PDA

View Full Version : Romes Army at hand



Scipio
11-03-2003, 05:23
The cavalry aspect



Alae:
These were units of non-Romans entirely composed of cavalry. The word ala means "wing" and was used because of the cavalry's deployment on the wings of the army. It was here that cavalry was most effective at preventing the outflanking of the Roman line. There were two sizes of alae. The ala quingenaria was a unit of roughly 500 men. This unit was further divided into 16 units of roughly 32 men called turmae.
During the Flavian period additional, larger units of alae were created. The ala milliariae was a unit of roughly 1,000 men. Only a few of these existed in the empire. A province would have no more than one at a time. There were 24 turmae of about 32 men each.

Cohortes Equitatae:
Introduced in the Julio-Claudian period, these units were composed of a mix of infantry and cavalry. Julius Caesar and Augustus used mixed troops in this fashion, but only when the need arose. The permanent cohors equita did not appear until after. There were two principle sizes: the cohors quingenaria of roughly 120 infantry and 380 cavalry and the The cohors milliaria requitata of roughly 240 cavalry and 760 cavalry.

Equites Legionis:
Each legion had an attached unit of cavalry of probably 120 men. In the later empire the number is thought to have risen to around 760. It is not certain whether these units had an overall commander apart form that of the legion. If it did, the post was probably filled by a centurio or perhaps an optio.

Equites Singulares:
The Emperor and the provincial governors had cavalry contingents as body guards. Those protecting the Emperor were called equites singulares Augusti. This was the cavalry equivalent of the Praetorian Guard.


TYPES OF MOUNTED TROOPS
Light Armored Cavalry
As seen in the above illustration. In use since the start of the Empire, they were more mobile than the heavily armored troops. made use of a lance, javelins and sword. They were effective at scouting, patrols, guarding the flanks and pursuing and cutting down a fleeing enemy. I don't know their name in Latin, and I am not sure if anyone does.
Conttarii:
These heavily armored troop types were created under the reign of Trajan probably to counter the cavalry of the Sarmatian people. They carried the heavy lance (contus) which was developed from the Sarmations.

Cataphractii or Clibanarii:
These are 2 different words describing the same troops or possibly 2 types of heavy-armored cavalry. Completely armored from head to toe, this type was developed by eastern civilizations to counter the use of arrows. These troops appeared in Roman service probably under the reign of Hadrian (117-138AD).

Sagittarii:
These horse archers were recruited from Crete, Vyrenaica Levant, Numidia, Thrace.
http://www.caerleon.net/spectacular/photos/img24.jpg

Scipio
11-03-2003, 05:25
The Infatry Aspect


Legatus Legionis The overall legionary commander. This post was filled by a man from the senatorial class picked by the emperor. He usually had previous military experience in command as a tribune. Typically, the man filling this post used it only a tem[porary step in his political career. So, unfortunately, it was very possible for a legion to be commanded by a legate who had little interest or ability in military matters.
Tribuna Laticlavius Each legion had 6 military tribunes who were the sons of senators or other equestrians (knights). Normally the tribunes divided themselves into 3 pairs and took turns commanding in 2 month intervals. This post was used as a way to train for later being a legate.
Praefectus CastorumThis was man was responsible for maintenance of the legionary fortress, supplies, munitions, equipment, etc. This post was usually filled by a man in his 50s or 60s who had been promoted from the rank of Primus Pilus. When the legate and senior tribune were away, this man took command.
Primus Pilus or Primipilus This was the centurion of the first cohort. He was the senior centurion of the legion.
Centuriones (chohort I) These were the other 4 centiurions of the 1st cohort. Along with the Pimus Pilus they were know as the Prima Ordines
Centuriones (chohorts II-X)There was one centurion for each century. Most of these men had previously served in the legion as soldiers or princepales, though some were appointed the position because of their status in the equestrian class
Optiones
2nd or sometimes 3rd in command of a century because some Centuries had a 2nd Centurian then an Optio. The Optio carried a staff called a hastile - with an ornamental knob at top. In battle he was stationed at the rear of the advancing unit.
Tesserarius
3rd in command of a Century.The Tesserarius was traditionally responsible for commanding the sentries. The name comes from the Tessera, the tablet that the night's password was distributed throught the camp (castra). Some Centuries had more than one. They were responsible for the regular duties of the milites. .
Princepales
These were the non commisioned officers appointed to aid the officers.
Immunes
Any soldiers who were exempt from the less desireable duties (such as latrine duty and digging ditches I presume) were called immunes. They had this special status because they held extra responsabilities such as being among the medical personnel, a musician, an instructor, etc.
Vexillarius: in charge of carrying the vexillum, or battle flag. He was the highest ranked member of the immunes.
Imaginifer: carried a sculptural image of the emperor on a pole.
http://www.stanford.edu/~samshap/legionjpg.jpg

Scipio
11-03-2003, 05:29
The True Power Of Rome





Republican era Legion: had 4,200 men. Each legion was made up of ten subdivisions of 420 men, known as a "cohort". Each cohort consisted of one maniple of 60 triari, one of 120 princips, one of 120 hastati, and one of 120 velites. Each maniple was divided into 2 centuries. Each comanded by a centurion. These may have been divided further into units of 6 men called contuburnia There was one overall legion standard, the signum. This was typically an animal of some sort: a bull, a horse, boar, etc. There were also standards for the maniples depicting an open hand. (maniple is latin for hand)
At he begining of the 100s BC Marius did away with the maniple and the velites. He also made the eagle the universal legionary standard http://www.novaroma.org/gallery/rd2002/legion.jpg

Scipio
11-03-2003, 05:32
The Imperial Legion





The Imperial Roman Legion: at full strength was comprised of 6,000 men. The cohorts each had 480 men. Each of these was broken down further into 6 "centuries" of 80 men. The exception was the First Cohort which had double the number of men in each century. There was a 120 man cavalry unit attached to the legionand possibly as much as 60 artillery pieces. There was one golden eagle standard, the aquilum (latin for eagle), for the entire legion. Each cohort its own standard as well.http://www.wargamer.com/articles/graphics/caesar3_romans_sm.jpg

Scipio
11-03-2003, 05:37
The Artillery aspect:Onager




The Onager was named after a wild ass because of the way it kicked back upon firing. It was first mentioned in writing in the 200s BC. It was most common in the armies in the mid 4th century AD. Since they were so large and slow to move the onagri were most suited for sieges. The length of the sling on the end of the arm could be adjusted to affect the trajectory of the stone.



http://xlegio.enjoy.ru/artilery/onager.jpg

Scipio
11-03-2003, 05:40
The Artillery Aspect:Ballista



The balisata pictured here is a scorpio (circa 50BC). It threw a bolt 27 inches long (67cm). Quite a few of these bolts survived till today. Obviously, it would have been impossible to find feathers large enough to provide stability to these over-sized arrows, so the flights were made of leather or wood. The iron points were pyramid shaped. The hand cranks at the rear were used to winch the arrow, or bolt, back to the firing position.
http://www.onager.net/pict11.jpg

Scipio
11-03-2003, 05:46
the triplex acies--three lines consisting of 4 cohorts in the first, 3 cohorts in the second, and 3 cohorts in the third. The distance between cohorts. The three lines were some 150 feet- 200 feet apart, although that's still debated by historians.http://home.comcast.net/~rthamper/assets/images/AciesTriplex-small.jpg

Scipio
11-03-2003, 05:47
Theire I think I just about covered everything worth knowing of the functions of the roman army if theres anything to add feal free to add it but it has to have a good picture

Oaty
11-03-2003, 06:48
could u please provide a little more info on this http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/joker.gif

Scipio
11-03-2003, 06:53
I could but do you really want me too? http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/joker.gif

spmetla
11-03-2003, 09:29
Yes, seeing as Rajput posted all those without any qualms and answered questions you should be just as delighted to enlight us that are not so wise in the ways of Rome.

Scipio
11-03-2003, 17:05
My thoughts exactly

Rajput
11-03-2003, 22:20
*blushes* You people are too nice http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/wave.gif

Seriously, another very nice thread Scipio.
As I mentioned in your other thread, as an Indian, I don't know much about European history. This gives me an excellent start.

Keep it up http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/pat.gif http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/pat.gif

Scipio
11-04-2003, 02:49
What else do you want to know? Ill be happy to ablidge http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/pat.gif

Rajput
11-05-2003, 03:52
Scipio, do you have any info on Roman archers? I was surprised to see the Romans using archers in the R:TW trailer, because I always thought that ancient western armies put a lot of emphasis on heavy infantry, with some cavalry and siege to complement. But never heard much about their archers.

Thanks http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif

Scipio
11-05-2003, 05:03
That does seem odd doesnt it? There was no archers for the most that I know of the infantry were equiped with pilum so they acted as archers I might be wrong but it seems pointless too have archers when all youre infantry can do it there selves

spmetla
11-05-2003, 07:08
The only Roman archers I know of would be the Assyrian archers that they recruited from their eastern provinces.

They should have either Assyrian archers or slingers(far more common than bows).

Rajput
11-05-2003, 14:02
Thanks http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif

Yes it did seem odd to me, I never saw or heard of Roman archers before I saw the trailer. But if they were Assyrian mercenaries, then it makes sense.

L`zard
11-05-2003, 22:05
"The Roman sagittarii or archers were either formed out of auxiliary units or were trained members of the Legion. Many Roman units of bowmen were originally recruited in the Middle East and in the Danubian provinces. Trajan's column shows these troops using distinctive native clothing and equipment including conical helmets, chain mail, long tunics and powerful composite bows fashioned of laminate wood and horn."

The glories of google, eh?

Scipio
11-05-2003, 23:22
As you said though they were recruited elswhere in the peak of expansion probobly but if you look at the punic wars (Zama) for instance they were not used

L`zard
11-05-2003, 23:44
Too true, Scipio

That last was just something I ripped from a google.

iirc, we'ld be talking late-period auxilae here,eh?