View Full Version : Baktrian D-Day in Greece
Rycalawre
06-21-2008, 20:38
The Baktrian Reich rised to the greatest nation of mankind. The inferior people of Arche Seleukeia and Ptolemaioi failed how the evolution decided. They got subjugated by the Baktrian Reich and remain only shady memories. Their skeleton of their soldiers and generals are covered with sand and earth in the infinte vastness of the East.
Few Greeks resist Baktria to restore the Reich of Alexander the Great. But the Baktrians won't rest until their task is done. They are eager to fight. Sie fordern Land und Boden! (They demand territory and soil) The Grossreich of Baktrian Nation won't fail to restore the will of their great ancestors!
They have two choices: They could fight an endless war through the Hellespont down to the greek city states under huge casulties. Or they stab a dagger from behind right in the heart of the Greek Empire! The only obstacle to forfill their god given task are the waters of the Aegean Sea!
Early spring, 173 BC
https://img294.imageshack.us/img294/3109/dday1ec7.jpg
The waters are calm, the swords cut, the mind invigorated by the Baktrian propaganda machinery. The troups gathered on Creta, the last preparations are done. The Baktrian Fuhrer held a last monumental speech in front of thousands of true sons of Baktria!
Later spring, 173 BC
https://img528.imageshack.us/img528/3438/dday2ss0.jpg
Anchors awaigh! The winds are good, a good sign of the gods! The Baktrian fleet under the command of the Great Admiral Triballos, a pure son of Baktria, is sailing directly towards the idyllic coastline of Greece. But the idyll is deceiving! The Baktrian soldiers thirst for blood and they will be no hold to draw them back from massacres of unreachable dimension! The Baktrian Intelligence Service has announced there will be no resistance in the Greek cities.
Summer, 173 BC
https://img528.imageshack.us/img528/1166/dday3ow1.jpg
Like a leaking poison barrel, the Baktrian troups outpoor over the Greek landscape, about to poisonig all. The orders are simple: Find, torture, and kill! Four Greek cities are under siege, they have not the slightest chance to escape or defend them. The kosher butchering stations of the Baktrian Gendarmerie are already built, to absorb the uncountable number of people caught in the cities. The executioners are whetting the knifes all day long, awaiting thousands of thoats to be cut.
Autumn, 173 BC
https://img440.imageshack.us/img440/2782/dday4pb1.jpg
The most important job is done, the Greek spine is in crumbs. The wine casks are opened to drive the Baktrian soldiers in their looting spree. But there's more blood spilling than wine is served. The base is laid, the army is moving to the north. The rest is a formal matter: The Greeks are done!
Baktria uber alles! Seig heil!
hrrypttrbst
06-21-2008, 21:34
How did you get the desert in Arabia i've never been able to get there.
Bloody hell that empire is huge! What version are you playing?
Wow, still on .8? (answer to hrrypttrbst's question)
You must have been working on this for a long time! Are you going to continue it as an AAR?
Rycalawre
06-21-2008, 22:58
How did you get the desert in Arabia i've never been able to get there.
We must confess we modded a bit the governor's palace we gave it a 20% happiness boost. We did this for several reasons:
1. When we had a full stack in a Arab city, 400 people rioted against them and killed about 25% of it (~1000 soldiers). Especially when one of our regular army was in it was quite a frustration when the Saba army did no damage but 400 citizens were a big threat. We know that the desert is hard to control in reality but
2. we decided that we want to set the focus on war campaining and so we don't have to spend more time in administration than in warfare.
But we have to say we did'nt cheat until we fulfilled the victory condition and we took Arabia before it. After that we decided to make the administration a bit easier.
We still play 0.81, we play for quite a year now.
lol
he must be, playing as a hellenic faction speaking english/german, o.O
and for having the patience to build that empire lolz
ezekiel2517
06-22-2008, 09:04
Sieg and not Seig. You are a sick person, really.
i have to agree on this one. Very graphic slaughter :furious3:
tapanojum
06-22-2008, 10:14
Awesome empire, but you got problems bro
Problems with -what- exactly?
RawPower
06-22-2008, 12:55
That is an impressive Baktrian empire, you must have spent some hours on it?
The General
06-22-2008, 17:17
Nice empire, and nice invasion, but...
"The Baktrian Reich"?
"The inferior people of Arche Seleukeia and Ptolemaioi failed how the evolution decided"?
"The Reich of Alexander the Great"?
"Sie fordern Land und Boden!"?
"The Grossreich of Baktrian Nation"?
"The Baktrian Fuhrer"?
"A pure son of Baktria"?
"The kosher butchering stations of the Baktrian Gendarmerie"?
"Baktria uber alles! Seig heil!"?
Seriously dude, what the hell?
LOL! This is the funniest AAR I have ever read. Make Die Baktrian Fuhrer proud!
i think he's a *cough* nazi *cough*lol joking
I think he's just joking around and trying to make it funny. I don't think he actually believes that way about his Baktrion Reich...
General Appo
06-22-2008, 22:28
Wouldn´t Operation Sealion or Barbarossa be a more fitting name than D-Day?
Yep, Seelöwe would be more suited.
The General
06-22-2008, 23:12
Maybe it's just me, but I've usually considered the nazi humour to be the kind of humour you just don't do in 'public'. Meh.
That, and considering it's tha internets, y'know never know, really.
Cadwalader
06-22-2008, 23:33
What would've made this ace is if someone actually chose to defy the awesome strength of the Baktrian reich, but who would possess such foolhearted bravery! :horn:
Irishmafia2020
06-23-2008, 02:21
Role playing Indo-Greek Nazi's, - that is original. I suppose I would tend to want to role play the resistance to such a huge empire, but then again you can justify all out extermination this way... Plus you get to use the language of propaganda, and at least you aren't using the Sweboz (that would actually be offensive)! Perhaps the Romans are really communists willing to die for the proletarian struggle as well...
I don't see any problems with Nazi jokes. Their jokes because Nazism is past. And most people's ankward reactions to this joke proves just that.
General Appo
06-23-2008, 09:41
... Plus you get to use the language of propaganda, and at least you aren't using the Sweboz (that would actually be offensive)!
It would? Hmmm.... perhaps in the future I shall start an AAR from my old 1.0 Sweboz save, and we´ll see just how offensive I can make it.
Surely, my empire is dangerously short of Lebensraum.
https://i232.photobucket.com/albums/ee276/GeneralAppo/Reich.jpg
The General
06-23-2008, 09:59
I've accustomed to nazi jokes, we've had them aplenty in our group of friends.
However, what is not so okay is when a (certain) friend, drunk, starts throwing nazi/white supremacy "jokes". In a bus. With a few black guys in it. Not cool. He says they're just jokes and that he just tries to irritate me, but sometimes he just sounds a bit too serious. Not cool.
Then you read/watch stuff like this (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/22/obama-and-race-most-white_n_108503.html) (digg-link'd yesterday). Reminds you, that all that bullshittery called nazism etc. isn't completely in the past, unfortunately. Makes all those nazi jokes etc. seem like not so funny anymore. So, I've become less inclined towards such jokes.
Although, I must say, a certain Monty Python skit (https://youtube.com/watch?v=XQkcP0olmQY) cracks me up each time.
But, on the whole, most likely, this was overreaction from me, caused by reading/watching neo-nazi/white supremacy-related articles and video clips just before finding this thread.
As I said in my previous post... Meh.
PS. I agree with the Unternehmen Seelöwe-thing.
Dutchhoplite
06-23-2008, 10:08
Who's family died in german concentrationcamps??
Mine did...
So who wants to tell a good nazi joke?? I want to laugh too!
:thumbsdown:
keravnos
06-23-2008, 10:21
Patris= "Land of our fathers", from "Pat(e)r"=father and the ending -"is" which denominates place.
Later on by the time of EB, it had evolved into "homeland".
compare that to
Country= "land of the count".
I think it is time to re-legalize some of the most important words in IndoEuropean common dictionary that the Nazis appropriated and never quite gave it back. "Fatherland" is too important to be left to them.
What it all comes down to, and this is why I think this AAR is hilarious, is that the Ubermensch (superman in german) of the Baktrians would be IndoIranians like the Kamboja (light IndoIranian cav.) or the Bahlikas (Baktrian cav.) and one of its elite infantry would be the Sreni swordaxe carrying guild infantry. They would be the big bulk of the army with hellenic phallanx and Baktrion agema as a smaller part of the army. Elite cavalry and the bodyguard would deffinitely be Hellenic, but the majority of the troops wouldn't.
In fact Baktrians were the most accepting and "non-xenophobic" of all the Diadochoi. Which makes this AAR all the more amusing.
Swordmaster
06-23-2008, 15:05
I think it is time to re-legalize some of the most important words in IndoEuropean common dictionary that the Nazis appropriated and never quite gave it back. "Fatherland" is too important to be left to them.
And the symbols, too. So we don't get stupid tourists asking what the Nazis did to the floor of the Amiens cathedral.
Bleh, all jokes are normally directed to something (gender/nationality/race/etc), now should I feel insulted by portuguese jokes brazilian regularly make about us? I couldn't care anything less.. I make jokes about black people in front of my black friends and they don't give a damn. I have some Sephardic Jewish blood (So says my father), so should I be really sensibilized and shocked when someone tells me a Nazi joke? Nope, and yet I find Nazi jokes the most funny I can remember of. They're jokes, and jokes are supposed to make fun of someone. Since the holocaust happened regrettably, people make fun of that. Just as I'm sure in a few decades, people might do jokes about terrorists and americans, 9/11 et al. (I'm not sure if they already do. If they do, those jokes haven't arrived in Portugal yet) Sad events later lead to jokes. And their created because normally their funny to people. Preventing from laughing at a joke "out of respect" for the sensibility of many victims and their famillies of the holocaust is just silly.
Tyrfingr
06-23-2008, 15:38
So who wants to tell a good nazi joke?? I want to laugh too!
:thumbsdown:
Hitler and his chauffeur was driving along the German countryside when they suddenly felt a bump under the car. They looked outside and saw that they have rammed a sheep.
- Don't you worry, said Hitler, to the chauffeur. I'll go explain to the farmer that we have killed one of his sheeps. And Hitler walked up to the farm-house and was gone for a long time...
Soon, Hitler returned bruised up and were almost beaten to a pulp. He got into the car and screamed:
"Good lord, these people are crazy here, beating you senseless for killing a sheep! Let's go away as fast as possible".
When they started to drive, they immediately felt another bump under the car. They looked outside against and saw that they had run over a pig.
Well, I'm not going up to that crazy farmer again, said Hitler. Chauffeur, you'll go!
And so the scared chauffeur walked up the farm-house and was gone for a long time. But then he returned, with a basket filled with wine-bottles, expensive sausages and cheese. Astonished, Hitler asked the driver: What the hell did you tell the farmer? And the chauffeur answered:
I got up to the cabin and said "Heil Hitler. The pig is dead and it was me who ran over him".
Bleh, all jokes are normally directed to something (gender/nationality/race/etc), now should I feel insulted by portuguese jokes brazilian regularly make about us? I couldn't care anything less.. I make jokes about black people in front of my black friends and they don't give a damn. I have some Sephardic Jewish blood (So says my father), so should I be really sensibilized and shocked when someone tells me a Nazi joke? Nope, and yet I find Nazi jokes the most funny I can remember of. They're jokes, and jokes are supposed to make fun of someone. Since the holocaust happened regrettably, people make fun of that. Just as I'm sure in a few decades, people might do jokes about terrorists and americans, 9/11 et al. (I'm not sure if they already do. If they do, those jokes haven't arrived in Portugal yet) Sad events later lead to jokes. And their created because normally their funny to people. Preventing from laughing at a joke "out of respect" for the sensibility of many victims and their famillies of the holocaust is just silly.
Exactly. Also, people tend to forget that "The Holocaust" wasn't the -only- thing in history in which people got murdered on a big scale. Take the Holodomor in Ukraine for example.
Being somewhat of a "pagan" (though I despise that term), should I be offended when people make jokes about witches being burned at the stake in the Middle Ages?
Edit: Also:
and was gone for a long time...
Soon,
Ehm..what?
Lysimachos
06-23-2008, 17:28
Well, making jokes about Nazis is one matter, though a matter which can be discussed, when it is capable of trivializing.
Utilizing nazi terminology in a glorifying or affirmative way is something completely different. There are many people deliberately using nazi terminology and projecting nazi ideology on something they do, because they identify with it or because they think it's "cool". But it is not, it marks the most terrible episode of mankind's history until now and hopefully for the future, too.
I don't know if it meant to be a joke or not. Even if it is, the chosen way (a positive, affirmative approach) shows disrespect towards all who suffered under the nazi reign and a belittlement of its actions.
Just my opinion on what is acceptable and what is not.
By the way: The choice of a historically rather "non-xenophobic" state doesn't make it amusing but at best ridiculous, imho.
Edit:
Exactly. Also, people tend to forget that "The Holocaust" wasn't the -only- thing in history in which people got murdered on a big scale. Take the Holodomor in Ukraine for example.
Though there have been many occasions when people got murdered on abig scale there never has been any comparably systematic and inhuman administration of the annihilation of life than under the nazis, which gives it a wholly different quality than most other occasions.
Not that i would legitimate to make jokes about victims of crimes of humanity in other times or locations!
Well, making jokes about Nazis is one matter, though a matter which can be discussed, when it is capable of trivializing.
Utilizing nazi terminology in a glorifying or affirmative way is something completely different. There are many people deliberately using nazi terminology and projecting nazi ideology on something they do, because they identify with it or because they think it's "cool". But it is not, it marks the most terrible episode of mankind's history until now and hopefully for the future, too.
I don't know if it meant to be a joke or not. Even if it is, the chosen way (a positive, affirmative approach) shows disrespect towards all who suffered under the nazi reign and a belittlement of its actions.
Just my opinion on what is acceptable and what is not.
By the way: The choice of a historically rather "non-xenophobic" state doesn't make it amusing but at best ridicoulus, imho.
How could this NOT be a joke? It's Baktria, as the Nazis!
Baktria!
Nazis!
If you couldn't see that it was a joke just from that, then I'm sorry my friend but I must question your sense of humour. Also the fact that his hilarious writing style did not make it obvious?
The time has passed in which we should hold back our humour on this particular subject just to be politically correct. People have always made jokes about past atrocities. It is only when we can make jokes about it that we can come to terms with it and accept that it happened. I have many jewish friends who often joke about Hitler and sometimes the holocaust. Yes, it was a horrible thing that happened, but the jokes are intended to mock and make fun of the Nazi's and their actions.
I want to find out what happens next from the Baktrian Reich.
Lysimachos
06-23-2008, 18:06
How could this NOT be a joke? It's Baktria, as the Nazis!
Baktria!
Nazis!
If you couldn't see that it was a joke just from that, then I'm sorry my friend but I must question your sense of humour. Also the fact that his hilarious writing style did not make it obvious?
Well, i have seen similar which has not been a joke, but has been used with conviction, because the writers thought it would be cool to be like Hitler.
And the writing style which you find hilarious just resembles absolutely serious propaganda style and thus gives no indication of the intention.
The time has passed in which we should hold back our humour on this particular subject just to be politically correct. People have always made jokes about past atrocities. It is only when we can make jokes about it that we can come to terms with it and accept that it happened. I have many jewish friends who often joke about Hitler and sometimes the holocaust. Yes, it was a horrible thing that happened, but the jokes are intended to mock and make fun of the Nazi's and their actions.
As i have written, i differentiate between one kind of jokes and another one. You may mock them, but you may not impersonate them.
keravnos
06-23-2008, 18:28
Lysimachos, As Hellenes have fought against nazi Germany valiantly (even Hitler admitted in his Reichstag that Greek's fight was valiant) and paid a terrible price for that (1 in 7 1940's Greeks was dead by the end of the decade), I think that anyone trying to portay Baktrians of yesteryear or Hellenes of today as Nazi like nation is utterly ridiculous.
As such, it is ok to get a laugh at a portrayal of Baktria as a nazi state. It is saying heaps about the creator of said AAR. I think I can even guess his place of origin... :laugh4:
General Appo
06-23-2008, 20:28
Come on, you don´t have to read if you don´t want to. Besides, if you really dislike Nazi stuff you should be at Nazi forums trying to convince them of Hitlers wrongdoings, not putting down people who are ridiculing Nazis.
there never has been any comparably systematic and inhuman administration of the annihilation of life than under the nazis
I'd suggest you read a book about the Mongol Empire. Hitler is worthy of seating right next to Jesus if he was ever compared to Genghis Khan. Yet he is idolatrated by the Mongols and studied with awe by many historians. Mongols were known for their brutality, any settlement who refused to surrender immediatly and was captured the whole entire population was wiped out. A few exceptions were those who actually had something to offer to the Mongols. All others, women and children, were massacred. And this happened from China up to Europe, going through the Middle East. Anyways, on with the figures: Lowest estimates are 30 million deaths. In an era more scarcely populated than ours, this is quite an achievement. The highest estimates reach over 60 million people.
Mao Zedong, through his great wisdom, also manages to make Hitler look like a Saint. Thanks to his "Cultural Revolution", systematics purges for the party who raised him and the "Great Leap Foward" he manages to kill, in the lowest estimates: 27 million people. The highest goes over 70 million. But since he is in the East, and the party currently in power is his own, I don't see many people rising in anger at the worshiping of such a man. Why don't you go around the Chinese websites saying the truth about Mao Zedong? Would you even care at the millions of Chinese scholars who publicy their academical essays praising all that Mao had done? Yet you would be outraged if a German one would praise the deeds of Hitler.
Do not give lectures about history. Hitler and his lackeys were sick, twisted people. But to consider the mentioning of "reich" and "panzer", etc as "Nazi Propaganda" is quite simply stupid. And there were people who comitted far greater atrocities that aren't even spoken of.
Centurio Nixalsverdrus
06-23-2008, 21:06
I really don't think Rycalawre was a nazi, I apologize when it came off that way.
What turns me off with his writing style is that I feel bad if someone uses German language just to funnily portray a nazi empire. I don't think he knows much German (correct me if I'm wrong), but what he knows are obviously some really "cool" nazi phrases. Put in some German words and hey, look how evil it turns. "Reich" is not a nazi word, it's just the German word for empire or (king)dom. The Swedish and the Norwegians have their Riksposten (sp), what is "Imperial Mail", and what would be in German "Reichsautobahnen" (Imperial Motorways), and their "Reichsgrenze" (Imperial border). But look, ooh, how evil and nazi-esque it seems now since we put it in German. Hahaha. I think we'll have to live with this pityful kind of humour forever. :no:
The General
06-23-2008, 21:22
Hitler and his chauffeur was driving along the German countryside when they suddenly felt a bump under the car. They looked outside and saw that they have rammed a sheep.
- Don't you worry, said Hitler, to the chauffeur. I'll go explain to the farmer that we have killed one of his sheeps. And Hitler walked up to the farm-house and was gone for a long time...
Soon, Hitler returned bruised up and were almost beaten to a pulp. He got into the car and screamed:
"Good lord, these people are crazy here, beating you senseless for killing a sheep! Let's go away as fast as possible".
When they started to drive, they immediately felt another bump under the car. They looked outside against and saw that they had run over a pig.
Well, I'm not going up to that crazy farmer again, said Hitler. Chauffeur, you'll go!
And so the scared chauffeur walked up the farm-house and was gone for a long time. But then he returned, with a basket filled with wine-bottles, expensive sausages and cheese. Astonished, Hitler asked the driver: What the hell did you tell the farmer? And the chauffeur answered:
I got up to the cabin and said "Heil Hitler. The pig is dead and it was me who ran over him".
Good one.
Lysimachos
06-23-2008, 21:43
I'd suggest you read a book about the Mongol Empire. Hitler is worthy of seating right next to Jesus if he was ever compared to Genghis Khan. Yet he is idolatrated by the Mongols and studied with awe by many historians. Mongols were known for their brutality, any settlement who refused to surrender immediatly and was captured the whole entire population was wiped out. A few exceptions were those who actually had something to offer to the Mongols. All others, women and children, were massacred. And this happened from China up to Europe, going through the Middle East. Anyways, on with the figures: Lowest estimates are 30 million deaths. In an era more scarcely populated than ours, this is quite an achievement. The highest estimates reach over 60 million people.
Mao Zedong, through his great wisdom, also manages to make Hitler look like a Saint. Thanks to his "Cultural Revolution", systematics purges for the party who raised him and the "Great Leap Foward" he manages to kill, in the lowest estimates: 27 million people. The highest goes over 70 million. But since he is in the East, and the party currently in power is his own, I don't see many people rising in anger at the worshiping of such a man. Why don't you go around the Chinese websites saying the truth about Mao Zedong? Would you even care at the millions of Chinese scholars who publicy their academical essays praising all that Mao had done? Yet you would be outraged if a German one would praise the deeds of Hitler.
Do not give lectures about history. Hitler and his lackeys were sick, twisted people. But to consider the mentioning of "reich" and "panzer", etc as "Nazi Propaganda" is quite simply stupid. And there were people who comitted far greater atrocities that aren't even spoken of.
I'm not going to exchange history lectures and i'm not going to discuss who is beeing praised how much and on which legitimation, because that doesn't affect the point of what i have said, so the only thing i will mention regarding the comparison to the Mongols or Mao:
I don't want to euphemize what they have done, but neither the mongols nor Mao have enacted plan and machinery to completely eradicate whole people and to create a superior race by obliterating anyone and anything which does not fit.
For an individual there is no difference if one is killed to secure power or because one is estimated as beeing without value for the planned breed, but i am still convinced that there is a difference in regard to human dignity.
Which does not make better what others have done, but i'm no one who said, jokes about everything else would be allright.
Besides, i don't consider mentioning of "Reich" and "Panzer" as Nazi propaganda, but i do consider mentioning of things that touch the inner workings of nazi ideology, as such:
inferior people [...] failed how the evolution decided.
Sie fordern Land und Boden!
I don't have to say something about the following, have i?
Baktria uber alles! Seig heil! [sic]
This should be enough.
I want to indicate that i have never said, Rycalawre was a Nazi, i just pointed out that i consider the report's style as very bad taste and this opinion has not changed and probably will not.
Oh, please.
Say, can someone get MAA or TA in here to close this thread?
I'm not going to exchange history lectures and i'm not going to discuss who is beeing praised how much and on which legitimation, because that doesn't affect the point of what i have said, so the only thing i will mention regarding the comparison to the Mongols or Mao:
I don't want to euphemize what they have done, but neither the mongols nor Mao have enacted plan and machinery to completely eradicate whole people and to create a superior race by obliterating anyone and anything which does not fit.
The point you had made was that the Nazis were basically the people who cared less about human lives. The problem many scholars find was that the said Nazi exterminators who preached about murdering millions were good fathers to their children, good husbands to their wives, leading perfectly normal lives, by modern standards.
Sadly, it is an accepted thesis that the Mongols had a complexity of inferiority. In it, they see that the truth is that the peoples they dominated were much more populous than themselves. (Mongol/Chinese population difference being a blatant one). As such, they considered it "a necessary evil" to systematically exterminate the populations they dominated, so in the eventuality of an uprising, there wouldn't be so many of them left. I pretty much see this as a much worse than what the Nazis tried to enact. It'd be the same as if the Nazis began exterminating everywhere they passed. Millions of Polish, French, Dutch, Belgian and Soviet citizens exterminated. So yes, the Mongols did enact plans to exterminate entire populations. Mao is a special case. Whereas it is believed that Hitler's motives for rebuilding Germany (Which he did, despite the Worldwide Economic Depression, and that is quite a deed) and for the war, uniting "Great Germany", and conquering land for the "vital space" was in part to help the German people prosper and become an indisputable power as a people, being partly "unselfish" motives; whereas Mao cared little for his own people, what he really wanted was more power. Any reason for the development of his country was simply to garner more power so he could bully other countries, and being taken into account more seriously by others.
For an individual there is no difference if one is killed to secure power or because one is estimated as beeing without value for the planned breed, but i am still convinced that there is a difference in regard to human dignity.
Which does not make better what others have done, but i'm no one who said, jokes about everything else would be allright.
Difference on Human Dignity about death is simply too subjective to even discuss. The fact is that they die for equally stupid purposes.
Besides, i don't consider mentioning of "Reich" and "Panzer" as Nazi propaganda, but i do consider mentioning of things that touch the inner workings of nazi ideology, as such:
I don't have to say something about the following, have i?
This should be enough.
I want to indicate that i have never said, Rycalawre was a Nazi, i just pointed out that i consider the report's style as very bad taste and this opinion has not changed and probably will not.
Simulating a fantasy ancient Baktrian invasion using "inferior people" to describe their Greek enemies, and other phrases which are conoted with Nazism, leads to an extrapolation of Nazi Propaganda? Heck, I wonder around Paradox's forum on the game HoI 2 (World War 2), and many German AARs use those terminologies. Phreaps we should censor them for using certain words while RPing a game? That's what I call a "Nazist attitude" (Example: Grammar Nazi :P). Paleeze.
Oh, will you guys shut the fuck up? This is a funny AAR that mocks the nazis. End of story!
*Eagerly awaiting the next chapter*
It started off badly, and got far far worse toward the end.
Closed for bad behaviour and unnecessary nazi discussion. This is a forum about EB and classical history.
Foot
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.