PDA

View Full Version : Spectator or voyeur?



Louis VI the Fat
05-05-2010, 00:55
' Le spectateur de théâtre est t-il un voyeur? '





https://img442.imageshack.us/img442/8815/44708523402384a9a47d.jpg





https://img525.imageshack.us/img525/1150/45639543706b34e135b6b.jpg





https://img442.imageshack.us/img442/5553/4294104444d2dce8b236b.jpg




https://img442.imageshack.us/img442/6721/3466769114a830be6413b.jpg





https://img138.imageshack.us/img138/3087/45633190258815a5fb48o.jpg




Where does appreciation of beauty turn from spectatorship into voyeurism?

Lemur
05-05-2010, 00:58
Until you're cleaning blood off your clown suit, it's all good.

Louis VI the Fat
05-05-2010, 01:07
Until you're cleaning blood off your clown suit, it's all good.Blood? That only happens to amateurs. Me I use pockets full of candy to lure 'em and


What if she brutally stares you down if your gaze turned out to be too indecent? Or just the right level of indecency, but for too long?

Sasaki Kojiro
05-05-2010, 01:18
When you turn your head instead of just glancing with your eyes, i.e. when you go out of your way.:bobby2:

Lemur
05-05-2010, 01:21
Well, let's be honest, I'm coming at this subject as a guy who has zero problem with putting on antlers, standing on a float and singing in parades, so maybe I don't have the most balanced view about what's voyeurism and what isn't.

That said, however, as long as one discreetly looks at another person, I don't see any harm. Sometimes they even look back and lovely things happen. But yeah, never be aggressive or pushy about it; that way madness lies.

Justiciar
05-05-2010, 01:24
I'm afraid I've dubbed you a pervert, thinking them all pictures of the same girl. Stalking some poor lass across town with a camera's one thing. Taking the odd shot of random (leggy, female) people going about their business another.

Crazed Rabbit
05-05-2010, 01:37
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes


Where does appreciation of beauty turn from spectatorship into voyeurism?

If you take more than one picture of a person you don't know. When the image focuses on the girl alone and not in connection with the background.

Sasaki's guideline is good too; glancing is one thing; staring is another.

CR

Husar
05-05-2010, 07:32
I don't mind if the girls look at my well-shaped behind either. And they do it, whether they look at mine is hard to say, don't have eyes in the back of my head but in general, they sure do it.
I don't take pictures of anyone usually so that is out of the question, and if I got that correctly the ones above were not taken by Louis?
When I was in Prague I saw a flash of a camera right behind a girl's skirt/jeans, I found that quite...you know...
However, it is hard to appreciate beauty without looking at it, and sometimes the details are very interesting, that doesn't always mean something dirty has to happen in the process, as I posted in the Frontroom I'm more the friendly friend (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzwXtrHOJLs) type anyway (though incidentally I hardly ever hug a woman I'm not related to, I never know when it would be appropriate and prefer not to get too close :shrug: ).

Fragony
05-05-2010, 08:14
When you turn your head instead of just glancing with your eyes, i.e. when you go out of your way.:bobby2:

Nah that's what we call the excorcist method

Hax
05-05-2010, 10:29
..which would give a whole new twist to "WE WANT MERRIN"

Hosakawa Tito
05-05-2010, 10:51
Everybody needs a hobby. More frontal shots please.

gaelic cowboy
05-05-2010, 13:45
I hugely confused whats wrong with the fourth photo of the rainy street????

Lemur
05-05-2010, 14:18
I hugely confused whats wrong with the fourth photo of the rainy street????
That rainy street never gave its permission to be photographed. Pervert.

gaelic cowboy
05-05-2010, 14:54
You know if you sit in a chair and rub both your upper thighs with your palms of your hands and say any word at all it sounds hugely perverted :clown: hours of fun that one

Strike For The South
05-05-2010, 16:55
It's only vouyerism if you get caught

PanzerJaeger
05-05-2010, 17:01
When you feel the need to start a thread like this...

Strike For The South
05-05-2010, 17:06
When you feel the need to start a thread like this...

Clearly you don't understand the intracacies of French art. To impress the plebs, sometimes a line must be towed. Louis is simply another brave artist towing that line between artful beauty and deviant sexual fetish

:france:

drone
05-05-2010, 20:24
It's only vouyerism if you get caught

And if they didn't want you looking, they wouldn't dress like that. ~;)

Husar
05-05-2010, 22:14
Don't forget that if you don't look, you're acting against (your) nature, just look for a thread on climate change, to see how dangerous that is!

Louis VI the Fat
05-06-2010, 13:15
Clearly you don't understand the intracacies of French art. To impress the plebs, sometimes a line must be towed. Louis is simply another brave artist towing that line between artful beauty and deviant sexual fetish I would link here to 'L'Origine du monde' ('The Origin of the World'), but you people are not ready for such art yet. :smug:


Don't google that at work or at a public computer...

Megas Methuselah
05-06-2010, 14:14
For some unknown reason, I'm drawn to the bottom half of the chick in the second pic.

Reenk Roink
05-06-2010, 15:44
Since you probably aren't brazen/creepy enough to take a picture of her face, rate it 1-10 please. :yes:

edit: My bad if you didn't take the pics, who did though?

Kagemusha
05-07-2010, 15:40
Don't forget that if you don't look, you're acting against (your) nature, just look for a thread on climate change, to see how dangerous that is!

QFT.

Skullheadhq
05-08-2010, 16:36
For some unknown reason, I'm drawn to the bottom half of the chick in the second pic.

That means you're healthy, congratulations!