Anakuj
07-10-2008, 15:28
Dear Persian Catapracht and Keravnos!
It seems to me that you are the only ones in these forum boards who have an incredible knowledge about the Ancient East, so I hope you can clear up my confused mind!
My 'problem' is the following: some times ago my brother showed me a very old preview of your Saka Rauka faction, where he found a very-very great and detailed paper about the sakas. I have read some parts of it several times now, but there is a part what I just can't understand.
Among his (Azes II's) billon coins, there is issued on the reverse the Prakrit legend "Indravarmaputrasa aspavarmasa strategasa jayatasa", or "of the victorious strategos Aspavarma, son of Indravarma". This man, probably an Indo-Greek general as his name suggests, also appears on a coin type closely related to those of Gondophares, the founder of the Indo-Parthian kingdom that later conquered the Indo-Saka kingdom of Azes II, which has lead to the suggestion that Aspavarma first served Azes II as a general ruling jointly with Azes II in the western Panjab and then later turned his allegiance to the conquering power - Gondophares and the Indo-Parthian kingdom.
- Thats clear. But:
These pieces of evidence, linking Azes II with Gondophares by Aspavarma, suggest that there is almost no doubt Azes II fell to the expanding power of Gondophares, whose regnal year most scholars seem to conclude was AD 19. From this, we can possibly deduce, according to one authority, that Azes II was ruling "within a decade or two of the birth of Christ", ie c.20-10 BC.
Is the regnal year means Gondophares' first year on the throne, or the last one? And if Azes II was ruling c.20-10 BC how could he fell to the expanding power of Gondophares, whose (maybe) first year on throne was AD 19, 15-20 years later then the fall of Azes II? According to Iranica.com and some other numismatic sites Azes II was ruling between 58-10 BC or 35-12 BC or 20 BC-5 AD. English is my third language, so please forgive me if it seems a very silly question, but I'm totally confused, and you are my last hope. :dizzy2:
THANK YOU!!!!!
Oh, there is something other, too. In my History Atlas I have seen that the 'capital' or center of Hyrkania was Zadrakarta, not Zadrakata. But if this is the native name of it or something, erm... just ignore me. :sweatdrop::sweatdrop::oops:.
It seems to me that you are the only ones in these forum boards who have an incredible knowledge about the Ancient East, so I hope you can clear up my confused mind!
My 'problem' is the following: some times ago my brother showed me a very old preview of your Saka Rauka faction, where he found a very-very great and detailed paper about the sakas. I have read some parts of it several times now, but there is a part what I just can't understand.
Among his (Azes II's) billon coins, there is issued on the reverse the Prakrit legend "Indravarmaputrasa aspavarmasa strategasa jayatasa", or "of the victorious strategos Aspavarma, son of Indravarma". This man, probably an Indo-Greek general as his name suggests, also appears on a coin type closely related to those of Gondophares, the founder of the Indo-Parthian kingdom that later conquered the Indo-Saka kingdom of Azes II, which has lead to the suggestion that Aspavarma first served Azes II as a general ruling jointly with Azes II in the western Panjab and then later turned his allegiance to the conquering power - Gondophares and the Indo-Parthian kingdom.
- Thats clear. But:
These pieces of evidence, linking Azes II with Gondophares by Aspavarma, suggest that there is almost no doubt Azes II fell to the expanding power of Gondophares, whose regnal year most scholars seem to conclude was AD 19. From this, we can possibly deduce, according to one authority, that Azes II was ruling "within a decade or two of the birth of Christ", ie c.20-10 BC.
Is the regnal year means Gondophares' first year on the throne, or the last one? And if Azes II was ruling c.20-10 BC how could he fell to the expanding power of Gondophares, whose (maybe) first year on throne was AD 19, 15-20 years later then the fall of Azes II? According to Iranica.com and some other numismatic sites Azes II was ruling between 58-10 BC or 35-12 BC or 20 BC-5 AD. English is my third language, so please forgive me if it seems a very silly question, but I'm totally confused, and you are my last hope. :dizzy2:
THANK YOU!!!!!
Oh, there is something other, too. In my History Atlas I have seen that the 'capital' or center of Hyrkania was Zadrakarta, not Zadrakata. But if this is the native name of it or something, erm... just ignore me. :sweatdrop::sweatdrop::oops:.