View Full Version : Assorted musings upon the fairer sex
Vladimir
05-27-2010, 11:12
Sweden also have upcoming elections.
However, I do not kid myself thinking the backroom cares. Not exactly great players on the world stage, are we, mate?
But, I thought Scandinavia was heaven on earth. The true model on which other nations should be based. Why wouldn't we be interested?
Kadagar_AV
05-27-2010, 11:39
But, I thought Scandinavia was heaven on earth. The true model on which other nations should be based. Why wouldn't we be interested?
Sweden: The girls are great when they stand still and shut up. As soon as they open their feminist mouths or show their ineptitude of walking in high heels though, the attraction dies.
Norway: Hitting baby seals with baseball bats is the national sport.
Denmark: Did you know that the orc language in LOTR was based on Danish?
Iceland: With their economy, they trade their daughters for a bumper sticker.
Finland: I am just joking of course. We all know it is not part of scandinavia, right? RIGHT!?
However, I prefer living in an insignificant nation that doesnt really cause much trouble and mainly MIND THEIR OWN BUSINESS, than some "player on the world scene".
Sweden: The girls are great when they stand still and shut up. As soon as they open their feminist mouths or show their ineptitude of walking in high heels though, the attraction dies.
This is the sort of thing that not so nice people say, I'm sure you are just quoting others though.
Vladimir
05-27-2010, 15:05
Sweden: The girls are great when they stand still and shut up. As soon as they open their feminist mouths or show their ineptitude of walking in high heels though, the attraction dies.
Norway: Hitting baby seals with baseball bats is the national sport.
Denmark: Did you know that the orc language in LOTR was based on Danish?
Iceland: With their economy, they trade their daughters for a bumper sticker.
Finland: I am just joking of course. We all know it is not part of scandinavia, right? RIGHT!?
However, I prefer living in an insignificant nation that doesnt really cause much trouble and mainly MIND THEIR OWN BUSINESS, than some "player on the world scene".
Very clever. I see your point. :2thumbsup:
Kadagar_AV
05-27-2010, 15:07
This is the sort of thing that not so nice people say, I'm sure you are just quoting others though.
Don't get me wrong. Same job - same salary, FINE by me.
However, you have no idea of what ultra-feminism is until you have visited Sweden.
When I studied ancient literature, we had a feminist "professor". I say "professor" as she wrote on feminism, and that is basically a free-pass to government funds no matter intellectual (or was it intelligent, just JOKING) ability.
Anyway, it was quite interesting to have a historical author list with 50/50 men and women. Don't get me wrong, women are great. But if you study literature history, one MIGHT assume that most writers worthy of reading would have been men, as women basically did not write much the first thousand years or so.
Dissing Shakespeare for some obscure female writer no one ever heard of?
So no, I was not quoting others. It is my genuine belief that Swedish girls are way to feminist for heir own good. There are of course exceptions.
Living in a society where you daily see posters saying men are rapist pigs kind of make me appreciate non-Swedish girls. Don't judge me till you have been there mate.
As to walking in high heels..
High heels are not by definition sexy, a woman must also know how to walk in them. When I am in Austria, France, Italy - the girls move with divine grace. In Sweden, the girls look like they are attempting some hardcore balancing act for the very first time.
It is very unflattering to the eye.
So no, I was not quoting others. It is my genuine belief that Swedish girls are way to feminist for heir own good. There are of course exceptions.
Living in a society where you daily see posters saying men are rapist pigs kind of make me appreciate non-Swedish girls. Don't judge me till you have been there mate.
As to walking in high heels..
High heels are not by definition sexy, a woman must also know how to walk in them. When I am in Austria, France, Italy - the girls move with divine grace. In Sweden, the girls look like they are attempting some hardcore balancing act for the very first time.
It is very unflattering to the eye.
Sounds like a load of nonsense to me. You believe that Swedish women should present themselves in a way you find attractive otherwise they are "too feminist". Doesn't even make sense.
Kadagar_AV
05-27-2010, 16:12
Sounds like a load of nonsense to me. You believe that Swedish women should present themselves in a way you find attractive otherwise they are "too feminist". Doesn't even make sense.
So shoot me, I prefer women I find at least remotely attractive.
I assume pulling out the chair for the lady, or opening the door for her, would also be bad in your eye? Mind you, this would be a date-ending thing for many Swedish girls. By pulling out her chair you are CLEARLY insinuating that she isn't able to, no?
Do you know how many girls in Sweden use Snus (it is kind of like chewing tobacco).
Have this picture:
A long-legged beautiful girl is standing outside a nightclub. You can not take your eyes off of her!
Then she stumbles (with her high heels) to a chair, sits down with legs wide apart, put some tobacco in her mouth, and spit on the ground. You still want to sex her up?
Maybe I am a chauvinist pig, but I would prefer not to have that behavior in my significant other.
Strike For The South
05-27-2010, 16:26
Then she stumbles (with her high heels) to a chair, sits down with legs wide apart, put some tobacco in her mouth, and spit on the ground. You still want to sex her up?
.
Yea dude, get laid and free tabacco
So shoot me, I prefer women I find at least remotely attractive.
I assume pulling out the chair for the lady, or opening the door for her, would also be bad in your eye? Mind you, this would be a date-ending thing for many Swedish girls. By pulling out her chair you are CLEARLY insinuating that she isn't able to, no?
Do you know how many girls in Sweden use Snus (it is kind of like chewing tobacco).
Have this picture:
A long-legged beautiful girl is standing outside a nightclub. You can not take your eyes off of her!
Then she stumbles (with her high heels) to a chair, sits down with legs wide apart, put some tobacco in her mouth, and spit on the ground. You still want to sex her up?
Maybe I am a chauvinist pig, but I would prefer not to have that behavior in my significant other.
I couldn't care less what you do or who you like. i just don't want to presented with your strange views as if they were perfectly normal.
Kadagar_AV
05-27-2010, 17:02
I get some very disturbing mental images when I think of you two with the Valkyries...
Whatever rocks your boat, I guess :)
I for one would not kiss a girl with tobacco in her mouth, but then, we can't all be picky.
[insert big clown face]
Can we all agree we like girls? And if not, can we agree that that is OK too?
Kadagar, you forgot to add how skilled Swedish women are with golf clubs.
Vladimir
05-27-2010, 19:10
Kadagar, you forgot to add how skilled Swedish women are with golf clubs.
I thought you said golf balls. I'd be impressed because I hear Aussie women are skilled with ping pong balls.
So no, I was not quoting others. It is my genuine belief that Swedish girls are way to feminist for heir own good. There are of course exceptions.
Living in a society where you daily see posters saying men are rapist pigs kind of make me appreciate non-Swedish girls. Don't judge me till you have been there mate.
Actually, it is called "home country symdrone". Basically, living in a country, you see everyone who isn't attractive as well as the attractive ones. Also for some reason, all the foreign girls who come over to your country are attractive. Perhaps it is because those from a middle class background are more attractive than those from a working class background.
As for example, the Swedish girls I know here are cute, sexy accents, and I also learnt, that in sweden, you don't make any sort of initimate contact, including hugging or kin.
gaelic cowboy
05-27-2010, 21:06
Actually, it is called "home country symdrone". Basically, living in a country, you see everyone who isn't attractive as well as the attractive ones.
What's seldom is often nice.
Sweden also have upcoming elections.
However, I do not kid myself thinking the backroom cares. Not exactly great players on the world stage, are we, mate?
Many Dutch members here
Skullheadhq
05-28-2010, 12:03
Many Dutch members here
This thread is now about Swedish women.
But are we looking at elections or Idols.
Tellos Athenaios
05-28-2010, 19:21
But are we looking at elections or Idols.
Then are we looking at issues or tv-debates?
Louis VI the Fat
05-28-2010, 19:52
Dissapointing thread. Half the posts are about babes. :wall:
Which, of course, is simply not on. We are discussing Sweden and the Netherlands here - this thread ought to be 100% chicks.
Louis VI the Fat
05-28-2010, 19:53
Step 1: Hot Swedish godesses.
Step 2: ???
Step 3: Hot steamy sex.
Seamus Fermanagh
05-28-2010, 20:06
Step 1: Hot Swedish godesses.
Step 2: ???
Step 3: Hot steamy sex.
Apparently, from what Kadagar suggests, ??? should be offer her a pinch of Skoal.
Both pictures feature quite lovely young ladies, though having an "infantile bias" I am partial to the Netherlander a tad more.
As to the thread, I am in favor of the Dutch holding elections.
That girl is 17, Louis you dirty old man.
That girl is 17, Louis you dirty old man.
Louis VI the Fat
05-29-2010, 02:55
Which girl?That Fragony godess:
That girl is 17, Louis you dirty old man. Oh you're soooo unimaginative.
Together, these girls are 34, so perfectly legal and moral.
17 is already legal here HA I can bang a 14 year old and say she told me she was 16.
17 is already legal here HA I can bang a 14 year old and say she told me she was 16.
I hope that is not from speaking from experience. :tongue:
I hope that is not from speaking from experience. :tongue:
TIGHT. If there is no blood on the wall it was not fun at all as we say here. Ok I just made that up. Did bang a 14 year old though, but I wasn't that old myself.
Skullheadhq
05-29-2010, 10:08
14 years old? How old where you then?
14 years old? How old where you then?
18 or 19 not sure. See nothing wrong with it she was a hell of a lot more mature then I was. Am really. Good memories.
Rhyfelwyr
05-29-2010, 12:18
I couldn't care less what you do or who you like. i just don't want to presented with your strange views as if they were perfectly normal.
His views sound normal enough to me.
Equal pay, equal rights etc, by all means. But for some reason some feminists feel the need to think women are 100% the same as men. And then there are the even crazier ones that think all men are scum.
Gah! This thread is giving me memories of my psychotic feminist teacher from social policy studies or whatever it was called. She had that wide-eyed psychotic look and managed to speak 10 times louder than I can shout. And some of the views that crept up in what she said... wow.
When women act the way Kadagar was describing, it really isnt' nice. And I don't think expectations for womens' behaviour are some sort of artificial social creation, there are a lot of pretty general similiarties across every culture I can think of. But these loonies talk about 'gender' roles as if men just made them up to oppress women. Bah! Another example of people trying to make nature fit to their ideologies... it never works.
I am in danger of having strangely similar views to Kadagar in many threads these days...
Banquo's Ghost
05-29-2010, 12:40
Contributions have meandered rather far from the original Dutch elections thread, so I have split out the pertinent contributions to a new thread and left this for discussion.
May I remind members that the rule is "babes in the Babe thread". Pictures of the fair sex, no matter how delightful, will be removed in line with this policy. Of course, copies will be made and retained for further review by Backroom staff. :wink:
Meneldil
05-29-2010, 12:40
This thread would be funny, if it weren't disguting. No wonders girls never stick to the org :-(
I'll go back to WoW for hot-cyber sex.
Rhyfelwyr
05-29-2010, 14:00
This thread would be funny, if it weren't disguting. No wonders girls never stick to the org :-(
I really can't see how anything Kadagar or myself said is disgusting. Really, why do people need to pretend everyone is the same?
Strike For The South
05-29-2010, 14:40
Laundry
Sammichs
Yea 5 minutes is enough time
ecetera ecetera
17 is already legal here HA I can bang a 14 year old and say she told me she was 16.
Do. Not. Want.
-10 internets sir
What are the political parties in the Netherlands?
There is the Greens, the Socialists, the Christian Democrats, the Paedos and Wilders.
Missing any big ones out?
Rhyfelwyr
05-29-2010, 15:51
Missing any big ones out?
You missed something anyway...
Reenk Roink
05-29-2010, 16:43
Montreal >>>>>> Scandinavia. It's not even close! :sweatdrop:
I thought you said golf balls. I'd be impressed because I hear Aussie women are skilled with ping pong balls.
Nah mate, Thai girls are the ones with interesting ping pong habits.
Seamus Fermanagh
05-30-2010, 05:10
Actually, I believe Meneldil has a point. Some of this after my post got a little needlessly crass.
Apologies to BG for missing the no-babes rule. I had actually thought that was Pappy's thing, not policy. Live and learn.
Kadagar is absolutely right and there's nothing disgusted with his view. If you are a man that is heterosexual you usually are attracted to girls no? So what is it that makes them attractive to you? Logically that are the woman's female characteristics both physical, mental, fertility... combined with other aspects like health for example. Biologically a man even looks to certain details that give away how 'female' a female is. Some physical appearances give away how much fertile and female a woman is. One can clearly make distinctive differences between women with a high level of œstrogens and a low one. This actually what make up originally tried to do, fool men to think woman had healthy skin and high levels of œstrogens. If he likes women with womanlike qualities and traditional womanlike behaviour than that's only biologically and scientifically normal.
It's plain stupid to say that men and women are equal and the same (except for thier genitalia obviously), they're of equal value but not the same.
Rhyfelwyr
05-30-2010, 17:25
Kadagar is absolutely right and there's nothing disgusted with his view. If you are a man that is heterosexual you usually are attracted to girls no?
Exactly. I wonder if all the people that find these views disgusting go out with macho women...
Behaviour also differs from male and females biologically. Look at how males and females of so many species have complete different lifestyles. The same with men and women from how they handle certain problems, social interaction and movement (which also have to do with physical differences obviously). But all those things get noticed by a possible interested male partner.
And if you don't agree with me you should better be dating lesbians.
Sasaki Kojiro
05-30-2010, 18:33
Kadagar is absolutely right and there's nothing disgusted with his view. If you are a man that is heterosexual you usually are attracted to girls no? So what is it that makes them attractive to you? Logically that are the woman's female characteristics both physical, mental, fertility... combined with other aspects like health for example. B
The girls are great when they stand still and shut up. As soon as they open their feminist mouths
Mental you say? :mellow:
Behaviour also differs from male and females biologically. Look at how males and females of so many species have complete different lifestyles. The same with men and women from how they handle certain problems, social interaction and movement (which also have to do with physical differences obviously). But all those things get noticed by a possible interested male partner.
And if you don't agree with me you should better be dating lesbians.
Biologically? Hmm, look then at the difference in crime rates between white people and black people in the US. Biological difference would you say? Look at how different the role of women is today compared to 100 years ago. Rapid evolution would you say?
The actual innate differences are notoriously hard to separate from environmental effects. And I don't see why you are trying to bring other species into it. Do you want to draw lessons about mating from the praying mantis?
Reenk Roink
05-30-2010, 18:54
The evidence for biological differences between sexes (a lot) is on a whole different scale than that of between races (nothing significant). Nobody considers sex a social construct.
And I know a wiseguy would bring up gender so I specifically used sex. :wink:
Sasaki Kojiro
05-30-2010, 19:01
The evidence for biological differences between sexes (a lot) is on a whole different scale than that of between races (nothing significant). Nobody considers sex a social construct.
And I know a wiseguy would bring up gender so I specifically used sex. :wink:
I mean, there are obviously major biological differences. Personality differences--which is what we are talking about with "different lifestyle" regardless of whether you say sex :p--are less obviously major.
Reenk Roink
05-30-2010, 19:06
I mean, there are obviously major biological differences. Personality differences--which is what we are talking about with "different lifestyle" regardless of whether you say sex :p--are less obviously major.
Yeah, I know what you're getting at and the environmental factor is still huge as well as you pointed out but the personality differences between sexes can be attributed a lot more to biology than between races/ethnicity (different hormones and their effects on behavior).
Kadagar basically said something in the wrong way which rubs people the wrong way, but I'm not gonna lie, I like girls who wear pretty, "feminine" clothes and don't like it when they start spouting off hardcore feminist views. :beam:
Exactly. I wonder if all the people that find these views disgusting go out with macho women...
I didn't know females wanting to be treated as equals meant they were "macho".
Sasaki Kojiro
05-30-2010, 19:12
Yeah, I know what you're getting at and the environmental factor is still huge as well as you pointed out but the personality differences between sexes can be attributed a lot more to biology than between races/ethnicity (different hormones and their effects on behavior).
Yeah, but the way we take a mental leap from differences in the world-->innate biological differences is the same. My comment was along the lines of "you wouldn't download a car"
:laugh4:
Kadagar basically said something in the wrong way which rubs people the wrong way, but I'm not gonna lie, I like girls who wear pretty, "feminine" clothes and don't like it when they start spouting off hardcore feminist views. :beam:
Maybe swedish girls are irrationally feminist, I wouldn't know...but if they were I wouldn't say they were "great as long as they keep their mouths shut", that's just weird kadagar :shame:
Rhyfelwyr
05-30-2010, 19:26
I didn't know females wanting to be treated as equals meant they were "macho".
I had in mind the behaviour's listed by Kadagar earlier on ie chewing tobacco, that is a whole different matter from wanting equal political rights.
Reenk Roink
05-30-2010, 19:28
Yeah, but the way we take a mental leap from differences in the world-->innate biological differences is the same. My comment was along the lines of "you wouldn't download a car" :laugh4:
Yeah, there seems to be a jump to that which is too widespread, like claiming girls don't do as well at science or math due to biology... :no: I think trying to pass it off to biology is due mainly to laziness and unwillingness to deal with certain social inequalities.
I had in mind the behaviour's listed by Kadagar earlier on ie chewing tobacco, that is a whole different matter from wanting equal political rights.
They do that in Texas too.
Look at how different the role of women is today compared to 100 years ago. Rapid evolution would you say?
Everyone have different roles today, the society is not the same. It constantly changes, so the behaviour has to adapt, while the biological component remains the same for the most part. None of this is to say that important differences are not caused by biology; e.g. how to tackle problems identical problems and other fundamental gender specific traits that might not be that easy to observe themselves, but whose consequences could be easily discernable.
The actual innate differences are notoriously hard to separate from environmental effects.
They don't have to be, because certain lab tests can be performed again and again in exactly the same manner regardless of which century we're in; which means we'll be capable of checking the results with the present roles. We could also test people with different backgrounds, lives, and cultures.
And I don't see why you are trying to bring other species into it.
That's just an attempt to show that biology creates different behaviour in some species, meaning that it is possible. Other species are relevant, we are related to them.
Personality differences--which is what we are talking about with "different lifestyle" regardless of whether you say sex :p--are less obviously major.
Males and females behave vastly different, and it is really obvious. There is also alot of variation between persons of the same gender, so it is not a given that average behaviour should be as different between the two genders as it is.
Biologically? Hmm, look then at the difference in crime rates between white people and black people in the US. Biological difference would you say? Look at how different the role of women is today compared to 100 years ago. Rapid evolution would you say?
Not going to bite the bait sorry. That's a whole other discussion which as is my opinion on those matters completely irrelevant. Scientists also take very different opinions between both topics.
The actual innate differences are notoriously hard to separate from environmental effects. And I don't see why you are trying to bring other species into it. Do you want to draw lessons about mating from the praying mantis?
Some of our behaviour traces back to a very far past, when we were a rather different species. We inherited not just physical qualities of our ancestors. Also while almost any animal that has different sexes behaves differently from their other sex, humans would be the exception? Please. Going back to your off-topic and silly race example; one will see more different behaviour between a female and a male tiger, than between a Bengal and an Indo-chinese tiger. So thanks for providing me an argument I guess...
Also everyone knows a woman's brain works different, not just comedians. There are actual big differences take for example the connection between both halves of the brain.
We had different roles in the past, hence we had different adaptations. A species in which there are different roles for various exemplars evolves into a species in which those with their various roles in general functions best. For example men have a more focused and centralised view and better depth vision because they were hunters, while females have a vision better for spotting danger as they watched the children. A species that would have either eagle eye vision (great for hunters) or rabbit vision (great for spotting predators all around) but had distinct hunters and caretakers wouldn't be as successful as one with adapted eyesight for both. Now with humans we mustn't blow this out of proportion as our differences are reasonably small, but they are there. And these characteristics are the ones we want our woman to have, as we want our possible daughters to be aptly adapted to have the best genes possible and the best chances of survival. The best examples of how these intra-special differences can be found with ants and termites who have evolved so many and distinguishing differences that a worker ant/termite and a soldier ant/termite even look like two complete different species. And than you've still go the males and the queens (especially a termite queen).
Edit: don't get me wrong I think women should have the right to chew tobacco, but we have to right to find it unattractive as well.
Sasaki Kojiro
05-30-2010, 22:30
It's really hard to figure out what you are saying.
I don't think anyone disagrees that men and women have differences, biological and personality wise. And we know that environment has an effect as well. But what are getting at with these statements:
Look at how males and females of so many species have complete different lifestyles.
...
Now with humans we mustn't blow this out of proportion as our differences are reasonably small, but they are there.
...
And if you don't agree with me you should better be dating lesbians.
...
women should have the right to chew tobacco, but we have to right to find it unattractive as well.
~:confused:
As best I can tell, it's something like: "there exists some reasonably small differences between men and women, therefore women should try not to be like lesbians (whatever that means), or else we will find them unattractive, because animals of others species live completely different lifestyles".
It's just a mish mash of stuff. And what people find attractive is a mix of biology and environmental factors too--so I am highly suspicious of claiming biology as support for a behavior. 100 years ago I bet many men found "meekness and obedience" attractive. That kind of thing changes over time. Even what we find visually attractive changes based on environment. We're very adaptable. So why are we looking at biology?
Examining differences is very different than using them for justification. And I don't even know what you are trying to justify. So :dizzy2:
-edit-
Maybe in Europe there is some huge "women are exactly the same as men" trend that I just don't know about. I can't imagine there is really a huge trend like that though.
Kagar was named sick because he didn't find women attractive when behaving like men. Clearly as I stated there are differences between us and females and it's actually those differences we find attractive.
Extreme feminism is what is sick in my eyes, as fighting for the right to act and be like a man isn't what they should be doing. They should fight against certain descrimination issues and the like, getting equal rights. Not becomming them. This is what Kagar, I think meant, somehow people foud that a wierd discussion. Cause it's macho women we were talking about. Now I just presented a case based on scientifical arguments to back it up.
About the lesbians, that was just a failed joke.
Sasaki Kojiro
05-30-2010, 23:02
Kagar was named sick because he didn't find women attractive when behaving like men.
Those were directed at his comments about girls being great when they stand still and shut up. I think chewing tobacco is considered unattractive by most people of both genders.
Clearly as I stated there are differences between us and females and it's actually those differences we find attractive.
Men find women attractive and vice versa, but opposites don't really attract. Most people are happiest with similar people. So what does it mean to say "it's the differences we find attractive"? When you're like "I'm going to watch the game" and she's like "I'm not I don't like sports" you think that's attractive?
It's not clear what you stated...at least, I don't know what you are saying.
Extreme feminism is what is sick in my eyes, as fighting for the right to act and be like a man isn't what they should be doing. They should fight against certain descrimination issues and the like, getting equal rights. Not becomming them. This is what Kagar, I think meant, somehow people foud that a wierd discussion. Cause it's macho women we were talking about. Now I just presented a case based on scientifical arguments to back it up.
Which masculine traits should women be discouraged from having in your view? Besides chewing tobacco.
The scientific fact was something about vision. Men and women have slight visual differences. So, I guess that backs up a claim you might make about women not being fighter pilots, maybe (I don't know).
Those were directed at his comments about girls being great when they stand still and shut up. I think chewing tobacco is considered unattractive by most people of both genders.
No. He didn't mind them earning as much. But he didn't like them walking ungracefully or being macho or overly not wanting to be feminine.
Men find women attractive and vice versa, but opposites don't really attract. Most people are happiest with similar people. So what does it mean to say "it's the differences we find attractive"? When you're like "I'm going to watch the game" and she's like "I'm not I don't like sports" you think that's attractive?
I wouldn't mind if she likes watching sports, but hopefully not in a too manly fashion. Drinking a couple of sixpacks, burping all the time yelling at the tv and other manly-macho kind of things.
It's not clear what you stated...at least, I don't know what you are saying.
I'm sorry.
Which masculine traits should women be discouraged from having in your view? Besides chewing tobacco.
Well it's not that I want to systematically discourage certain behaviour. But lets rather say I'd not like it to be encouraged. It's not like its morally wrong for a woman to be the noisiest and macho person of the group or sitting in front of the tv in their underwear scratching everything that itches. But I do think its unnatural, unattractive and something a woman shouldn't focus on fighting for. A 'manly' wage or chances that's something else.
The scientific fact was something about vision. Men and women have slight visual differences. So, I guess that backs up a claim you might make about women not being fighter pilots, maybe (I don't know).
That was an example of how women are different from men both physical and in behaviour and that they were made for two distinct functions excluding their part in mating. And that women trying to escape these traits of evolution are just being plain silly. Now it's true our roles in life have changed somewhat, but that doesn't mean we have to deny who we are. Which is what I think some women, namely those who Kagar was talking about, are doing. Of course he did make some generalisations, but we all do that when arguing and making points.
Now on Swedish women themselves I cannot judge. I never met one. And yes there are some females in Europe these days who are offended when you want to pay the (first) date or open the door for her. Women who cannot do something without wanting to prove they are equal. Thank God they are a minority. No idea how it's like in Sweden. But hey none of my worries I date a moslim girl.
I love how the females got to put on make-up, look pretty and constantly be on best behaviour while the males can sit around burping, not washing and being a slob.
Perhaps you want them in the kitchen while you play poker with your friends too?
Sasaki Kojiro
05-30-2010, 23:41
Well, when I watch the game, I don't:
Drink a couple six packs
chew tobacco
burp loudly
yell at the tv
So, my not wanting a woman to do that is not "finding our differences attractive". You are talking about things that are just bad in general.
I like girls to be more emotionally outgoing than I am (and most men are). To talk intimately with ease. That's one of the most obvious differences between men and women. I can't think of another personality difference that I especially like right now though.
Reenk Roink
05-30-2010, 23:42
I love how the females got to put on make-up, look pretty and constantly be on best behaviour while the males can sit around burping, not washing and being a slob.
Perhaps you want them in the kitchen while you play poker with your friends too?
They don't got to do any of that stuff at all. It's fine for a girl to wear baggy tomboyish clothes, not wear makeup, burp loudly. I just think it's kinda gross and I probably won't hang out with that type of girl. Is that wrong?
I love how the females got to put on make-up, look pretty and constantly be on best behaviour while the males can sit around burping, not washing and being a slob.
Perhaps you want them in the kitchen while you play poker with your friends too?
Well I wouldn't say I wouldn't like a woman who can cook. As like to eat good food. But I wouldn't mind cooking though as I like to do it.
Well, when I watch the game, I don't:
Drink a couple six packs
chew tobacco
burp loudly
yell at the tv
So, my not wanting a woman to do that is not "finding our differences attractive". You are talking about things that are just bad in general.
I like girls to be more emotionally outgoing than I am (and most men are). To talk intimately with ease. That's one of the most obvious differences between men and women. I can't think of another personality difference that I especially like right now though.
I exagerated and presented a cartoonish example that's true. A different example would be an overly competitive girl or one that wants to be the smart one all the time. Apparantly a lot of men wouldn't like a girl smarter than him. (something I'd not care about, at least you can have some god conversations with those, though I bet it doesn't come in handy during a fight or argument lol) One thing I like about girls is that they aren't always bussy trying to be better than someone else and that they can talk about things better.
Rhyfelwyr
05-30-2010, 23:54
I love how the females got to put on make-up, look pretty and constantly be on best behaviour while the males can sit around burping, not washing and being a slob.
Perhaps you want them in the kitchen while you play poker with your friends too?
Because men who sit around burping, not washing and being a slob have girls queueeueueueing up to to go out with them...
As for make up and all, well thats what girls are doing from primary school these days, nothing to do with boys making them do it. Heck, from some things I've heard, and what I think personally, a lot of girls go overboard with the whole make-up thing. Nobody likes an oompa-loompa.
Sasaki Kojiro
05-31-2010, 00:04
They don't got to do any of that stuff at all. It's fine for a girl to wear baggy tomboyish clothes, not wear makeup, burp loudly. I just think it's kinda gross and I probably won't hang out with that type of girl. Is that wrong?
Not even hang out? How often does someone who burps loudly burp loudly anyway...
I exagerated and presented a cartoonish example that's true. A different example would be an overly competitive girl or one that wants to be the smart one all the time. Apparantly a lot of men wouldn't like a girl smarter than him. (something I'd not care about, at least you can have some god conversations with those, though I bet it doesn't come in handy during a fight or argument lol) One thing I like about girls is that they aren't always bussy trying to be better than someone else and that they can talk about things better.
Well who likes overly competitive guys? That's kind of what "overly" means. Trying to one-up everyone else is just another generally objectionable trait.
A guy who wouldn't want a girl who is smarter than him is sexist and insecure.
It's a question of what differences between you and the girl you might like, are attractive. Not what differences between an embodiment of the most negative masculine traits.
Because men who sit around burping, not washing and being a slob have girls queueeueueueing up to to go out with them...
As for make up and all, well thats what girls are doing from primary school these days, nothing to do with boys making them do it. Heck, from some things I've heard, and what I think personally, a lot of girls go overboard with the whole make-up thing. Nobody likes an oompa-loompa.
I think it's mostly women setting each other up on the make-up and dieting things. I've never heard a hetrosexual guy say: ' did you see those shoes!?' or 'oh my if I had those curves, I'd not be wearing that'. And it's even worse when they are making comments about each other face to face.
@Rhyfelwyr: Nah, there are enough en who sit around burping who have girls. I really know some pigs who actually have girls I'd not mind dating myself if I was single.
I've never heard a hetrosexual guy say: ' did you see those shoes!?'
I only think it because if I said it, you'd make fun of me. :jester:
And the whole seeing people thing only goes so far, the short people at work often ask me to get something for them that they cannot reach so obviously I'm a little more equal than they are, it's kind of a birth right since it's not my fault that I'm 185cm and they are not. :sweatdrop:
Banquo's Ghost
05-31-2010, 10:16
I've never heard a hetrosexual guy say: ' did you see those shoes!?'
You would be surprised, perhaps, at how an interest in shoes and the ability to articulate an opinion upon them can prove to be a winner in female company. At least, among intelligent, self-confident women attracted by men comfortable in their own skin and who appear to be interested in more than one thing.
And for later married life, you can use the knowledge to console yourself that you now have a clue where 90% of your earnings get spent - and pepper your rants about the charge card deficit currently rivalling that of Greece with clever references to newly out-of-fashion designers that will ensure you don't get laid for a month anyway, but at least she is confused now. *and breathe*
I only think it because if I said it, you'd make fun of me. :jester:
And the whole seeing people thing only goes so far, the short people at work often ask me to get something for them that they cannot reach so obviously I'm a little more equal than they are, it's kind of a birth right since it's not my fault that I'm 185cm and they are not. :sweatdrop:
Not only that, but do you feel the need to express it? No, you don't. I often see persons wearing ugly shoes or whatever, but I don't need to tell it to everyone to make me feel good or better than someone else. We just arm wrestle or something.
You would be surprised, perhaps, at how an interest in shoes and the ability to articulate an opinion upon them can prove to be a winner in female company. At least, among intelligent, self-confident women attracted by men comfortable in their own skin and who appear to be interested in more than one thing.
And for later married life, you can use the knowledge to console yourself that you now have a clue where 90% of your earnings get spent - and pepper your rants about the charge card deficit currently rivalling that of Greece with clever references to newly out-of-fashion designers that will ensure you don't get laid for a month anyway, but at least she is confused now. *and breathe*
Yeah it can be a winner I assume. But I'd refuse to know anything about fashion anyway. I loathe fashion as it's just a way to keep people buying clothes for more money than they're worth, while they still have enough perfectly fine clothes. It's ridiculous.
Now, now Banquo that only happens when you let her do it. You've got to show from the beginning you're the leader of the pack and keep her tight. And if she's a good girl just constantly reward her. Just be consistent with it and it'll automatically behave.
Banquo's Ghost
05-31-2010, 17:59
Now, now Banquo that only happens when you let her do it. You've got to show from the beginning you're the leader of the pack and keep her tight. And if she's a good girl just constantly reward her. Just be consistent with it and it'll automatically behave.
:laugh4: Every married man on the Org is currently shaking with silent laughter. (Best be quiet in case She Who Must Be Obeyed gets curious about one's sudden mirth).
TinCow don't open this thread!
Hosakawa Tito
05-31-2010, 20:49
Now, now Banquo that only happens when you let her do it. You've got to show from the beginning you're the leader of the pack and keep her tight. And if she's a good girl just constantly reward her. Just be consistent with it and it'll automatically behave.
:laugh4: Every married man on the Org is currently shaking with silent laughter. (Best be quiet in case She Who Must Be Obeyed gets curious about one's sudden mirth).
Yes, I was single & delusional once myself.
Seamus Fermanagh
06-01-2010, 20:54
Yes, I was single & delusional once myself.
Banquo, Hosa:
Concur. Or, to quote C.W. McCall's classic, "That's a big Ten-Four!"
pevergreen
06-02-2010, 02:17
They don't got to do any of that stuff at all. It's fine for a girl to wear baggy tomboyish clothes, not wear makeup, burp loudly. I just think it's kinda gross and I probably won't hang out with that type of girl. Is that wrong?
*ruffles hair* Its ok champ.
Heck, from some things I've heard, and what I think personally, a lot of girls go overboard with the whole make-up thing. Nobody likes an oompa-loompa.
True. I like a girl that is happy enough with how she looks to not wear any at all.
Apparantly a lot of men wouldn't like a girl smarter than him.
I think it really only applies when the gap is massive, and the other person doesn't "dumb" it down. I have a friend who just by talking normally, she makes other people feel stupid. Her everyday conversation is the premium of the debates that happen around here, and any time I'm talking to her, I feel absolutely terrible. I don't understand half of what she says.
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.