View Full Version : Historical question about Fabius Maximus
Majd il-Romani
07-29-2008, 06:07
I am writing a story and it takes place around 220-200 BC which is the time that the Roman's Fabius Maximus fought against Hannibal. my main character befriends a Fabius Maximus and I want to know the Dictator FM's first name (like Gaius or Kaeso) so I dont use his name. If possible could I know the name of his son?
Lysimachos
07-29-2008, 06:24
I am writing a story and it takes place around 220-200 BC which is the time that the Roman's Fabius Maximus fought against Hannibal. my main character befriends a Fabius Maximus and I want to know the Dictator FM's first name (like Gaius or Kaeso) so I dont use his name. If possible could I know the name of his son?
His name was Quintus, iirc.
Majd il-Romani
07-29-2008, 06:33
OK thanks
His name was Quintus, iirc.
What was the name Fabius Maximus too (and his father, and his grandfather,...)
Thats not an Arabic military maxim. Wasnt that Alexander, or Caesar? "Id rather fight an army of lions led by a sheep than fight an army of sheep led by a lion"
Majd il-Romani
07-29-2008, 16:02
hey I dunno, I saw it on one of EB's loading screens.
TWFanatic
07-29-2008, 16:24
His name was Quintus, iirc.
Quite so.
His second cognomen was of course "Cunctator"--"the Delayer."
Quite so.
His second cognomen was of course "Cunctator"--"the Delayer."
To be over-exact "Cuntator" was his third cognomen, his second was "Verrucosus"
TWFanatic
07-29-2008, 18:02
To be over-exact "Cuntator" was his third cognomen, his second was "Verrucosus"
Wow I've never heard this before. What was "Verrucosus" for?
Someone who actually speaks Latin may have to confirm this, but I believe it means 'warty'.
Correct
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabius_Maximus
Lysimachos
07-29-2008, 19:58
Actually, i think those are agnomina, while his cognomen - which earlier had the same function as an agnomen then - is Maximus :)
Edit: Well, could of course be that this terminology wasn't yet established in those days...
Majd il-Romani
07-30-2008, 18:51
OK one more question, was the Aurelian family a plebian family or a patrician family?
ps EB has really helped me withthe story and its realism. great job guys!
OK one more question, was the Aurelian family a plebian family or a patrician family?
ps EB has really helped me withthe story and its realism. great job guys!
I think Plebeian. Only the plebs could run for Tribune of the Plebs, and there's an historic record of a Gaius Aurelius Cotta running for that position and losing.
Majd il-Romani
07-30-2008, 20:49
OK thanks a million
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.