Yomama
08-21-2001, 02:16
Thanks for all the responses. Some of you are driven crazy the same as me.
However, for those who say it is realistic, I have no problem with the realism insofar as the enemy 'should have' reinforcements.
My issue is that reinforcements are generally kept 'in the rear'. So, If the enemy (or yourself for that matter) "call up" reinforcements, they should not come up from the opponents 'rear'. Maybe the flank..but not the rear. BECAUSE, ostensibly, YOUR army just came from there!
Of course, it is what is is... you have to becareful to reform your forces properly if you expect reinforcements.
In one bridge battle, I just stood aside and the enemy reinforcements crossed the bridge and walked off the map without saying 'thank you' or anything. My problem with that was that the labels said "marching" not "running away". I guess they were "marching away"
However, for those who say it is realistic, I have no problem with the realism insofar as the enemy 'should have' reinforcements.
My issue is that reinforcements are generally kept 'in the rear'. So, If the enemy (or yourself for that matter) "call up" reinforcements, they should not come up from the opponents 'rear'. Maybe the flank..but not the rear. BECAUSE, ostensibly, YOUR army just came from there!
Of course, it is what is is... you have to becareful to reform your forces properly if you expect reinforcements.
In one bridge battle, I just stood aside and the enemy reinforcements crossed the bridge and walked off the map without saying 'thank you' or anything. My problem with that was that the labels said "marching" not "running away". I guess they were "marching away"