Log in

View Full Version : Creative Assembly New Unit - Carthaginian Elephants



Barkhorn1x
10-31-2003, 18:26
Carthaginian Elephants:

These tractable elephants are well-suited to warfare. As a fast-moving force, they can easily trample down most opposition and fleeing enemies in particular. Their presence alone can induce fear, even in the most disciplined of troops. Standing just over 2m at the shoulder, these elephante are fast, deadly and very difficult for opposing troops to stop. They also have a good temperament for war, being easy to train and rarely given to running amok in battle. These elephant will terrify horses and all infantry, and many missiles glance off their tough hides. Each has a single driver mounted on a leather saddlecloth, and has metal "collar" plates that protect its most vulnerable spot: the veins in the neck just behind the ears.

http://www.totalwar.com/community/unit1.htm

Barkhorn.

The Wizard
10-31-2003, 19:32
No picture. http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/frown.gif But thanks anyways =)

Rajput
10-31-2003, 21:28
I was waiting for this unit for a long time http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif

But yes, there's no picture http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/frown.gif

Funky Phantom
11-01-2003, 02:55
Shame about there being no picture, i usually just ignore the blurb and drool over the picture :P

Scipio
11-01-2003, 21:14
No picture? thats the point of the unit descriptions to get some background info and a nice pic

Hurin_Rules
11-03-2003, 01:34
Is it just me, or does 2m sound a little small for an elephant? I mean, there are some horses almost that tall-- its only about 6 feet.

Scipio
11-03-2003, 06:01
thats at the shoulder. I don't know where the shoulder on an elephant still I know where you are coming from

Ulug Beg
11-03-2003, 13:41
These were the now extinct North African elephants that were smaller than Indian Elephants (and thier much bigger cousins south of the Sahara)and couldn't carry a tower.
They were the ones Ptolomy used in Time Commanders a couple of weeks ago.

Kraxis
11-03-2003, 17:34
Quote[/b] (Hurin_Rules @ Nov. 02 2003,18:34)]Is it just me, or does 2m sound a little small for an elephant? I mean, there are some horses almost that tall-- its only about 6 feet.
Yes, that is a small elephant. But even the biggest horses we have today are not much more than 1.6 meters at the shoulder and significantly slimmer than the elephant. And never forget the immense size of the elephant's head, it will certainly grant the small elephant some needed size.

6 feet = 1.81 meters.

The Wizard
11-03-2003, 18:50
Aren't elephants at least 2.7m or so? http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/confused.gif

shingenmitch2
11-03-2003, 19:13
Wizzy

Read Ulug Beg's response --- he is dead on.

BTW they may not be completely extinct. There is recent genetic evidence that a few of the breed may still exist.

The Wizard
11-03-2003, 20:41
Oh -- a classic case of the mixing up of names.. I thought of African elephants, not realising that these were North-African elephants. http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif

longjohn2
11-03-2003, 22:09
Don't dis the 2m elephants guys. That's bigger than the ones they bring into the cities to entertain the tourists in Asia. When you're standing squished up against a concrete wall while one of these brushes past you, and really really hoping it doesn't decide to take a step sideways, you realize just how massive they are. You may be as tall as the elephant, but in terms of mass you're totally insignificant.

Nowake
11-03-2003, 23:08
Lets not forget that the romans were small even by contemporan standards. So, chopping through http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/pat.gif

Leet Eriksson
11-04-2003, 06:06
Arghthe romans need elephants too http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/tongue.gif

The Wizard
11-04-2003, 17:39
Well, they could've gotten them easily, however the legions worked better. http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif

Kraxis
11-04-2003, 18:25
Quote[/b] (Wizzy @ Nov. 04 2003,10:39)]Well, they could've gotten them easily, however the legions worked better. http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif
The Romans used elephants several times, so it isn't like they shouldn't have them.

w00tage
11-04-2003, 18:48
dont say that too loud the advertising dept. at CA might hear you, then we wil find out in game that the elephants were key to the romans wining *ANY* batle http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/eek.gif

The Wizard
11-04-2003, 20:06
Yes, and we'll also find Briton legionaries...

spmetla
11-04-2003, 23:42
and Assyrian heavy infantry...

Leet Eriksson
11-05-2003, 06:43
speaking of legionnares,why do the greeks get "Legionnare Deserters?"

i thought the legionnares never desert http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/tongue.gif