View Full Version : Concilium Plebis - The Unofficial Rome 2 Survey
Fred from forums.totalwar.com setup a survey for all fans of Rome 2 TW
The final survey is now accessible and open for everyone without registration
Results will be submitted on .com
http://kwiksurveys.com/s.asp?sid=77as8k8zo9audom272267
so far over 1280 people took part. I think this is going somewhere.
Thank you for spreading this worthy news.
al Roumi
12-12-2013, 12:07
While it's redolent with a (justifiable) bias that the game is BROKEN, it's not a bad idea. Might help if CA could venture what avenues are actually open to them, otherwise the wishlists are a bit futile.
It's a very biased survery though I have to say I agree with a lot of the questions asked but do not really feel able to answer them without also sounding like the hordes of people crying about everything. The game has its strong points but it seems to me that the negative ones outweigh the positive ones and CA's decision to go ahead with the game as they envisioned it makes me feel as if they never actually cared and/or listened to what any of their core fans actually like.
The funny thing is, I probably don't consider myself a core or loyal fan anymore but that's been the case since I played Empire and Napoleon, both of which just took all the excitement I felt since playing Medieval 2. Shogun 2 was a step in the right direction, simple, easy to understand, pretty, polished but lacking the diversity of older games but that is mainly because of the period/choice in geographical location.
The main thing that made me look forward to Rome 2 was the size of the campaign map and the faction diversity but after playing the game for some amount of time, there really is none of that. Factions have unique unit rosters but what's the difference between Oathsworn and Legionaries other than looks? I don't know, maybe it is right, maybe that is how it was but it feels meh. The graphics are nice though *not very motivated cheer*
I honestly don't feel like buying anything else from this franchise because I don't like the way they've taken it.
Kamakazi
12-12-2013, 17:41
I took it... wish they had a comment section to reinforce certain thoughts
Took it too, but felt the survey was very biased: plus several of the improvements I desire most were not mentioned. Examples: #1, making the darned thing more difficult (way more difficult) on legendary/very hard and especially during mid-game/late-game; #2, fixing the campaign ai (so it does not aimlessly cruise the seas, leave its settlements undefended when at threat (or not), etc.); #3, putting some script into place that would allow some major AI powers [I am talking about powers rivaling player's size (30-60 regions would be nice for starters), not some 10 region "large" AI's...] to develop during mid-game, late-game; #4 if number 3 is impossible allow solid AI alliance blocks develop during mid-game; these should hate the player to the death and proactively attack, tamper with player's progress; #5 (but not least) fix the darned siege assault AI...
The lack of negative answers for some questions regarding the family tree was a problem. I'm perfectly happy to see the back of that useless system.
The Stranger
12-13-2013, 11:45
CA made me feel like i had a date to the prom with the pretiest girl in skool, we went out, had a blast of a night and then she invited me over to her place. But after I unwrapped the giftpaper she came in, I found out that she was actually... a dude. I cried softly as I let him **** me in the ***. Turned out that he and his friends made a bet to see if I was actually so stupid that I would fall for this thing again. And then I remembered what I had hidden away deep down, that the same thing had happened last year. And the year before that, and before that...
If I get AIDS it is probably CA's way of saying "Thank you! Thank you for buying every TW game and expansion we have released so far. But if you did that, then you are most likely too old to be in the group we target... But hey, you can always dream, you won't be the only one."
CA made me feel like i had a date to the prom with the pretiest girl in skool, we went out, had a blast of a night and then she invited me over to her place. But after I unwrapped the giftpaper she came in, I found out that she was actually... a dude. I cried softly as I let him **** me in the ***. Turned out that he and his friends made a bet to see if I was actually so stupid that I would fall for this thing again. And then I remembered what I had hidden away deep down, that the same thing had happened last year. And the year before that, and before that...
If I get AIDS it is probably CA's way of saying "Thank you! Thank you for buying every TW game and expansion we have released so far. But if you did that, then you are most likely too old to be in the group we target... But hey, you can always dream, you won't be the only one."
Haha.
CA made me feel like i had a date to the prom with the pretiest girl in skool, we went out, had a blast of a night and then she invited me over to her place. But after I unwrapped the giftpaper she came in, I found out that she was actually... a dude. I cried softly as I let him **** me in the ***. Turned out that he and his friends made a bet to see if I was actually so stupid that I would fall for this thing again. And then I remembered what I had hidden away deep down, that the same thing had happened last year. And the year before that, and before that...
If I get AIDS it is probably CA's way of saying "Thank you! Thank you for buying every TW game and expansion we have released so far. But if you did that, then you are most likely too old to be in the group we target... But hey, you can always dream, you won't be the only one."
This is quite possibly the greatest post I have read on this forum so far.
I liked the survey, it felt like it gave plenty of graded options and my annoyances and praises were all listed.
Hi there. The survey creator meanwhile reacted to the complaints about being a biased survey and adjusted the terms and captions used within. For me I can say it is fine now. BTW 1% of all participants came from ORG... +3 % and your are challenging TWC :)
The Stranger
12-14-2013, 13:25
do you mean the results from .org are different from those of TWC? are the results from here more positive than the average or less?
Seyavash
12-14-2013, 17:20
It is interesting survey. I took it but I still feel the desired features related questions did not really speak to me. Rather than a skip the question choice I would prefer an option to say "none of these matter" to me or " these not really important" etc. Skipping is not really an answer. I really could care less about family tree an I am fairly satisified with most of the features it is the bugs and ai issues that need work. I want seasons and a clearer political system but otherwise I have enjoyed the innovations added to this game and seasons would lengthen the character lifespan allowing us to take better advantage of the traits system without resorting to mods.
Oh and I would like a more easily managed naval combat system. I still cannot get the hang of it compared to empire/napoleon. Of course I stink at shogun 2 naval battles too so perhaps it's just me.
You know what's kind of silly? I feel like an idiot when I speak up about the ridiculous AI issues that have been around since I have started playing these games but somewhere along the line, I got conditioned into telling myself "It's a TW game, of course the AI is gonna suck, if you think otherwise, you're stupid so stop telling people the AI sucks!"
fallen851
12-14-2013, 18:01
You know what's kind of silly? I feel like an idiot when I speak up about the ridiculous AI issues that have been around since I have started playing these games but somewhere along the line, I got conditioned into telling myself "It's a TW game, of course the AI is gonna suck, if you think otherwise, you're stupid so stop telling people the AI sucks!"
This is why TW veterans become CA apologists. Before release I said "this game is looking like it will be a disaster, especially given CA's history" but they said "No this game is going to be amazing!"
But what they really meant in there heads was that the game will be terrible on release and slowly get better and perhaps with mods morph into a good game. But they knew the AI will always be broken and bad, because that is what they expect from a CA game.
We both thought exactly the same thing, they just used the same evidence I used to damn game, to defend the game, and their defense was ridiculous and silly, as you pointed out.
It is all about expectations. If you honestly expect CA to produce a polished professional product (as they should), anywhere near the level of what Valve or Blizzard would produce, you're dead wrong. RedHarvest got it right when he said (in reference to the first RTW): "RTW isn't a game, it's a do-it-yourself project." RTW: II didn't change that. If you expected it to be a do-it-yourself project with terrible AI and questionable design features, then perhaps it is amazing. And I, like many others, enjoying modding greatly, so these projects can be fun. But if you expect CA to make a good game (and CA advertises their products as games), then CA will never stop letting you down.
They've delivered quite a few good games.
fallen851
12-14-2013, 19:49
They have no competition for the genre, so their games are by default the best and worst. Though at this point, we can at least compare RTW I to RTW II. I believe RTW I is a much more rich and rewarding game (with mods) than RTW II will ever be. I don't like how armies are created, I don't like the city battles, I miss my family tree, guard mode and fire at will, I don't like the unit abilities, I don't like the naval battles, I don't like the unit collision and I don't like the political system. Some of that can be redeemed perhaps with mods, patches and DLC's. Some of it is poor game design. Comparing RTW I and II is like comparing Diablo 2 and 3. Diablo 2 is a much better game all around, while Diablo 3 is streamlined to death, but has nice graphics.
And I wasn't saying TW games are total crap, they are fun. But we know all the potential of a TW game. We always try to realize it with mods... but CA never gets there, and we never quite get there with mods. So I always feel like I'm playing something that could be so much better if CA put more time into the game and listened to the community...
The Stranger
12-14-2013, 20:38
yup, except the sad story is that the majority of casual gamers dont care that units are called silver pikemen instead of argyraspidai. they wont notice that egypt at the time wasnt the mummy returns or that it would be extremely difficult to pelt armored soldiers to death with skulls of your fallen foes :/
but this time i think they really screwed it up because the game was just unfinished, so even the casuals cant really play it.
mtw was awesome. rtw was awesome with mods. i skipped stw2 sadly but i heard its pretty good. and i already said what i think about rome2 :/ its just a lie from their part and thats unacceptable, no matter how many FreeLC they give away.
is there a place where the results of the survey are made public?
do you mean the results from .org are different from those of TWC? are the results from here more positive than the average or less?
I cannot answer that, no seperate data is collected. What I intended to say is that only 1% of all votes came from .org users.
Hey guys,
I am trying to summary the results we have so far from over 2400 people now (summarized in an average score) :
What is your overall opinion of the game to date?
3,4 out of 7
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
(it is) bad <> average
How likely are you to buy the Caesar in Gaul expansion?
2,96 out of 7
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
Possibly. If there are major improvements made to the core game as well
Do you think $15 is a fair price point for the new expansion?
2,93 out of 7
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
No, the main game needs fixing first
How impressed are you by the implementation of season changes in the forthcoming expansion?
Most answered:
Not at all. They should have been there at release
Second most answered:
I'm impressed, though I would prefer to see them implemented in the main game
Third most answered:
Not at all. We need to see more/better gameplay features
Would you like to see seasons implemented in the main game and how would you do it?
4,5 out of 7
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
Yes, I would like to see 2 turns per year as in previous games
<>
Yes, I would like 4 turns per year, 4 seasons per year
How would introducing a Family Tree affect your playing habits?
3,4 out of 7
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
No change - I am already playing as much as I want to
<>
I would likely play a lot more
How likely would an overhaul of the politics system affect your playing habits?
3,74 out of 5
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
I would likely play a lot more
Would you consider paying for a DLC that delivered additional or improved gameplay features?
3 out of 8
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
No
If you had to choose from the following, what are the TOP THREE reasons why you were most disappointed with Rome 2?
TOP THREE (most chosen ones):
#1 Poor immersion - no historical events, bland unit descriptions, few cut scenes etc
#2 Confusing/broken features - politics and random civil wars
#3 Poor player engagement - no family tree
BOTTOM THREE (less chosen ones):
#1 Difficulty level (Too hard)
#2 I am perfectly happy with the game
#3 Balancing*
*personal remark: but it is still a pain in multiplayer, however only 2% of all players play it actively. AggonyDuck made an attempt to balance it with a mod though.
If you had to choose from the following, which do you think are Rome 2's TOP THREE biggest successes?
TOP THREE (most chosen)
#1 Size of campaign map
#2 New province system
#3 Graphics
Please arrange the following features according to the order you would like to see them implemented: most important at the top, least important at the bottom
TOP THREE (most important)
#1 Enhanced Political System
#2 Performance/cosmetic improvements
#3 Family Tree
BOTTOM THREE (less important ones):
#1 More factions
#2 UI Improvements
#3 Greater Unit Variety
In terms of battle gameplay, do you prefer historical accuracy or arcade style action?
2 out of 5
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
Strong emphasis on historical accuracy
Rank the following improvements in order of how effectively they would add to IMMERSION, most important at the top:
TOP THREE (most important)
#1 Family tree
#2 Character Traits/Retinue System
#3 Length of character lifespan
BOTTOM THREE (less important ones):
#1 Extended soundtrack
#2 Faction-specific UI
#3 Interesting Unit descriptions
How do you feel about the game's overall level of complexity?
2,46 out of 7
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
It's not nearly in-depth enough, but I am playing it
<>
It's a bit too shallow for my tastes
Do you consider the City View a priority for the developers?
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
2,24 out of 5
Not really, but it would be nice
If developers offered you a choice between new/improved gameplay features and new content (factions, units, campaigns etc), which would you choose?
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
New and improved gameplay features (93%) INSTEAD OF
New Content (7%)
^^ WATCH OUT CA STOP DLCs like EA on BF4 and you'll be honoured by more than 2% *joking*
Do you feel that CA's marketing of Rome 2 accurately reflects the game you are playing now?
2 ouf of 6
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
No, I was hoping for much more
How much trust do you have in the "Total War Brand" compared with before the release?
3 out of 9
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
Badly dented, but still a fan
What impact do you think modding will have on the game?
3,75 out of 7
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
Modding will make a difference , but it will not enough for me to become an avid player
How likely would you be to buy future DLCs if CA fix the main technical problems and implement a number of the most desired gameplay features?
5,2 out of 7
Quite Likely
Keep on sharing and voting lads. 2,4k are not enough :)
The Stranger
12-15-2013, 13:02
thanx for the work :) i hope CA/Sega does something with it.
Great work! I'd personally pay 2 euro for an extended soundtrack. Soundtrack DLCs for CKII are around that price and they are actually expensive to produce.
If they hire Paul Anthony Romero to do some new stuff for the Rome II soundtrack I will sacrifice a goat to Apollo in their honour.
I agree Myth :) even a mod of Rome 1 music into Rome 2 would be a help :)
However I just want to say thank you for the meaninful adoption across the Org. Your votes are meaninful in the survey and we soon will reach 3100 votes, which is a remarkable result for something that did not get covered by game magazines yet.
Thank you for your marvellous and numbered support
Veho Nex
12-18-2013, 00:08
Its cool seeing the results of these types of surveys. I hope CA listens and they quick switch to improving the existing game and not releasing dlc
Its cool seeing the results of these types of surveys. I hope CA listens and they quick switch to improving the existing game and not releasing dlc
All that happens at this point is them gathering ideas for the next game.
Hey guys,
Here is the next summary and possibly final summary of the results. We collected over 3300 votes.
What is your overall opinion of the game to date?
3,47 out of 7
3,4 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
(it is) bad <> average
How likely are you to buy the Caesar in Gaul expansion?
3 out of 7
2,96 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
Possibly. If there are major improvements made to the core game as well
Do you think $15 is a fair price point for the new expansion?
2,9 out of 7
2,93 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
No, the main game needs fixing first
How impressed are you by the implementation of season changes in the forthcoming expansion?
Most answered:
Not at all. They should have been there at release
Second most answered:
I'm impressed, though I would prefer to see them implemented in the main game
Third most answered:
Not at all. We need to see more/better gameplay features
Would you like to see seasons implemented in the main game and how would you do it?
4,53 out of 7
4,5 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
Yes, I would like to see 2 turns per year as in previous games
<>
Yes, I would like 4 turns per year, 4 seasons per year (most votes)
How would introducing a Family Tree affect your playing habits?
3,42 out of 7
3,4 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
No change - I am already playing as much as I want to
<>
I would likely play a lot more
How likely would an overhaul of the politics system affect your playing habits?
3,74 out of 5
no change to previous summary
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
I would likely play a lot more
Would you consider paying for a DLC that delivered additional or improved gameplay features?
3 out of 8
no change to previous summary
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
No
If you had to choose from the following, what are the TOP THREE reasons why you were most disappointed with Rome 2?
TOP THREE (most chosen ones):
#1 Poor immersion - no historical events, bland unit descriptions, few cut scenes etc
#2 Confusing/broken features - politics and random civil wars
#3 Tactical AI (based on 2300 votes: poor player engagement - no family tree)
BOTTOM THREE (less chosen ones):
#1 Difficulty level (Too hard)
#2 I am perfectly happy with the game
#3 Balancing
If you had to choose from the following, which do you think are Rome 2's TOP THREE biggest successes?
TOP THREE (most chosen ones)
#1 Size of campaign map
#2 New province system
#3 Graphics
Please arrange the following features according to the order you would like to see them implemented: most important at the top, least important at the bottom
TOP THREE (most missed ones)
#1 Enhanced Political System
#2 Enhanced diplomacy
#3 Seasons
BOTTOM THREE (least missed ones):
#1 More factions
#2 UI improvements
#3 Greater Unit Variety
In terms of battle gameplay, do you prefer historical accuracy or arcade style action?
2,12 out of 5
2 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
Strong emphasis on historical accuracy
Rank the following improvements in order of how effectively they would add to IMMERSION, most important at the top:
TOP THREE (most wanted ones)
#1 Family tree
#2 Character Traits/Retinue System
#3 Length of character lifespan
BOTTOM THREE (least wanted ones):
#1 Extended soundtrack
#2 Faction-specific UI
#3 Interesting Unit descriptions
How do you feel about the game's overall level of complexity?
2,48 out of 7
2,46 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
It's not nearly in-depth enough, but I am playing it
<>
It's a bit too shallow for my tastes
Do you consider the City View a priority for the developers?
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
2,29 out of 5
2,24 (2300 votes)
Not really, but it would be nice
If developers offered you a choice between new/improved gameplay features and new content (factions, units, campaigns etc), which would you choose?
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
New and improved gameplay features (92%) INSTEAD OF
New Content (8%)
93 / 7 (2300 votes)
Do you feel that CA's marketing of Rome 2 accurately reflects the game you are playing now?
2 ouf of 6
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
No, I was hoping for much more
How much trust do you have in the "Total War Brand" compared with before the release?
2,98 out of 9
3 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
Badly dented, but still a fan
What impact do you think modding will have on the game?
3,77 out of 7
3,75 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
Modding will make a difference , but it will not enough for me to become an avid player
How likely would you be to buy future DLCs if CA fix the main technical problems and implement a number of the most desired gameplay features?
5,15 out of 7
5,2 (2300 votes)
Quite Likely
A big thank you goes out to Fredrin, for his cool idea and work, to those from the community helped him to form up an appropriate survey, and last but not least to all people for their participation across the globe.
A special thanks for all people that helped Fredrin and me to share this survey outside the forums.
https://img194.imageshack.us/img194/8836/nrfn.png
complete results:
http://kwiksurveys.com/tmp_pdf/report-52b360c53113b.png
Greetings fans of Total War,
I am here to link the lastest results from the survey. I haven't summarized them yet, but I think you are able to get your points out of the charts and pies.
https://img812.imageshack.us/img812/6118/p1h5.png
Happy New Year everyone!
The Stranger
12-31-2013, 21:35
75% thinks the game is average or worse. And while it may come from a slightly biased (towards historical accuracy etc) player group, I also think these people are the hardcore TW fans and players. I really hope CA and Sega take this to heart...
Hi guys sorry I did not know the link on kwiksurveys was only temporarily valid. I fixed the link and replaced it with a permanent one. @mod: Thanks for fixing the spoilers.
Kamakazi
01-05-2014, 15:23
suddenly im hungry for pie...... Anywho its very telling in the charts that the game is in a bad state an a lot of people aren't happy. I hope it gets fixed
Thanks again for all your feedback and participation!
Hey guys,
Here is the next summary and for me final summary of the results. We collected over 4047 votes.
What is your overall opinion of the game to date?
3.44 out of 7
3.47 (3300 votes)
3.4 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
(it is) bad (20.5 %) <> average (22.6 %)
How likely are you to buy the Caesar in Gaul expansion?
2.97 out of 7
3 (3300 votes)
2.96 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
Possibly. If there are major improvements made to the core game as well (26.7 %, highest single vote: No not at all 35%)
Do you think $15 is a fair price point for the new expansion?
2.87 out of 7
2.9 (3300 votes)
2.93 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
No, the main game needs fixing first (46.1%)
How impressed are you by the implementation of season changes in the forthcoming expansion?
Most answered:
Not at all. They should have been there at release (35.4%)
Second most answered:
I'm impressed, though I would prefer to see them implemented in the main game (26.3 %)
Third most answered:
Not at all. We need to see more/better gameplay features (13.6%)
Would you like to see seasons implemented in the main game and how would you do it?
4.55 out of 7
4.53 (3300 votes)
4.5 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
Yes, I would like to see 2 turns per year as in previous games (31.9 %)
<>
Yes, I would like 4 turns per year, 4 seasons per year (most votes, 41 %)
How would introducing a Family Tree affect your playing habits?
3.41 out of 7
3.42 (3300 votes)
3.4 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
I would likely play a lot more (32 %)
<>
I would play more and be more likely to buy additional content (24.4 %)
How likely would an overhaul of the politics system affect your playing habits?
3.72 out of 5
3.74 (3300 votes)
3.74 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
I would likely play a lot more (41.1 %)
Would you consider paying for a DLC that delivered additional or improved gameplay features?
3 out of 8
3 (3300 votes)
3 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
No, that's what patches are for (34.5 %)
If you had to choose from the following, what are the TOP THREE reasons why you were most disappointed with Rome 2?
TOP THREE (most chosen ones):
#1 Poor immersion - no historical events, bland unit descriptions, few cut scenes etc
#2 Confusing/broken features - politics and random civil wars
#3 Tactical AI (based on 2300 votes: poor player engagement - no family tree)
BOTTOM THREE (less chosen ones):
#1 Difficulty level (Too hard)
#2 I am perfectly happy with the game
#3 Balancing
If you had to choose from the following, which do you think are Rome 2's TOP THREE biggest successes?
TOP THREE (best successes)
#1 Size of campaign map
#2 New province system
#3 Graphics
BOTTOM THREE (biggest fails)
#1 New political system
#2 Tactical AI
#3 Economy / New UI / New character traits (places all 3rd because very similar votes)
Please arrange the following features according to the order you would like to see them implemented: most important at the top, least important at the bottom
TOP THREE (most missed ones)
#1 Enhanced Political System
#2 Performance
#3 Family tree
BOTTOM THREE (least missed ones):
#1 More factions
#2 UI improvements
#3 Greater Unit Variety
In terms of battle gameplay, do you prefer historical accuracy or arcade style action?
2.12 out of 5
2.12 (3300 votes)
2 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
Strong emphasis on historical accuracy (38.7%)
Rank the following improvements in order of how effectively they would add to IMMERSION, most important at the top:
TOP THREE (most wanted ones)
#1 Political System
#2 Family tree
#3 Character traits
BOTTOM THREE (least wanted ones):
#1 Extended soundtrack
#2 More indepht tech-tree
#3 faction specific UI
How do you feel about the game's overall level of complexity?
2.47 out of 7
2,48 (3300 votes)
2,46 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
It's not nearly in-depth enough, but I am playing it (27 %)
<>
It's a bit too shallow for my tastes (32%)
Do you consider the City View a priority for the developers?
2,29 out of 5
2,24 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
Not really, but it would be nice (44.2%)
If developers offered you a choice between new/improved gameplay features and new content (factions, units, campaigns etc), which would you choose?
92 / 8 (3300 votes)
93 / 7 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
New and improved gameplay features (92.12%)
INSTEAD OF
New Content (7.88%)
Do you feel that CA's marketing of Rome 2 accurately reflects the game you are playing now?
2.03 out of 6
2 (3300 votes)
2 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
No, I was hoping for much more
Most choosen answer: Absolutely not. I feel I have been lied to (45.2 %)
How much trust do you have in the "Total War Brand" compared with before the release?
2.98 out of 9
2.98 (3300 votes)
3 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
Badly dented, but still a fan (29 %)
What impact do you think modding will have on the game?
3.79 out of 7
3,77 (3300 votes)
3,75 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
Modding will make a difference , but it will not enough for me to become an avid player (20.5 %)
Most choosen answer: Modding will make a sizeable difference and I will play more (26 %) - *personal remark: good hope for TWC ;)
How likely would you be to buy future DLCs if CA fix the main technical problems and implement a number of the most desired gameplay features?
5.09 out of 7
5.15 (3300 votes)
5.2 (2300 votes)
In the survey this would reflect the answer:
Quite Likely (23.8 %)
Most chosen answer: Definitely (24.5 %)
A big thank you goes out to Fredrin, for his cool idea and work, to those from the community helped him to form up an appropriate survey, and last but not least to all people for their participation across the globe.
A special thanks for all people that helped Fredrin and me to share this survey outside the forums.
geographical spread of 4047 votes
https://img844.imageshack.us/img844/5023/rs6j.png
geographical spread of 3300 votes
https://img194.imageshack.us/img194/8836/nrfn.png
geographical spread of 2300 votes
https://imageshack.com/a/img809/2807/hkhq.png
This will be the last summary on this survey. Thank you everyone for your participation and helping to make this real. Also a big thank you towards fredrin for his idea and work spent into it.
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.