Log in

View Full Version : Zimbabwe bans the color red on tv...



Jacque Schtrapp
07-15-2004, 23:48
P.S.
Zimbabwe's colour TV may also ban pink, purple, white and green
July 14, 2004

By John Scott

Red is just the start, said Solly Solinga, spokesperson for Zimbabwean Television, when I phoned him about the decision to ban that colour from the country's TV screens because it symbolised the opposition Movement for Democratic Change party. We have other colours in mind, too.

But there is red in so many things, I argued. You can't simply ban it out of the spectrum.

We can do what we like with the spectrum, whatever that is, said Solly. We are not bound by Western concepts. Besides, red also signifies other hateful things to our revered president. It is the colour of London buses, so beloved by our former colonial oppressors. There is also the red herring of human rights abuses, when everyone knows our people have never been happier. Worst of all is when our enemies claim our national finances are in the red, so envious are they of our favourite colour, black.

What about red carpets? I asked.

The president is prepared to make an exception in the case of red carpets, so long as they are for him, said Solly. Pink is also banned. It reminds the president of homosexuals.
You mentioned other colours, I reminded Solly.

Purple is out, he said. It's the colour of archbishops. Yours were bad enough, but now our own Pius Ncube is going round treacherously calling for sanctions against Zimbabwe with the false allegation that the rule of law is being violated. Believe me, anyone who pitches up on TV in purple won't be seen again.


But the rest of the spectrum is okay, is it? I mean the colours in it.

Is white in this spectrum of yours? asked Solly. Because if it is, we are probably going to remove it from our TV programmes, too.

It is the colour of racism. No one with a white face will in future be allowed to infect our nation on screen, and that includes cricketers in white clothing.

But in the one-day internationals your chaps wear red.

That shows how closely the two colours are horribly related, said Solly. Did I mention green?

Not yet.

Green is the colour of the Greenies, the imperialists who were opposed to our government's decision to nationalise all wildlife conservation areas and who claimed that this spelt the end of game protection. If they think their colour will appear on TV again, they have as much hope as a red-light district for gays in downtown Harare.

You might as well revert to black-and-white TV, I commented.

Except for the white, Solly reminded me. Viewers will be happy with lighter shades of black, once we explain it's for their own good that we are keeping them in the dark.


E-mail: johnvscott@mweb.co.za

BDC
07-15-2004, 23:55
I love it.

Shame about Zimbabwe though. Their president was good once (then his wife died and he got a new one obsessed with shopping... Draw your own conclusions about the power behind the man).

RisingSun
07-18-2004, 20:04
Wait... This is satire, right? With all the crazy people in the world nowadays, it's hard to tell.

Which parts are true? I haven't been up on current events lately. https://forums.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/frown.gif

Sjakihata
07-18-2004, 20:11
Rofl

Hilarious

https://forums.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif

Uhmm, yes this is satire

TheSilverKnight
07-19-2004, 03:18
Is this real???? OMG if it is Zimbabwe is messed up...good thing we let them go...

RisingSun
07-19-2004, 06:50
Yes, it's fake, but I'm sure it's taking an existing idea and stretching it to the extreme to make it funny, aka- satire.

So what's the factual basis behind it?

Sjakihata
07-19-2004, 11:57
yes, and in your first post you asked whether this was satire or an actul event. I responded with, yeah it is satire. Now you say it's satire... so were you ever in doubt?

BDC
07-19-2004, 12:20
Quote[/b] (RisingSun @ July 19 2004,06:50)]Yes, it's fake, but I'm sure it's taking an existing idea and stretching it to the extreme to make it funny, aka- satire.

So what's the factual basis behind it?
Zimbabwe is gradually becoming a dictatorship. And banning everything. And no one outside Britain cares.

nightcrawlerblue
07-19-2004, 16:05
... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

ROFL LMAO LOL

Oh that was one of the funniest things I've read in a while. Guess you'll be reverting to black and white TV... Without the white...

Fragony
07-19-2004, 16:53
Viewers will be happy with lighter shades of black, once we explain it's for their own good that we are keeping them in the dark.

https://forums.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/gc-jester.gif https://forums.totalwar.org/forum/non-cgi/emoticons/bigthumb.gif

RisingSun
07-20-2004, 02:34
Quote[/b] ]yes, and in your first post you asked whether this was satire or an actul event. I responded with, yeah it is satire. Now you say it's satire... so were you ever in doubt?

Don't take me so literally. Of course it's satire; what I wanted to know was what was the factual basis behind the satire.

Papewaio
07-20-2004, 04:23
The factual basis behind it is the madman in Zimbabwee... sort of a reverse apartheid which the rest of the British Commonwealth is doing minimal about.

BDC
07-20-2004, 10:03
He's kicked all the white farmers out now, so it isn't really that anymore. Of course they were the only ones who could grow enough food for the country, so they don't have any food now. And because of Mugabe's corrupt antics they don't have any land either. Or free press. Or laws that he needs to respect.

Anyway the surrounding African nations should do something rather than just claiming we are trying to retake the colonies whenever we interfere. Can't win.

Armchair Athlete
07-20-2004, 10:46
The other African countries surrounding Zimbabwe are probably trying to interfere with the Commonwealth efforts because they know that if Mugabes policies are reversed then all the white farmers that moved to their countries and are now running farms and helping their economies might move back.