View Full Version : Battle of zama video
This video had the most realistic looking roman army i've ever seen in film
watch it :D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unKuRvO12Sg
Love that movie, got it on DVD.
personally I find the depiction of Cannae more impressive tho ;)
Perhaps the Romans but certainly not the Celts.
Perhaps the Romans but certainly not the Celts.
And they might never be, dear Brennus.
~Jirisys ()
And they might never be, dear Brennus.
~Jirisys ()
lol.
moonburn
06-30-2012, 03:15
pretty good whats the movie ?
capomafioso
06-30-2012, 10:11
whats the movie it looks great
Hannibal – Rome's Worst Nightmare (www.imdb.com/title/tt0766213/)
I give that movie a 5.5/10, but I don't know if there is much competition for it, so it may very well be "the best" out there, lol.
Harkilaz
07-01-2012, 09:13
I give that movie a 5.5/10, but I don't know if there is much competition for it, so it may very well be "the best" out there, lol.
Indeed, I agree completely.
However, it isn't a bad basic introduction, but you should really read as much as you can on it!
Jormungand
07-04-2012, 15:22
Not a terribly bad film, by the standards of what's accepted today to be a proper Classical movie (Gladiator, 300, etc).
This should have been on a bigger scale though, it's more akin to a documentary.
Couldn't resist chuckling at Hannibal's joke as he addresses his men before Trebia: "The Romans think we are barbarians. Savages! [pause] Perhaps some of us are.... [chuckling from the men]"
Harkilaz
07-05-2012, 09:13
Not a terribly bad film, by the standards of what's accepted today to be a proper Classical movie (Gladiator, 300, etc).
This should have been on a bigger scale though, it's more akin to a documentary. [chuckling from the men]"
It isn't meant to be a film, it is of the category of documentary-drama.
Vilkku92
07-05-2012, 18:23
Not a terribly bad film, by the standards of what's accepted today to be a proper Classical movie (Gladiator, 300, etc).
300 was never meant to be a proper classical film. It was meant to be a proper comic book film. And by the way, it actually did a good job at what it tried to do.
It isn't meant to be a film, it is of the category of documentary-drama.
300 was never meant to be a proper classical film. It was meant to be a proper comic book film. And by the way, it actually did a good job at what it tried to do.
These. (I assume if we can say "this" we should be able to pluralize it, too.)
Jormungand
07-06-2012, 12:28
300 was meant to be a comic book adaptation, I agree with that. Just as Hannibal: Rome's Worst Nightmare was a docudrama.
But I didn't say 300 was meant to be a proper Classical movie. I said it was what would be generally accepted (i.e. by the majority) to be a proper Classical movie. I really should have used the term "film set in the Classical period" to be more precise, actually.
I do believe plenty of peoples' expectations as to what a Classical period film are like are now coloured by action-rich, high-octane movies of the sort which run too loose with the facts - making "300" style movies what the vast majority accept to be a proper film set in the Classical period, nowadays at least.
300 is obviously comic book fantasy. I don't believe that people really think of it alongside Gladiator. I think they are more likely to group Gladiator with movies like Alexander, Kingdom of Heaven, or HBO's Rome. I don't think it's really a "sword and sandals" epic in most people's minds.
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.