Log in

View Full Version : Tiger Woods



Strike For The South
12-03-2009, 17:55
Ok I'm sure many Americans know this story but I'll get the rest of you up to date.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/breakingnews/os-tiger-woods-crash-report-20091202,0,3980485.story

Basiclly, Woods got into his Escalade Very late at night and crashed it. Then his wife came out with a golf club to "save" him.

Numerous theories abounded.

Then we find out he's getting some strange, which kinda puts a whole new spin on the golf club.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iCO59IPe8XbUkaPJ_XfVJYSYnFbwD9CBTUGO4

So bascially this has thrown everyone in a tizzy.

People are astonished that he could do this, which is dumb because people have been doing this for 0000s of years. The man is near perfect on the golf course and thats it.

The other main point here is privacy. Many Jurnos feel that Woods forfited this because he pitches many products. But I feel that if I buy a razor sponsered by Woods it's because he can hit 5 birdies on the back 9 and not because he screws his wife.

There are plenty of people who stay faithful but we don't buy everything they sell do we?

Sasaki Kojiro
12-03-2009, 17:58
It's true that he makes a lot of money from endorsemants because he's famous, and scrutiny comes along with that fame.

The outrage is pretty silly though.

Idaho
12-03-2009, 17:59
What's the difference between a car and a golf ball?













Tiger Woods can drive a golf ball more than 300 yards.


Seriously though. Who's business is it but his. He is famous for his golf skills. He's never presented himself as a moral guardian. He's never done kiss and tell gossip stories with the media. If he had he would be fair game. As it is he is a remarkable golfer - perhaps the best there will ever be? His sex life is between him and the other people he has sex with.

Subotan
12-03-2009, 18:01
People who are complaining about Tiger Woods having too much sex probably aren't getting enough themselves.

rory_20_uk
12-03-2009, 18:05
He's quite young, extremely rich and very famous. Some women wanted to get some and then sell thier stories. Who the hell cares?

His wife is probably upset, but then marrying the rich and famous one has to accept that they are far more likely to get accosted than (for example) I am as they're rich and famous and I'm not. If she doesn't like that deal, the ex-nanny can go and find someone else and life in a little house somewhere - with someone who might still cheat on her. As it is, her kids will get everything they can possibly need and she has to put up with some extra-marital affairs.

~:smoking:

seireikhaan
12-03-2009, 18:11
His family. Let them sort it out "behind closed doors", as he put it, and whatever happens happens. Not my business, not anyone else's business.

drone
12-03-2009, 18:24
It doesn't matter if you are white, black, or a rich caublasian uber-golfer, women are nothing but trouble. ~;)

He may be a god with the clubs, but he's an idiot for having his strange's number on his cellphone. One of the richest guys around, he should have had a second secret phone for that sort of thing. :wall:

Judging from the reports, he didn't just sleep around with groupies. He started seeing the Grubbs girl while his wife was pregnant, and has been seeing her for 2.5 years. A little infidelity here and there might be expected for a rich and famous athlete, but this was a relationship. So it's not unexpected for Elin to beat him about the head and shoulders with the 3-iron.

His face will heal, he'll win more majors, and life will go on. He may get divorced, Elin might stick with him, but I doubt his sponsors care. Sucks for the kids, but oh well.

Major Robert Dump
12-03-2009, 19:48
This is a very difficult thing to recount, but I fear the time is appropriate:

4 months ago, Tiger Woods forced himself on me. I was too drunk to consent and he knew it. It was in a Hotel in Virginia, and we had both been drinking. When I called him to threaten to press charges, his attorney told me:

Yes, if I am drunk it is not consent

Yes, when I begged him to at least use protection it was not consent

No, when I asked him to put on a wig, stilettos and a push-up bra and call me "baby Jill" that was consent.

I hate lawyers

Ja'chyra
12-03-2009, 19:50
His wife is hot, if she feels like getting her own back I feel it would be my duty to offer my help.

KukriKhan
12-03-2009, 20:07
So it's not unexpected for Elin to beat him about the head and shoulders with the 3-iron.

See, if she knew anything about golf, was even a little interested in what her man did for a living, she'd have known to use a driver, not a 3-iron. Can you blame the guy for feeling alienated?

Ronin
12-03-2009, 20:13
He is a very good golf player...that is what he is paid to do and what he gets endorsed for.

I fail to see what interest in his personal life I or anyone else is supposed to have.

Major Robert Dump
12-03-2009, 20:16
He is a very good golf player...that is what he is paid to do and what he gets endorsed for.

I fail to see what interest in his personal life I or anyone else is supposed to have.


Because rather than parenting, I prefer to let TV and professional sports babysit my children while I got kanoodle various women and get my drink on. Now that my kids know that Tiger cheats with women who have big boobies, they will think it is okay, too. I MEAN WTF DID I EVEN BY 4 TVS FOR????

drone
12-03-2009, 20:53
See, if she knew anything about golf, was even a little interested in what her man did for a living, she'd have known to use a driver, not a 3-iron. Can you blame the guy for feeling alienated?

:laugh4: Isn't that what Parnevik said?

KukriKhan
12-03-2009, 22:27
:laugh4: Isn't that what Parnevik said?

I had to look him up (http://sports.espn.go.com/golf/news/story?id=4707629), not being a follower of the small ball. ZOMG, he sed the same ting! :laugh4:

Idaho
12-04-2009, 01:01
I would stick with the iron. The driver has a lighter and blunter head on it. A 6 iron for me. A nice medium angle for taking a chunk of skull out.

A Very Super Market
12-04-2009, 01:06
We need a headline for every time this happens to a middle-aged, potbellied man.

Centurion1
12-04-2009, 02:22
See, if she knew anything about golf, was even a little interested in what her man did for a living, she'd have known to use a driver, not a 3-iron. Can you blame the guy for feeling alienated?

i too would stay with a 3 iron. driver is lighter and wouldnt give you the same edge of damage.


personally i think the man is retarded now. liked him alot but no more. besides i dont care if hes famous you shouldnt cheat but anyway HAVE YOU SEEN HIS WIFE! shes the only thing that makes me tolerate kadagar or horetore...... hopefully they have sisters.....

and i thought she did NOt beat him with the clubs but legitly broke him out of the vehicle.

all in all a pretty trashy thing to do to your wife and children, i dont care how rich or famous you are it doesnt excuse it. you dont see me cheating on my girl just because im amazingly amazing.

Samurai Waki
12-04-2009, 02:29
Eh, I don't care. The media can sod off.

a completely inoffensive name
12-04-2009, 02:38
Who the **** cares.

Sasaki Kojiro
12-04-2009, 03:08
Who the **** cares.

Major Robert Dump 2
drone 2
Idaho 2
KukriKhan 2
Strike For The South 1
Ja'chyra 1
a completely inoffensive name 1
Yaseikhaan 1
Wakizashi 1
rory_20_uk 1
Centurion1 1
Subotan 1
A Very Super Market 1
Ronin 1
Sasaki Kojiro 1

Gregoshi
12-04-2009, 04:23
Let's take a look at the leader board so far...


Major Robert Dump 2
drone 2
Idaho 2
KukriKhan 2
Strike For The South 1
Ja'chyra 1
a completely inoffensive name 1
Yaseikhaan 1
Wakizashi 1
rory_20_uk 1
Centurion1 1
Subotan 1
A Very Super Market 1
Ronin 1
Sasaki Kojiro 1

a completely inoffensive name
12-04-2009, 05:43
Major Robert Dump 2
drone 2
Idaho 2
KukriKhan 2
Strike For The South 1
Ja'chyra 1
a completely inoffensive name 1
Yaseikhaan 1
Wakizashi 1
rory_20_uk 1
Centurion1 1
Subotan 1
A Very Super Market 1
Ronin 1
Sasaki Kojiro 1

I don't get it, where is the part that's funny? Oh wait, it's not.

pevergreen
12-04-2009, 05:47
I think its hilarious. :laugh4:

Ja'chyra
12-04-2009, 09:49
The more pictures I see of her the more I care

miotas
12-04-2009, 11:19
Someone I've never met and probably never will crashed a car I've never seen in a place I have never visited. Meanwhile, this same someone cheated on someone I've never met and probably never will, with someone I've never met and probably never will. Have I got the gist of it so far?

Mithrandir
12-04-2009, 11:53
What's the difference between a car and a golf ball?


Tiger Woods can drive a golf ball more than 300 yards.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a very difficult thing to recount, but I fear the time is appropriate:

4 months ago, Tiger Woods forced himself on me. I was too drunk to consent and he knew it. It was in a Hotel in Virginia, and we had both been drinking. When I called him to threaten to press charges, his attorney told me:

Yes, if I am drunk it is not consent

Yes, when I begged him to at least use protection it was not consent

No, when I asked him to put on a wig, stilettos and a push-up bra and call me "baby Jill" that was consent.

I hate lawyers


See, if she knew anything about golf, was even a little interested in what her man did for a living, she'd have known to use a driver, not a 3-iron. Can you blame the guy for feeling alienated?


Let's take a look at the leader board so far...



The more pictures I see of her the more I care

:laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4::laugh4:
Best thread of the yeard Award

Viking
12-04-2009, 13:31
Since there has now been more than one tiger in his woods lately, should he now change his name to Tigers' Wood?

tibilicus
12-04-2009, 14:59
His wife's hot, tiger disapoints me.

That is all.

rvg
12-04-2009, 15:08
Since there has now been more than one tiger in his woods lately, should he now change his name to Tigers' Wood?

Lion Cheetah Woods.

Seamus Fermanagh
12-04-2009, 15:13
Major Robert Dump 2
drone 2
Idaho 2
KukriKhan 2
Strike For The South 1
Ja'chyra 1
a completely inoffensive name 1
Yaseikhaan 1
Wakizashi 1
rory_20_uk 1
Centurion1 1
Subotan 1
A Very Super Market 1
Ronin 1
Sasaki Kojiro 1

I'll break the tie.

Vote: MRD

What a pointless and funny thread. Good chuckles. :laugh4:

Andres
12-04-2009, 15:26
The more pictures I see of her the more I care


I just googled a bit :eyebrows: :sweatdrop: :date:

Ja'chyra
12-04-2009, 15:30
I just googled a bit :eyebrows: :sweatdrop: :date:

Yep yep :pimp::heart::sleeping:

Subotan
12-04-2009, 17:16
Lion Cheetah Woods.

Why has this not been added to the list?

Mooks
12-04-2009, 17:41
You dissapoint me South, I think this is the thread iv read of yours which is completely pointless. All the others were funny/informative/hateful etc, this is just boring and noones business.

Gregoshi
12-04-2009, 19:41
It's gonna be tough for Tiger to get out of the Woods on this one. He didn't get a good lie.

Ironic that Tiger had a accident while driving a Caddy.

Ja'chyra
12-04-2009, 19:50
You dissapoint me South, I think this is the thread iv read of yours which is completely pointless. All the others were funny/informative/hateful etc, this is just boring and noones business.

I disagree, the obvious point of this thread is to highlight the obvious angelic aspects of the current Mrs Woods, soon to be be Mrs Ja'chyra if only temporarily, to a world that has only been superficially aware that she even exists.

This in itself would not normally be worthy of SFTS's personal attention, but in this case he was simply paving the way for my own humanitarian mission to support the future needs of she who must be obeyed in her hour of need.

Kadagar_AV
12-05-2009, 03:03
Sooo...

Some guy who is really good at hitting a plastic ball with an iron/wood rod in a very precise manner and who has earnt millions upon millions off of it... Has sex with someone else than his Barbie-looking-wife.





Sorry but I am just dumbfounded by this... Such a TRAGEDY. And it's def not like it's going on all around the world the whole time.

:juggle2:



Who cares? No really, why would anyone give a damn about this?

I mean, if you are a pro-family-backwater-US-senator who run your whole campaign about "family first"; I can understand if there is a slight uproar among those with a less than 2 (or 3) digit number of sexual partners who hoped to vote for him.

For the rest of us though....

Meh.

Strike For The South
12-05-2009, 03:13
I mean, if you are a pro-family-backwater-US-senator who run your whole campaign about "family first"; I can understand if there is a slight uproar among those with a less than 2 (or 3) digit number of sexual partners who hoped to vote for him.
.

Every time you equate sexual partners with enlightenment I want to pet you with a hammer.

:smash:

Kadagar_AV
12-05-2009, 03:37
Every time you equate sexual partners with enlightenment I want to pet you with a hammer.

:smash:

Oh, KINKY!!

But you should buy me dinner first...



On a more serious note though: I do not equate sexual partners with enlightment...

Or do I...

*muhahaha*

In a way you are right... Me, my friends, and the people I work with all have cheating in our daily life. So yes, in a way you could say that someone who have had sex with quite a couple of married people, or people in a relationship, won't be ALL that suprised by hearing about someone cheating.

I guess that would be enlightment in a way.

On the other hand... I would very much prefer to keep sex away from enlightment...

Sex is all about primal instincts... Enlightment is all about stepping away from your primal instincts and use logic instead.

Thank god (:laugh4:) we can still appreciate a cultivated mind who still is human enough to accept that sometimes he just wants to "stick it into this girl, right here, right now."

Unless of course you have a relationship where both satisfies the others sexual needs... But let's be honest, how often does that happen?

Strike For The South
12-05-2009, 03:42
In a way you are right... Me, my friends, and the people I work with all have cheating in our daily life. So yes, in a way you could say that someone who have had sex with quite a couple of married people, or people in a relationship, won't be ALL that suprised by hearing about someone cheating.

I guess that would be enlightment in a way.

On the other hand... I would very much prefer to keep sex away from enlightment...

Sex is all about primal instincts... Enlightment is all about stepping away from your primal instincts and use logic instead.

Thank god (:laugh4:) we can still appreciate a cultivated mind who still is human enough to accept that sometimes he just wants to "stick it into this girl, right here, right now."
?

I'm not surprised by this at all, but you comment how people with a smaller # of partners would vote for the "family vaules" (stupid backward) canidate and that's simply not true.

Sex is not all about primal instincts. The evolution of sex for pleasure is all about building a complex socitey. Animals whom only have sex for repoduction tend to have less complex socities.

I'm not going to judge Tiger on this for the reasons mentioned in my OP but a human should realize the hurt and pain he is going to cuase someone who carried his children.

I don't mean to frame it like that but thats a shallow statement of you.



Unless of course you have a relationship where both satisfies the others sexual needs... But let's be honest, how often does that happen


Every single one I've ever been in.

Sasaki Kojiro
12-05-2009, 04:12
I give famous people a pass on cheating because they live in conditions that make it harder to keep a relationship going and harder to breakup, and because enough people are hating on them already.

People are natural gossips though (which is a good thing), so of course we want to hear the news.

Kadagar_AV
12-05-2009, 04:28
SFTS, I will break your post down and answer them in turn, I hope that is OK?


I'm not surprised by this at all, but you comment how people with a smaller # of partners would vote for the "family vaules" (stupid backward) canidate and that's simply not true.

I never said stupid...

Anyway, what part was "not true?"

That people with the belief that no sex with anyone but your partner for life is = more directed towards family value?

I just do not get your point here, please elaborate!

My points was that people who have had some partners already, and who already have had sex with a couple of people who were in a relationsip, will be less shocked by the fact soemone cheated. Is this wrong?



Sex is not all about primal instincts. The evolution of sex for pleasure is all about building a complex socitey. Animals whom only have sex for repoduction tend to have less complex socities.

:juggle2:

Sex is not about primal instincts?

Sex for pleasure is all about building a complex society?

Hmmmm... This is a bit tricky for me to answer. I mean, everything about the topic I ever read says otherwise.

So I will go with: source, please?

Sorry, that is the best answer I could do. I would have gone into a Tribesman amount of :laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4: otherwise.



I'm not going to judge Tiger on this for the reasons mentioned in my OP but a human should realize the hurt and pain he is going to cuase someone who carried his children.

Agreed. If you have promised your partner to only be with her it's not cool to cheat. Ever.

However, we don't know ANYTHING, not a single bit, about her, or her, or him... For all WE know, his wife may have labidabidabidadaDA-him for months straight cause she is the daughter of Satan... Oh ok, it's not like we all believe in satan, but you get my point.

I mean, the lover, the mother, the man... We have no insight what so ever into their lives, no matter how much the media likes us to believe we do.

So again, why even bring this up? It's not really a worthy topic, is it? I am sure I both you and me could have spent our time more wise.



I don't mean to frame it like that but thats a shallow statement of you.


You don't mean to call me shallow, you just did anyway, or?

*damn, I had the coolest reply to this, but I deleted it cause I am in a very good mood today, and it would not have brought the topic further*

I will try and answer you with a smiley instead....

:clown: <- nah wait... I can do better...

:2thumbsup: <- damn, I guess you shouldnt use a thumbs up smiley to mark sarcasm, huh?

:book: <- Much better. Please follow the instruction given.



Every single one I've ever been in.

:inquisitive:

You have had... GREAT... sex... with every women you have ever been with?

Sorry, that is just a very hard statement to respect, you know...

A) You had only one partner or so, and do not know better as you don't have enough to compare with.

B) You get aroused by ANYONE, doing, ANYTHING, at ANYTIME...

C) You think that if you have had an orgasm during sex, that the sex was good...



Ok... So I ran out of options. I am sure you have an option D)

Would you share it with us?

I must say, from my personal experience, I have never met a single person EVER who has been completely satisfied with each and every partner...

Have you had plastic surgery to give you G-spots all over your body, along with the new technology to always give the girl you are with multiple orgasms and a spreadsheet for the talk afterwards/in between?

Or are you just easily entertained?

Strike For The South
12-05-2009, 04:47
SFTS, I will break your post down and answer them in turn, I hope that is OK?

That's fine



I never said stupid...

Anyway, what part was "not true?"

That people with the belief that no sex with anyone but your partner for life is = more directed towards family value?

I just do not get your point here, please elaborate!

My points was that people who have had some partners already, and who already have had sex with a couple of people who were in a relationsip, will be less shocked by the fact soemone cheated. Is this wrong?


It's wrong in the fact that you think single partner or "family vaule" people are that naive to belive Tiger simply turned out to be human or that they all are foaming at the mouth now that they found out what he did.

# of sexual partners does not equal sexual or human knowledge (as much as you'd like it to ~;))






Sex is not about primal instincts?

Sex for pleasure is all about building a complex society?

Hmmmm... This is a bit tricky for me to answer. I mean, everything about the topic I ever read says otherwise.

So I will go with: source, please?

Sorry, that is the best answer I could do. I would have gone into a Tribesman amount of :laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4: otherwise.



http://futurity.org/society-culture/love%E2%80%99s-not-the-only-reason-women-have-sex/
Thats the best link I can pull out of my rear atm.

I don't know what you're reading but sex is a key compenent in building complex socities and groups.




Agreed. If you have promised your partner to only be with her it's not cool to cheat. Ever.

However, we don't know ANYTHING, not a single bit, about her, or her, or him... For all WE know, his wife may have labidabidabidadaDA-him for months straight cause she is the daughter of Satan... Oh ok, it's not like we all believe in satan, but you get my point.

I mean, the lover, the mother, the man... We have no insight what so ever into their lives, no matter how much the media likes us to believe we do.

So again, why even bring this up? It's not really a worthy topic, is it? I am sure I both you and me could have spent our time more wise.

Fair enough


It's all over the news here in the States figure I could liven this place about a bit.






You don't mean to call me shallow, you just did anyway, or?

*damn, I had the coolest reply to this, but I deleted it cause I am in a very good mood today, and it would not have brought the topic further*

I will try and answer you with a smiley instead....

:clown: <- nah wait... I can do better...

:2thumbsup: <- damn, I guess you shouldnt use a thumbs up smiley to mark sarcasm, huh?

:book: <- Much better. Please follow the instruction given.



I said your statment was shallow not you.



Thank god (:laugh4:) we can still appreciate a cultivated mind who still is human enough to accept that sometimes he just wants to "stick it into this girl, right here, right now."

And stand by that statement. And shallow isn't necesarilly a bad thing, it's just a shallow statement. I wasn't attacking your charcter.

The hammer remark was attacking your charcter :yes:



:inquisitive:

You have had... GREAT... sex... with every women you have ever been with?

Sorry, that is just a very hard statement to respect, you know...

A) You had only one partner or so, and do not know better as you don't have enough to compare with.

B) You get aroused by ANYONE, doing, ANYTHING, at ANYTIME...

C) You think that if you have had an orgasm during sex, that the sex was good...



Ok... So I ran out of options. I am sure you have an option D)

Would you share it with us?

I must say, from my personal experience, I have never met a single person EVER who has been completely satisfied with each and every partner...

Have you had plastic surgery to give you G-spots all over your body, along with the new technology to always give the girl you are with multiple orgasms and a spreadsheet for the talk afterwards/in between?

Or are you just easily entertained?
A. Wrong, I'm not going to share the info here but its more than one

B. Wrong, I would classify myself as excitable but nothing strange considering I'm a jacked and tanned college kid.

C.It certainly helps but I'll agree with you that the big O is a low bar to set



Sex for me has never been the centerpeice for any relationship. Has some sex been better than others? Of course, but for me it has always been about my emotional connection with the person. Having sex with someone you're emotionally invested with is usually better than a fling.

I've never had sex make or break a relationship, I think sex is a key compenent and you should listen to your partner and try new things but it should never be the component.

I've never been so dissapointed that I was forced to cheat.


Or are you just easily entertained

All my time spent here should answer that question ~:)

Louis VI the Fat
12-05-2009, 05:00
I don't get it, where is the part that's funny? Oh wait, it's not.That's not a nice way to putt it.

Kadagar_AV
12-05-2009, 05:26
It's wrong in the fact that you think single partner or "family vaule" people are that naive to belive Tiger simply turned out to be human or that they all are foaming at the mouth now that they found out what he did.

# of sexual partners does not equal sexual or human knowledge (as much as you'd like it to ~;))

Just have a look at the US media to have a figure of the "foaming at the mouth".

Sure, there are some more people than the religious nutcases involved in this... I do however refuse to believe it is the intellectual elite.


http://futurity.org/society-culture/love%E2%80%99s-not-the-only-reason-women-have-sex/
Thats the best link I can pull out of my rear atm.

I don't know what you're reading but sex is a key compenent in building complex socities and groups.

Only if by "complex society" you mean a society on par with apes and such...

I mean, yeah, lots of animals have comlex societys, but the animal world is not what we strive for, is it?

However, if you go by the "scientists" in the psychological arena, they would all agree that sex is controlled by very (extremly) primitive parts of the mind.

Don't get me wrong, I believe most of psychology to be wrong or ill researched. However, even a broken watch is right two times a day. And I think you would struggle proving me wrong about sex = calling to the primal parts of our brains.



I said your statment was shallow not you.


I claim your point is idiotic, not you. However, me claiming your point is idiotic does not really further this discussion, so why dont we leave such remarks aside?





A. Wrong, I'm not going to share the info here but its more than one

B. Wrong, I would classify myself as excitable but nothing strange considering I'm a jacked and tanned college kid.

C.It certainly helps but I'll agree with you that the big O is a low bar to set

If the big O is a low bar to set, what would be the correct bar?

For me: The perfect sexual partner is someone who takes pleasure from all the things I take pleasure from... Someone who responds to my inner callings... Someone who is utterly dedicated to make both have a great time...

I can only speak for myself, but there was QUITE a number of girls before I was even remotely close to getting what I wanted (anyone younger than 25, forget it).

I have had lots of good sex, even more OK sex... But that isn't really what we discuss here, is it?

I mean that mind-blowing sex that has you wake up in sweaty blankets with the girl snuggled in, the biggest smile crowning your face and a huge hard-on.

I'm not sure we talk about the same thing here, are we?



Sex for me has never been the centerpeice for any relationship. Has some sex been better than others? Of course, but for me it has always been about my emotional connection with the person. Having sex with someone you're emotionally invested with is usually better than a fling.

QFT

I agree, simple as that :2thumbsup:

And yes, sex should never be the centerpiece... However, why not have it all............ perfect?

I mean, you almost make it sound like you cant have good sex with someone you find perfect and are emotionally deeply attracted to (sidenote: no one is perfect, but some are def more close than others).


I've never had sex make or break a relationship, I think sex is a key compenent and you should listen to your partner and try new things but it should never be the component.

If the sex doesnt work the relationship doesnt work.

If you get OK sex with an otherwise very nice partner I guess you could settle for that.

Well, maybe you, not me.

I look for a lot in a partner, a LOT. Good sex is of course one of the factors, but not the most crucial one.

With that said however, bad sex DOES break up relationships...
OK sex WILL have the partner cheating if/when they get great sex.

So why dont we just get a partner we can have great sex with, so we dont have to cheat.


I've never been so dissapointed that I was forced to cheat.

Fun fact, I never cheated in my life.

I have, however, ended relationships after some nights of bad sex with the motivation "we are just not very compatible in bed".

I think it is better if people have a load of partners, that way they can make a more informed decision when they later choose their partner for life, or the one they want to get children with (if you get kids you should stick around for some 18 years in the same relationship, better make it worth it).





I guess I am a bit damaged though.

I would never cheat. However, I have seen soooooooo much cheating in my life, even participated in it. The most common reason for cheating is that their partner does not fullfill their physical needs...

So my point is: why torture yourself? get a partner you want to Dabidi bidibi dibidibidi dibi dibidi DI the brain out with... And who ALSO have everything else you need.

We are not in the medieval ages anymore, where the general population at MOST saw some 1000 people their whole life.

Nope, today we have SO many means of meeting just the perfect partner, so why settling for something less than perfect?

Among my friends, some 80% have a partner from another country... Not an "immigrant", no, I mean they used to live way apart... Then of course, most of my friends are like me...

I just do not accept the need to settle for something sub-standard.





All my time spent here should answer that question ~:)

Touché!