NobleJms
02-19-2004, 00:02
This is my reply to someone asking me why I abandoned my provinces bordering the Horde when they first appeared on the map:
When I gave up my provinces bordering the horde, I actually was having another idea in mind. The idea probably also comes from my experience playing the board game, Risk. Whenever I was preparing to fight a HUGE battle with a faction, destroying his weakest terriorites might not be a very good idea, although you may gain immediate gratification. Yes, the problem with it is that you will get your troops divided, making yourself more vulnerable to enemies' counterattacks. Instead, what you should do is if you have enough forces at hand (with reinforcement then it's even better), you should attack their provinces that have the greatest amount of armies, even if you might lose...well, I win most of the time though . The basic philosophy behind this is to weaken the enemy before they come to you.
I know some of you might argue that attacking weak provinces first might earn you some $. But hey, wasn't I talking about HUGE wars? In small battles and raids, I don't think that it matters that much. But in huge wars, nothing is certain. The weak province you just take might be taken in the next rounds, due to your divided armies.
So somehow I also found this kind of mentality in the AI. If the enemy faction has large troops and they can attack either a weak province or a strong province, it is quite likely that they choose the latter. This is why I gave up my provinces bordering the Horde--to make myself look less significant and hostile to them while making the Egyptians look bad.
When I gave up my provinces bordering the horde, I actually was having another idea in mind. The idea probably also comes from my experience playing the board game, Risk. Whenever I was preparing to fight a HUGE battle with a faction, destroying his weakest terriorites might not be a very good idea, although you may gain immediate gratification. Yes, the problem with it is that you will get your troops divided, making yourself more vulnerable to enemies' counterattacks. Instead, what you should do is if you have enough forces at hand (with reinforcement then it's even better), you should attack their provinces that have the greatest amount of armies, even if you might lose...well, I win most of the time though . The basic philosophy behind this is to weaken the enemy before they come to you.
I know some of you might argue that attacking weak provinces first might earn you some $. But hey, wasn't I talking about HUGE wars? In small battles and raids, I don't think that it matters that much. But in huge wars, nothing is certain. The weak province you just take might be taken in the next rounds, due to your divided armies.
So somehow I also found this kind of mentality in the AI. If the enemy faction has large troops and they can attack either a weak province or a strong province, it is quite likely that they choose the latter. This is why I gave up my provinces bordering the Horde--to make myself look less significant and hostile to them while making the Egyptians look bad.