View Full Version : Game of thrones: the role playing game
Winter is coming
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENAKzih1DjM
Hooahguy
04-30-2012, 16:42
Looks quite good!
Might be interesting but the graphics look a little too.....'cartoonish' and gamey for a story so grim as one set in ASoIaF universe might be.
Hooahguy
04-30-2012, 17:20
Might be interesting but the graphics look a little too.....'cartoonish' and gamey for a story so grim as one set in ASoIaF universe might be.
I was thinking that as well.
The Stranger
04-30-2012, 22:19
compared to a slightly older game such as Witcher 2 the graphics just look downright outdated and ugly.
As a player interested in the plot and gameplay, so far it's looks quite good: especially the inability to pause in combat!
Looks like the First Templar with a GoT theme ontop of it.
CountArach
05-01-2012, 09:13
compared to a slightly older game such as Witcher 2 the graphics just look downright outdated and ugly.
It is made by a pretty small studio, so that's not too surprising.
It looks interesting but I'll reserve judgement until it comes out.
Imagine if the trailer had not shown Lord Commander Mormont or Varys, nor played a rendition of the show's theme tune... in fact, just imagine that it showed gameplay alone; could you have easily identified it as a Game of Thrones product then? Or would you have labelled it as another generic Western RPG?
When I watch some of the trailers for this game, I feel that it's just a bog-standard RPG with the ASoIaF license slapped on. I really hope the product is successful so that we may see more of Westeros in video games, but I'm not optimistic.
CountArach
05-01-2012, 09:18
When I watch some of the trailers for this game, I feel that it's just a bog-standard RPG with the ASoIaF license slapped on. I really hope the product is successful so that we may see more of Westeros in video games, but I'm not optimistic.
The Game of Thrones RTS was much like that - it was going to be a different title and then they just put a Game of Thrones in the title and changed the story a bit. Given it is the same developers, I'm fairly sure that this will be much the same.
All up, for me this will come down to plot - if it is an interesting plot then I'll stick with it. Otherwise, I'll give it a miss.
Looks like the First Templar with a GoT theme ontop of it.
Might not be all bad then. I liked First Templar, although it was a little lackluster.
Anyhow, dull graphics don't really matter much as long as the story itself is told properly, with a good amount of dialogue.
frogbeastegg
05-02-2012, 18:45
Rock, Paper, Shotgun has a reasonably positive preview (http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2012/05/02/game-of-thrones-preview/#more-106620) of the game.
I'm cautiously hopeful, myself. It's clearly a mid-tier game. In recent years, I've enjoyed quite a few of them ... sometimes more than the big budget alternatives. Games like Divinity II, Risen and Rise of the Argonauts are undeniably a bit clunky and visually unexciting, but they all had something which made up for that. Big budget games by necessity must play things safe and aim for the widest possible audience. Low budget games are a little more able to stray from the beaten path.
Games like Divinity II, Risen and Rise of the Argonauts are undeniably a bit clunky and visually unexciting, but they all had something which made up for that.
I have two of those! :yes:
Divinity II is probably the only game in recent times which allows the player to be the dragon. How can any game top that! I got the expansion too, but TBH I did not like it so much. Cannot wait for part 3.
And I got Rise of the Argonauts because the premise seemed interesting, despite seeing the Internet filled with reviews criticising the game. I was not disappointed. The whole thing could've used a lot more polish but smashing monsters with a mace and building those combos was a lot of fun.
frogbeastegg
05-02-2012, 19:35
Yay!
I have two of those! :yes:
Divinity II is probably the only game in recent times which allows the player to be the dragon. How can any game top that! I got the expansion too, but TBH I did not like it so much. Cannot wait for part 3.
I played the original DII as well. I have a copy of the Dragon Knight Saga edition (snapped it up on release day ages ago) and I can't quite motivate myself to play it. I want more DII content, I'd love to see the more polished version of the game - but I adore the original ending. I do not want to see that ending changed.
DII had a very good sense of humour. It didn't take itself seriously, and that enabled it to turn some of its weaker areas (e.g voice acting) into strengths.
Did you find the giant pink killer bunny rabbit of avenging doom? That was a surprise! Oh yes. :yes:
And I got Rise of the Argonauts because the premise seemed interesting, despite seeing the Internet filled with reviews criticising the game. I was not disappointed. The whole thing could've used a lot more polish but smashing monsters with a mace and building those combos was a lot of fun.
I enjoyed the way it was an RPG mainly about talking. The combat was very much in second place to the hero's brains, and his character was formed by dialogue choices instead of combat stats. How many times do we enter a debating contest with a boss, and win or lose based on how the audience judged our arguments? I liked the game enough to play through it twice.
Alexander the Pretty Good
05-03-2012, 04:03
Imagine if the trailer had not shown Lord Commander Mormont or Varys, nor played a rendition of the show's theme tune... in fact, just imagine that it showed gameplay alone; could you have easily identified it as a Game of Thrones product then? Or would you have labelled it as another generic Western RPG?
When I watch some of the trailers for this game, I feel that it's just a bog-standard RPG with the ASoIaF license slapped on. I really hope the product is successful so that we may see more of Westeros in video games, but I'm not optimistic.
To be fair, on the surface ASOIAF *looks* pretty bog-standard, since it's low medieval fantasy. What sets the universe apart is in the story (somewhat), the characters (definitely), and the subversion of fantasy tropes (those poor Starks). That's hard to show off in a trailer that is a mix of people standing around and other people fighting without any dialogue at all.
But it's still underwhelming.
I don't mind about the graphics as long as they get the story right. I really want this game to be good.
CountArach
05-05-2012, 13:44
Rock, Paper, Shotgun has a reasonably positive preview (http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2012/05/02/game-of-thrones-preview/#more-106620) of the game.
"The game apparently contains around 270000 words of dialogue (“as much as you get in the first book”) and will take around 25 hours to complete if you rush through it, more like 35-40 if you explore everything."
"I was a little surprised to discover that it’s actually built around tactical pause-time combat in the vein of Knights of the Old Republic or Dragon Age."
I like the sound of these two things particularly.
Crazed Rabbit
05-05-2012, 23:53
Well the RPS preview is heartening, but I'm still skeptical. I will pay attention to reviews when it comes out.
CR
frogbeastegg
05-09-2012, 20:06
RPS has posted an interview (http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2012/05/08/a-song-of-scripts-france-game-of-thrones-chat/#more-107172) with the developers. It's quite interesting. The comment about team size and time scales may be of particular interest to some people:
Sylvain Sechi: We moved from prototype to production with ten people, roughly ten people, for 6/8 months, set up the engine first, the design, making sure what we wanted in the game, make some prototypes and then we moved into full scale production for almost two years…
Thomas Veauclin: One year and a half.
Sylvain Sechi: One year and a half maybe for full scale production with 45 persons, which is actually not so much compared to Bethesda or Bioware which have at least 100, 200 people.
RPS has posted an interview (http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2012/05/08/a-song-of-scripts-france-game-of-thrones-chat/#more-107172) with the developers. It's quite interesting. The comment about team size and time scales may be of particular interest to some people:
Few people working on a game for some years is better than a hundred people working for one year IMO, cause time is essential for good ideas to...sprout, for the lack of a better word.
DAO took 5 years I think. Turned out to be excellent.
Either way it sounds very promising. The developers appear to know what is needed in a good RPG. With KOTOR as inspiration they can't go wrong. They also like M&B which is another plus. And the stuff they're saying about the story sounds promising.
As long as they have some good voice actors, this might well be a game worth remembering.
Also who else gets the feeling that the protagonists might end up dead at the end of the game?
CountArach
05-10-2012, 01:16
RPS has posted an interview (http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2012/05/08/a-song-of-scripts-france-game-of-thrones-chat/#more-107172) with the developers. It's quite interesting. The comment about team size and time scales may be of particular interest to some people:
Okay I'm officially excited about this game.
The Stranger
05-10-2012, 09:37
battlesystem seems a bit like Witcher2 :P
Crazed Rabbit
05-10-2012, 14:26
They need a better trailer; this game sounds good.
CR
frogbeastegg
05-16-2012, 19:13
There's a last second delay to the UK release date. The game is now out at the start of next month. It's out now in America. Early indications are pretty much what I expected: poor reviews in the general media, and a split in gamer opinion based on those who can live with the wonkiness and those who need more polish. The general theme seems to be big ideas, small budget, with the occasional result that it over-reaches itself. A good number of people seem pleased with the storyline so far.
I'll probably give it a go if I can find a copy for around £20.
Crazed Rabbit
06-03-2012, 05:30
Reviewed:
http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2012/06/01/wot-i-think-game-of-thrones/#more-110540
There’s much left to both praise (the loot/gear system is well balanced, avoids excess and neatly themed to the various houses and banners of Westeros) and criticise (the broad depicting of women as victims or whores; the occasional open use of magic somewhat conflicts with the book, or at least the state of the world before the arrival of the red comet) but it’s time to do what George R.R. Martin will not and conclude. He makes a cameo appearance, incidentally, but unfortunately his acting is on a par with his respect for deadlines.
In short, it’s a troubled roleplaying game but also a really interesting and strong one. Every misfire is met by a triumph of some sort, and the one thing it is not is a lazy, perfunctory cash-in. It’s an epic that doesn’t quite have the budget to be an epic, but strives its hardest to be one nonetheless. It’s much more like the kind of experience I’d hoped for from Risen 2, which sadly turned out to be a stereotype-laden exercise in hollow jolliness. This is thoughtful, heavy with a sense of consequence and impressively nasty even despite stylistic and apparent budgetary failings. After the woeful Genesis, it’s also Cyanide very much making good on the huge license they lucked into.
CR
frogbeastegg
06-03-2012, 10:13
It's out here next Friday. I am rather tempted. They seem to be launching it as a middle price point, and the RPS piece has boosted my interest.
Ja'chyra
06-08-2012, 19:34
It's out here next Friday. I am rather tempted. They seem to be launching it as a middle price point, and the RPS piece has boosted my interest.
Think I can safely avoid this one, the whole series is blown out of proportion IMHO so I see no need to feed his ego any more by buying what looks to be a decidedly average game.
Oh, and in case you read this George, two things:
You're books are outrageously overpriced on the Kindle, me no likey so me no buyey
And, what's with the R.R.?
Hooahguy
06-08-2012, 19:58
And, what's with the R.R.?
His middle names?
He just copied the R.R. from Tolkien to feel like a big man.
Hooahguy
06-08-2012, 21:01
Well why not? His middle name is Raymond Richard, and he has every right to feel like a "big man," creating arguably the greatest fantasy series in modern times.
Ja'chyra
06-08-2012, 22:02
Well why not? His middle name is Raymond Richard, and he has every right to feel like a "big man," creating arguably the greatest fantasy series in modern times.
Not even close
Hooahguy
06-08-2012, 22:18
Really? Name a more successful fantasy series in the past decade. Tolkien doesnt count because it was written in the 50's. GoT has spawned an immensely popular HBO series, plus been on the top of the NY Times bestseller list for ages.
EDIT: Whoops, forgot about Harry Potter. Duh-'doy.
But after Harry Potter...
Ja'chyra
06-08-2012, 22:36
Greatest doesn't equal most popular
Hooahguy
06-08-2012, 22:56
Then the entire notion of sonething being "great" is purely an opinion.
The Stranger
06-09-2012, 02:04
lmao XD
you say that he created arguably the best fantasy series, and then you are going to complain when someone argues. thats funny XD
Hooahguy
06-09-2012, 02:38
What? How am I complaining? I am arguing that GoT is the greatest fantasy series in modern times. He disagrees, which I have no problem with, he can have his opinion, but I will still argue why I think so.
spankythehippo
06-09-2012, 03:05
Oh dear. I sense a Backroom argument raring to go.
I like the series. I consider it the best fantasy series in modern times. Which is saying a lot since I never knew the book's existence until after season 2 came out. Which is when I went back and started watching. I shall read the books, in due time. I didn't like Harry Potter. At all. And yet, I've read all of them.
I'd give the game a go. If I had quite a bit of money to burn. Otherwise, it can wait.
frogbeastegg
06-09-2012, 10:56
Think I can safely avoid this one, the whole series is blown out of proportion IMHO so I see no need to feed his ego any more by buying what looks to be a decidedly average game.
I'm not a big fan of the series, to be honest, and I started reading long before all the publicity and "Greatest modern fantasy!" stuff hit. I thought that the first three books were generally good. The last two books were pretty poor; 'Dance' was worse than 'Crows'. I've seen series 1 of the TV series and liked it a lot. I haven't seen any of 2, and won't until it's out on DVD.
I know what kind of gamer I am: I'd rather play the Divinity IIs of the RPG world than the Mass Effect 3s. Flawed ambition is more interesting than safe polish. It sounds like the game is strongest in the areas I care most about, and weakest in areas I can live with. It's not going to be a game for everyone, however.
Anywho, I'm renting it. Will post impressions when able.
All right I got this today morning. Been playing it since. Finished three chapters, must say that generally, the game is very similar to The First Templar (aside from combat, which unlike TFT isn't hack and slash).
Combat is averagely challenging even on easiest difficulty. On medium and high difficulty, dieing often is the norm. It's mainly queuing attacks and powers, nothing extraordinary but fun, specially in encounters where you have allies to mix and match the attacks.
The story seems interesting up until now, although it does not feel like something gritty set in the ASoIaF world. The voice acting is rather lackluster, and the dialogue wheel at times does not clearly indicate, as to what the actions of your choice are going to be.
My two main gripes till now are the camera, which is too zoomed in and low for a game where you need to click on an enemy and queue attacks. Second is the large number of loading screens and how this game seems to be a resource hog and rather unstable. I had a BSOD and a CTD in the first hour. :sweatdrop:
frogbeastegg
07-04-2012, 19:01
It's been a month? It can't have been a month. It's been a month. Stupid work, stupid commuting, stupid getting ill, and stupid everything else which eats up my time! :cries:
I'm halfway through, right at the point where Things Kick Off Dramatically. It took a while to get going. The early Alister chapters aren't as interesting as the Mors ones, and that slowed the game's flow down somewhat. Now I'm starting to see how the two characters link together and it's all getting rather interesting. Even at its slowest, the plot had sufficient interesting beats to hold my attention. It's a nice change from the usual fantasy RPG themes; the motivations so far have all been personal and low-key rather the grandiose save the world guff. That makes the questing more believable. If I didn't have other things eating up my time I suspect I'd have ripped through the whole game in the space of a weekend in order to follow the plot.
There are choices, and I rather like the implementation. I don't think that there is a right choice in many of the cases. It's more about what fits the characters you want to play. Help the nobles or help the peasants? Forgive the guy or tell him he's scum? Lie or be honest? It's not an easy selection of lol-oppression or lol-hero. I replayed a few choices on a separate save to see how the other side would turn out, and I felt both sides turned out equally validly.
Combat starts out quite rough. It's easy to die, and you absolutely must use your character's skills in every battle. After ~5 levels and some fresh equipment it's gotten a bit easier in that my characters are less likely to go from half health to dead in the blink of an eye. I'm enjoying that challenge though - this isn't an RPG with a new battle encounter at every fifth step so battles feel relatively meaningful. It's nice to need to use a bit of brain-power.
Some of the voice acting is dreadful. Most of it is tolerable, and the odd character is almost good. The writing is ... well, mostly good, I'd say. Better than plenty of games.
Areas like King's Landing feel more like corner squares than medieval metropolises. The North fares rather better, and the sound effects ensure that it's suitably chilling.
Definitely not for everyone, but certainly interesting.
There are choices, and I rather like the implementation. I don't think that there is a right choice in many of the cases. It's more about what fits the characters you want to play. Help the nobles or help the peasants? Forgive the guy or tell him he's scum? Lie or be honest? It's not an easy selection of lol-oppression or lol-hero. I replayed a few choices on a separate save to see how the other side would turn out, and I felt both sides turned out equally validly.
The choices are one thing I'm liking about this game. I'm still unable to tell what kind of consequences my choices will have in the future (I really do hope they have some consequences, I'm on chapter 7, and up until now, no serious ramifications). I'm just using my knowledge of the game world to decide matters, and keeping my fingers crossed that (for instance) the murderous mercenaries I forgave and recruited will help me later, and not stab me in the back.
Replaying/saving-reloading is a pain though. I've probably already spent as much time on loading screens as much as I have actually playing the game.
The Stranger
07-05-2012, 00:48
would u guys recommend it?
frogbeastegg
07-05-2012, 20:48
I'm on chapter 7
Chapter 7 was very good, my favourite chapter so far by a good distance. Heh - I'm still in chapter 8 so that may not mean much! I do feel that the game is ramping up ready for some big revelations/events now. Going to try and finish chapter 8 tonight ... assuming I can stay awake for long enough. :brews strong coffee:
I've probably already spent as much time on loading screens as much as I have actually playing the game.
Is that the PC version? I've got the xbox one and I thought the epic loading times were probably due to a PC-oriented engine not scaling well to the hardware.
would u guys recommend it?
If (big and important if) you are the type of gamer it appeals to, then yes I would. GoT:RPG is definitely not a game for everyone! If you're a strongly gameplay oriented gamer, avoid it. Likewise, if you suspect the rough gameplay edges, occasionally wonky engine tech, and low-budget presentation will bug you, avoid it. It's a storyteller's game, in that the plot is by far and away the strongest aspect of the game. Consider it an interactive novel with decent RPG combat and limited exploration.
I would say that the Rock, Paper, Shotgun 'Wot I think' is pretty on the mark. There's a link a few posts back. Read it and see if it sounds like a game you'd enjoy.
Chapter 7 was very good, my favourite chapter so far by a good distance. Heh - I'm still in chapter 8 so that may not mean much! I do feel that the game is ramping up ready for some big revelations/events now. Going to try and finish chapter 8 tonight ... assuming I can stay awake for long enough. :brews strong coffee:
I'm nearly done with Chapter 8 now.
Combat is getting a lot more fun with all the new skills. I am seriously considering ramping up the difficulty a notch.
Plot is indeed getting thicker. And 'hotter'. I do fear though that whatever big twist is one the way, this being Game of Thrones, might be too sad/tragic.
Is that the PC version? I've got the xbox one and I thought the epic loading times were probably due to a PC-oriented engine not scaling well to the hardware.
Yup I have PC version. I've ended up deciding that i'll just go with the flow and not reload again and again to see the different choices. The combat is fun enough, so I'll probably do a second playthrough with different classes and check the alternatives out then.
The Stranger
You should also consider waiting for an update that might fix bugs and the load time. They're planning on releasing a few small DLCs, so the update will probably come alongside.
I'm loving this game ^^
Warging is funny :D
The story is also quite nice...
I finished it day before yesterday, but it was late night so completely forgot to post.
There were a few unpredictable twists. And the story does after all, stay true to the GRRM spirit. Probably even takes it a step further than the books.
It's all right to feel sad about videogame characters right.... :cry:
Game of Thrones hit the flash sale. Worth the money?
Imo absolutely yes!
The story and the characters are awesome, there are very interesting concepts and in overall makes for an entertaining game :)
But as frog said, if you can't get past the graphics and the battle system (the latter isn't incredible, but is not even as bad as most say if you ask me), then no don't buy it :P
Yes, but it is 3x the price of Dragon Age. :tongue:
I will try it out anyway.
First thoughts so far.
Gameplay is pretty basic, it is a less streamlined system than Dragon Age 1. Which isn't that bad considering this is not Bioware. The lack of camera options is the only thing which brings discomfort, as I would prefer it "further back". The rest is tolerable.
Voice-acting... wow...
You have Varys and Morment, the voices were spot on and perfect. Mor and Alester are both okay. However, there are others which I will sum up with "Ravella", you would expect a more older and wiser voice, but instead, it sounds more like somebodies younger sister with a cold and a blocked nose. What horrible voice acting.
Oh yeah, Ravella is so annoying XD
BTW, I'm not spoilering, but wow what an ending!
The twist was in the air, but overall quite an awesome tale, I really hope they get mentioned in the new books :P
You have Varys and Morment, the voices were spot on and perfect.
Well Cosmo and Hill are the very same actors :D
johnhughthom
07-19-2012, 23:10
How much did you pay Beskie? I'd consider getting it at 75% off, even then I'm not sure.
How much did you pay Beskie? I'd consider getting it at 75% off, even then I'm not sure.
For the record it is a good game.
The story, although it has pacing issues in the beginning gets interesting around the halfway point, and like Arjos said, if GRRM references this in the books, you don't want to be left out of the loop. :tongue:
Plus you can meet Maester Martin and asking him some questions.
Plus you can meet Maester Martin and asking him some questions.
Ahahahah that cameo...
The conversation with Alester and his assistant about the release of the book was funny :P
frogbeastegg
07-20-2012, 18:51
Aaaand I'm still in chapter 8! :on_void:
This weekend. I will complete it. I'm determined!
frogbeastegg
07-22-2012, 16:11
I did chapters 8, 9 and 10 yesterday. All very good, and the story is really in its stride now, gathering pace and momentum with each event sequence. It's managed to surprise me a few times, and I particularly like some of the character dynamics they have going on. It's a story which would make a good book - it's not just "good for a video game".
I finished chapter 11 this afternoon. Holy heavens! That just happened! That, I believe, is what you call :daisy: getting real. That's obviously not the total end of that but all the same, shocking.
Also: if you cut Mors in two you would find the word "awesome" running right through him.
:hurries off back to the game:
Also: if you cut Mors in two you would find the word "awesome" running right through him.
Ahahahahaha, couldn't agree more! ^^
Also: if you cut Mors in two you would find the word "awesome" running right through him.
Exactly. I cannot believe some reviewers wrote that they found his voice acting dull.
Also he gets to wear the coolest armour in the game.
frogbeastegg
07-22-2012, 23:18
Finished. Well, finished with 2 out of the 3 major ending variations. I'm going back to an earlier save to get the final one out of the trio. At some point in the future I will replay the whole game, see how the story works when you know all the detail. That was one heck of a finale. I could see some of it forming, yet seeing it play out ... heart-rending.
Very good game, very good indeed. The slow start was the only real fly in the ointment aside from a tragic lack of development budget. I would love to see what Cyanide could have done with a Witcher 2 or Bioware style budget. With more polish and presentation, people would probably be hailing this as one of the best RPGs in recent years. I replaced my rented copy with a purchased one, and it will sit proudly next to Witcher 2 on my shelf.
Problem is, it's hard to tell people why the game is so good without breaking into spoilers, and for once this is a game where spoilers matter a lot.
Exactly. I cannot believe some reviewers wrote that they found his voice acting dull.
I agree with the Rock, Paper, Shotgun article linked to earlier in the thread. The voice actor starts out passable, and then seems to click on to the fact this isn't a bog standard low-budget game with poor writing. He has some excellent speeches in the second half. One right at the end was - well, I'm sure it's the one RPS described as mesmerising. The growly, gravelly tones fit the character brilliantly.
I really liked this game and it is one of the few with great writing and good characters...
Ofc I would like to see it succeed and get money for a better sequel, but what I care the most in an RPG was covered and I'm an happy player :P
Am I the only one who thinks they plunked Mors straight from Warhammer 40k: Space Marine and gave him a sword and a pet dog? I have to admit, the voice is just making me scream "For the Emperor!". Though on a genuine point, does anyone happen to know if he voices a role in any of the 40k Franchise games?
Am I the only one who thinks they plunked Mors straight from Warhammer 40k: Space Marine and gave him a sword and a pet dog? I have to admit, the voice is just making me scream "For the Emperor!".
Now that you mention it, there is an uncanny resemblance.
https://img228.imageshack.us/img228/6175/sidonis.jpghttps://img404.imageshack.us/img404/1733/morsl.jpg
Maybe not the same guy, but more like brothers separated at birth. :clown:
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.