Log in

View Full Version : WW3 - Who would win?



King Jan III Sobieski
06-30-2008, 03:54
You know it's coming someday, so which nation do you think would win if there was a new, Mid-East/Asiatic World War?

King Jan III Sobieski
06-30-2008, 03:58
I should have put None of the Above and GAH! Oh well...:juggle2::inquisitive::laugh4:

Reverend Joe
06-30-2008, 04:05
Where's the "nobody, we would all be royally :daisy:ed" option?

Mikeus Caesar
06-30-2008, 04:09
No one would win. Not even non-participants, as fallout affects everyone.

CountArach
06-30-2008, 04:09
The ultra-wealthy war profiteers.

Errr... I mean... we can't actually know who will be involved.

Ice
06-30-2008, 04:18
The roaches

Lemur
06-30-2008, 04:25
I refuse to vote in any poll that does not include the option "Octosquid Overlords." In fact, to make up for this injustice, I'm going to add that as a tag for this thread right now.

Mikeus Caesar
06-30-2008, 04:25
Just to reinforce my point...

http://xs128.xs.to/xs128/08260/defcon_ad_lg241.jpg

The next big war will inevitably see the large-scale use of nuclear weapons, in the same way that WW2 saw the use of all the new weapons that came in at the end of WW1. (tanks, bombers, etc)

If anyone has played DEFCON, then you'll know as well as me that when the missiles start flying, there is very little hope. In a massive full scale nuclear war, even with the imaginary defences in the game, over half the missiles still get in. Deathtolls reach the tens of millions. No one wins. Everyone loses.

Evil_Maniac From Mars
06-30-2008, 05:04
Where is the boom (http://neatorama.cachefly.net/images/2007-02/nuclear-bomb-badger.jpg) option?

Lemur
06-30-2008, 05:11
No one wins. Everyone loses.
Well, sure, if you're carrying around a negative attitude like that, I guess you can't win a nuclear exchange. Why not turn that "can't" into a "can" and see how much better that makes it? Remember, it takes more muscles to frown than to smile, and cheerful people always win.

If you want to come out on top from a nuclear Armageddon, you need to buff up your attitude! Be like Pip-boy, and spread the sunshine!


https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v489/Lemurmania/9735-1184134704-pipboy.jpg

Reverend Joe
06-30-2008, 06:17
Lemur, you just made my day. I will go to bed happy now. :2thumbsup: Thanks, man.

Suddenly, a great big concrete bunker seems like a cheerful side project rather than a grim portent of doom. And I'm gonna stamp a giant picture of Pip-boy on the top of mine.

PanzerJaeger
06-30-2008, 07:07
Germany.

Third time's a charm. :2thumbsup:

CountArach
06-30-2008, 09:49
I refuse to vote in any poll that does not include the option "Octosquid Overlords." In fact, to make up for this injustice, I'm going to add that as a tag for this thread right now.
Seconded. :2thumbsup:

FactionHeir
06-30-2008, 10:24
The planet would win. Finally nature can undo what humankind has done to her :clown:

Geoffrey S
06-30-2008, 11:21
These guys. (http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/5305/)

Banquo's Ghost
06-30-2008, 12:50
Somalia, without doubt.

No-one is going to waste a nuke on them and let's face it, if anyone has years of training for a post-apocalyptic wilderness, it's those chaps.

Beefy187
06-30-2008, 13:59
Im not a expert but..

Right now North Korea is being the buffer area between America/South Korea and China. Soon as North Korea is gone im guessing they may be war.

Now looking at the military

America is undoubtedly the no. 1 in war. Jumping in pretty much every war in another country, they are most experienced. They are most suited for large scale invasion if they are fighting big country like China.

China is huge. But their army got a serious problem. One child policy combined with traditional Asian idea of family.The fact that if their only son die they will be no others who can continue their family will be the burden for the Chinese.

Also it seems that America is slowly starting to get into WWII style surrounding their enemy with allies. With Japan, Korea (maybe united Korea when North Korea is gone), Taiwan, India and possibly Russia on their side, China will be easily defeated. China is having trouble securing resources like fuels and energy, unlike America who got strong relationship with Mid east oil countries.

Although America is also in somewhat similar situation, Chinese people are not very obedient like the Japanese were in WWII. They possess couple rebellion issue like Tibet and recent revolt resulting torching one of the police station, Communist party will soon be torn apart and China will be divided in couple of countries in couple of years. Americas pacifist movement is also getting big but this can be solved by jailing a couple of peoples.

Assuming that North Korea vanishes, war will probably start by China invading Korea and Taiwan simultaneously. This will most likely end with failure to capture Taiwan (taking a Island is somewhat hard..) and Americans landing on Korea.

America will probably defeat China unless Russia decides to help China.

Being a nuke country, this war could end up by China shooting America and their allies like crazy which will completely wipe out everyone on the pacific. Knowing that, its going to be interesting how America will act in WWIII

Now in that scenario, both Americans and the Chinese (Taiwan too..) will not be the winner. Real winner will probably be Israel.

America has been defeating multiple strong mid eastern countries recently which could stand up against the might of Israelite army. Israel has a extremely high moral army with advanced equipment. Unless in nuclear situation, there will be no one who can match Israel in the mid east. Also Jewish people are incredibly smart and has influences in many power house countries. In WWIII it will most likely end up in their favor.

Russia is also interesting. I wonder if they go invading Europe randomly. If so, could Euro alliance stand up against the Russians?

Vote: Israel... Also Russians

In Armageddon situation Switzerland and few of the Northern Europe countries will survive and Australia + Kiwi Land will be a paradise for everyone.

I just thought up of those scenarios on top of my head so..

If theres a actual expert on org it will be interesting to know what they gotta say.

Uesugi Kenshin
06-30-2008, 19:16
I don't think a huge large-scale war is on the way, and if one does get started by some idiots somewhere the minute a nuclear armed nation is in danger of being overrun we all lose.

Ironside
06-30-2008, 19:59
Somalia, without doubt.

No-one is going to waste a nuke on them and let's face it, if anyone has years of training for a post-apocalyptic wilderness, it's those chaps.

I'm not so sure, they lack a bit in the rebuild phase and I would say that's pretty important.

Tribesman
06-30-2008, 20:54
I'm not so sure, they lack a bit in the rebuild phase and I would say that's pretty important.
Are you confusing the Somalis with the current regime in Washington ?

Don Corleone
06-30-2008, 20:59
It's not often Count Arach and I wind up in complete agreement, but we do here. I'll go with "Who are the arms merchants, Alex?" to win the Daily Double.

WTF ?!?! :weirdthread: Lemur's jokes aside, how does one 'win' a nuclear war anyway. In the midst of Cold War paranoia in the early 80's, the best they could ever say was that our nuclear winter patch of rock would be safe for democracy, when we finally could come out of the bunkers in 500 years.

Sheesh.

Devastatin Dave
06-30-2008, 21:01
Keith Richards...

Dammit, I just lost my 6666 in posts. better make it worth it...
Teabag.
How long is your dong?
Tribesman + Sheep = love

Tribesman
06-30-2008, 21:07
Well Dave your level of intelligence still shines through .
So has kindergarden finished for the summer or have you still got some more lessons to go to ?

Csargo
06-30-2008, 22:54
The roaches

Roaches are nothing without us.

CrossLOPER
06-30-2008, 23:46
Iran, India, Taiwan, Pakistan, Israel and "Arabia" (which isn't even a real nation, barely a concept of a nation) somehow made it. However Russia, Gah! and Octosquids were left out.... I'm starting to think this poll wasn't serious. :idea2:

Evil_Maniac From Mars
06-30-2008, 23:48
Actually, come to think of it, Russia. Nuclear winter over Siberia would result in a temperature change of what, one or two degrees Celsius?

CrossLOPER
07-01-2008, 00:01
Actually, come to think of it, Russia. Nuclear winter over Siberia would result in a temperature change of what, one or two degrees Celsius?
Actually, I was thinking of one, huge, real-life S.T.A.L.K.E.R. arena.

https://i122.photobucket.com/albums/o273/CrossL/liveinrussia.jpg

ELITEofWARMANGINGERYBREADMEN88
07-01-2008, 00:19
China...


No Wait, CareBears! :clown::egypt::clown::egypt::clown::egypt::clown::egypt:

LittleGrizzly
07-01-2008, 00:39
Whichever company is quick enough to start selling sticks and stones for round 4

Devastatin Dave
07-01-2008, 03:25
Well Dave your level of intelligence still shines through .
So has kindergarden finished for the summer or have you still got some more lessons to go to ?

I got sent back, thanks for reminding me...:furious3:

Caius
07-01-2008, 03:33
Nobody wins in war. Those who win lose, and those who lose... well, lose.

KukriKhan
07-01-2008, 03:46
Well Dave your level of intelligence still shines through .
So has kindergarden finished for the summer or have you still got some more lessons to go to ?

I guess we're done then. Thanks for all contributions. :bow:

Kudos to our newest thread-killer.