PDA

View Full Version : Beware the Pahlavan VC!



Tristuskhan
03-31-2008, 18:32
Beware the Pahlavan VC!

The map on the faction screen is not accurate!

I was expecting the victory screen when I took Gava Roxalana, in the middle of nowhere (rhââââ, at last I finish a campaign!). And nothing happened. Bugged? After playing 511 turns?

No, asking the advisor and listing the settlements I should own, I see that there is Ubar!

Ubar? In the middle of nowhere again? Can't Wastelanders have rest?

Here we go!

Ibrahim
03-31-2008, 20:12
got the same with AS-it could be a bug, I don't care......

The Persian Cataphract
03-31-2008, 21:53
No, it's the map that is out-dated. Historically, direct Parthian influence stretched as far as Ubar and contacts were consolidated during Vâzarangîg exploits (Bazrangid expeditions across certain coastal areas of the Indian Ocean, as far as Zanzibar to the Champa ports in Vietnam). I did cut the Pahlava some slack, because I originally opted for a tiered victory condition, one where they restore the sphere of influence of Mithradates II The Great, another more relevan to Gondophares' exploits in India and finally a re-establishment of Achaemenid borders.

That is tough shit. Re-achieving what took ages for Parthian monarchs in matter of weeks? Hell no :eyebrows:

beatoangelico
03-31-2008, 23:15
Hayasdan VC map is outdated too

Sir Edward
04-01-2008, 05:38
The Lusotannan VC map is also out of date they only get 1 of the starting 2 provinces shown on the map.But that is small beans and not that hard at all to fix just replacing a couple images, just follow the Advisor he is always right. By the way TPC is there any chance we'll see tiered VC in future builds of EB?

Teleklos Archelaou
04-01-2008, 05:41
Give me the changes needed as compared to the current one and I will update them.

Sir Edward
04-01-2008, 06:03
1) The ingame_maps for Lusitania has them starting out with both Lusitania and Celtiberia when it should only be Lusitania.

Tristuskhan
04-01-2008, 06:24
Pahlava must hold Gerrha, Homna and Ubar. At least.

General Appo
04-01-2008, 08:36
The Romani VC seems wrong as well, at least the map. And I´ve tried to listen to the advisor, but he just lists about 100 city´s and I´m having a hard time finding the ones I don´t hold.

LorDBulA
04-01-2008, 08:57
And I´ve tried to listen to the advisor, but he just lists about 100 city´s and I´m having a hard time finding the ones I don´t hold.

Look for blinking clamps on the map.

General Appo
04-01-2008, 09:09
Yeah, I´ve done that too, but can´t find any. Oh well, I´ll try again later today.

Laevex
04-01-2008, 12:56
The Getai VC map is very wrong too.

CONQUER:
Buridava, Kallatis, Naissos, Singidunum, Sarmiszegethusa, Olbia, Gawjam Bastarnoz, Carrodunum, Lucarottea, Vindobonna, Serdike, Tylis, Byzantion, Segestica, Pella, Nikaia, Eburonum, Demetrias, Epidamnos, Ambrakia, Ak-Ink, Iuvavoaeta, Chersonesos, Pantikapaion

RAID:
Athenai, Korinthos, Thermon, Sinope, Pergamon, Dalminion, Sparte, Chalkis, Patavium, Gordu Neuriji, Mediolanum, Roma

Hope this helps. You probably have access to all that anyway but if you could update that map it would be awesome.

stupac
04-02-2008, 07:26
I've been had!

I thought this thread for the discussion of a new unit. I guess communists weren't around yet though...

Sarkiss
04-03-2008, 21:42
Give me the changes needed as compared to the current one and I will update them.
i can definately say that Hayasdan VC map is wrong. Foot would be the best person to ask for details.