World Politics - Israel/Palestine... Why? [Archive]

Seamus Fermanagh

01-27-2009, 17:11

Don:

1. I enjoy hearing the opposing perspective, especially when supported by evidence and/or good logic. Nothing tests and refines my own sense of the world as fully as learning from the other perspective. Pushing my own case encourages the pushback that generates this knowledge.

2. Sometimes it is cathartic to throw out my viewpoint, even when I know it will be disagreed with by a majority of those reading. Just the act of stating my own views provides a sense of satisfaction.

3. Every so often I strike a chord with someone on some subject and I know I have added a little something to their own knowledge of things -- satisfies the "teacher" in me.

Warning: if this sub-theme develops long enough I'll have to give it its own thread.

LittleGrizzly

01-27-2009, 17:13

I was laughing all the way through that post don, good stuff...

anyway onto your points...

I usually get tired of the israeli topics after a while, we usually end up going over similar stuff everytime.... god knows how many times the discussion of israel's founding has come up, then we usually get onto population figures before and after israel was founded, if i haven't been involved in one for a while or there some recent news on the issue to get me 'worked up' i will have the energy to take part, but i get fatigued after a while, i think it was after about 30 pages on the last one i finally gave up...

I suppose i remain convinced that people can be convinced by logic, or specifically my logic, and i suppose most other people are like this as well, either that or on the other side of the coin they simply can't believe a person has logically choosen thier position and wants to show them the error in thier ways... theres probably a little anger venting in there as well... i know i usually feel better after calling the israel goverment terrorists...

I would make one small point though... the palestinian side usually runs along the lines off thier both as bad as each other, whilst the israeli side runs along the lines off they are better than the palestinians...(or the palestinian goverment/hamas/fatah)

I'm really curious regardless of your stance, whether you have any marginal hope or belief that you might actually influence anyone's views on this issue, and if so, what supports you in that delusion?

I suppose i never think i will change hoohah guys views, but maybe some of the more nuetral minded people or perhaps just those curious and browsing, though i guess you hope you can prove a few facts show that the other is wrong in a few things and with the person's new awareness of the facts they can make a better informed decision...

Edit: probably a good idea seperating this into a different topic seamus...

Agreed, and posts moved to this thread. You accidently get a +1, but your a decent sort when you're not mafia, so....

Don Corleone

01-27-2009, 17:21

I'm curious folks, and I'm taking an informal poll, tangentially related to the thread topic. We have a 'usual suspects' list of those who play apologist for the IDF versus those who play apologist for Hamas. While the degree of defense (and denial) varies among members on each side, at the end of the day, I believe the lines are pretty set.

Normally in politics, 1/3 argues with the other 1/3 for mindshare of the undecided 1/3 in the middle. On this particular issue, there is no middle, and it's rare, if not strictly hypothetical, for somebody's views to shift on this issue.

I know Idaho and Tribesman are always going to agree with the Palestinians. And I know CR & Hooahguy are going to come down on the side of the Israelis. There's never going to be any deviation from that predetermined result.

So, like Sisyphus with his rock, we roll this debate out about once a month. I'm as guilty as anyone. But I find myself asking, myself and all of you, why do we continue to debate this? Do any of us really honestly believe we're not in the Verdun of backroom conversations? Do any of you have any hope of climbing out of the trench and advancing, or of evolving your own line of thought, for that matter?

I'm serious about this... I'm really curious regardless of your stance, whether you have any marginal hope or belief that you might actually influence anyone's views on this issue, and if so, what supports you in that delusion?

I should make note, I myself have been pretty passionate over the years as a usual defender of Israel, however I can see where they've been wrong on some issues, and I can attest to those. I just don't want anybody thinking that I'm claiming to be an unbiased mediator.

Hooahguy

01-27-2009, 17:23

I'm serious about this... I'm really curious regardless of your stance, whether you have any marginal hope or belief that you might actually influence anyone's views on this issue, and if so, what supports you in that delusion?

i have no hope that tribesman, idaho, or bopa will change their views.
but i do, as Seamus Fermanagh said, take satisfaction in telling the word what i think.

let me be clear about something. i am both pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian. i want a Palestinian country to live peacefully side-by-side with Israel. i do not want the destruction of the Palestinian people. i want them to live and prosper, but live peacefully. that, by my definition, as well as people like Alan Dershowitz, and im sure many others, that is the definition of being pro-Palestinian.
if you support Palestinians in taking violence against israel, you are not working for the betterment of the Palestinians.

LittleGrizzly

01-27-2009, 17:24

was laughing all the way through that post don, good stuff...

anyway onto your points...

I usually get tired of the israeli topics after a while, we usually end up going over similar stuff everytime.... god knows how many times the discussion of israel's founding has come up, then we usually get onto population figures before and after israel was founded, if i haven't been involved in one for a while or there some recent news on the issue to get me 'worked up' i will have the energy to take part, but i get fatigued after a while, i think it was after about 30 pages on the last one i finally gave up...

I suppose i remain convinced that people can be convinced by logic, or specifically my logic, and i suppose most other people are like this as well, either that or on the other side of the coin they simply can't believe a person has logically choosen thier position and wants to show them the error in thier ways... theres probably a little anger venting in there as well... i know i usually feel better after calling the israel goverment terrorists...

I would make one small point though... the palestinian side usually runs along the lines off thier both as bad as each other, whilst the israeli side runs along the lines off they are better than the palestinians...(or the palestinian goverment/hamas/fatah)

I'm really curious regardless of your stance, whether you have any marginal hope or belief that you might actually influence anyone's views on this issue, and if so, what supports you in that delusion?

I suppose i never think i will change hoohah guys views, but maybe some of the more nuetral minded people or perhaps just those curious and browsing, though i guess you hope you can prove a few facts show that the other is wrong in a few things and with the person's new awareness of the facts they can make a better informed decision...

Edit: did i hear something about a poll....?

HoreTore

01-27-2009, 17:30

Where's the option for "I support the civilians, may the war-hungry idiots burn"?

I support a secular one-state solution. So I guess I support both sides. Just neither of those in charge.

Andres

01-27-2009, 17:31

My viewpoint is not in the poll.

I think both sides are in the wrong.

:shrug:

EDIT: HoreTore was faster... I'm getting old and rusty :shame:

Don Corleone

01-27-2009, 17:32

LittleGrizzly

01-27-2009, 17:36

someone else mentioned it in the other thread, an idea to stop the majority lording over the minority.... you could use a few methods, one would be to require something like 75% to pass legislation, it would stop any bad laws getting passed and mean coalition goverment and compromise is the only way to govern.... maybe we should have this discussion back over in the other topic ?

Tribesman

01-27-2009, 17:38

not very surprising that most neo-nazi's vote for the SP
:laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4:
Fragony you really are out of the loop since your old "lets beat up immigrants" days , why not visit some of those nice dutch neo-nazi websites and see how happy the scum there are that the Israelis are confronting the muslim menace .
You will see Frag that they have the same "muslims gonna getya" line of errrrrrr......"thought" that you exhibit .

I know Idaho and Tribesman are always going to agree with the Palestinians.
Its not that I agree with the Palestinians Don , its just that those who are most vocal in support of Israel are usually the ones with gaping great holes in their arguements which are easier to rip apart .

Andres

01-27-2009, 17:38

HoreTore, do you really think a one-state solution, with a Palestinian majority, would allow for Jewish residents? A bit off topic for this particular thread, but by saying one-secular state, you're saying Palestine only, no more Jews, whether you intend to or not.

How about a (con)federal state, with protection of minority rights written in the constitution? And certain mechanisms when deciding to change certain issues (listed in the constitution, e.g. said minority rights), like a qualified majority (for example 1/2 +1 in each "group" and 2/3 in the whole parliament)?

Andres, I think you fall under Gah. Sorry. :shrug:

:inquisitive:

I feel... excluded.

:bigcry:

HoreTore

01-27-2009, 17:39

HoreTore, do you really think a one-state solution, with a Palestinian majority, would allow for Jewish residents? A bit off topic for this particular thread, but by saying one-secular state, you're saying Palestine only, no more Jews, whether you intend to or not.

PAH! A proper police should help iron out the idiots on both sides, ie. the settlers and Hamas. You don't see many attacks from the arabs living inside Israel, do you? Why are they capable of living in peace, but those who have lived with bombings all their life are not? If anything, it should be the other way around. I'm more than confident that there are enough moderates on both sides to make a state. There would be some tension with the idiots, but I can't see it being more than there already is.

And I'm sorry, if you can't make a state including the original inhabitants(the palestinians), then you can't make a state. Pure and simple.

ajaxfetish

01-27-2009, 17:40

I really can't bring myself to support either side. I don't think moving arguments would be enough to change that; it'll require an improvement in the maturity and compassion of the leadership of one or both groups.

Ajax

Don Corleone

01-27-2009, 17:42

How about a (con)federal state, with protection of minority rights written in the constitution? And certain mechanisms when deciding to change certain issues (listed in the constitution, e.g. said minority rights), like a qualified majority (for example 1/2 +1 in each "group" and 2/3 in the whole parliament)?

This is kind of off-topic, as Little Grizzly politely hinted, but I'm sorry, I can't resist. There are no protections you could put into the Consitution that the Palestinians wouldn't override on day 3. If they didn't have the votes, enough Jordanians, Syrians Lebanese, et. al. would enter the new secular state, register to vote, and swell the ranks until they had the votes, assuming folks like Hamas would waste their time with following Constitutions in the first place.

Any one-state solution means death/displacement to all Jews in Israel. Period.

Furunculus

01-27-2009, 17:42

I voted with israel but this statement sums me up perfectly too:

let me be clear about something. i am both pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian. i want a Palestinian country to live peacefully side-by-side with Israel. i do not want the destruction of the Palestinian people. i want them to live and prosper, but live peacefully.

Andres

01-27-2009, 17:44

This is kind of off-topic, as Little Grizzly politely hinted, but I'm sorry, I can't resist. There are no protections you could put into the Consitution that the Palestinians wouldn't override on day 3. If they didn't have the votes, enough Jordanians, Syrians Lebanese, et. al. would enter the new secular state, register to vote, and swell the ranks until they had the votes, assuming folks like Hamas would waste their time with following Constitutions in the first place.

Any one-state solution means death/displacement to all Jews in Israel. Period.

Well, if a majority in each group and 2/3d in the entire parliament (cumulative conditions) is needed, then it doesn't matter how large the arab group is.

It works for Belgium :shrug:

master of the puppets

01-27-2009, 17:45

GAH!!! which palestinians do you expect me to support. I support those getting shelled by the isrealis, those crushed to death by falling buildings or horribly burning because there was a member of hamas in their building. but i don't support the men who fire rockets into isreali towns. i support those who lost their homes, their ancestral lands to the jews. but i do not support those that will kill children to reclaim them.

and who among the isrealis am i to support? i would gladly support those who want a peaceful resolution. those who advocate talks, and those small few harmed by hamas. but i cannot condone the generals who want to drop tons of explosives. those who attack schools, blow up homes. kill indescriminatly and destroy thousands of pounds of food meant to feed the impovershed.

Don Corleone

01-27-2009, 17:45

I support a strong, autonomous, healthy and prosperous Palestine. I just believe it has to be along side, living in peaceful harmony with Israel. . I have nothing against the Palestinians, and I do not begrudge them their own prosperous, soevereign state. But I am coming to believe that is not what they want for themselves.

HoreTore

01-27-2009, 17:45

This is kind of off-topic, as Little Grizzly politely hinted, but I'm sorry, I can't resist. There are no protections you could put into the Consitution that the Palestinians wouldn't override on day 3. If they didn't have the votes, enough Jordanians, Syrians Lebanese, et. al. would enter the new secular state, register to vote, and swell the ranks until they had the votes, assuming folks like Hamas would waste their time with following Constitutions in the first place.

Why do you only mention the palestinian crazies as the people who would break such a constitution? Do you really think the jewish settlers would somehow magically stop their arab-killing ways?

In order for such a state to come about, there would undoubtedly be tensions. But I really can't see how there would be more than there already is. The IDF would still be as strong, and it should be quite capable of protecting both sides.

ajaxfetish

01-27-2009, 17:46

And I'm sorry, if you can't make a state including the original inhabitants(the palestinians), then you can't make a state. Pure and simple.
Maybe give them a modicum of self-government, call them the Palestinian Nation, and set up a Bureau of Palestinian Affairs to manage relationships with them? Then you could relocate them to reservations in the Negev desert so you could use any quality land they happen to have.

Ajax

HoreTore

01-27-2009, 17:48

Maybe give them a modicum of self-government, call them the Palestinian Nation, and set up a Bureau of Palestinian Affairs to manage relationships with them? Then you could relocate them to reservations in the Negev desert so you could use any quality land they happen to have.

Ajax

Uhm..... That would be the current situation....

Any solution to the problem in the middle-east would have to allow the palestinians the right to return to their land, the land stolen from them. Nothing else will last.

ajaxfetish

01-27-2009, 17:50

Uhm..... That would be the current situation....

Any solution to the problem in the middle-east would have to allow the palestinians the right to return to their land, the land stolen from them. Nothing else will last.
I'm just saying, some of us may have put states together in the past without including the original inhabitants.

Ajax

HoreTore

01-27-2009, 17:57

I'm just saying, some of us may have put states together in the past without including the original inhabitants.

Yes, but you massacred 95% of them. So I guess another option is to massacre 95% of either the jews or arabs.... But then again, this is the 18th century anymore, killing millions to keep order is kinda frowned upon....

Furunculus

01-27-2009, 18:00

How about a (con)federal state, with protection of minority rights written in the constitution? And certain mechanisms when deciding to change certain issues (listed in the constitution, e.g. said minority rights), like a qualified majority (for example 1/2 +1 in each "group" and 2/3 in the whole parliament)?

hmmm, sounds like................ belgium, but with suicide bombings and white phosherous too. no thanks.

more seriously:

there is no common polity therefore there can be no true nation of citizens.

as i said in another thread:

My point is that a representative polity functions precisely because the individual delegates responsibility to a political class to act in their name. The individual must therefore take responsibility for the actions committed in his name, and does so in sound conscience because the community have a sufficient pool shared values that decisions made are likely to reflect the will of the individual.

drone

01-27-2009, 18:10

I don't believe any other topic fits the Gah! option better. :gah2: ftw.

rory_20_uk

01-27-2009, 18:15

Where's the option for "I support the civilians, may the war-hungry idiots burn"?

I support a secular one-state solution. So I guess I support both sides. Just neither of those in charge.

Right on the mark! :thumbsup:

But in terms of interest, getting increasingly apathetic. My life is too short to get an ulcer over this segment of desert.

~:smoking:

Strike For The South

01-27-2009, 20:38

I support mass geoncide

Hooahguy

01-27-2009, 21:25

wait- how come im the one who "started" this thread? i didnt. don did.
just letting everyone know....

tibilicus

01-27-2009, 21:55

Where's the option for they're both as bad as each other and quite frankly im sick of hearing about them continuously blow each other up?

~;)

drone

01-27-2009, 21:58

wait- how come im the one who "started" this thread? i didnt. don did.
just letting everyone know....

If I'm not mistaken, the thread wasn't started, just split off from the other thread by the moderators with the poll added. Your post from the other thread was the oldest, so you get post#1, (which to the forum code gives you creator credits).

Where's the option for they're both as bad as each other and quite frankly im sick of hearing about them continuously blow each other up?
I believe that option is Gah!, which happens to be "winning". ~D

Incongruous

01-27-2009, 22:34

Palestine, to me it is almost black and white, good & evil. To me Israel is the colonial occupier and a brutal one at that, which shows no sign of ever treating the Palestinians as human beings or allowing them to create a state. It also annoys me that Israelis somehow thought that they would not be bombed by the Palestinians, it is a the simple application of logic, Israel has been founded upon Palestinian land and it now continues to take more. Rule one of Imperial adventures is, you will bleed for it, Israel is bleeding for the crime of colonisation and racism.

To me it is the right of any occupied people to fight back, I see no difference in the way Israel bombs hostpitals and schools and the way Palestinians blow up school buses, except in the death toll and the idea behind them. The Israelis murder Palestinians to get rid of them, to continue the expansion of their zionist dream, the Palestinians blow themselves up becasue they now have nowhere else to go, the Gazans live in refugee camps and are expeposed to brutality on a daily basis, they have lived no other life. The Israelis take away their food and destroy their homes, they shoot them when they protest peacefully. Then the West, that most disgustingly hypocritical of civilizations dares to tell them about peacefull solutions? Lokk, they say, look at what happened yesterday at the dividing wall! It is of no consequence, because the West, following Washington's lead, does not care about the Palestinians.

And so, when these young men and women (some of them university students) have had their families murdered or brutalised, they see no other way, and they are right, they strap a bomb onto their bodies. They walk into an Israeli school bus, and their despair, anger and pain is so strong, they see only enemies in the faces of children and they set it off. Children are no longer children and life is no longer worth lving.

I hate Israel, because they forced a people so close to the edge that they have no other way out other than to kill.
An Israeli soldier kills because he is ordered to a Palestinain blows himself up because he has lost everything. This is the difference.

Marshal Murat

01-27-2009, 23:06

The Israelis take away their food and destroy their homes, they shoot them when they protest peacefully. Then the West, that most disgustingly hypocritical of civilizations dares to tell them about peacefull solutions? Lokk, they say, look at what happened yesterday at the dividing wall! It is of no consequence, because the West, following Washington's lead, does not care about the Palestinians.

I'd like to see any news about Israel killing "peacefully protesting" Palestinians because I haven't seen anything that would indicate that the Palestinians have tried the non-violent approach to solving this problem. If anything, many in the "West" care just as much about Palestine as they do about Israel. The media roundly blamed Israel for using excessive force against Palestine, I heard of many who disapproved of Israeli policy against Palestine.

I think Martin Luther King Jr. said, about using violence to accomplish domestic goals, that were one to begin a violent campaign against their "oppressors", then the "oppressors" feel justified in responding in kind. I think that for all attempts to make this an international issue, it's more a domestic issue. If the African-Americans in this country began a campaign of violence and rocket attacks then we would respond in kind, avoiding International action. It's reasonable to assume that both sides are justified in their actions. I however, roundly condemn Palestinian tactics against Israel. While Israel does kill civilians in it's attacks against Palestine, they are primarily concerned with military targets. They've moderated their "imperialist" tendencies, in my view, and have started to see reason. Palestinian tactics deliberately target civilians hoping to somehow "cow" the Israeli population into giving up their war against Palestine. It's a stupid tactic, and one that has only bred ill-will and mistrust between the two side rather than solving anything. The random violence and "terrorism" that the PLO and Hamas has used has only resulted in stronger and stronger backlash against the groups rather than making Israel respond to their demands.

To say the least, this problem can be solved. South Africa has solved her problems, moving from one of the most oppressive systems in human history to being *relatively* democratic. It wouldn't have helped if the ANC began a rocket campaign against South African cities from Botswana or Mozambique. What did help was the realization by Botha that he would eventually have to work with the ANC to maintain his countries' integrity. So he began secret talks with Mandela and other ANC members, trying to work out how they could rectify the situation. Palestinians have to realize that simply blowing themselves up or shooting rockets into Israel solves nothing. They need to change their government (even if Hamas tries to kill them), have responsible lower-level talks with Israel to wake them up to the situation at hand, to at least alleviate the conditions in Gaza and the West Bank.

Tribesman

01-27-2009, 23:09

If I'm not mistaken, the thread wasn't started, just split off from the other thread
Yes , which is why there is a reponse to fragonys nonsense in this topic but fragonys nonsense remains in the other .

Husar

01-27-2009, 23:13

Nice, another middle eastern Schlammschlacht thread.
And again we have the usual suspects supportin the evil Palestinians, and they even think they can convince everybody...oh, wait... :laugh4:
It's almost like the positions in the discussions are as hard as the positions of the politicians over there, no wonder noone can solve that because they're all the same.
When you cannot admit the other side may have a point here or there you cannot solve such a conflict, it's pretty simple, then again you may not even want to solve the conflict because conflicts are nice and preferable, when you watch them from your sofa in a relatively safe distance anyway. :dizzy2:

Also convincing people seems really hard nowadays, I probably try it as well now and then but it feels a lot more rewarding to just troll a bit, I mean you get warning points for it. :sweatdrop:

Meneldil

01-27-2009, 23:19

The only real question is "when and where is the marriage between Fragony and Tribesman taking place ?".

Don Corleone

01-27-2009, 23:23

:laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4:
:laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4:
:laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4:
:laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4: :laugh4:
:laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4:
:laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4:

Hooahguy

01-28-2009, 00:07

Ice

01-28-2009, 00:15

This isn't a zero sum game. I support both parties... pretty much along the lines of what Horetore has said about the one state solution or something similar.

LittleGrizzly

01-28-2009, 00:19

Im sorry but what is the difference between legitimising suicide bombers and legitimising the isreali attacks... both are equally legitimate or illegitimate as far as im concerned...

I wouldn't legitimise the actions of either side... but i can certainly understand why a suicide bomber does what he does... and i can also understand why an israeli feels right to strike at palestinians....

Furunculus

01-28-2009, 00:22

odd, the results are coming out the opposite of what i would have predicted, for those who profess an opinion, must be the result of my victim complex.

Strike For The South

01-28-2009, 00:34

There was nothing of substance in this.

LittleGrizzly

01-28-2009, 00:39

I didn't now Gah! was so well supported either...

I think i now what you mean... i put myself down as a palestinian supporter so to speak, rather because i was defining myself but what others would think rather than my opinion of my views.... whereas i would have gone for the Gah! option as i see both sides as bad as each other... which is what i think a lot of the 'pro-palestinian' people actually think...

The reason i come off as pro palestinian is because i think the israelis are the only ones who could solve the problem but choose not to....

Incongruous

01-28-2009, 01:56

@Bopa-
so you are legitimizing suicide bombers, the kind of people who killed two cousins and a friend of mine? people who murdered my friend/cousins for no reason other than because they were jewish?
i have no words for you to express my utter disgust.
:shame:

They were not killed because they were Jewish, that Palestinian was not looking to go and kill a Jew, he was looking to kill an Israeli.
No reason? Well I think that you are being foolish if you think that the Palestinian killed himself and others for no reason. The Palestinians have plenty of reasons to kill Israelis.

Disgust...
and the:shame: icon, yeah very powerful coming from someone who supports a war machine which tortures children...
Try again please.

Don Corleone

01-28-2009, 02:36

They were not killed because they were Jewish, that Palestinian was not looking to go and kill a Jew, he was looking to kill an Israeli.
No reason? Well I think that you are being foolish if you think that the Palestinian killed himself and others for no reason. The Palestinians have plenty of reasons to kill Israelis.

Disgust...
and the:shame: icon, yeah very powerful coming from someone who supports a war machine which tortures children...
Try again please.

Okay, I've learned 2 things:

1) The vast majority of you are too :daisy: to pony up one way or the other. You'd rather vote "Gah" and go on griping about both sides, without doing any hard work of taking a stance.

2) Bopa has no compassion for somebody who's lost family members. He'd rather tell somebody who lost a cousin that they got what they had coming to them. Damn....

If a moderator would be so kind as to close this thread, I think I've learned everything I need to about the Backroom in general, and Bopa in particular. I knew there were hateful people hanging around, but I didn't know it got down to this level.... :oops:

Incongruous

01-28-2009, 02:46

Okay, I've learned 2 things:

1) The vast majority of you are too :daisy: to pony up one way or the other. You'd rather vote "Gah" and go on griping about both sides, without doing any hard work of taking a stance.

2) Bopa has no compassion for somebody who's lost family members. He'd rather tell somebody who lost a cousin that they got what they had coming to them. Damn....

If a moderator would be so kind as to close this thread, I think I've learned everything I need to about the Backroom in general, and Bopa in particular. I knew there were hateful people hanging around, but I didn't know it got down to this level.... :oops:

Yes, so much compassion for the thousands of slain Palestinian children has been show here.
I am not celebrating the death of anyone, I just thought that hooah had drawn the wrong conclusion from the experience.
I was annoyed at his disgust and :shame: icon because of his views on the IDF which is known to have tortured children.

Now, I understand why hooah's friend and cousins were killed, but I feel that he does not and this is a big problem. He used the term Jewish and believed that the bomber had no good reason. This is a clearly dangerous mindset because it shows he has no understanding of the Palestinians. The bomber clearly had a reason and to him a good one.

Hmm, so it would seem that you either have an inherent dislike for me becasue I am pro-Palestinian or you did not read my post properly. :smash:

Also, I called him out on the icon because I felt it was a cheap shot, nowhere did I say that it was "AWSOME TEH COOLZ" that Israeli civilians were being killed.
I dislike his attempt to shame me out of the discussion, something which you have also tried to do Don:yes:

Don Corleone

01-28-2009, 02:51

Incongruous

01-28-2009, 02:54

The man said he lost two friends and a cousin, and you all as much as said "GOOD!". Justify it any way you want to, claim victim status if it makes you feel better, but you gloated that somebody died. Yes, hundreds of Palestinian children died, and that's horrible. That doesn't excuse you gloating over Hooahs friends and relatives dying. At least be a man and own your words, or are you capable of that?

Hmmm, so Don where did I say "GOOD"?
Oh sorry its that you read from my post that I had almost, kinda said good but actually had not, but that doesn't matter because that is what you took from it?
Oh, ok then Don, I am very sorry for having allowed you to misread my post and get angry:shame: