View Full Version : Left-handed people
spiritusdilutus
10-10-2009, 20:36
So, are there any records on left-handed people in ancient times? Ones specifically mentioning people that favour their other hand, or maybe soldiers in battle wielding a weapon in the left hand.
Were there possibly any custom made swords or axes for the purpose?
I know that with Rome, they would just train any lefties to use their right hand to fight. as for custom made swords and axes, I don't think so. you pick up a sword, it's going to work just as well whether you are wielding it in your right hand or left.
G. Septimus
10-10-2009, 20:53
i Think there is
there must be. but ancient bioghraphy does'nt tell us about the persons left handness
spiritusdilutus
10-10-2009, 21:01
I know that with Rome, they would just train any lefties to use their right hand to fight. as for custom made swords and axes, I don't think so. you pick up a sword, it's going to work just as well whether you are wielding it in your right hand or left.
Yeah you`re right. I asked just in case there was a single weapon accustomed only to right-handed people.
Hmm, I could have guessed it was like that with Rome. No making an exception for a small minority, getting them to use the right hand seemed a cheaper and a quicker way around it.
spiritusdilutus
10-10-2009, 21:05
i Think there is
there must be. but ancient bioghraphy does'nt tell us about the persons left handness
Ok, I am not looking for the person`s exact description of the preferred hand, just anything recording the phenomena.
Macilrille
10-10-2009, 21:31
Difficult to fight left-handers though, as their attacks come from an unexpected angle.
Edited to add, an angle/way that you have not trained as much to reflectively parry.
A Very Super Market
10-10-2009, 21:32
I think something with like left-handedness, a genetic trait shared by one tenth of the population, it would be acceptable to assume that it was present in EB's timeframe.
spiritusdilutus
10-10-2009, 21:42
Difficult to fight left-handers though, as their attacks come from an unexpected angle.
Edited to add, an angle/way that you have not trained as much to reflectively parry.
Good point :beam: :book:
G. Septimus
10-10-2009, 21:57
Difficult to fight left-handers though, as their attacks come from an unexpected angle.
Edited to add, an angle/way that you have not trained as much to reflectively parry.
yeah, we think that they're gonna attack from the right, but they attack from the left.
:idea2: so, if maybe left handed generals attack with there left wing first
antisocialmunky
10-10-2009, 22:01
Many warriors during the Middle Ages learned to fight with both hands against people fighting with either hand. Probably the same goes true for the EB period.
Tellos Athenaios
10-10-2009, 22:17
A few things:
Left or right handedness matters relatively little if it doesn't come down to fine & precise movements; in particular because the world is sort of right-handed by default many left-handed people will have to learn to wield right-handed tools just the same. You'll find that left-handed people often can work with right-handed scissors and similar tools; sometimes so much so that they can not or no longer wield left-handed equivalents. Also many often used movements become ingrained nerve cells of the spine and therefore somewhat disconnected from dexterity. In any case working with tools is about making them a habit.
Many fighting styles are quite ambidextrous too: chucking a javelin for instance. So it is really about what hand you happen to learn the movements with.
Some fighting styles force the use of the right-hand because the majority prefers the right hand and the formation demands you all use the same hand. Extremely close-order infantry (phalanx and similar shield-walls) or cavalry (knee-to-knee charging formation of some cataphracts) spring to mind.
Also: left-handedness is actually the absence of a genetic trait (right-handedness can be by birth; left-handedness however can't) combined with a better-than-average right brain-half.
ARCHIPPOS
10-10-2009, 23:24
well my father was born left-handed... then in primary school the teachers made him use his right hand (we're talking about the 50's) so ever since he can write with both hands. hmmmmm, i don't think that using your "good" left hand would have worked in a phallanx context though...and i've seen no left-handers having problems in modern-day army drills :yes:
Look to the Bible:
Judges 20:16 - Among all this people there were seven hundred chosen men lefthanded; every one could sling stones at an hair breadth, and not miss. (KJV)
If I recall correctly, both Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar were left handed, as are Fidel Castro and Queen Elizabeth II
MButcher
10-11-2009, 01:00
A few things:
Left or right handedness matters relatively little if it doesn't come down to fine & precise movements; in particular because the world is sort of right-handed by default many left-handed people will have to learn to wield right-handed tools just the same. You'll find that left-handed people often can work with right-handed scissors and similar tools; sometimes so much so that they can not or no longer wield left-handed equivalents. Also many often used movements become ingrained nerve cells of the spine and therefore somewhat disconnected from dexterity. In any case working with tools is about making them a habit.
I can personally attest to this, I'm left handed but my right hand has become dominant in all but writing.
Azathoth
10-11-2009, 01:21
I think something with like left-handedness, a genetic trait shared by one tenth of the population, it would be acceptable to assume that it was present in EB's timeframe.
There's actually an interesting trend in human left-handedness. Apparently, when the species first appeared, 150000-200000 years ago, let's say, half the population was left handed. Nowadays, supposedly 1 in 20 are left-handed.
well my father was born left-handed... then in primary school the teachers made him use his right hand (we're talking about the 50's) so ever since he can write with both hands. hmmmmm, i don't think that using your "good" left hand would have worked in a phallanx context though...and i've seen no left-handers having problems in modern-day army drills :yes:
same here actually. In the Arab world, its considered unlucky to use the left hand, so my grandmother made sure that I used my right hand to write with in Kindergarden/1st grade. as a result, I also became ambidextrous, but at the same time my left hands writes as I used to write in Kindergarden (no practice). I otherwise do everything else with either hand (drawing, shooting, eating, drinking, etc).
and left handedness is a recessive trait, so its not really the result of the absence of a gene, as it is the absence of dominent alleles in the gene.
Macilrille
10-11-2009, 10:06
yeah, we think that they're gonna attack from the right, but they attack from the left.
:idea2: so, if maybe left handed generals attack with there left wing first
Nope not at all like that, it is only in duels/ one-on-one fights. You have trained against 90% right-handed people, if unlucky only against them. That means that the reflective defensive reactions you have trained is partly useless when it comes to facing a lefthander as his natural attacks come from the opposite places you are used to. And they come in from the weapon side instead of from the shield side.
It is a bit hard to explain, but I hope I succeeded somewhat, it goes even for people who are lefthanded themselves and for people like me who have trained to fight with both hands and/or two weapons. A part of Christopher "Lefty" Cold-Ravnkilde's fame comes from being left-handed, he is extremely good, but that he is a lefty only adds to it.
Macilrille
10-11-2009, 10:09
There's actually an interesting trend in human left-handedness. Apparently, when the species first appeared, 150000-200000 years ago, let's say, half the population was left handed. Nowadays, supposedly 1 in 20 are left-handed.
How on earth can we talk about how large a % of people were left-handed then? Who says the finds we have are representative of the population then? That is the problem with all archeology as we all know; "how representative is it?".
Not dizzing you, merely curious and pointing out problems.
HunGeneral
10-11-2009, 11:15
I'm not sure how much reality might be behind this, but if I recall then there was a character (I think Scaevola or something) in early roman legend who was sent to an Italian King whose Army was beseiging Rome. After the King asked what made him think that the romans were anything special the messenger answered by puttinh his right hand into a nearby campfire/torch and made no sound while his arm burned to ashes. After that the King gave up the siege - he knew he couldn't win over a people so determined and hardy.
If I remember right then the messenger survived and used his left hand from there on - that also gave him his nickname Scaevola which means as much as left handed.
spiritusdilutus
10-11-2009, 11:39
I'm not sure how much reality might be behind this, but if I recall then there was a character (I think Scaevola or something) in early roman legend who was sent to an Italian King whose Army was beseiging Rome. After the King asked what made him think that the romans were anything special the messenger answered by puttinh his right hand into a nearby campfire/torch and made no sound while his arm burned to ashes. After that the King gave up the siege - he knew he couldn't win over a people so determined and hardy.
If I remember right then the messenger survived and used his left hand from there on - that also gave him his nickname Scaevola which means as much as left handed.
Actually the story is a bit different than you retold it.... :book:, however it`s a good example you gave. I almost forgot about Scaevola from the early history of Rome.
Cute Wolf
10-11-2009, 13:14
In formation it was assumed all soldiers use the right hand to grab thair weapons and the left to use their shield.... well, it doesn't matter which hand did u use to write, but if you are trained to fight with swords on your right and shield on your left.... maybe you'll try to slam your enemy with your shield more than right handed men. Just remember that the Roman legionaries' fighting style using their shields as much as the main course of attack, gladius is just for finishers.
I know that with Rome, they would just train any lefties to use their right hand to fight.
Could you cite a source for this? It seems logical, but I don't think we know this for sure. The obsession with forcing children to use their right hand may be something of the last two centuries.
There's actually an interesting trend in human left-handedness. Apparently, when the species first appeared, 150000-200000 years ago, let's say, half the population was left handed. Nowadays, supposedly 1 in 20 are left-handed.
I rather doubt that, since mammals (and even birds) also have a preference for the left or right side. Handedness is not an uniquely human trait, so presumably there was a bias in our direct ancestor that would have been transferred to our species. Also, the percentage of left-handedness varies between cultures.
antisocialmunky
10-11-2009, 13:46
Actually handedness seems to be present in most creatures with bilateral symmetry. '_'
Its even been theorized that Trilobites were 'right handed' because they always favored turning right when predators attacked them. Apparantly its because of that almost all trilobite fossils with bite damage have it on the right side.
AFIAK the romans thought being left handed was unlucky, hence the use of sinister (derived form the latin for left) today to mean something that is evil.
AFIAK, the Romans had special cohorts for left handed people.
antisocialmunky
10-11-2009, 16:57
Special cohorts in the good way or bad way? Did they just stick them on the right flank so they better shield the right side?
Azathoth
10-11-2009, 20:57
How on earth can we talk about how large a % of people were left-handed then? Who says the finds we have are representative of the population then? That is the problem with all archeology as we all know; "how representative is it?".
Not dizzing you, merely curious and pointing out problems.
Well, I concede that to you. It's interesting to think about, at least, and might point to a progressive decline in left-handedness.
Special cohorts in the good way or bad way? Did they just stick them on the right flank so they better shield the right side?
That way. They weren't some Super-Duper Leftie Elite.
IrishHitman
10-12-2009, 02:30
Look to the Bible:
Judges 20:16 - Among all this people there were seven hundred chosen men lefthanded; every one could sling stones at an hair breadth, and not miss. (KJV)
Interesting.
Where's the "peaceful" part in slinging stones accurately.....
Oh, the Bible, what an amusing text...
Still, some interesting answers on the leftie front so far.
Interesting.
Where's the "peaceful" part in slinging stones accurately.....
Oh, the Bible, what an amusing text...
:inquisitive:
I don't see any mention of "peaceful" in that verse myself...
*assumes movie gangster tone*
You tryin'a start sumthun, punk?
IrishHitman
10-12-2009, 03:17
:inquisitive:
I don't see any mention of "peaceful" in that verse myself...
*assumes movie gangster tone*
You tryin'a start sumthun, punk?
I meant that too many people state that the Bible is a peaceful text that preaches love, etc.
Clearly they missed the bit about left-handed slingers throwing rocks at people to kill them....
:laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4:
Actually handedness seems to be present in most creatures with bilateral symmetry. '_'
I believe that polar bears are 100% left handed. I cannot back up that statement with any sources unfortunately but I distinctly remember reading in more than one biology journal that all polar bears that have ever been recorded, wild and captivity, will only use there left hand to swipe or paw something while standing on there right hand. I actually remember one journal making a small point about it. And thos ein captivity can be teased to stand up and swipe at food. They always either only use their left hand, or do multiple swipes with boht hands but always starting with there left hand.
Anyone able to back this up with sources maybe?
I meant that too many people state that the Bible is a peaceful text that preaches love, etc.
Clearly they missed the bit about left-handed slingers throwing rocks at people to kill them....
:laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4:
Aye, well, there's an Old Testament in which the Israelites conquer and are conquered - obviously there is much violence detailed here - and there's a New Testament, which preaches love, etc.
I believe that polar bears are 100% left handed. I cannot back up that statement with any sources unfortunately but I distinctly remember reading in more than one biology journal that all polar bears that have ever been recorded, wild and captivity, will only use there left hand to swipe or paw something while standing on there right hand. I actually remember one journal making a small point about it. And thos ein captivity can be teased to stand up and swipe at food. They always either only use their left hand, or do multiple swipes with boht hands but always starting with there left hand.
Anyone able to back this up with sources maybe?
Strange, a quick look on Wikipedia (*gasp*, but it provides sources) and I find that what you described is *supposedly* an internet meme/myth. Take a look here (http://www.polarbearsinternational.org/bear-facts/myths-and-misconceptions/), second paragraph. There is little detail, unfortunately.
I meant that too many people state that the Bible is a peaceful text that preaches love, etc.
Clearly they missed the bit about left-handed slingers throwing rocks at people to kill them....
:laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4:
what do you expect? its a book tracing the mythologised history of the Israelites, as they saw themselves. its bound to have many disturbing scenes. most religous/cultural books tend to e that way: the gitas, the mythologies of greece and rome, etc. of course some are WAY less violent than the Bible, but you get the point.
but I was under the impression that right and left handedness was somehow related to the presence of assymetrical brains-as in Humans.
Strange, a quick look on Wikipedia (*gasp*, but it provides sources) and I find that what you described is *supposedly* an internet meme/myth. Take a look here (http://www.polarbearsinternational.org/bear-facts/myths-and-misconceptions/), second paragraph. There is little detail, unfortunately.
My mistake, I forgot wikipedia as the source of all that is good and right in our world. :laugh4:
I distinctly remember reading it more than once in some peer reviewed scientific journals while doing a (totally unrelated I might add) assignment. However considering the crap that lands up in peer reviewed stuff sometimes you may be right about it being a myth. Who knows, thats why I asked for sources to verify or disprove. Thanks.
Irenaeus
10-12-2009, 11:09
Also in the bible, Judges 3:12-30 - Ehud is left-handed (I heard that the hebrew text literally says his right-hand was "closed" i.e. deformed, so he couldn't use it in warfare), and so is unsuspected when he delivers a "message" to the King of Moab. This carries on the recursive theme of God using unlikely people which the author is emphasising.
That "message" was a sword thrust to the belly, if I recall correctly. I remember citing that verse as my favorite several years ago. :laugh4:
Celtic_Punk
10-12-2009, 19:40
I wonder if some could weild an axe left handed, but a sword only right... I bowl right, shoot right, hold the hockey stick right, but play pool left, and shoot a bow left too. My dad's left handed, and taught me to shoot pool and a bow left.
I meant that too many people state that the Bible is a peaceful text that preaches love, etc.
Clearly they missed the bit about left-handed slingers throwing rocks at people to kill them....
:laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4:
:no:
It is certainly true that the Bible contains some nasty bits and that several atrocities have been committed in its name. However, this is not the right way to start a discussion about it; nor is this the right forum.
No more bible-bashing, please.
Now, back to left-handedness.
AFIAK the romans thought being left handed was unlucky, hence the use of sinister (derived form the latin for left) today to mean something that is evil.
AFIAK, the Romans had special cohorts for left handed people.
Interesting, but do you have sources?
Well, I concede that to you. It's interesting to think about, at least, and might point to a progressive decline in left-handedness.
There is a theory that left-handedness gives an advantage in combat against adversaries used to fighting right-handed enemies, which, in a right-biased species, means most people. This would explain why left-handedness is more common in "deadly" tribal societies. However, handedness has never been properly measured in these societies, so the evidence is not that strong.
Interesting, but do you have sources?
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/morph?l=sinistre&la=la&prior=tam#lexicon
Its interesting to note that the romans considered it lucky before adopting the greek veiw (has to do with the direction of the "lucky" east when performing augeries).
alexanderthegreater
10-15-2009, 22:06
I recall reading an article about a correlation between violence in societies and left handedness. The advantage of lefthandedness is that the majority of the populace (righties) are not accustomed to fighting a left-handed person. In cultures with a higher murder-rate theres a higher left-handedness.
Its seen in modern sports too. Rafael Nadal is left-handed.
Im a leftie ^^. Whenever i picked up the baseball bat the field team panicked because they had to alter their entire formation.
On-topic, I would think that in the tribal societies of the Celts there would be significant amount of left-handedness. Nobody would be trained to fight right handed there anyway because nobody was trained at all.
That way. They weren't some Super-Duper Leftie Elite.
No? darn i wanted to join.
I recall reading an article about a correlation between violence in societies and left handedness. The advantage of lefthandedness is that the majority of the populace (righties) are not accustomed to fighting a left-handed person. In cultures with a higher murder-rate theres a higher left-handedness.
Like I wrote above, the evidence that deadly societies have a greater proportion of left-handed people is disputed.
On-topic, I would think that in the tribal societies of the Celts there would be significant amount of left-handedness. Nobody would be trained to fight right handed there anyway because nobody was trained at all.
:no:
-Praetor-
10-16-2009, 16:39
On-topic, I would think that in the tribal societies of the Celts there would be significant amount of left-handedness. Nobody would be trained to fight right handed there anyway because nobody was trained at all.
:wall:
G. Septimus
10-16-2009, 16:46
On-topic, I would think that in the tribal societies of the Celts there would be significant amount of left-handedness. Nobody would be trained to fight right handed there anyway because nobody was trained at all.
.
Hmmm.
I think your right, because the celts are'nt trained, they used there own weapons and skill.
So, maybe a lot of Celts are lefties:sweatdrop:
-Praetor-
10-16-2009, 16:50
Hmmm.
I think your right, because the celts are'nt trained, they used there own weapons and skill.
So, maybe a lot of Celts are lefties:sweatdrop:
:wall::wall::wall:
Perhaps the average Celt came out of their mother's thighs with a longsword, spikey hair and a fiery look on its face, right?
antisocialmunky
10-16-2009, 17:46
Hooray for the steel plated birth canals of Celtic women!
Macilrille
10-16-2009, 22:41
:wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall::wall:
I think this thread has run its course a while ago...
:stop:
:dancinglock::dancinglock:
Fisherking
10-18-2009, 14:15
I don’t recall much more about the piece than reading it but long ago I was reading on Roman military tactics.
A part of the article said that they would place lefties on the flank to stop the lines from drifting as they fought.
There is little genetic evidence that left-handedness is inherited. I think only one protein has been found that slightly increases the chance that someone is left handed.
The best evidence is that it has to do with elevated testosterone levels in the fetus, also would explain why only 2% of women are left handed.
Lefties occur throughout nature, not just humans, and it seems they have a survivability advantage in confrontations because of their rarity
Macilrille
10-18-2009, 14:26
A part of the article said that they would place lefties on the flank to stop the lines from drifting as they fought.
A natural tendency fighting is to get as much cover from the guy on your weapon side's shield. This is what makes line drift. Positioning lefties on the left would split the unit as the flanks would drift in opposite directions. Positioning then on the right would make the unit too close. I am very dubious about this remembered article you quote. It may be something you saw in The Sun or something equivalent for all you recall.
Not even all scientific articles are correct and artciles dealing with history appear in some very "popular" forms sometimes in less serious magazines for the broad public.
I am sorry to be an arrogant and stubborn mule, but your vague memory of something you do not remember where, when or specifically what you read is no valid source.
I shall make some inquiries though to avoid misunderstandings. We should hopefully be able to validate or discount this theory in 2-3 days.
I still feel this thread has run its course, but also that such a matter needs resolving, for now people reading this thread will vaguely remember having read somewhere and in 4-5 years with dimmed memory pass on something probably incorrect as truth...
madbriton
10-18-2009, 20:51
If you want another example of left-handedness in the Bible, Ehud was a hero from the Book of Judges who killed Eglon, the king of Moab, helped because the guards didn't see his sword on the opposite side from normal.
I know that one from a very silly song written by a poet and co at a Christian festival (I believe they were trying to find the most innapropriate Bible story to write a children's song about - this festival is quite open and liberal, otherwise they might not have got away with it!)
mountaingoat
10-18-2009, 23:28
I wonder if some could weild an axe left handed, but a sword only right... I bowl right, shoot right, hold the hockey stick right, but play pool left, and shoot a bow left too. My dad's left handed, and taught me to shoot pool and a bow left.
well i do not believe in "handedness" , mostly because of this reason. somewhere in time , someone decided that if you lead with your left or right hand in a few select activities ,that somehow dictates your overall preference for deciding on which hand you lead with in every activity.
Cute Wolf
10-19-2009, 07:12
well i do not believe in "handedness" , mostly because of this reason. somewhere in time , someone decided that if you lead with your left or right hand in a few select activities ,that somehow dictates your overall preference for deciding on which hand you lead with in every activity.
Wait... I read this discussion and this give an aggrement to my experience. When I was a little child, I usually used my left hand to do anything, but, in my primary school, I was tought to write exclusively in right hand (involving anything from my teacher giving an extra cake when I behave nicely, and she grab my left hand and say "Don't do this this is the baadddd hand" everytime I try to write with it). The result is: I was able to write nicely only with right hand (i still capable to write clearly readable with my left, but the quality is poor compared to my right writing (I have a really nice handwriting, everyone said that.. eheh)), and the right hand was better to do some soft work (such as titration and place small objects on microscope), but when I got into a fight or playing sports that need strength, I use the left, because the muscles on my left hand is definitely bigger than the right..... well, I play tennis, badminton, and basketball mostly with my left.
So, that handedness... is decided by who are teaching you about doing something...
Apázlinemjó
10-19-2009, 10:26
Wait... I read this discussion and this give an aggrement to my experience. When I was a little child, I usually used my left hand to do anything, but, in my primary school, I was tought to write exclusively in right hand (involving anything from my teacher giving an extra cake when I behave nicely, and she grab my left hand and say "Don't do this this is the baadddd hand" everytime I try to write with it). The result is: I was able to write nicely only with right hand (i still capable to write clearly readable with my left, but the quality is poor compared to my right writing (I have a really nice handwriting, everyone said that.. eheh)), and the right hand was better to do some soft work (such as titration and place small objects on microscope), but when I got into a fight or playing sports that need strength, I use the left, because the muscles on my left hand is definitely bigger than the right..... well, I play tennis, badminton, and basketball mostly with my left.
So, that handedness... is decided by who are teaching you about doing something...
That's why I was lucky in Primary School, because my teacher was left-handed too.
AlexanderSextus
10-19-2009, 11:00
I'm right handed, but for some reason my left arm is stronger. I am quite ambidextrous actually, but this probably has to do with the fact i trained in wing chun kuen at one point, which requires you learn to be ambidextrous. Good thing too, because i no longer do certain things with only one hand. :beam:
IrishHitman
10-19-2009, 12:12
:no:
It is certainly true that the Bible contains some nasty bits and that several atrocities have been committed in its name. However, this is not the right way to start a discussion about it; nor is this the right forum.
No more bible-bashing, please.
Now, back to left-handedness.
Perhaps you should check your vocab, bible-bashing around here = zealous belief in the Bible...
Wait... I read this discussion and this give an aggrement to my experience. When I was a little child, I usually used my left hand to do anything, but, in my primary school, I was tought to write exclusively in right hand (involving anything from my teacher giving an extra cake when I behave nicely, and she grab my left hand and say "Don't do this this is the baadddd hand" everytime I try to write with it).
That still happens in the modern world?
That is messed up :no:
Perhaps you should check your vocab, bible-bashing around here = zealous belief in the Bible...
I understand it means either bashing the Bible and bashing with the Bible.
Cute Wolf
10-20-2009, 11:26
That still happens in the modern world?
That is messed up :no:
Far - far away from your "modern education" system pal.... this is Indonesia, about 1994-1997 (first until third class of primary school)..... :laugh4: and right there, left hand is still considered "baaaad baaaaaad hand" and I won't get an extra cake if I still write with my left... :clown: and without that extra cake, my handwriting will be still a hieroglyphs..... :egypt:
G. Septimus
10-20-2009, 11:38
Far - far away from your "modern education" system pal.... this is Indonesia, about 1994-1997 (first until third class of primary school)..... :laugh4: and right there, left hand is still considered "baaaad baaaaaad hand" and I won't get an extra cake if I still write with my left... :clown: and without that extra cake, my handwriting will be still a hieroglyphs..... :egypt:
yes, indeed well in indonesian:
"tulisan gw tu entar ancur kolo pake tangan kiri
:book:
our writing will get a C or F if we write with our left hand. and if we eat with our left hand, we could be get mad at....
Cute Wolf
10-20-2009, 12:15
yes, indeed well in indonesian:
"tulisan gw tu entar ancur kolo pake tangan kiri
:book:
our writing will get a C or F if we write with our left hand. and if we eat with our left hand, we could be get mad at....
Left hand was customarily used as "toilet-paper hand" here, so if someone see you eat with left hand, they'll say ck ck ck.....
Kalo boker emang dari kecil juga diajarin cebokna pake tangan kiri....
Ancur apaan? kata guru gw ceker bebek gan....... :laugh4:
This thread has run it's course.
Thread closed.
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.