PDA

View Full Version : ATMOSPHERE OF INCLUSION



TakeshidaSo
01-23-2002, 02:51
CONSUMER GOODWILL
Is it meritless to say, that the company men don't appreciate the importance of re-establishing, and maintaining, the goodwill of their customers? If they didn't offend people, or too-quickly take offense without proper warrant, then a positive environment would prevail. The people who get called snipers, or complainers, are often shown how to behave that way. As evidenced by this recent, and many other examples before today. It is only natural for people to feel deeply disatisfied with being insulted, or totally ignored.

Goodwill is critical to improving the company's online performance. Goodwill has a tremendous economic impact on a company's value, not only to itself, and it's investors, but to it's customers who want to remain loyal to their own smaller investments. Even serious problems with policy protocols, and service limitations, could be turned into a positive for the goodwill of the company, if the right public approach was taken.

The latest developments of cooperation with the community has been a positive sign. Establishing limited customer contact, after all this time, with a small clique of veteran players, is not going to entirely solve the problem of re-establishing company goodwill. Even though it is stark in comparison with the past, it was a desperate remedy to the failure to be inclusive in the first place. The result of which, was a firestorm of criticism for Mongol Invasion, instead of the tremendously positive boost it should have been.

Many of the game-features, designed specifically for online play, have repeatedly shown themselves to be inadequate, or counter-productive to developing a strong online market, and have been critisized for years. Equally important is how the company men have interacted with, and responded to, it's customers, and their complaints. This company handles it's somewhat regular physical service lapses, with extremely weak customer service, which has only exacerbated the poor cooperation between EA/CA, if that was the real cause of every serious problem.

A review of physical service, customer service, public relations, and online marketing strategy, is desperately needed prior to the release of MTW. With special emphasis on existing, or new, game features that will improve online play, and increase the number of customers who play online. No matter whether you want to ignore what I say; by calling it unworthy of a response, or a complaint intended only for the purpose of inciting a flame-war, listen to the people who do consider it, and do analyze the merit of it. Maybe you will listen to me second, or third-hand.

Toda Nebuchadnezzar
01-23-2002, 04:14
Is thispost just the same as the one entitled CONSUMER GOODWILL? thats a bit stupid. I fear that because that got closed you have erred by opening the same thread under a different name.

Sorry but I doubt this will be tolerated at the ORG! But hey it's not my problem good luck!

------------------
Grand Master of
The Knights Templar
"non nobis Domine non nobis sed Nomine tuo da gloriam"

Toda Nebuchadnezzar
01-23-2002, 04:15
P.S. 200 posts!!! not amazing but still good http://www.totalwar.org/ubb/wink.gif

------------------
Grand Master of
The Knights Templar
"non nobis Domine non nobis sed Nomine tuo da gloriam"

solypsist
01-23-2002, 08:01
a while ago Take commented about a certain post I made. His line was something like, "You ain't the bird." Apparently he assumes he himself is, and with posts like this, I guess the kid in the pic is a metaphor for the .Org discussion boards...

TakeshidaSo
01-23-2002, 11:09
The thread you started entitled "To Takeshida, Redleg, Khan7, etc...", which contained only the image of a bird crapping on a child, was closed for it's childish attempts to be insulting purely for it's own sake. At least, I believe that was the reason.

My comment to you in that thread was, "Your mistake is in believing that you are the bird." It was JAG, who said "I am the bird!"

As for the rest of your post here, I can't make heads or tails out of it. Maybe another image would explain what you mean.

solypsist
01-23-2002, 13:05
qctually just doing my best to get this thread closed.
will it work?

ubertech
01-23-2002, 21:37
Did someone say closing a thread? This sounds like a job for…I’ve been here two days, posted less than 40 times, and started 4 threads, 3 of which were closed, including my first one, all this without so much as tossing one personal insult. Surely there are more sophisticated and quicker ways of getting a thread closed than flaming. Flaming is too easy, and we’d be here all day. Might I suggest instead, going for the jugular. Just question a moderator’s authority. It doesn’t even have to be that direct either, it can be very subtle and with platitude. Watch and learn:

“Oh, I see, I get a thread closed just because I ask who’s got the right to say what, but I guess its perfectly ok to throw personal insult to your hearts content. So who dropped the ball and let a picture of bird shitting on child stay posted very long. Well, that’s a lot of hypocritical bullox if you ask me.”

Notice the use of the phrase ‘hypocritical bullox’, this is the ‘money shot’, if you will. It’s the flag that is sure to bring the moderators out of the woodwork. Also note how I make it sound like there out to get me (they’re not and I don’t think they are), but it plays well to the crowds, the more bitter this sounds, the better! Referencing an old feud never hurts and then being critical, as in ‘dropped the ball’, is the icing on the cake. I hope this helps. Thanks.

Catiline
01-23-2002, 23:23
Closed. I'm not bothering to move this to OT

------------------
Bis peccare in bello non licet