View Full Version : Verdict: JUSTICE and LAW
Reenk Roink
08-29-2011, 20:18
Deliberate.
Reenk Roink
08-29-2011, 20:21
How ironic that the color of the TINCOW option is BLUE
Populus Romanus
08-29-2011, 20:23
What is this supposed to be about?
What is this supposed to be about?
Just vote ANDRES, please.
Anyone who votes Andres will have their names turned Pink.
Veho Nex
08-29-2011, 21:38
I voted GAH, can I have my name turned Purple?
classical_hero
08-29-2011, 21:39
Tincow just betrayed the Law.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aaubVlhNK4
Tincow just betrayed the Law.
The law says that people who vote for Andres should be punished with a pink name. I am simply enforcing the law.
Montmorency
08-29-2011, 21:46
Why are the results hidden? I demand that an inquiry of this matter be launched immediately.
Why are the results hidden?
So that TinCow can abuse his tech admin powers to influence the poll results unnoticed.
Of course, the intelligent members of this forum already know that I have more knowledge than TinCow. And not just in law, if I may add.
Populus Romanus
08-29-2011, 22:01
Awesome, my name turns pink? I always wanted a special color. :smug:
So that TinCow can abuse his tech admin powers to influence the poll results unnoticed.
The Tech Admin position exists to solve problems and fix errors. It would be impossible for you to win this poll normally, so if you did win it would have to be as the result of a forum software bug. Under such circumstances, I would be duty-bound to fix the error. That's the kind of dedication I have to the Org.
The Tech Admin position exists to solve problems and fix errors. It would be impossible for you to win this poll normally, so if you did win it would have to be as the result of a forum software bug. Under such circumstances, I would be duty-bound to fix the error. That's the kind of dedication I have to the Org.
O tempora, O mores!
Not only is this man capable of abusing his power. No. On top of that, he's not even ashamed to admit he will do so.
Impossible for me to win this poll normally? If I did, it's a bug? What sort of misinformation is this? Lies that are so obvious that you could as well say "well yes, if you win, I'll just change it so that I win."
:no:
What a sad day this is.
And all of that because an honest and prudent man like me pointed out a silly mistake in a forum post.
Fisherking
08-29-2011, 22:21
:rolleyes:Why is Andres misrepresenting himself like this?
I think that most of the staff knows TinCow’s legal abilities after his encounter with one UK ambulance chaser…not to mention BG’s aptitude for, umm, however you want to phrase that little issue…
I can hardly wait to see who turns pink! :2thumbsup:
I would assume Andres will be first. :laugh4:
:creep:
Populus Romanus
08-29-2011, 22:28
I would like to point out that black is not the same color as pink. I believe this is of vital importance as, though the LAW stipulates that those members who select the poll option ANDRES shall have the color of their name changed to pink, and though I have selected the poll option ANDRES therefore fulfilling all given requirements for my name being changed to the color pink, my name is still 100% black. This is of vital importance because it appears that Tincow has in fact come up with the notion that black and pink are the same color. This is however untrue, one can tell simply by looking at them that they are very different. Pink is the color red mixed with white, whereas black is just black. I demand that my name changed at one, or Tincow is breaking the LAW.
Veho Nex
08-29-2011, 22:43
I would like to point out that black is not the same color as pink. I believe this is of vital importance as, though the LAW stipulates that those members who select the poll option ANDRES shall have the color of their name changed to pink, and though I have selected the poll option ANDRES therefore fulfilling all given requirements for my name being changed to the color pink, my name is still 100% black. This is of vital importance because it appears that Tincow has in fact come up with the notion that black and pink are the same color. This is however untrue, one can tell simply by looking at them that they are very different. Pink is the color red mixed with white, whereas black is just black. I demand that my name changed at one, or Tincow is breaking the LAW.
hear hear! Sue the lot of them!
Reenk Roink
08-29-2011, 22:48
I have hidden the votes because this isn't a game show, this is a matter of LAW. On Wednesday, August 31, at 17:00 EST, I will reveal the verdict. :knight:
Hosakawa Tito
08-29-2011, 22:51
Anyone who votes Andres will have their names turned Pink.
Is that considered a shade of red?
I would like to point out that black is not the same color as pink. I believe this is of vital importance as, though the LAW stipulates that those members who select the poll option ANDRES shall have the color of their name changed to pink, and though I have selected the poll option ANDRES therefore fulfilling all given requirements for my name being changed to the color pink, my name is still 100% black. This is of vital importance because it appears that Tincow has in fact come up with the notion that black and pink are the same color. This is however untrue, one can tell simply by looking at them that they are very different. Pink is the color red mixed with white, whereas black is just black. I demand that my name changed at one, or Tincow is breaking the LAW.
Actually painters don't use just red and white to make pink. But lying TinCow did!
I would like to point out that black is not the same color as pink. I believe this is of vital importance as, though the LAW stipulates that those members who select the poll option ANDRES shall have the color of their name changed to pink, and though I have selected the poll option ANDRES therefore fulfilling all given requirements for my name being changed to the color pink, my name is still 100% black. This is of vital importance because it appears that Tincow has in fact come up with the notion that black and pink are the same color. This is however untrue, one can tell simply by looking at them that they are very different. Pink is the color red mixed with white, whereas black is just black. I demand that my name changed at one, or Tincow is breaking the LAW.
What kind of a Kangaroo Court do you think this is? We do not punish people until they have been found guilty of breaking the law. Your trial date has not even been set yet.
I voted GAH, can I have my name turned Purple?
Only if you join the Creative Assembly staff! :P
Why are the results hidden?
They're hidden to me when I try to view them normally, but when I go to edit the original post... :P
Gregoshi
08-30-2011, 01:19
Lawyer canabalism...excellent!
:laugh4:
TinCow, there is a problem in your methods: if everyone who votes for Andres has their name turned pink, we will have a visual confirmation of just how many voted for Andres despite any monkeying around with the poll numbers you may do. This flaw shows inferior critical thinking so important to a lawyer. Andres is shown superior to you by default...though how he fairs against "Gah!" is uncertain.
What we need is a judge however. As Secura has jerusdiction here and clearly is following the case and using her powers, she would be the logical choice.
Populus Romanus
08-30-2011, 04:52
What kind of a Kangaroo Court do you think this is? We do not punish people until they have been found guilty of breaking the law. Your trial date has not even been set yet.I'll have my trial tomorrow at 1:00, and I plead GUILTY.
Crazed Rabbit
08-30-2011, 05:17
Tincow, for layingeth the smacketh downeth on ancient orders of banner bearers.
CR
I'll wager that GAH is the winner in this poll.
stratigos vasilios
08-30-2011, 08:01
Gah!
Peasant Phill
08-30-2011, 12:00
Tincow, for layingeth the smacketh downeth on ancient orders of banner bearers.
CR
Hey, don't you dare say anything bad about banner bearers. :PP looks fleetingly towards his title:
Such people bring much joy and amusement to the Org
As Secura has jerusdiction here and clearly is following the case and using her powers, she would be the logical choice.
I can tell you that twenty-five people have voted thus far (I haven't, heh), and that the results are very close. :laugh4:
Kagemusha
08-30-2011, 13:18
There is no other option then vote for Andres .Everyone should understand that as an content manager Andres is above any suspicion of being wrong about anything.CM´s would all be perfect, except we lack the faults, which is making us still mortal creatures. Also from personal experience i have experienced the "pink terror" of tech admins and it is nothing.Absolutely nothing, so vote Andres!
Reenk Roink
08-30-2011, 13:20
I can tell you that twenty-five people have voted thus far (I haven't, heh), and that the results are very close. :laugh4:
You are abusing your executive powers and making a mockery of the LAW. :angry: I am the jury foreman, as well as judge, plaintiff, and defendant of this particular case. :snobby:
Now, GO TINCOW GO! :balloon3: :charge: :2thumbsup:
Reenk Roink
08-30-2011, 13:29
This is what showed me TinCow's obvious legal and chromatic superiority over Andres:
Let's say, for hypothetical purposes only, that I am a complete imbecile and need to be reminded of my own words because I am too stupid to be able to remember what I have said and too inept to be able to use my own scroll wheel to re-read the thread. Given this hypothetical situation, what previous statement of mine would you quote as evidence to support your argument?
TinCow, there is a problem in your methods: if everyone who votes for Andres has their name turned pink, we will have a visual confirmation of just how many voted for Andres despite any monkeying around with the poll numbers you may do. This flaw shows inferior critical thinking so important to a lawyer. Andres is shown superior to you by default...though how he fairs against "Gah!" is uncertain.
I do not 'monkey' with poll numbers. I fix bugs. That's my job. Nowhere in my job description does it say "Tech Admins may abuse the absolutely unlimited power they have to influence the fates of each and every person on the Org." Not even in the super-secret invisible fine print that only Tech Admins can so. No, not even there. That text says something quite different.
I'll have my trial tomorrow at 1:00, and I plead GUILTY.
You will have your trial when it pleases the court and you will be grateful when it happens! Your plea is invalid, as this is not an arraignment. Your arraignment also has not been scheduled yet. Clearly you are incapable of self-representation due to ineptitude. I suggest you seek outside legal counsel. Here is a list of all attorneys licensed to practice before the Org Bar:
TinCow
You will have your trial when it pleases the court and you will be grateful when it happens! Your plea is invalid, as this is not an arraignment. Your arraignment also has not been scheduled yet. Clearly you are incapable of self-representation due to ineptitude. I suggest you seek outside legal counsel. Here is a list of all attorneys licensed to practice before the Org Bar:
TinCow
Who will be the judge?
Who will be the judge?
For reasons of impartiality, the judge will be randomly selected from amongst all the current members of the Org Bar.
You are abusing your executive powers and making a mockery of the LAW.
Hahaha, I think you'll find the new poll does that just fine; a shame that you had to call my impartiality into question! :P
You are abusing your executive powers and making a mockery of the LAW. :angry: I am the jury foreman, as well as judge, plaintiff, and defendant of this particular case. :snobby:
Now, GO TINCOW GO! :balloon3: :charge: :2thumbsup:
A system where one of the parties is able to change the jury votes as he pleases, is a mockery and a disgrace.
Hahaha, I think you'll find the new poll does that just fine; a shame that you had to call my impartiality into question! :P
Your blatant disregard for the law and falsification of the poll results has failed due to your insignificant powers. Your puny efforts to change GAH into SECURA and add several thousand votes to that category do not register as individual votes by individual forum members. Only I can see precisely who has voted in each category, and it is beyond your powers to falsify that list.
You see, forum members?! This is the abuse of power that I protect you against! The rule of tyrants and oligarchs! Those who laud their powers over you and use them to cause travesties of justice! Support me and we shall lead this forum to a new era of equality and fairness, without subjection to the repressive powers of the hereditary elite who are unaccountable to anyone but themselves!
Only I can see precisely who has voted in each category, and it is beyond your powers to falsify that list.
This raises an interesting question though; the poll creation/editing process states that I (and indeed, any moderators for this subforum) will be able to see the results and voters even if it's made private by the creator, but that's not the case. Sort it out. :P
This raises an interesting question though; the poll creation/editing process states that I (and indeed, any moderators for this subforum) will be able to see the results and voters even if it's made private by the creator, but that's not the case. Sort it out. :P
Why, so that you can abuse your power in a manner that is harder to detect?
O tempora o mores!
Your blatant disregard for the law and falsification of the poll results has failed due to your insignificant powers. Your puny efforts to change GAH into SECURA and add several thousand votes to that category do not register as individual votes by individual forum members.
Do you have any evidence to back up that claim?
Only I can see precisely who has voted in each category, and it is beyond your powers to falsify that list.
This is a lie.
Ser Clegane, Sigurd and therother can see that too.
Kralizec
08-30-2011, 14:36
Let's say, for hypothetical purposes only, that I am a complete imbecile and need to be reminded of my own words because I am too stupid to be able to remember what I have said and too inept to be able to use my own scroll wheel to re-read the thread.
If only I did not cower in fear of the staff (who are cruel, and barely just), this would have been worthy to include in my signature...
Do you have any evidence to back up that claim?
No, Secura removed her fabrications shortly after I pointed out her abuse of power. It is unimportant to me to present such evidence though, as I have already succeeded in protecting the people of The Org from her cruel oppression. She will receive her comeuppance in good time. Such malfeasors always do. It is enough for me to have upheld the cause of truth and justice for this day.
This is a lie.
Ser Clegane, Sigurd and therother can see that too.
True, but where are these esteemed men? They do not appear to have any interest in these proceedings.
No
Then why would we have to believe your accusations?
True, but where are these esteemed men? They do not appear to have any interest in these proceedings.
They are probably facing piles of complaints about abuse of power by their colleague TinCow...
Then why would we have to believe your accusations?
I do not care whether you believe them or not. My only concern is the protection of the humble members from abuse by power-hungry staff members like you and Secura. I have won a great victory for them today, and am content with that knowledge. Your acknowledgment of that victory is meaningless.
the protection of the humble members from abuse by power-hungry staff members like you and Secura.
Let them eat cake. :laugh4:
I do not care whether you believe them or not. My only concern is the protection of the humble members from abuse by power-hungry staff members like you and Secura. I have won a great victory for them today, and am content with that knowledge. Your acknowledgment of that victory is meaningless.
What abuse by me?
:inquisitive:
What abuse by me?
:inquisitive:
Your shameful actions and groundless badgering of me in the other thread with a similar title to this one. As I am the defender of the rights of the people, your attacks on me are also attacks on them.
Your shameful actions and groundless badgering of me in the other thread with a similar title to this one. As I am the defender of the rights of the people, your attacks on me are also attacks on them.
My actions were not shameful and my badgering of you was not at all groundless.
Also, tell me what "powers" did I "abuse" while rightfully pointing out that you made an error?
Reenk Roink
08-30-2011, 15:28
Your blatant disregard for the law and falsification of the poll results has failed due to your insignificant powers. Your puny efforts to change GAH into SECURA and add several thousand votes to that category do not register as individual votes by individual forum members. Only I can see precisely who has voted in each category, and it is beyond your powers to falsify that list.
:laugh4: Too bad I missed this. You have much to learn from SECURA.
My actions were not shameful and my badgering of you was not at all groundless.
We shall have to agree to disagree on this point, though I doubt you'll agree to that. In any case, I believe the good forum members will provide a verdict on this issue in the near future.
Also, tell me what "powers" did I "abuse" while rightfully pointing out that you made an error?
Perhaps I was a bit too harsh in equating your misunderstanding of words and inability to use logic to an abuse of power. Secura's blatant abuse of her position so inflamed my passions that I felt compelled to strike back against the totalitarian oligarchy which runs the Org. To the extent that I have accused you of abuses on her scale, I apologize. You are guilty only of being unbelievably wrong, not unbelievably corrupt.
:laugh4: Too bad I missed this. You have much to learn from SECURA.
You didn't miss it. It never happened.
You didn't miss it. It never happened.
More proof of your own poor logic and debating skills, as Secura admitted that she had edited the poll:
Hahaha, I think you'll find the new poll does that just fine; a shame that you had to call my impartiality into question! :P
This raises an interesting question though; the poll creation/editing process states that I (and indeed, any moderators for this subforum) will be able to see the results and voters even if it's made private by the creator, but that's not the case. Sort it out. :P
Let them eat cake. :laugh4:
Why eat cake? There is naught nor ought there be nothing so exalted on the face of God's grey earth as that prince of foods, the pie!
More proof of your own poor logic and debating skills, as Secura admitted that she had edited the poll:
Nowhere in those quoted posts is Secura explicitly stating that she has edited the poll.
All right so what's at stake here. What does the winner (assuming gah does not win) get aside from satisfaction?
Major Robert Dump
08-30-2011, 17:38
a NEW FACEBOOK GROUP
Nowhere in those quoted posts is Secura explicitly stating that she has edited the poll.
Secura referred to a "new poll" which accomplished "just fine" the task of "abusing [her] executive powers and making a mockery of the LAW." She then specifically stated that she had been looking at the poll editing features of the forum. Why are you so insistent on ignoring her blatant abuse of power? You, sir, are dangerously close to being an accessory after the fact to her crime.
Populus Romanus
08-30-2011, 18:58
I VOTED FOR ANDRES BECAUSE HE IS RIGHT
Veho Nex
08-30-2011, 20:58
I have new evidence! I SHALL TELL YOU NO...HNNNNNGGGGGGGG
Montmorency
08-30-2011, 22:06
This is what showed me TinCow's obvious legal and chromatic superiority over Andres:
Let's say, for hypothetical purposes only, that I am a complete imbecile and need to be reminded of my own words because I am too stupid to be able to remember what I have said and too inept to be able to use my own scroll wheel to re-read the thread. Given this hypothetical situation, what previous statement of mine would you quote as evidence to support your argument?
This is cool, though.
But my good sir, I would never want to imply in any way that you are by hypothesis an imbecile.
Of course, the intelligent members of this forum already know that I have more knowledge than TinCow. And not just in law, if I may add.
In short:
Bow-chicka-bow-wow
Reenk Roink
09-01-2011, 00:00
Sorry I'm late, I was delayed by a pair of Belgian assassins, no doubt hired by Andres to stop me from giving the verdict: TinCow wins :2thumbsup:
It was closer in votes than the lopsided debate indicated though, 12-10. Interestingly GAH only mustered 9 votes. Org spirit must be low. :shame:
Kralizec
09-01-2011, 00:12
This verdict is a travesty of justice; even Joseph Stalin would be too ashamed to call this a trial :soapbox:
This verdict is a travesty of justice; even Joseph Stalin would be too ashamed to call this a trial :soapbox:
I agree! There's no way 10 people would have voted for Andres if this was done legitimately!
Veho Nex
09-01-2011, 05:44
It was close, but I believe the voting was rigged.
Interestingly GAH only mustered 9 votes. Org spirit must be low. :shame:
It is true then, the world is ending.
classical_hero
09-01-2011, 08:31
Sorry I'm late, I was delayed by a pair of Belgian assassins, no doubt hired by Andres to stop me from giving the verdict: TinCow wins :2thumbsup:
It was closer in votes than the lopsided debate indicated though, 12-10. Interestingly GAH only mustered 9 votes. Org spirit must be low. :shame:I don't believe you, since you can't show us the results. I will not believe until I see the actual results.
As per Reenk's post, I've closed the poll and changed the results to public. :bow:
Quite obviously most votes for TinCow and Andres were missclicked GAHs :)
Populus Romanus
09-01-2011, 14:19
I'm still not pink yet. >:l
Veho Nex
09-01-2011, 20:15
I DEMAND MY PURPLE NAME! DONT FORCE ME TO BEG CA FOR A JOB!!!
There is no need for name coloring, as I have decided not to prosecute those who voted incorrectly. You were clearly brainwashed by Andres and were not aware of the evil act you were committing. He is the only one to blame, I will not take out my wrath on the rest of you. You will notice that Andres has lost the color on his own name as well. This is totally because of his shameful behavior and is definitely not a total coincidence that has nothing at all to do with these threads.
Peasant Phill
09-02-2011, 15:45
Oh common TC. Pink would suit me better than blue. I'm a spring type you know.
Fisherking
09-02-2011, 15:58
Oh common TC. Pink would suit me better than blue. I'm a spring type you know.
Don’t tick him off.
For you he might make your name Dutch Orange. :laugh4:
Peasant Phill
09-02-2011, 21:05
Don’t tick him off.
For you he might make your name Dutch Orange. :laugh4:
That would be a capital punishment.
classical_hero
09-05-2011, 15:14
There is no need for name coloring, as I have decided not to prosecute those who voted incorrectly. You were clearly brainwashed by Andres and were not aware of the evil act you were committing. He is the only one to blame, I will not take out my wrath on the rest of you. You will notice that Andres has lost the color on his own name as well. This is totally because of his shameful behavior and is definitely not a total coincidence that has nothing at all to do with these threads.That makes you a liar and thus against the law. See I was right to vote Andres rather than you.
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.