Log in

View Full Version : WotB Sixth Council Session - Legislation Voting



Ibn-Khaldun
01-27-2009, 15:09
This poll is only for players of Will of the Basileus.

Voting will be open for 48 hours, until 14:00 GMT on Thursday, January 29th.

Please note: If you wish to abstain on a vote, do not vote either yes or no for it.

The full text of the proposals is as follows:

Edict 6.1: Alexandreia must be taken.
Proposed: Sarpedon Syriakos

Edict 6.2: did not receive the required seconds!

Edict 6.3: That the Epirote city of Tylis be taken.
Proposed: Panaitolos Ankyrikos
Seconded: Sarpedon Syriakos, Patrokles Adiabenikos

Charter Amendment 6.1: At each Council Session, the Basileus may make one Edict or Permanent Edict that automatically succeeds. (Beyond that it's just like a regular permanent/non-permanent edict.) This would be added to the Basileus' powers in Rule 2.4.
Proposed: Sarpedon Syriakos

Charter Amendment 6.2: The following part will be added to the General Rules:

1.6 - Game Master: Ibn-Khaldun will serve as Game Master and is responsible for management of the game and enforcement of the Game Rules. Ibn-Khaldun can delegate any of his powers to another person whenever he chooses.
Proposed: Magistrate
Seconded: Aratos Arethousas Syriakes, Panaitolos Ankyrikos

Charter Amendment 6.3: The following part will be added to the Rule 1.4:

In case player do not vote in 2 consecutive Council Session Ibn-Khaldun can kill that avatar off(including family members).
Proposed: Magistrate
Seconded: Aratos Arethousas Syriakes, Panaitolos Ankyrikos

Charter Amendment 6.4: The following part will be added to the Rule 2.5:

If player haven't posted screenshot with the results of the battle he will receive 1 Bp less than shown below.
Proposed: Magistrate
Seconded: Aratos Arethousas Syriakes, Panaitolos Ankyrikos

Celtic_Punk
01-27-2009, 15:44
the last charter amendment should not pass... the present rule only affecting heroic victories is best. I usually some people like to use anti aliasing, so that puts a dent into screenshots. and its a bit unfair to get 1 or even 0 victory points just cause you buggered up. posting screenshots can be a little time consuming too, especially when you've fought a 20-30 minute battle, and need to hit the road. alot of us have jobs or families.

not that not posting screenies is good... post them you bastards!

The Celtic Viking
01-27-2009, 15:51
the last charter amendment should not pass... the present rule only affecting heroic victories is best. I usually some people like to use anti aliasing, so that puts a dent into screenshots. and its a bit unfair to get 1 or even 0 victory points just cause you buggered up. posting screenshots can be a little time consuming too, especially when you've fought a 20-30 minute battle, and need to hit the road. alot of us have jobs or families.

not that not posting screenies is good... post them you bastards!

One word: fraps.

Ibn-Khaldun
01-27-2009, 15:59
Celtic_Punk - I know that people have families and RL can interfere. I just want that at least Battle results are posted and nothing more. If you can not do it right after battle then just post the results in written and mention that You will post SS later. That way you will not lose Bp's and you can post that SS later when you have some spare moments or sometime in the next day.

Ibn-Khaldun
01-28-2009, 14:56
Conclusion:

All legislation passed. No tallies necessary.

Any questions about the current voting please post below.