Tamur
10-19-2004, 03:49
Getting a few beloved minutes to get back to some game research here, and I've got a question...
I've heard both sides, but no conclusions on the question, "Do you get better results from diplomatic negotiation at a faction's capital? Or, do you get better results from haggling with a zero-influence diplomat from the other side?"
Personally I've had mixed results. It seems like I'm more able to push through a tough negotiation (like a ceasefire or extorted Regular Tribute) with a low-influence enemy negotiator. Unfortunately I run into so few 8+ influence enemy faction members, it's hard to say for sure.
Anyone else have any experiences/facts/etc they can share?
I've heard both sides, but no conclusions on the question, "Do you get better results from diplomatic negotiation at a faction's capital? Or, do you get better results from haggling with a zero-influence diplomat from the other side?"
Personally I've had mixed results. It seems like I'm more able to push through a tough negotiation (like a ceasefire or extorted Regular Tribute) with a low-influence enemy negotiator. Unfortunately I run into so few 8+ influence enemy faction members, it's hard to say for sure.
Anyone else have any experiences/facts/etc they can share?