View Full Version : My newest monarch
Greyblades
03-08-2009, 01:50
https://img27.imageshack.us/img27/1820/17477286.th.jpg (https://img27.imageshack.us/my.php?image=17477286.jpg)
Do I even have to say anything?
Cecil XIX
03-08-2009, 02:05
Wow, she looks a lot prettier than I expected.
Does this mean that Monarchs change the same way they did in history? Doesn't seem like there's a family tree, but surely that would be relevant?
Greyblades
03-08-2009, 02:08
You have noticed the date, havent you?
A Very Super Market
03-08-2009, 04:20
In my Prussian game, Austria also had a female leader, and Maratha starts out with one.
But this... can't be coincidental..
https://i257.photobucket.com/albums/hh210/Lysander_Photo/Tarabi.png
INDIA: RULED BY LESBIANS AND TIGERS SINCE 1700!
I have noticed a hell of a lot of bugs in those monarchy/heads of state tabs. Female leaders are also referred to as he or him a lot, instead of her or she.
Still, it's no gamebreaker.
A Very Super Market
03-08-2009, 04:38
He-heh-heh.
Megas Methuselah
03-08-2009, 06:21
:laugh4:
Tartantyco
03-08-2009, 06:32
...I don't get it.
Sol Invictus
03-08-2009, 06:45
Woah! Victoria and Tarabai are HOT!:2thumbsup:
Cecil XIX
03-08-2009, 07:00
You have noticed the date, havent you?
Whoops, looks like I just exposed my ignorance. :sweatdrop:
A Very Super Market
03-08-2009, 07:31
Tarantyco.
She is female and has a mistress.
Man, Malkut, she must be hard to get but that only makes her more attractive! ~;)
Ibn-Khaldun
03-08-2009, 09:46
Must say that those women in ETW are really beautiful! :dizzy2:
Man, Malkut, she must be hard to get but that only makes her more attractive! ~;)
Must say that those women in ETW are really beautiful! :dizzy2:
Woah! Victoria and Tarabai are HOT!:2thumbsup:
Guys, you do realise that they are made out of polygons, right? -_-
Megas Methuselah
03-08-2009, 10:00
Guys, you do realise that they are made out of polygons, right? -_-
O tempora! O mores!
Hmm in my game Austria and Prussia both had a female monarch
Guys, you do realise that they are made out of polygons, right? -_-
Actually, they are simple image files, and are therefore made of pixels.
Sir Beane
03-08-2009, 10:41
Actually, they are simple image files, and are therefore made of pixels.
Just like a real woman :2thumbsup:. No, wait....
Calmarac
03-08-2009, 11:55
I commented on this yesterday when I saw Victoria succeed William in 1720 in an AAR thread at .net - http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=231532&page=5
As I said over there -
Victoria! In 1720?
She wasn't even born until 1819 and came to the throne in 1837. What happened to Anne and all the Georges?
I'm really surprised that CA didn't just use the historical timeline
1689-1702 William III (and Mary 1689-1694)
1702-1714 Anne
1714-1727 George I
1727-1760 George II
1760-1820 George III
1820-1830 George IV
1830-1837 William IV
1837-1901 Victoria
http://www.royal.gov.uk/HistoryoftheMonarchy/KingsandQueensoftheUnitedKingdom/TheHanoverians/Victoria.aspx
Great AAR by the way, thanks for taking the trouble
But really, the Victorian era starting in 1720....bah...mutter...mutter...
The only comments so far have been to dismiss it as "Oh well, anything can happen in ETW" and "It isn't the same Victoria"
Seriously, what was wrong with just using a simple list of (historical) Monarch names? And have the right portrait too for that matter? I know TW are 'what if' games but using random or out of sequence monarchs is, well, pointless and just wrong. :thumbsdown:
It's hardly as if the names, ages and appearences of the monarchs are set in stone. If you want to see historical re-enactment, read a book.
https://i257.photobucket.com/albums/hh210/Lysander_Photo/Tarabi.png
INDIA: RULED BY LESBIANS AND TIGERS SINCE 1700!
Hmm, I see she likes a man (woman?) in uniform.
Maleficus
03-08-2009, 12:00
https://img27.imageshack.us/img27/1820/17477286.th.jpg (https://img27.imageshack.us/my.php?image=17477286.jpg)
Do I even have to say anything?
It's 25 years in and you have nothing in India?
BTW how do you make screenshots?
Greyblades
03-08-2009, 13:33
I think the irony is that about 10 years earlier I got a message that William just had a son called george...
A Very Super Market
03-08-2009, 17:21
Fraps.
I think printscreen is the "official" way to take them, but it doesn't work all the time.
Guys, you do realise that they are made out of polygons, right? -_-
What are polygons if not virtual cells?
Hmm, I see she likes a man (woman?) in uniform.
I'm sure she also finds tigers in uniforms to be charming.
Kind of like those people who dress up their dogs.
I'm sure she also finds tigers in uniforms to be charming.
Kind of like those people who dress up their dogs.
*Is instantly reminded of "The Tiger Who Came to Tea"*
Who else read and loved that book?
Mister V
03-08-2009, 19:00
It is somehow appropriate that a man-eating tiger would be attracted to a woman-eating minister .
:laugh4:
With the description of the ancillary ("Not every lady is ladylike...") and the uniform fetish, my imagination paints bizarre pictures...
Generally speaking, I like the random monarchs... it wouldn't be fun otherwise. Also, the fact that you get historical figures as generals is particularly awesome.
It's hardly as if the names, ages and appearences of the monarchs are set in stone. If you want to see historical re-enactment, read a book.
I used this same argument against someone concerning factions in multiplayer. However this use of it here fails, to be frank. The fact that Victoria comes to the throne over 100 years earlier than she should does not make the game any more fun and only serves to miseducate people for absolutely no reason.
A Very Super Market
03-09-2009, 00:02
Miseducate?
You are arguing that the monarchs have a set sequence, and death time. Why? Victoria is just one of the names they have in the database for female monarchs.
Sir Beane
03-09-2009, 00:06
Miseducate?
You are arguing that the monarchs have a set sequence, and death time. Why? Victoria is just one of the names they have in the database for female monarchs.
Its slightly odd though, because she seems to appear regardless of anything else. I got a messahe saying 'Your monarch has had an heir, his name is George' (or something to that effect). But as soon as the King dies I get Victoria.
She must have killed off baby George somehow...
Sol Invictus
03-09-2009, 01:30
Guys, you do realise that they are made out of polygons, right? -_-
I don't hear you!:quiet:
NimitsTexan
03-12-2009, 00:20
I have started a British campaign 4 times. Every time, Victoria came to the thrown after William. Based on this and other people's observations, far from being random, I'd say there was a bug pretty much ensuring all your Monarchs will be female, regardless of the gender of the so called heir.
A Very Super Market
03-12-2009, 00:28
What the bugger, that sounds rather stupid.
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.