand guys with pikes.

    It sounded vaguely like:

    Krateurrr-eurgh

    Did he meant :

    1-Krateroi (to Krateros)
    2-Kratistôi (to the strongest)
    3-Give me that Krater full of wine, I'm thirsty by Zeus!

    It's everybody's guess.

    Krateros missed the boss' death, missed the succession and stupidly falled from his horse on a cavalry charge less than two years later. Three strikes, you're out.

    After that, the free for all. It's a worse read than the king plays by Shakespeare. The who' stabbed/poisoned/bitchslapped who of the makedonians kings is quite tedious actually. Bottom line; the romans and the parthians splitted the kingdom in half less than two hundred years after Alexander's death.

    To answer you frankly, Alexander had no true heir. And no one showed up.
    The diadochus were the worst kind of land pirates until Timur and his piles of skulls.
    History is the witness that testifies to the passing of time; it illumines reality, vitalizes memory, provides guidance in daily life and brings us tidings of antiquity.
    Cicero, Pro Publio Sestio

  6. #6
    Lover of Toight Vahjoinas Member Bootsiuv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,411

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    A quote from Hellenistic Civilization by W.W. Tarn (revised by he and G.T. Griffith)

    'The arrangements made by the army after his [alexander's] death vested the kingship jointly in his idiot half-brother Phillip III and his posthumous son by Roxane, Alexander IV: his general Perdiccas had the effective control of Asia, and Antipater in Europe.'

    In 321, war broke out between Antipater, Antigonus, and Ptolemy against Perdiccas. Perdiccas was murdered, and Antipater ruled a united empire until his death in 319....after that, all hell broke loose apparently.
    SSbQ*****************SSbQ******************SSbQ

  7. #7
    Member Member Andronikos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    small European country
    Posts
    363

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    I wold say that the most successful successor (from the first generation) was Ptolemaios, but he wanted only Egypt and knew that there is nobody able to rule all the Alexandros empire. He made Egypt the greatest power in the mediterranean but later kings ruined this.
    And the true heir - Alexandros IV.

    I have seen the movie Alexander by Oliver Stone, so what do you think about it? (if there is such thread, please post a link)



    my balloons

  8. #8
    Lover of Toight Vahjoinas Member Bootsiuv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,411

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    Too confusing....flash-forwards, flash-backwards, I think they're was even a flash-sideways in there somewhere...

    I enjoyed it because it was a 'historical' (and I use that term loosely) film with battle scenes....aside from that, the oft-scholarly despised 'Gladiator' was a much better movie IMO.

    *awaits the inevitable flame for that one*
    SSbQ*****************SSbQ******************SSbQ

  9. #9

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bootsiuv

    I enjoyed it because it was a 'historical' (and I use that term loosely) film with battle scenes....aside from that, the oft-scholarly despised 'Gladiator' was a much better movie IMO.

    *awaits the inevitable flame for that one*

    Gladiator is still my favorite movie

  10. #10
    Whatever Member konny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Germania Inferior
    Posts
    1,787

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    I found 'Alexander' an awfull movie of which I was happy when it was over. And yes, 'Gladiator' was a fine movie, I think. When I want to see historical acurencay I can watch some of those docus that are around by the hundreds on the Ancient times - with variing quality, of course, or read a book. When I am watching a movie I want to be entertained, and when it is set in a historical periode what I am interessted in, the better. And neither Alexander nor Troy did entertain me.

    Disclaimer: my posts are to be considered my private opinion and not offical statements by the EB Team

  11. #11
    Uneasy with Command Member Treverer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    295

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    Quote Originally Posted by konny
    klick image for unit guide
    Cool solution, man. Really good, that one.

    NB, es heißt "click". Aber wahrscheinlich ein typo.

    Yours, Treverer

    And now:
    Towards the end of the book, the Moties quote an old story from Herodotus:

    "Once there was a thief who was to be executed. As he was taken away he made a bargain with the king: In one year he would teach the king's favorite horse to sing hymns."
    "The other prisoners watched the thief singing to the horse and laughed. 'You will not succeed,' they told him. 'No one can.' To which the thief replied, 'I have a year, and who knows what will happen in that time. The king might die. The horse might die. I might die. And perhaps the horse will learn to sing.'"

  12. #12
    Lover of Toight Vahjoinas Member Bootsiuv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,411

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    To answer the original question....I'd say Antipater would be the closest thing to Alexander's true heir...

    He was the only other one who ruled something even remotely close to what Alexander ruled, and he was only able to rule because the great respect the other Diadochoi afforded him.

    Once he died, they all wanted a piece of the pie.

    Lysamachus was pretty bad-ass from what I hear, but probably no more so than Seleukos I Nikator or Ptolemy I Soter.
    SSbQ*****************SSbQ******************SSbQ

  13. #13
    Asia ton Barbaron mapper Member Pharnakes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    The Kingdom of Fife
    Posts
    1,768

    Smile Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    Incidentaley, what does Nikator mean?
    Asia ton Barbaron The new eastern mod for eb!

    Laziest member of the team My red balloons, as red as the blood of he who mentioned Galatians.
    Roma Victor!

    Yous ee gishes?

  14. #14

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    Nikator means victor (i think)

    About the movie... those indians looked more muslim than they should have imo....

    MARMOREAM•RELINQUO•QUAM•LATERICIAM•ACCEPI

  15. #15
    Asia ton Barbaron mapper Member Pharnakes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    The Kingdom of Fife
    Posts
    1,768

    Smile Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    I thought they looked exactly like the the EB hindu archers, I was absolutley amazed by the similarity when I saw the movie at a friends house...
    Asia ton Barbaron The new eastern mod for eb!

    Laziest member of the team My red balloons, as red as the blood of he who mentioned Galatians.
    Roma Victor!

    Yous ee gishes?

  16. #16
    Lover of Toight Vahjoinas Member Bootsiuv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,411

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    Nikator = victor
    Soter = saviour

    Someone correct me if I'm wrong...
    SSbQ*****************SSbQ******************SSbQ

  17. #17
    Asia ton Barbaron mapper Member Pharnakes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    The Kingdom of Fife
    Posts
    1,768

    Smile Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    As, I said, I don't know the Nikator, but soter is definatly saviour.
    Asia ton Barbaron The new eastern mod for eb!

    Laziest member of the team My red balloons, as red as the blood of he who mentioned Galatians.
    Roma Victor!

    Yous ee gishes?

  18. #18
    Lover of Toight Vahjoinas Member Bootsiuv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,411

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    Well, Nike was the Greek word for victory....so I assume it's correct. I know I've seen it somewhere (maybe in EB even).
    SSbQ*****************SSbQ******************SSbQ

  19. #19

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    Yes its victor just checked on wiki

    MARMOREAM•RELINQUO•QUAM•LATERICIAM•ACCEPI

  20. #20
    People's Padishah Emperor Member Emperor Burakuku's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Salusa Secundus
    Posts
    437

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bootsiuv
    Nikator = victor
    Soter = saviour

    Someone correct me if I'm wrong...
    I think Nikator means "conqueror" or maybe something between "victor" and "conqueror". As for Lysimach I know that during his getae campaign he was captured by Dromihades, a dacian/gaetian basileus. It is said that the "noble's council" wanted the macedonians dead but the basileus managed to save them by convincing the other nobles with his arguments. At least that is what our teacher told us. I would like to continue but I gtg. Happy birthday to me! Cheers.
    "The more people I meet, the more I like my dog"

  21. #21
    Asia ton Barbaron mapper Member Pharnakes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    The Kingdom of Fife
    Posts
    1,768

    Smile Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    Happy birthday Burakuku
    Asia ton Barbaron The new eastern mod for eb!

    Laziest member of the team My red balloons, as red as the blood of he who mentioned Galatians.
    Roma Victor!

    Yous ee gishes?

  22. #22
    Come to daddy Member Geoffrey S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach
    Posts
    4,028

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    None was. Alexander was a conqueror, yet left his successors with a massive area only loosely under Makedonian control: their goal, namely consolidation, was different from his.
    "The facts of history cannot be purely objective, since they become facts of history only in virtue of the significance attached to them by the historian." E.H. Carr

  23. #23
    Lover of Toight Vahjoinas Member Bootsiuv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,411

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    A very good point, although I'd argue that Seleukis led expeditions into India, although I don't really know how successful they were, or if they were even expeditions of conquest, as opposed to the consolidation that you already spoke of.
    SSbQ*****************SSbQ******************SSbQ

  24. #24

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bootsiuv
    A very good point, although I'd argue that Seleukis led expeditions into India, although I don't really know how successful they were, or if they were even expeditions of conquest, as opposed to the consolidation that you already spoke of.
    Seleukos was defeated by and lost some land to Chandragupta Maurya iirc. However, their actual war was resolved through diplomacy, with a diplomatic mairrage between the macedonians and the indians and Chandragupta donating some 500 (exaggerated?) elephants to the Seleukid Empire.

    MARMOREAM•RELINQUO•QUAM•LATERICIAM•ACCEPI

  25. #25
    Lover of Toight Vahjoinas Member Bootsiuv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,411

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    Yes, I've heard that in the past, as those were the elephants so instrumental in the Seleukid victory at Raphia.
    SSbQ*****************SSbQ******************SSbQ

  26. #26
    Asia ton Barbaron mapper Member Pharnakes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    The Kingdom of Fife
    Posts
    1,768

    Smile Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    Ehh, I thought raphia was way later (ie all the elphants would have died) I thought the Elephants seleukos the first got were used to smash the galatians instead...
    Asia ton Barbaron The new eastern mod for eb!

    Laziest member of the team My red balloons, as red as the blood of he who mentioned Galatians.
    Roma Victor!

    Yous ee gishes?

  27. #27
    Lover of Toight Vahjoinas Member Bootsiuv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,411

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    Honestly....I don't really know. I'm sure Abou would know.
    SSbQ*****************SSbQ******************SSbQ

  28. #28
    Come to daddy Member Geoffrey S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach
    Posts
    4,028

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bootsiuv
    A very good point, although I'd argue that Seleukis led expeditions into India, although I don't really know how successful they were, or if they were even expeditions of conquest, as opposed to the consolidation that you already spoke of.
    In the sense of bringing Hellenistic culture to (relatively) unknown lands I'm tempted to place the Indo-Greeks before the Seleucids, particularly under Menander I for his conquests and embracement of foreign cultural ideas such as Buddhism.
    "The facts of history cannot be purely objective, since they become facts of history only in virtue of the significance attached to them by the historian." E.H. Carr

  29. #29
    Lover of Toight Vahjoinas Member Bootsiuv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,411

    Default Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    Well, I would agree that Menander was definitely much more important than even Alexander himself in that respect with regards to India, as he went further east than any other hellenic ruler IIRC.

    EDIT: Well, after dwelling on it further, saying he was more influential than alexander may be pushing it, as the indo-hellenics wouldn't even have existed (at least, not in the form/time period they did) were it not for Alexander going into places like Baktria and India in the first place.

    Menander was a bad-arse mofo though, that much is certain.
    Last edited by Bootsiuv; 10-31-2007 at 23:19.
    SSbQ*****************SSbQ******************SSbQ

  30. #30
    Member Megas Methuselah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Prairie Grasslands
    Posts
    5,040

    Talking Re: Who was the real successor to Alexander?

    Quote Originally Posted by Pharnakes
    Ehh, I thought raphia was way later (ie all the elphants would have died) I thought the Elephants seleukos the first got were used to smash the galatians instead...
    Perhaps they were the descendants of said elephants...?
    Last edited by Megas Methuselah; 10-31-2007 at 23:37.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO