View Full Version : Why was there no Hot Seat play for MTW?
Given that this is basically turn-based, I don't see any problem. In fact it may enhance diplomacy. Would your cockeyed son marry my bullneck daughter?
The only problem I see is if one human player attacked another, but that can be resolved by having only automatic resolve for human-human battles.
A.Saturnus
10-23-2002, 19:10
Yeah, it would still be a cool strategy game. Bad that they didn`t do that.
------------------
In the name of electricity: CHARGE!!!
el_slapper
10-23-2002, 19:33
guess : playtesting would simply have lasted faaaar too long. SP campaigns are already looooong, so... If you adjust some tweaks after each campaign, it means the game is ready 1 or 2 months later!!!
------------------
War is not about who is right, only about who is left
TomThumbKOP
10-23-2002, 20:09
How exactly would a hotseat battle work when attacking the other human player?
autocalculate battle... which is very dissappointing in itself, i think. but it isnt undo-able
TomThumbKOP
10-23-2002, 20:39
That's no fun at all.
Strategy by mail, Tactics online would be cool. It would take months to end a campaign but who cares?
Niccolomachiavelli
10-23-2002, 23:56
Quote Originally posted by el_slapper:
guess : playtesting would simply have lasted faaaar too long. SP campaigns are already looooong, so... If you adjust some tweaks after each campaign, it means the game is ready 1 or 2 months later!!!
[/QUOTE]
They playtested?!
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.